Simulation analysis of methanol flash distillation circulation process in biodiesel production with supercritical method

Abstract

High methanol-to-oil ratio is required to obtain a high conversion of oil for the production of biodiesel with supercritical methanol. Recovering the methanol of a stream issuing from a transesterification supercritical reactor by flash distillation instead of evaporation was analyzed. The one-stage and two-stage flash distillation processes were presented and compared. The difference of the recovery percentage of methanol of the above two flash processes is less than 0.5% and the methanol concentration in the vapor for the one-stage process decreases rapidly when feed temperature increases. The process in which the product of transesterification of soybean oil with supercritical methanol is cooled to an appropriate temperature (about 240°C) first and then flashed was put forward. The effect of cooling temperature, feed pressure and flash pressure on methanol concentration and recovery percentage was investigated. According to this study, when the feed pressure range is 15–30 MPa, the flash pressure equals 0.4 MPa, and cooling temperature range is 240°C–250°C, the recovery percentage of methanol is not less than 85%, and the concentration of the vapor in mass fraction of methanol is approximately 99%. Thus, the vapor leaving the flash tank can be directly circulated to the transesterification reactor.

Keywords

supercritical methanol / biodiesel / recovery / flash distillation

References

[1] Tang Shenglan, Zhang Jianan, Wu Haitang, Li Chun. Research advances in preparation of biodiesel fuel using supercritical techniques. Modern Chemical Industry, 2006, 26(Suppl.2): 391-394 (in Chinese)

[2] Demirbas A. Recent developments in biodiesel fuels. International Journal of Green Energy, 2007, 4(1): 15-26

[3] Nabetani H. Development of non-catalytic reaction processes for production of biodiesel fuel. Journal of the Japan Institute of Energy, 2007, 86(6): 371-374

[4] Demirbas A. Biodiesel production via non-catalytic SCF method and biodiesel fuel characteristics. Energy Conversion and Management, 2006, 47(15,16): 2271-2282

[5] D'Ippolito S A, Yori J C, Iturria M E, Pieck C L, Vera C R. Analysis of a two-step, noncatalystic, supercritical biodiesel production process with heat recovery. Energy and Fuels, 2007, 21(1): 339-346

[6] Liu Qidong, Wang Cunwen, Wang Weiguo, Wu Yuanxin, Zhang Junfeng, Chi Ruan, Li Shirong, Ding Yigang. The primary study of continuous preparation of biodiesel under supercritical condition. Chemistry & Bioengineering, 2006, 23(4): 26-28 (in Chinese)

[7] Wang Tielin, Wang Cunwen, Zhao Anmin, Wang Weiguo, Zhang Junfeng. Bench-scale research for continuous preparation of bio-diesel with supercritical methanol in a single tubular reactor. Modern Chemical Industry, 2008, 28(12): 71-75 (in Chinese)

[8] Wu Miaoxin, Wu Guoying, Han Ying, Zhang Peidi. Fatty acid composition of six edible vegetable oils and their biodiesel fuels. Chinese Fats, 2003, 28(12): 65-67 (in Chinese)

[9] Dong Xinfa. Principles of Physical Property Estimation and Calculation with Computer. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2007, 44-45, 151-159

[10] Yuan W, Hansen A C, Zhang Q. Vapor pressure and normal boiling point predictions for pure methyl esters and biodiesel fuels. Fuel, 2005, 84(7,8): 943-950

[11] Horstmann S, Fischer K, Gmehling J. PSRK group contribution equation of state: Revision and extension III. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2000, 167(2): 173-186

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 20576105).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg