A new technique for solving the multi-objective optimization problem using hybrid approach

Mimoun YOUNES, Khodja FOUAD, Belabbes BAGDAD

PDF(488 KB)
PDF(488 KB)
Front. Energy ›› 2014, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (4) : 490-503. DOI: 10.1007/s11708-014-0311-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A new technique for solving the multi-objective optimization problem using hybrid approach

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Energy efficiency, which consists of using less energy or improving the level of service to energy consumers, refers to an effective way to provide overall energy. But its increasing pressure on the energy sector to control greenhouse gases and to reduce CO2 emissions forced the power system operators to consider the emission problem as a consequential matter besides the economic problems. The economic power dispatch problem has, therefore, become a multi-objective optimization problem. Fuel cost, pollutant emissions, and system loss should be minimized simultaneously while satisfying certain system constraints. To achieve a good design with different solutions in a multi-objective optimization problem, fuel cost and pollutant emissions are converted into single optimization problem by introducing penalty factor. Now the power dispatch is formulated into a bi-objective optimization problem, two objectives with two algorithms, firefly algorithm for optimization the fuel cost, pollutant emissions and the real genetic algorithm for minimization of the transmission losses. In this paper the new approach (firefly algorithm-real genetic algorithm, FFA-RGA) has been applied to the standard IEEE 30-bus 6-generator. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated by comparing its performance with other evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms. Simulation results show the validity and feasibility of the proposed method.

Keywords

economic power dispatch (EPD) / firefly algorithm (FFA) / real genetic algorithm (RGA) / hybrid method

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Mimoun YOUNES, Khodja FOUAD, Belabbes BAGDAD. A new technique for solving the multi-objective optimization problem using hybrid approach. Front. Energy, 2014, 8(4): 490‒503 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-014-0311-0

References

[1]
Carpentier J. Contribution to the study of economic dispatch. Bulletin of the French Society of Electricians, 1962, 3: 431–447
[2]
Vanderbei J R, Shanno F D. An interior-point algorithm for nonconvex nonlinear programming. Computational Optimization and Applications, 1999, 13(1–3): 231–252
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Bottero M H, Caliana E D, Fahmideh-Vojdani A R. Economic dispatch using the reduced hessian. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1982, 101(10): 3679–3688
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Reid G E, Hasdorf L. Economic dispatch using quadratic programming. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1973, 92(6): 2015–2023
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Stott B, Hobson E. Power system security control calculation using linear programming. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1978, 97(5): 1713–1720
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Stott B, Hobson E. Power system security control calculation using linear programming. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1978, 97(5): 1721–1731
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Momoh J A, Zhu J Z. Improved interior point method for OPF problems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1999, 14(3): 1114–1120
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Sun D I, Ashley B, Brewer B, Hughes A, Tinney W F. Optimal power flow by Newton approach. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1984, PAS-103(10): 2864–2880
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Bahiense L, Oliveira G C, Pereira M, Granville S. A mixed integer disjunctive model for transmission network expansion. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2001, 16(3): 560–565
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Dusonchet Y P, El-Abiad A H. Transmission planning using discrete dynamic optimization. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1997, 92: 1358–1371
[11]
Haffner S, Monticelli A, Garcia A, Romero R. Specialised branch and bound algorithm for transmission network expansion planning. IEE Proceedings-Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 2001, 148(5): 482–488
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Glover F. Tabu search—Part I. ORSA Journal on Computing, 1986, 1(3): 190–206
[13]
Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt C D, Vecchi M P. Optimisation by simulated annealing. Science, 1983, 220(4598): 671–680
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Lai L L, Ma J T, Yokoyama R, Zhao M. Improved genetic algorithms for optimal power flow under both normal and contingent operation states. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 1997, 19(5): 287–292
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Yuryevich J, Wong K P. Evolutionary programming based optimal power flow algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1999, 14(4): 1245–1250
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Mousavian S, Valenzuela J, Wang J. Real-time data reassurance in electrical power systems based on artificial neural networks. Electric Power Systems Research, 2013, 96: 285–295
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Abido M A. Optimal power flow using particle swarm optimization. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2002, 24(7): 563–571
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Song Y H, Chou C S, Stonham T J. Combined heat and power economic dispatch by improved ant colony search algorithm. Electric Power Systems Research, 1999, 52(2): 115–121
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Fesanghary M, Mahdavi M, Minary-Jolandan M, Alizadeh Y. Hybridizing harmony search algorithm with sequential quadratic programming for engineering optimization problems. Computer Methods Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 197(33–40): 3080–3091
[20]
Abido M A. A novel multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for environmental/economic power dispatch. Electric Power Systems Research, 2003, 65(1): 71–81
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Abido M A. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms for electric power dispatch problem. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2006, 10(3): 315–329
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Yang X S. Review of meta-heuristic and generalized evolutionary walk algorithm. International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation, 2011, 3(2): 77–84
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Amiri B, Hossain L, Crawford J W, Wigand R T. Community detection in complex networks: multi-objective enhanced firefly algorithm. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2013, 46: 1–11
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Gandomi A H, Yang X S, Talatahari S, Alavi A H. Firefly algorithm with chaos. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 2013, 18(1): 89–98
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Senapati M R, Dash P K. Local linear wavelet neural network based breast tumor classification using firefly algorithm. Neural Computing & Applications, 2013, 22(7–8): 1591–1598
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Fister I, Yang X S, Brest J, Fister I Jr. Modified firefly algorithm using quaternion representation. Expert Systems with Applications, 2013, 40(18): 7220–7230
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Kazem A, Sharifi E, Hussain F K, Saberi M, Hussain O K. Support vector regression with chaos-based firefly algorithm for stock market price forecasting. Applied Soft Computing, 2013, 13(2): 947–958
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Yang X S. Multiobjective firefly algorithm for continuous optimization. Engineering with Computers, 2013, 29(2): 175–184
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Yang X S. Nature-Inspired Metaheuristic Algorithms. Bristol: Luniver Press, 2008
[30]
Yang X S. Engineering Optimization: An Introduction with Metaheuristic Applications. Wiley, 2010: 221–230
[31]
Basu B, Mahanti G K. Firefly and artificial bees colony algorithm for synthesis of scanned and broadside linear array antenna. Progress in Electromagnetic Research B, 2011, 32: 169–190
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Yazdani A, Jayabarathi T, Ramesh V, Raghunathan T. Combined heat and power economic dispatch problem using firefly algorithm. Frontiers in Energy, 2013, 7(2): 133–139
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Holland J. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Ann Arbor, USA: The University of Michigan Press, 1975
[34]
Goldberg D E. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison Wesley Educational Publishers Inc, 1989
[35]
Younes M, Rahli M, Koridak L A. Optimal power flow based on hybrid genetic algorithm. Journal of Information Science and Engineering, 2007, 23: 1801–1816
[36]
Michalewicz Z. A survey of constraint handling techniques in evolutionary computation methods. In: Mcdonnell J R, Renolds R G, Fogel D B, eds. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference on Evolutionary Programming, MIT Press, 1995, 135–155
[37]
Caorsi S, Massa A, Pastorino M. A computational technique based on a real-coded genetic algorithm for microwave imaging purposes. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2000, 38(4): 1697–1708
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Oyama A, Obayashi S, Nakamura T. Real-coded adaptive range genetic algorithm applied to transonic wing optimization. Applied Soft Computing, 2001, 1(3): 179–187
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Niknam T, Narimani M R, Jabbari M, Malekpour A R. A modified shuffle frog leaping algorithm for multi-objective optimal power flow. Energy, 2011, 36(11): 6420–6432
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Saini A, Chaturvedi D K, Saxena A K. Optimal power flow solution: a GA-fuzzy system approach. International Journal of Emerging Electric Power Systems, 2006, 5(2): 1–21
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Ongsakul W, Tantimaporn T. Optimal power flow by improved evolutionary programming. Electric Power Components and Systems, 2006, 34(1): 79–95
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Abido M A. Optimal power flow using tabu search algorithm. Electric Power Components and Systems, 2002, 30(5): 469–483
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Yuryevich J, Wong K P. Evolutionary programming based optimal power flow algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1999, 14(4): 1245–1250
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Narimani M R, Azizipanah-Abarghooee R, Zoghdar-Moghadam-Shahrekohne B, Gholami K. A novel approach to multi-objective optimal power flow by a new hybrid optimization algorithm considering generator constraints and multi-fuel type. Energy, 2013, 49: 119–136
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Sailaja Kunari M, Maheswarapu S. Enhanced genetic algorithm based computation technique for multi-objective optimal power flow. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2010, 32(6): 736–742
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Vaisakh K, Srinivas L R. A genetic evolving ant direction DE for OPF with non-smooth cost functions and statistical analysis. Energy, 2010, 35(8): 3155–3171
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Rezaei Adaryani M, Karami A. Artificial bee colony algorithm for solving multi-objective optimal power flow problem. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2013, 53: 219– 230
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Perez-Guerrero R E, Cedefio-Maldonado J R. Differential evolution based economic environmental power dispatch. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual North American Power Symposium. Piscataway, USA: NJ IEEE Service Center, 2005, 191–197
[49]
Wang L, Singh C. Balancing risk and cost in fuzzy economic dispatch including wind power penetration based on particle swarm optimization. Electric Power Systems Research, 2008, 78(8): 1361–1368
CrossRef Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(488 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/