Impact of selection of DC base values and DC link control strategies on sequential AC-DC power-flow convergence

Shagufta KHAN, Suman BHOWMICK

PDF(373 KB)
PDF(373 KB)
Front. Energy ›› 2015, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (4) : 399-412. DOI: 10.1007/s11708-015-0374-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Impact of selection of DC base values and DC link control strategies on sequential AC-DC power-flow convergence

Author information +
History +

Abstract

This paper demonstrates the convergence of the integrated AC-DC power-flow algorithm as affected by the selection of different base values for the DC quantities and adoption of different control strategies for the DC link. For power-flow modeling of integrated AC-DC systems, the base values of the various DC quantities can be defined in several ways, giving rise to different sets of per-unit system equations. It is observed that different per-unit system models affect the convergence of the power-flow algorithm differently. In a similar manner, the control strategy adopted for the DC link also affects the power-flow convergence. The sequential method is used to solve the DC variables in the Newton Raphson (NR) power flow model, where AC and DC systems are solved separately and are coupled by injecting an equivalent amount of real and reactive power at the terminal AC buses. Now, for a majority of the possible control strategies, the equivalent real and reactive power injections at the concerned buses can be computed a-priori and are independent of the NR iterative loop. However, for a few of the control strategies, the equivalent reactive power injections cannot be computed a-priori and need to be computed in every NR iteration. This affects the performance of the iterative process. Two different per-unit system models and six typical control strategies are taken into consideration. This is validated by numerous case studies conducted on the IEEE 118-bus and 300-bus test systems.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

AC-DC power-flow / Newton-Raphson method / high voltage direct current (HVDC) control strategy

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Shagufta KHAN, Suman BHOWMICK. Impact of selection of DC base values and DC link control strategies on sequential AC-DC power-flow convergence. Front. Energy, 2015, 9(4): 399‒412 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-015-0374-6

References

[1]
Arrillaga J, Watson N R. Computer Modelling of Electrical Power Systems. 2nd ed. Sinapore: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2003
[2]
Kundur P. Power System Stability and Control. New York: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Co. Ltd., 2007
[3]
Wang X F, Song Y H, Irving M. Modern Power Systems Analysis. New York: Springer, 2008
[4]
Acha E, Kazemtabrizi B, Castro L M. A new VSC-HVDC model for power flows using the Newton-Raphson method. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2013, 28(3): 2602–2612
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Angeles-Camacho C, Tortelli O L, Acha E, Fuerte-Esquivel C R. Inclusion of a high voltage DC-voltage source converter model in a Newton-Raphson power flow algorithm. IEE Proceedings-Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 2003, 150(6): 691–696
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Zhang X P. Multiterminal voltage-sourced converter-based HVDC models for power flow analysis. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2004, 19(4): 1877–1884
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Braunagel D A, Kraft L A, Whysong J L. Inclusion of DC converter and transmission equations directly in a Newton power flow. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1976, PAS-95(1): 76–88
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Arritlaga J, Bodger P. AC-DC load flows with realistic representation of the converter plant. Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, 1978, 125(1): 41–46
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
El-marsafawy M M, Mathur R M. A new, fast technique for load flow solution of integrated multi terminal DC/AC systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1980, PAS-99(1): 246–255
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Arritlaga J, Harker B J, Turner K S. Clarifying an ambiguity in recent AC-DC load flow formulations. IEE Proceedings C Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 1980, 127(5): 324–325
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Smed T, Andersson G, Sheble G B, Grigsby L L. A new approach to AC/DC power flow. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1991, 6(3): 1238–1244
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Reeve J, Fahny G, Stott B. Versatile load flow method for multi terminal HVDC systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1977, PAS-96(3): 925–933
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Fudeh H, Ong C M. A simple and efficient AC-DC load flow method for multiterminal DC systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1981, PAS-100(11): 4389–4396
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
El-Hawary M E, Ibrahim S T. A new approach to AC-DC load flow analysis. Electric Power Research, 1995, 33(3): 193–200
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Beerten J, Cole S, Belmans R. Generalized steady-state VSC MTDC model for sequential AC/DC power flow algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2012, 27(2): 821–829
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
UW Electrical Engineering. Power systems test case archive. 2014-10-02

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Department of Electrical Engineering, Delhi Technological University, Delhi for the help and the support received.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2015 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(373 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/