Choosing configurations of transmission line tower grounding by back flashover probability value

Abstract

There is a considerable number of works devoted to electrical characteristics of grounding. These characteristics are important in general. However, in application to grounding of transmission line towers they are not enough to determine what grounding construction is preferable in some particular case, because these characteristics are calculated or measured apart from the grounded object, and only limited number of current (or voltage) source waveforms is used. This paper indicates reasons in favor of the fact that to choose the optimum design of grounding, the calculation model should include the tower as it is. The probability of back flashover, which provides both qualitative and quantitative estimate of the grounding structure efficiency, can be taken as the criterion for the grounding design. The insulation flashover probability is calculated on the basis of engineering method, which evaluates breakdown strength of insulation for nonstandard waveshapes, and probability data on lightning currents. Different approaches are examined for identifying the back flashover probability, as not only amplitudes but also other parameters can be taken into account. Finite-difference time-domain method is used for calculations of transients. It is found that lightning current waveform can greatly influence calculated back flashover probability value.

Keywords

grounding / transmission line tower / back flashover probability / FDTD method

References

[1] Dwight H B. Calculation of resistances to ground. Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, 1936, 55(12): 1319–1328

[2] Otero A F, Cidras J, del Alamo J L. Frequency-dependent grounding system calculation by means of a conventional nodal analysis technique. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 1999, 14(3): 873–878

[3] Liu Y, Theethayi N, Thottappillil R. An engineering model for transient analysis of grounding system under lightning strikes: nonuniform transmission-line approach. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2005, 20(2): 722–730

[4] Grcev L D, Dawalibi F. An electromagnetic model for transients in grounding systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 1990, 5(4): 1773–1781

[5] Tanabe K. Novel method for analyzing the transient behavior of grounding systems based on the finite-difference time-domain method. In: IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Columbus, USA, 2001, 1128–1132

[6] Olsen R G, Willis M C. A comparison of exact and quasi-static methods for evaluating grounding systems at high frequencies. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 1996, 11(2): 1071–1081

[7] Yutthagowith P, Ametani A, Nagaoka N, Baba Y. Application of the partial element equivalent circuit method to tower surge response calculations. IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 2011, 6(4): 324–330

[8] Sarajcev P, Vujevic S. A review of methods for grounding grid analysis. In: 17th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications Computer Networks, SoftCOM. Hvar, Croatia, 2009, 42–49

[9] Dos Santos T L T, De Oliveira R M S. da S SSobrinho C L, Almeida J F. Soil ionization in different types of grounding grids simulated by FDTD method. In: SBMO/IEEE MTT-S International Microwave and Optoelectronics Conference (IMOC). 2009, 127–132

[10] Thang T H, Baba Y, Nagaoka N, Ametani A, Itamoto N, Rakov V A. FDTD simulations of corona effect on lightning-induced voltages. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2014, 56(1): 168–176

[11] Grcev L, Rachidi F. On tower impedances for transient analysis. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2004, 19(3): 1238–1244

[12] Motoyama H, Kinoshita Y, Nonaka K, Baba Y. Experimental and analytical studies on lightning surge response of 500-kV transmission tower. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2009, 24(4): 2232–2239

[13] Taflove A, Hagness S C. Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method (Artech House, Incorporated). Berlin, Germany, 2005

[14] Noda T, Yonezawa R, Yokoyama S, Takahashi Y. Error in propagation velocity due to staircase approximation of an inclined thin wire in FDTD surge simulation. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2004, 19(4): 1913–1918

[15] Railton C J, Paul D L, Craddock I J, Hilton G S. The treatment of geometrically small structures in FDTD by the modification of assigned material parameters. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2005, 53(12): 4129–4136

[16] Taniguchi Y, Baba Y, Nagaoka N, Ametani A. An improved thin wire representation for FDTD computations. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2008, 56(10): 3248–3252

[17] Guiffaut C, Reineix A, Pecqueux B. New oblique thin wire formalism in the FDTD method with multiwire junctions. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2012, 60(3): 1458–1466

[18] Sunde E D. Earth Conduction Effects in Transmission Systems.New York: Dover Publications, 1968

[19] Rakov V A, Borghetti A, Bouquegneau C, Chisholm W A, Cooray V, Cummins K, Diendorfer G, Heidler F, Hussein A M, Ishii M, Nucci C A, Piantini A, Pinto O, Qie X, Rachidi F, Saba M, Shindo T, Schulz W, Thottappillil R, Visacro S.Lightning parameters for engineering applications. CIGRE, 2013, Tech Broch no. 549

[20] LaForest J J. Transmission line reference book, 345 kV and above. Electric Power Research Institute, 1982

[21] Heidler F, Cvetic J. A class of analytical functions to study the lightning effects associated with the current front. European Transactions on Electrical Power, 2002, 12(2): 141–150

[22] CIGRE. Guide to Procedures for Estimating the Lightning Performance of Transmission Lines., <Date>2015-02-27</Date>, http://c4.cigre.org/WG-Area/WG-C4.23-Guide-to-Procedures-for-Estimating-the-Lightning-Performance-of-Transmission-Lines

[23] Vainer A L. Leaking of current from elements of reinforced concrete foundations of transmission line towers. Elektrichestvo, 1960, (12): 34–40 (in Russian)

[24] Korsuncev A V, Pokrovskaya K I. Reinforced concrete foundations resistance calculation technique. Elektricheskie Stancii, 1968, (11): 63–68 (in Russian)

[25] Vainer A L. Leaking of current from reinforced concrete foundations in soils with high resistivity. Elektrichestvo, 1970, (11): 74–77(in Russian)

[26] Caldwell R O, Darveniza M. Experimental and analytical studies of the effect of non-standard waveshapes on the impulse strength of external insulation. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1973, PAS-92(4): 1420–1428

[27] Pigini A, Rizzi G, Garbagnati E, Porrino A, Baldo G, Pesavento G. Performance of large air gaps under lightning overvoltages: experimental study and analysis of accuracy predetermination methods. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 1989, 4(2): 1379–1392

[28] Chisholm W A. New challenges in lightning impulse flashover modeling of air gaps and insulators. IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine, 2010, 26(2): 14–25

[29] Takami J, Okabe S. Observational results of lightning current on transmission towers. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2007, 22(1): 547–556

[30] Visacro S, Soares A, Schroeder M A O, Cherchiglia L C L, de Sousa V J. Statistical analysis of lightning current parameters: measurements at Morro do Cachimbo Station. Journal of Geophysical Research, D, Atmospheres, 2004, 109(D1): 19–34

[31] Korsuncev A V, Kuznecova S E. Dangerous parameters curves and calculation of probability of transmission line insulation flashover caused by lightning strikes. Izvestiya NIIPT, 1963, (10): 3–17 (in Russian)

[32] Okabe S, Takami J. Evaluation of improved lightning stroke current waveform using advanced statistical method. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2009, 24(4): 2197–2205

[33] Ballarotti M G, Medeiros C, Saba M M F, Schulz W, Pinto O Jr. Frequency distributions of some parameters of negative downward lightning flashes based on accurate-stroke-count studies. Journal of Geophysical Research, D, Atmospheres, 2012, 117(D6): 2240-2260

[34] Anderson R B, Eriksson A J. Lightning parameters for engineering applications, Electra, 1980, (69): 65–102

[35] Jiang R, Jiang S, Zhang Y, Xu Y, Xu L, Zhang D. GPU-accelerated parallel FDTD on distributed heterogeneous platform. International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, 2014, 18(1): 118–121

[36] Datsios Z G, Mikropoulos P N, Tsovilis T E. Estimation of the minimum shielding failure current causing flashover in overhead lines of the hellenic transmission system through ATP-EMTP simulations. In: 2012 International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP). Vienna, Austria, 2012, 1–5

[37] De Conti A, Visacro S. Analytical representation of single- and double-peaked lightning current waveforms. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2007, 49(2): 448–451

[38] Khodr H M, Machado e Moura A, Miranda V. Optimal design of grounding system in transmission line. In: International Conference on Intelligent Systems Applications to Power Systems. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2007, 1–9

[39] Alipio R, Visacro S. Frequency Dependence of Soil Parameters: effect on the lightning response of grounding electrodes. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2013, 55(1): 132–139

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and Murmansk Regional Government under scientific project No. 14-08-98803.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2016 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg