About the journal
Browse
Collections
Multimedia collections
Authors & reviewers
Spatiotemporal patterns and scenario prediction of greenhouse gas emissions from air pollutants treatment in global iron and steel industry
Pengyuan Wei , Nan Li , Shaoze Xiao , Enze Wang , Zhiqi Ren , Jiaying Ma , Jie Xu , Huaqiang Chu , Xuefei Zhou , Yalei Zhang
ENG. Environ. ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (12) : 183
The treatment of air pollutants in iron and steel industry was crucial for environmental protection, but this process generated GHG emissions. This study adopted the emission factor approach to assess the spatiotemporal variation and future trends of GHG emissions from air pollutants treatment in the global steel industry. In 2019, global GHG emission from air pollutants treatment in iron and steel industry reached 5.37×109 kg CO2e in 2019, comparable in scale to GHG emissions from wastewater and waste treatment. Among these, SO2 treatment accounted for the largest source of GHG emissions. Spatially, Asia accounted for 91% of global GHG emissions, with China contributing 76% primarily due to its massive crude steel production. Industrial production structure and terminal treatment technology were two important factors influencing GHG emissions. Under baseline scenario, GHG emissions from air pollutants treatment would reach 1.1×1010 kg CO2e by 2050. Significant reductions in GHG emissions could be achieved by adjusting production structure. This study quantified GHG emissions in air pollutants treatment and underscored the potential of adjusting industrial production structure to reduce air pollutants generation and mitigate corresponding GHG emissions.
GHG emissions / Air-pollutants treatment / SO2 / Terminal treatment / Production structure
| ● Global GHG emissions caused by air pollutants treatment were quantified. | |
| ● GHG emissions caused by SO2 treatment played a decisive role. | |
| ● GHG emissions mainly originated from certain countries. | |
| ● Steel production and terminal treatment technology determined GHG emissions. | |
| ● Optimizing production structure could significantly reduce GHG emissions. |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
Ritchie H, Rosado P (2020). Electricity Mix. Oxford: Our World in Data |
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
Shi W X (2016). Life cycle assessment on various flue gas desulfurization processes in coal-based power plant. Thesis for Master’s Degree. Jinan: Shandong University |
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
Sun W Q, Zhao L, Li X L, Zhao Y Q (2016). Particulate matter emission in iron and steelmaking plants. In: Cavaliere P, ed. Ironmaking and Steelmaking Processes: Greenhouse Emissions, Control, and Reduction. Cham: Springer, 355–372 |
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
Wang H (2012). LCA of desulfurization technologies applied in coal-fired power plants. Master Degree Thesis. Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China |
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
World Steel Association (2025). World Steel in Figures 2025. Brussels: World Steel Association |
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
Zhang R, Zhang K, Kong L, Liu S (2024). Research progress and prospect of low-carbon biological technology for nitrate removal in wastewater treatment. Frontiers of Environmental Science Engineering, 2024, 18(7): 80 |
| [38] |
Zhang X Y (2018). Life cycle assessment research of ultra-clean flue gas emission system in coal-fired power plant. Thesis for Master’s Degree. Jinan: Shandong Universityaster Degree Thesis. Shandong University |
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
Higher Education Press 2026
Supplementary files
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |