Inactivation and mechanism of UV222 radiation on cyanobacteria: Microcystis aeruginosa in aggregates and unicellular forms
Xuanxuan Xian , Chenlan Chen , Xin Yu , Liang Zhu , Lei Wang , Gang Lian
ENG. Environ. ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3) : 49
Inactivation and mechanism of UV222 radiation on cyanobacteria: Microcystis aeruginosa in aggregates and unicellular forms
Cyanobacterial blooms persistently threaten the safety of drinking water. While UV222 is highly effective and safe for inactivating microorganisms such as viruses and bacteria, its efficacy against cyanobacteria remains unclear. This study investigated the inactivation effects and mechanisms of UV222 on laboratory-prepared Microcystis aeruginosa (M. aeruginosa) aggregates and unicellular cells. The M. aeruginosa aggregates and unicellular cells could be inactivated by a 1–15 mJ/cm2 dose of UV222, with the inactivation primarily involving damage to the photosystem, cell integrity, and biomacromolecules, along with impaired metabolic functions. The aggregates exhibited greater UV222 resistance than that of the unicellular cells, attributable to the outer cell shielding and protective protein components exist in extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). Although UV222 impaired the photosynthetic activity and damaged the cell membranes of the aggregates, their regrowth capacity persisted. Conversely, the unicellular cells suffered extreme inhibition of Fv/Fm and esterase activity, with near-complete loss of regrowth ability at UV222 doses > 6 mJ/cm2. UV222 directly damaged the cell membrane, chlorophyll-a, and phycocyanin, reducing cyanobacterial activity. Additionally, M. aeruginosa was more readily inactivated during the late lag phase than during the exponential phase (e.g., membrane damage proportions were 95% vs. 87%, respectively). These findings demonstrate the potential of UV222 for cyanobacterial control and highlight the need to consider practical factors such as aggregation morphology, growth-phase differences, and media effects on radiation efficacy in applications.
Cyanobacterial blooms / Microcystis aeruginosa / Aggregates / UV222
| ● Lab cyanobacterial aggregates morphology and composition were similar to field samples. | |
| ● Inner cells in aggregates could be protected by outer cells from UV222 attacked. | |
| ● Cyanobacterial aggregates were more resistant to UV222 than unicellular cell. | |
| ● UV222 attacked cyanobacterial activities, membrane, biomacromolecule and proteins. | |
| ● Cyanobacterial growth phases would affect UV222 inactivation effect. |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
Jing Z B, Lu Z D, Santoro D, Zhao Z N, Huang Y, Ke Y C, Wang X H, Sun W J (2022). Which UV wavelength is the most effective for chlorine-resistant bacteria in terms of the impact of activity, cell membrane and DNA? Chemical Engineering Journal, 447: 137584 |
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
Higher Education Press 2026
Supplementary files
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |