Performance comparison of cocurrent and countercurrent flow solid oxide fuel cells

Abstract

Solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) is a complicated system with heat and mass transfer as well as electrochemical reactions. The flowing configuration of fuel and oxidants in the fuel cell will greatly affect the performance of the fuel cell stack. Based on the developed mathematical model of direct internal reforming SOFC, this paper established a distributed parameters simulation model for cocurrent and countercurrent types of SOFC based on the volume-resistance characteristic modeling method. The steady-state distribution characteristics and dynamic performances were compared and were analyzed for cocurrent and countercurrent types of SOFCs. The results indicate that the cocurrent configuration of SOFC is more suitable with regard to performance and safety.

Keywords

solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) / cocurrent / countercurrent / dynamic performance

References

[1] EG&G Technical Services, Inc. Fuel cell handbook. 7th ed. U.S. Department of Energy, 2004, 197

[2] Aguiar P, Adjiman C S, Brandon N P. Anode-supported intermediate temperature direct internal reforming solid oxide fuel cell. I: Model-based steady-state performance. Journal of Power Sources, 2004, 138(1-2): 120–136

[3] Heidebrecht P, Sundmacher K. Dynamic modeling and simulation of a countercurrent molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC) with internal reforming. Fuel Cells (Weinheim), 2002, 2(3-4): 166–180

[4] Iwata M, Hikosaka T, Morita M. Performance analysis of planar-type unit SOFC considering current and temperature distributions. Solid State Ionics, 2000, 132(3-4): 297–308

[5] Iora P, Aguiar P, Adjiman C S, Brandon N P. Comparison of two IT DIR-SOFC models: Impact of variable thermodynamic, physical, and flow properties. Steady-state and dynamic analysis. Chemical Engineering Science, 2005, 60(11): 2963–2975

[6] Achenbach E, Riensche E. Methane/steam reforming kinetics for solid oxide fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources, 1994, 52(2): 283–288

[7] Todd B, Young J B. Thermodynamic and transport properties of gases for use in solid oxide fuel cell modelling. Journal of Power Sources, 2002, 110(1): 186–200

[8] Achenbach E. Three-dimensional and time-dependent simulation of a planar solid oxide fuel cell stack. Journal of Power Sources, 1994, 49(1-3): 338–348

[9] Campanari S, Iora P. Comparison of Finite Volume SOFC Models for the Simulation of a Planar Cell Geometry. Fuel Cells (Weinheim), 2005, 5(1): 34–51

[10] Wang L J, Zhang H S, Weng S L. Modeling and simulation of high temperature direct internal reforming solid oxide fuel cell. Proc. of the CSEE, 2007, 27(35), 78–83

[11] Wang L J, Zhang H S, Weng S L. Modeling and simulation of solid oxide fuel cell based on the volume-resistance characteristic modeling technique. Journal of Power Sources, 2008, 177(2): 579–589

[12] Lim L T, Chadwick D, Kershenbaum L. Achieving autothermal operation in internally reformed solid oxide fuel cells: Simulation studies. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2005, 44(25): 9609–9618

Acknowledgments.

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 50676061), the Program of Shanghai Subject Chief Scientist (No. 08XD14021) and the Science and Technology Committee of Shanghai Municipal (Nos. 09DZ1200702, 08DZ1200403).

Notations
F	Molar flow rate/(mol·s-1)
G	Mass flow rate/(kg·s-1)
H	Specific enthalpy/(kJ·kg-1)
k	Ratio of the special heats of the air
p	Pressure/Pa
Pw	Power/kW
T	Temperature/K
t	Time/s
U	Voltage/V
I	Reaction I
II	Reaction II
III	Reaction III
IV	Reaction IV
Greek symbols
ρ	Density/(kg·m-3)
η	Efficiency
ϵ	Pressure loss coefficient
π	Compression ratio
Δp	Pressure loss/Pa
ΔH	Enthalpy change of reaction/(kJ·mol-1)
Subscripts
0	Standard state
1	Inlet
2	Outlet
a	Air
c	Compressor
f	Fuel
g	Reacted gas

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg