Deciphering the role of biochar type and particle size in anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge under thermophilic conditions
Yuwei Yang , Min Zhang , Changhao Zheng , Xiaomei Su , Feng Dong , Xiao Xiao , Liang Xu , Hailu Fu , Faqian Sun
ENG. Environ. ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (8) : 123
Biochar amendment has been proposed to enhance thermophilic anaerobic digestion (AD), yet the influence of biochar physicochemical properties on co-digestion performance and microbial restructuring remains unknown. In this study, three biochars derived from bamboo, hog manure, and hickory shell were evaluated during thermophilic (55 °C) co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge. Compared with the control (310.5 ± 7.6 mL CH4 /g volatile solids), biochar supplementation significantly increased cumulative methane yield, with hickory shell biochar achieving the highest production (393.4 ± 9.8 mL CH4 /g volatile solids), corresponding to a 26.7% increase. Kinetic analysis showed that biochar increased the maximum methane production rate by up to 34.6% and shortened the lag phase by approximately one-third. Propionate accumulation was suppressed with hickory shell biochar, accompanied by enhanced soluble chemical oxygen demand removal and improved pH buffering. Biochar particle-size variation at the millimeter scale had a negligible effect. Microbial analysis revealed enrichment of hydrolytic Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 and versatile methanogens such as Methanosarcina and Methanoculleus in biochar-amended systems. Functional prediction indicated an increase in carbohydrate metabolism, acetate conversion (ackA, pta), and methanogenesis genes (mcrA/B/G). Overall, biochar enhanced thermophilic AD through coordinated improvements in hydrolysis, syntrophic metabolism, and methanogenic activity.
Thermophilic co-digestion / Biochar / Microbial community / Organic solid waste / Hickory shell biochar
| ● Different types of biochar and particle size on thermophilic AD were investigated. | |
| ● Hickory shell biochar achieved the highest methane yield of 393.4 ± 9.8 mL/g VS. | |
| ● Particle size distribution at millimeter scale had negligible impact on AD. | |
| ● Biochar enriched syntrophic fermenters and versatile methanogens. | |
| ● Metabolic analysis revealed biochar enhanced hydrolysis and DIET-related pathways. |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
Higher Education Press 2026
Supplementary files
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |