Fuzzy stochastic long-term model with consideration of uncertainties for deployment of distributed energy resources using interactive honey bee mating optimization

Abstract

This paper presents a novel modified interactive honey bee mating optimization (IHBMO) base fuzzy stochastic long-term approach for determining optimum location and size of distributed energy resources (DERs). The Monte Carlo simulation method is used to model the uncertainties associated with long-term load forecasting. A proper combination of several objectives is considered in the objective function. Reduction of loss and power purchased from the electricity market, loss reduction in peak load level and reduction in voltage deviation are considered simultaneously as the objective functions. First, these objectives are fuzzified and designed to be comparable with each other. Then, they are introduced into an IHBMO algorithm in order to obtain the solution which maximizes the value of integrated objective function. The output power of DERs is scheduled for each load level. An enhanced economic model is also proposed to justify investment on DER. An IEEE 30-bus radial distribution test system is used to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Keywords

component / distributed energy resources / fuzzy optimization / loss reduction / interactive honey bee mating optimization (IHBMO) / voltage deviation reduction / stochastic programming

References

[1] Pai P F, Yang S L, Chang P T. Forecasting output of integrated circuit industry by support vector regression models with marriage honey-bees optimization algorithms. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36(7): 10746–10751

[2] Ghasemi A. A fuzzified multi objective interactive honey bee mating optimization for environmental/economic power dispatch with valve point effect. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 2013, 49: 308–321

[3] Shayeghi H, Ghasemi A.Multiple PSS design using an improved honey bee mating optimization algorithm to enhance low frequency oscillations. International Review of Electrical Engineering (I.R.E.E.), 2011, 6(7): 3122–3133

[4] Jain N, Singh S N, Srivastava S C. A generalized approach for DG planning and viability analysis under market scenario. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2013, 60(11): 5075–5085

[5] Gil H A, Joos G. Models for quantifying the economic benefits of distributed generation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2008, 23(2): 327–335

[6] Chiradeja P, Ramakumar R. An approach to quantify the technical benefits of distributed generation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2004, 19(4): 764–773

[7] Prenc R, Škrlec D, Komen V. Distributed generation allocation based on average daily load and power production curves. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2013, 53, 612–622

[8] Wang C, Nehrir M H. Analytical approaches for optimal placement of distributed generation sources in power systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2004, 19(4): 2068–2076

[9] Georgilakis P S, Hatziargyriou N D. Optimal distributed generation placement in power distribution networks: models, methods, and future research. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2013, 28(3): 3420–3428

[10] El-Khattan W, Bhattacharya K, Hegazy Y, Salama M M A. Optimal investment planning for distributed generation in a competitive electricity market. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2005, 20(4): 1718–1727

[11] Ahmadigorji M, Abbaspour A, Rajabi-Ghahnavieh A, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M. Optimal DG placement in distribution systems using cost/worth analysis. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 2009, 25: 746–753

[12] Wang S, Watada J, Pedrycz W. Recourse-based facility location problems in hybrid uncertain environment. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part B, Cybernetics, 2010, 40(4): 1176–1187

[13] Wang S, Watada J, Pedrycz W. Value-at-Risk-based two-stage fuzzy facility location problems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2009, 5(4): 465–482

[14] Wang S, Watada J. A hybrid modified PSO approach to VaR-based facility location problems with variable capacity in fuzzy random uncertainty. Information Sciences, 2012, 192(1): 3–18

[15] Celli G, Ghiani E, Mocci S, Pilo F. A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for the sizing and sitting of distributed generation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2005, 20(2): 750–757

[16] Das D. Optimal placement of capacitors in radial distribution system using a Fuzzy-GA method. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 2008, 30(6–7): 361–367

[17] Neimane V. Distribution network planning based on statistical load modeling applying genetic algorithms and Monte-Carlo simulations. In: IEEE Power Tech Proceedings. Porto, Portugal, 2001

[18] Roh J H, Shahidehpour M, Fu Y. Market-based coordination of transmission and generation capacity planning. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2007, 22(4): 1406–1419

[19] Hashemzadeh H, Ehsan M. Locating and parameters setting of unified power flow controller for congestion management and improving the voltage profile. Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference. Chengdu, China, 2010

[20] Santoso N I, Tan O T. Neural-net based real-time control of capacitors installed on distribution system. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 1990, 5(1): 266–272

[21] Basu A K, Chowdhury S, Chowdhury S P. Impact of strategic deployment of CHP-based DERs on microgrid reliability. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2010, 25(3): 1697–1705

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg