Progress in developing an innovative lean burn catalytic turbine technology for fugitive methane mitigation and utilization

Abstract

Approximately 2.8 × 10¹⁰ m³ of methane is emitted per year to the atmosphere from coal mining activities around the world. Mitigation and utilization of the fugitive coal mine methane is very difficult because its concentration is very low and varies from 0.1% to1%, and the methane is contained in a large air flow rate of 150–400 m³/s. This paper overviews existing and developing technologies for the mitigation and utilization of the fugitive mine methane, and then presents research progress in developing an innovative lean burn catalytic turbine technology for fugitive methane mitigation and utilization. This turbine system can be powered with about 1% methane in air.

Keywords

coal mine methane / mitigation and utilization / lean burn gas turbine / catalytic combustion

References

[1] Wang Y H. Coal demand and coal industry development in China. In: 5th Meeting of the Australia — China Bilateral Dialogue on Resources Cooperation. Sydney, Australia, 2009

[2] Su S, Adhikary D, Worrall R, Gabeva D. Study on coal mine methane resources and potential project development. CSIRO Exploration and Mining Report P2009/423. 2009

[3] Su S, Beath A C, Guo H, Mallett C W. An assessment of mine methane mitigation and utilisation technologies. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2005, 31(2): 123–170

[4] You C F, Xu X C. Utilization of ventilation air methane as a supplementary fuel at a circulating fluidized bed combustion boiler. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(7): 2590–2593

[5] Cimino S, Pirone R, Russo G. Thermal stability of perpvskite-based monolithic reactors in the catalytic combustion of methane. Industrial Chemical Research, 2001, 40(1): 80–85

[6] Zak K, Mattus R. MEGTEC: VAM processing: energy generation from ventilation air methane. In: U.S. Coal Mine Methane Conference. Boulder, Colorado, 2009

[7] Liebert J.Extracting value from coal mine methane. 2009-<month>06</month>-<day>12</day>

[8] Durr. State of the Art RTO for VAM application — Ecopure RL. In: U. S. Coal Mine Methane Conference. Boulder, Colorado, 2009

[9] Su S, Beath A C, Mallett C W. A method and system for combustion of methane. <patent>US 7 430 869 B2</patent> 2008

[10] Su S, Teakle P, Beath A C. Technical and economic assessment of mine methane mitigation and utilisation technologies. ACARP Project C14076 Report, 2007

[11] Melse R W, van der Werf A W. Biofiltration for mitigation of methane emission from animal husbandry. Environmental Science & Technology, 2005, 39(14): 5460–5468

[12] Stachowitz D A. Global CO₂ consideration, trade with CO₂–certificates: Overview of methane oxidation at (old) landfills. In: Ninth International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium, Sardinia, 2003

[13] Thiruvenkatachari R, Su S, Yu X X. Carbon fibre composite for ventilation air methane (VAM) capture. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 172(2–3): 1505–1511

[14] Su S, Chen H W, Teakle P, Xue S. Characteristics of coal mine ventilation air flows. Journal of Environmental Management, 2008, 86(1): 44–62

[15] Su S, Agnew J. Catalytic combustion of coal mine ventilation air methane. Fuel, 2006, 85(9): 1201–1210

[16] Yin J, Su S, Yu X X, Weng Y W. Thermodynamic characteristics of a low concentration methane catalytic combustion gas turbine. Applied Energy, 2010, 87(6): 2102–2108

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg