Toward sustainable lithium-ion battery industry: an integrated approach to the trilemma
Jiefeng Xiao , Junming Hong , Zhenming Xu
ENG. Environ. ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (7) : 115
The global energy transition’s reliance on lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) faces a critical sustainability trilemma, in which the simultaneous pursuit of rapid decarbonization, resource security, and economic viability generates inherent trade-offs. This perspective highlights that the trilemma is reinforced by three interconnected systemic dilemmas: a policy-action chasm (weak enforcement), a technology-market dislocation (scalability gaps), and a temporal disequilibrium (economic misalignment). Current fragmented approaches are insufficient to address these core challenges. We propose an integrated circularity framework that aligns interventions across policy, technology, and market domains. To bridge the policy-action chasm, we advocate for smart regulations, including multilateral certification reciprocity. To mitigate the technology-market dislocation, we recommend adaptable, modular recycling systems augmented with AI. To resolve the temporal disequilibrium, we suggest market restructuring through blockchain-tracked material certificates linked to tradable environmental, social, and governance tokens. This framework provides a coordinated pathway to decouple LIB growth from dependence on virgin resources, directly tackling the root causes of the sustainability trilemma.
Lithium-ion battery industry / Resource dependency shift / Policy divergence / Sustainability trilemma / Integrated circularity framework / Policy-technology-market nexus
| ● LIB sustainability faces conflicting decarbonization, security, and economy. | |
| ● Policy gap, technology lock-in, and market distortion block global LIB circularity. | |
| ● A frame integrates smart regulation, modular recycling, and blockchain markets. | |
| ● The solution decouples battery growth from virgin resource dependency. | |
| ● This turns LIB recycling from a compliance burden into a strategic value driver. |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
EVTank (2025a). White Paper on China Lithium-ion Battery Recycling, Dismantling and Cascade Utilization Industry Development (2025). Beijing: Ivy Institute of Economics |
| [23] |
EVTank (2025b). White Paper on the Development of China’s Lithium-ion Battery Industry (2025). Beijing: Ivy Institute of Economics |
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
Li J J, Wang Z X, Li H, Jiao J L (2024). Which policy can effectively promote the formal recycling of power batteries in China? Energy, 299: 131445 |
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
Liu Q N, Hu Z, Li W J, Zou C, Jin H L, Wang S, Chou S L, Dou S X (2021). Sodium transition metal oxides: the preferred cathode choice for future sodium-ion batteries? Energy & Environmental Science, 14(1): 158–179 |
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
Higher Education Press 2026
Supplementary files
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |