Reliability prediction and its validation for nuclear power units in service

Abstract

In this paper a novel method for reliability prediction and validation of nuclear power units in service is proposed. The equivalent availability factor is used to measure the reliability, and the equivalent availability factor deducting planed outage hours from period hours and maintenance factor are used for the measurement of inherent reliability. By statistical analysis of historical reliability data, the statistical maintenance factor and the undetermined parameter in its numerical model can be determined. The numerical model based on the maintenance factor predicts the equivalent availability factor deducting planed outage hours from period hours, and the planed outage factor can be obtained by using the planned maintenance days. Using these factors, the equivalent availability factor of nuclear power units in the following 3 years can be obtained. Besides, the equivalent availability factor can be predicted by using the historical statistics of planed outage factor and the predicted equivalent availability factor deducting planed outage hours from period hours. The accuracy of the reliability prediction can be evaluated according to the comparison between the predicted and statistical equivalent availability factors. Furthermore, the reliability prediction method is validated using the nuclear power units in North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) and China. It is found that the relative errors of the predicted equivalent availability factors for nuclear power units of NERC and China are in the range of –2.16% to 5.23% and –2.15% to 3.71%, respectively. The method proposed can effectively predict the reliability index in the following 3 years, thus providing effective reliability management and maintenance optimization methods for nuclear power units.

Keywords

nuclear power units in service / reliability / reliability prediction / equivalent availability factors

References

[1] ANSI/IEEE Std762. IEEE Standard Definition for Use in Reporting Electric Generating Unit Reliability, Availability and Productivity. IEEE Power Energy and Society, 1988

[2] National Economy and Trade Commission of the People’s Republic of China. DL/T793 Reliability Evaluation Code for Generating Equipment. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2002 (in Chinese)

[3] Shi J Y, Yang Y, Wang Y. Theory and Method of Reliability Prediction and Safe Operation of Large Generating Units. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2014 (in Chinese)

[4] Shi J Y. Study on reliability boost of power plant equipment. Power Engineering, 1991, 11(5): 51–53 (in Chinese)

[5] Fang K T, Quan H, Chen Q Y. Practical Regression Analysis.<PublisherLocation><?Pub Caret?>Beijing</PublisherLocation>: Science Press, 1988 (in Chinese)

[6] National Economy and Trade Commission of the People’s Republic of China. DL/T838 Guide of Maintenance for Power Plant Equipment. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2003 (in Chinese)

[7] NERC. Generating unit statistical brochure.<Date> 2016–01–04</Date>, www.nerc.com/pa/RAPA/gads/Pages/Reports.aspx

[8] Electric Reliability Management Center of National Energy Administration. China Electric Reliability Management Reports, 1996–20 13

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2016 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg