A novel method for reliability and risk evaluation of wind energy conversion systems considering wind speed correlation

Seyed Mohsen MIRYOUSEFI AVAL, Amir AHADI, Hosein HAYATI

PDF(1484 KB)
PDF(1484 KB)
Front. Energy ›› 2016, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : 46-56. DOI: 10.1007/s11708-015-0384-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A novel method for reliability and risk evaluation of wind energy conversion systems considering wind speed correlation

Author information +
History +

Abstract

This paper investigates an analytical approach for the reliability modeling of doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) wind turbines. At present, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, wind speed and wind turbine generator outage have not been addressed simultaneously. In this paper, a novel methodology based on the Weibull-Markov method is proposed for evaluating the probabilistic reliability of the bulk electric power systems, including DFIG wind turbines, considering wind speed and wind turbine generator outage. The proposed model is presented in terms of appropriate wind speed modeling as well as capacity outage probability table (COPT), considering component failures of the wind turbine generators. Based on the proposed method, the COPT of the wind farm has been developed and utilized on the IEEE RBTS to estimate the well-known reliability and sensitive indices. The simulation results reveal the importance of inclusion of wind turbine generator outage as well as wind speed in the reliability assessment of the wind farms. Moreover, the proposed method reduces the complexity of using analytical methods and provides an accurate reliability model for the wind turbines. Furthermore, several case studies are considered to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method in practical applications.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

doubly-fed induction generator (DFIG) / composite system adequacy assessment / wind speed correlation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Seyed Mohsen MIRYOUSEFI AVAL, Amir AHADI, Hosein HAYATI. A novel method for reliability and risk evaluation of wind energy conversion systems considering wind speed correlation. Front. Energy, 2016, 10(1): 46‒56 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-015-0384-4

References

[1]
Hua B. Correlation between carbon emissions and energy structure−reliability analysis of low carbon target. Frontiers in Energy, 2011, 5(2): 214–220
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Zhang P, Huang S H. Review of aeroelasticity for wind turbine: current status, research focus and future perspectives. Frontiers in Energy, 2011, 5(4): 419–434
[3]
Bekakra Y, Ben Attous D. DFIG sliding mode control fed by back-to-back PWM converter with DC-link voltage control for variable speed wind turbine. Frontiers in Energy, 2014, 8(3): 345–354
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Tamaarat A, Benakcha A. Performance of PI controller for control of active and reactive power in DFIG operating in a grid-connected variable speed wind energy conversion system. Frontiers in Energy, 2014, 8(3): 371–378
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Verma Y P, Kumar A. Dynamic contribution of variable-speed wind energy conversion system in system frequency regulation. Frontiers in Energy, 2012, 6(2): 184–192
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Karaki S H, Salim B A, Chedid R B. Probabilistic model of a two-site wind energy conversion system. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2002, 17(4): 530–536
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Billinton R, Chen H, Ghajar R. Time-series models for reliability evaluation of power systems including wind energy. Microelectronics and Reliability, 1996, 36(9): 1253–1261
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Billinton R, Gao Y. Multistate wind energy conversion system models for adequacy assessment of generating systems incorporating wind energy. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2008, 23(1): 163–170
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Billinton R, Gao Y. Adequacy assessment of composite power generation and transmission systems with wind energy. International Journal of Reliability and Safety, 2008, 2(1/2): 79–98
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Negra N B, Holmstrom O, Bak-Jesen B, Sorensen P. Aspects of relevance in offshore wind farm reliability assessment. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2007, 22(1): 159–166
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Vallee F, Lobry J, Deblecker O. Impact of the wind geographical correlation level for reliability studies. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2007, 22(4): 2232–2239
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Wangdee W, Billinton R. Considering load-carrying capability and wind speed correlation of WECS in generation adequacy assessment. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2006, 21(3): 734–741
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Wen J, Zheng Y, Donghan F. A review on reliability assessment for wind power. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009, 13(9): 2485–2494
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Giorsetto P, Utsurogi K F. Development of a new procedure for reliability modeling of wind turbine generators. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1983, PAS -102(1): 134–143
[15]
Deshmukh R G, Ramakumar R. Reliability analysis of combined wind-electric and conventional generation systems. Solar Energy, 1982, 28(4): 345–352
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Singh C, Kim Y. An efficient technique for reliability analysis of power systems including time dependent sources. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1988, 3(3): 1090–1096
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Billinton R, Chen H, Chajar R. A sequential simulation technique for adequacy evaluation of generating systems including wind energy. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 1996, 11(4): 728–734
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
V90−1.8MW & 2MW Built on experience, Vestas Wind Systems A/S, Randers, Denmark, 2007
[19]
VGB 116 D2 Guideline reference designation system for power plants (RDS-PP) Application explanations for wind power plants, VGB PowerTech, Essen, Germany, 2007
[20]
V90−1.8MW/2MW, Vestas Wind Systems A/S, Randers, Denmark, 2009
[21]
V90−1.8MW/2MW, Vestas Wind Systems A/S, Randers, Denmark, 2010
[22]
Ahadi A, Ghadimi N, Mirabbasi D. An analytical methodology for assessment of smart monitoring impact on future electric power distribution system reliability. Complexity, 2014
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Ahadi A, Ghadimi N, Mirabbasi D. Reliability assessment for components of large scale photovoltaic systems. Journal of Power Sources, 2014, 264: 211–219
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Casteren J V. Power system reliability assessment using the Weibull-Markov model. Dissertation for the Master’s Degree. Gteborg: Charmels University of Technology, 2001
[25]
Manwell J F, McGowan J G, Rogers A L. Wind Energy Explained: Theory, Design and Application. New York: Wiley, 2002
[26]
Billinton R, Li W. Reliability Assessment of Electric Power Systems Using Monte Carlo Methods. New York: Plenum Press, 1994
[27]
Billinton R, Kumar S, Chowdhury N, Chu K, Debnath K, Goel L, Khan E, Kos P, Nourbakhsh G, Oteng-Adjei J. A reliability test system for educational purposes−basic data. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1989, 4(3): 1238–1244
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Albrecht P F, Bhavaraju M P, Biggerstaff B E, Billinton R, Jorgensen G E, Reppen N D, Shortley P B. IEEE task force: IEEE reliability test system. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1979, PAS-98(6): 2047–2054
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Allan R N, Billinton R, Sjarief I, Goel L, So K S. A reliability test system for educational purposes basic distribution system data and results. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1991, 6(2): 813–820
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Billinton R, Allan R N. Reliability Evaluation of Power Systems, 2nd ed. New York: Plenum, 1994
[31]
Chen F, Li F, Wei Z, Sun G, Li J. Reliability models of wind farms considering wind speed correlation and WTG outage. Electric Power Systems Research, 2015, 119: 385–392
CrossRef Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2015 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1484 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/