Power system reconfiguration and loss minimization for a distribution systems using “Catfish PSO” algorithm

Abstract

One of the very important ways to save electrical energy in the distribution system is network reconfiguration for loss reduction. Distribution networks are built as interconnected mesh networks; however, they are arranged to be radial in operation. The distribution feeder reconfiguration is to find a radial operating structure that optimizes network performance while satisfying operating constraints. The change in network configuration is performed by opening sectionalizing (normally closed) and closing tie (normally opened) switches of the network. These switches are changed in such a way that the radial structure of networks is maintained, all of the loads are energized, power loss is reduced, power quality is enhanced, and system security is increased. Distribution feeder reconfiguration is a complex nonlinear combinatorial problem since the status of the switches is non-differentiable. This paper proposes a new evolutionary algorithm (EA) for solving the distribution feeder reconfiguration (DFR) problem for a 33-bus and a 16-bus sample network, which effectively ensures the loss minimization.

Keywords

distribution system reconfiguration (DFR) / power loss reduction / catfish particle swarm optimization (catfish PSO) / radial structure

References

[1] Lyons P C, Thomas S A. Microprocessor based control of distribution systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1981, PAS-100(12): 4893–4900

[2] Gomes F V, Carneiro S Jr, Pereira J L R, Vinagre M P, Garcia P A N, Araujo L R. A new heuristic reconfiguration algorithm for large distribution system. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2005, 20(3): 1373–1378

[3] Shirmohammadi D, Hong W H. Reconfiguration of electric distribution networks for resistive line losses reduction. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 1989, 4(2): 1492–1498

[4] Zhu J Z. Optimal reconfiguration of electric distribution network using refined genetic algorithm. Electric Power Systems Research, 2002, 62(1): 37–42

[5] Civanlar S, Grainger J J, Yin H, Lee S S H. Distribution feeder reconfiguration for loss reduction. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 1988, 3(3): 1217–1223

[6] Kumar K S, Jayabarathi T. Power system reconfiguration & loss minimization for a distribution system using BFOA. International Journal Power & Energy Systems, 2012, 36(1): 13–17

[7] Bouhouras A S, Labridis D P. Influence of load alterations to optimal network configuration for loss reduction. Electric Power Systems Research, 2012, 86(2): 17–27

[8] Gomes F V, Carneiro S Jr, Pereira J L R, Vinagre M P, Garcia P A N, de Araujo L R. A new distribution system reconfiguration approach using optimum power flow and sensitivity analysis for loss reduction. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2006, 21(4): 1616–1623

[9] Shi Y, Eberhart R C. A modified particle swarm optimizer. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, Anchorage, USA, 1998, 69–73

[10] Liu H, Abraham A, Hassanien A E. Scheduling jobs on computational grids using a fuzzy particle swarm optimization algorithm. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2010, 26(8): 1336–1343

[11] Parsopoulos K E, Vrahatis M N. Parameter selection and adaptation in unified particle swarm optimization. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2007, 46(1-2): 198–213

[12] Herrera F, Zhang J. Optimal control of batch processes using particle swam optimisation with stacked neural network models. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2009, 33(10): 1593–1601

[13] Zhang R. A particle swarm optimization algorithm based on local perturbations for the job shop scheduling problem. International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology, 2011, 3(4): 256–264

[14] Liu Y, Qin Z, Shi Z, Lu J. Center particle swarm optimization. Neurocomputing, 2007, 70(4–6): 672–679

[15] Angeline P J. Evolutionary Optimization Versus Particle Swarm Optimization: Philosophy and Performance Differences. In: Porto V W, Saravanan N, Waagen D, Eiben A E eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Berlin Heidelberg2007, 1447: 601–610

[16] Taher N. An efficient multi-objective HBMO algorithm for distribution feeder reconfiguration. Expert Systems with Applications. 2011, 38(3): 2878–2887

[17] Jiang Y, Hu T, Huang C, Wu X. An improved particle swarm optimization algorithm. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2007, 193(1): 231–239

[18] Wu Y K, Lee C Y, Liu L C, Tsai S H. Study of reconfiguration for the distribution system with distributed generators. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2010, 25(3): 1678–1685

[19] Martín J A, Gil A J. A new heuristic approach for distribution systems loss reduction. Electric Power Systems Research, 2008, 78(11): 1953–1958

[20] Anil S, Nikhil G, Niazi K R. Minimal loss configuration for large-scale radial distribution systems using adaptive genetic algorithms. In: 16th National Power Systems Conference, Hyderabad, India, 2010

[21] Goswami S K, Basu S K. A new algorithm for the reconfiguration of distribution feeders for loss minimization. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 1992, 7(3): 1484–1491

[22] Su C T, Chang C F, Chiou J P. Distribution Network reconfiguration for loss reduction by ant colony search algorithm. Electric Power Systems Research, 2005, 75(2–3): 190–199

[23] Kavousi-Fard A, Niknam T. Multi-objective stochastic distribution feeder reconfiguration from the reliability point of view. Energy, 2014, 64: 342–354

[24] de Resende Barbosa C H N, Mendes M H S, de Vasconcelos J A. Robust feeder reconfiguration in radial distribution networks. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2014, 54: 619–630

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg