Synergistic efficiency in greenhouse gas emission reduction and water pollution control: evaluating policy impacts in China

Yang Chen , Rui Qiu , Jingquan Wang , Peng Chen , Min Zheng , Hongguang Guo

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (10) : 132

PDF (6306KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (10) : 132 DOI: 10.1007/s11783-025-2052-1
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Synergistic efficiency in greenhouse gas emission reduction and water pollution control: evaluating policy impacts in China

Author information +
History +
PDF (6306KB)

Abstract

The synergistic reduction of wastewater greenhouse gases (GHGs) and pollutants presents a critical environmental challenge. Understanding the synergistic efficiency and the factors that influence it is crucial for informed policy-making, but methods for assessing this efficiency are currently lacking. This study evaluates the synergistic efficiency in China from 2009 to 2019 using the elastic coefficient method, and assesses strict water policy impacts using double machine learning (DML). Results indicate that before 2015, China experiences synergistic increases, which shift to non-synergistic following the implementation of a strict water policy in 2015. Despite improved wastewater treatment rates, this policy paradoxically increases GHG emission intensity, leading to a “water-carbon” contradiction, especially in water-scarce, poorly enforced, and underdeveloped regions. The policy effect on GHG emission intensity is most influenced by wastewater pipeline infrastructure, followed by socioeconomic development, technological innovation, and industrial structure. Inefficiencies in GHG emission reductions are due to expanded wastewater treatment facilities and lower industrial energy efficiency. Conversely, higher salaries and technological advancements facilitate emission reductions. To achieve the synergy of effluent pollution and GHG reduction in the wastewater sector, provincial control priorities into four patterns are explored. This study provides guidance for low-carbon retrofitting of existing wastewater treatment plants and informs the design of effective water policies.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Wastewater greenhouse gas / “Water-carbon” contradiction / Synergistic efficiency / Policy effect / Double machine learning

Highlight

● Developed a method to assess synergistic efficiency and its spatiotemporal changes.

● We use double machine learning to study the wastewater policy effect.

● Water-carbon contradiction varies across regions, water resources, and economy.

● We analyze pathways based on wastewater treatment plants, energy use, and salaries.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yang Chen, Rui Qiu, Jingquan Wang, Peng Chen, Min Zheng, Hongguang Guo. Synergistic efficiency in greenhouse gas emission reduction and water pollution control: evaluating policy impacts in China. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2025, 19(10): 132 DOI:10.1007/s11783-025-2052-1

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Ang B W (2004). Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? Energy Policy, 32(9): 1131–1139

[2]

Athey S. (2017). Beyond prediction: using big data for policy problems. Science, 355(6324): 483–485

[3]

AtheySTibshirani JWagerS (2019). Generalized random forests. arXiv: 1610.01271, 2018

[4]

Battocchi K, Dillon E, Hei M, Lewis G, Oka P, Oprescu M, Syrgkanis V (2019). EconML: a python package for ML-based heterogeneous treatment effects estimation. Amsterdam: Python Software Foundation

[5]

Brand J E, Xie Y. (2010). Who benefits most from college? Evidence for negative selection in heterogeneous economic returns to higher education. American Sociological Review, 75(2): 273–302

[6]

Cao Y Q, Kang Q, Zhang B Y, Zhu Z W, Dong G H, Cai Q H, Lee K, Chen B. (2022). Machine learning-aided causal inference for unraveling chemical dispersant and salinity effects on crude oil biodegradation. Bioresource Technology, 345: 126468

[7]

Cao Y S, Tang J G, Henze M, Yang X P, Gan Y P, Li J, Kroiss H, van Loosdrecht M C M, Zhang Y, Daigger G T. (2019). The leakage of sewer systems and the impact on the ‘black and odorous water bodies’ and WWTPs in China. Water Science and Technology, 79(2): 334–341

[8]

Chen J J, Wang H C, Yin W X, Wang Y Q, Lv J Q, Wang A J. (2024). Deciphering carbon emissions in urban sewer networks: bridging urban sewer networks with city-wide environmental dynamics. Water Research, 256: 121576

[9]

Chen P Y. (2024). Unlocking policy effects: water resources management plans and urban water pollution. Journal of Environmental Management, 365: 121642

[10]

Chen S Q, Zhang L M, Liu B B, Yi H, Su H S, Kharrazi A, Jiang F, Lu Z M, Crittenden J C, Chen B. (2023). Decoupling wastewater-related greenhouse gas emissions and water stress alleviation across 300 cities in China is challenging yet plausible by 2030. Nature Water, 1(6): 534–546

[11]

Chen Z, Kahn M E, Liu Y, Wang Z. (2018). The consequences of spatially differentiated water pollution regulation in China. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 88: 468–485

[12]

Cohen B. (2006). Urbanization in developing countries: current trends, future projections, and key challenges for sustainability. Technology in Society, 28(1−2): 63–80

[13]

Cornejo P K, Zhang Q, Mihelcic J R (2016). How does scale of implementation impact the environmental sustainability of wastewater treatment integrated with resource recovery? Environmental Science & Technology, 50(13): 6680–6689

[14]

Devkota J P, Burian S J, Tavakol-Davani H, Apul D S. (2017). Introducing demand to supply ratio as a new metric for understanding life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from rainwater harvesting systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 163: 274–284

[15]

Du W J, Lu J Y, Hu Y R, Xiao J X, Yang C, Wu J, Huang B C, Cui S, Wang Y, Li W W. (2023). Spatiotemporal pattern of greenhouse gas emissions in China’s wastewater sector and pathways towards carbon neutrality. Nature Water, 1(2): 166–175

[16]

Duan H R, Zhao Y F, Koch K, Wells G F, Weißbach M, Yuan Z G, Ye L. (2021). Recovery of nitrous oxide from wastewater treatment: current status and perspectives. ACS ES&T Water, 1(2): 240–250

[17]

Feng K L, Zhao Z H, Li M Y, Tian L L, An T, Zhang J W, Xu X Y, Zhu L. (2022). Novel intelligent control framework for WWTP optimization to achieve stable and sustainable operation. ACS ES&T Engineering, 2(11): 2086–2094

[18]

Fesenmyer K A, Wenger S J, Leigh D S, Neville H M. (2021). Large portion of USA streams lose protection with new interpretation of Clean Water Act. Freshwater Science, 40(1): 252–258

[19]

Fu H R, Kang Q, Sun X J, Liu W, Li Y, Chen B, Zhang B Y, Bao M T. (2024). Mechanism of nearshore sediment-facilitated oil transport: new insights from causal inference analysis. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 465: 133187

[20]

Guo Y, Mauzerall D L, Lyu Y Z, Hu W Q, Tian J P, Chen L J. (2022). Benefits of infrastructure symbiosis between coal power and wastewater treatment. Nature Sustainability, 5(12): 1070–1079

[21]

Hayes A F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4): 408–420

[22]

Huang R Y, Xu J, Xie L, Wang H T, Ni X H. (2022). Energy neutrality potential of wastewater treatment plants: a novel evaluation framework integrating energy efficiency and recovery. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 16(9): 117

[23]

Huang Y J, Meng F L, Liu S M, Sun S A, Smith K. (2023). China’s enhanced urban wastewater treatment increases greenhouse gas emissions and regional inequality. Water Research, 230: 119536

[24]

Huang Y Y, Zhou B H, Han R R, Lu X H, Li S, Li N. (2020). China’s industrial gray water footprint assessment and implications for investment in industrial wastewater treatment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(7): 7188–7198

[25]

Huo Z Y, Kim Y J, Chen Y Y, Song T Y, Yang Y, Yuan Q B, Kim S W. (2023). Hybrid energy harvesting systems for self-powered sustainable water purification by harnessing ambient energy. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 17(10): 118

[26]

Joo J, Jeong S, Shin J, Chang D Y. (2024). Missing methane emissions from urban sewer networks. Environmental Pollution, 342: 123101

[27]

Kardos M K, Patziger M, Jolánkai Z, Clement A. (2025). The new urban wastewater treatment directive from the perspective of the receiving rivers’ quality. Environmental Sciences Europe, 37(1): 10

[28]

Knaus M C, Lechner M, Strittmatter A. (2022). Heterogeneous employment effects of job search programs: a machine learning approach. Journal of Human Resources, 57(2): 597–636

[29]

Kuroda M, Hara K, Takekawa M, Uwasu M, Ike M. (2018). Historical trends of academic research on the water environment in Japan: evidence from the academic literature in the past 50 years. Water, 10(10): 1456

[30]

Kyung D, Kim D, Yi S, Choi W, Lee W. (2017). Estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from sewer pipeline system. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(12): 1901–1911

[31]

Li L B, Qiao J D, Yu G, Wang L Z, Li H Y, Liao C, Zhu Z D. (2022). Interpretable tree-based ensemble model for predicting beach water quality. Water Research, 211: 118078

[32]

Li X, Deng Y B, Liu B H, Yang J, Li M, Jing W L, Chen Z H. (2024). GDP spatial differentiation in the perspective of urban functional zones. Cities, 151: 105126

[33]

Liang J H, Luo Y C, Li B H, Liu S Q, Yang L S, Gao P, Feng L, Liu Y Z, Du Z W, Zhang L Q. (2022). Removal efficiencies of natural and synthetic progesterones in hospital wastewater treated by different disinfection processes. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 16(10): 126

[34]

Ling S, Jin S R, Wang H J, Zhang Z H, Feng Y C. (2024). Transportation infrastructure upgrading and green development efficiency: empirical analysis with double machine learning method. Journal of Environmental Management, 358: 120922

[35]

Lu L, Guest J S, Peters C A, Zhu X P, Rau G H, Ren Z J. (2018). Wastewater treatment for carbon capture and utilization. Nature Sustainability, 1(12): 750–758

[36]

LundbergS MLee S I (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Long Beach: Curran Associates Inc., 4768–4777

[37]

Menon A K, Haechler I, Kaur S, Lubner S, Prasher R S. (2020). Enhanced solar evaporation using a photo-thermal umbrella for wastewater management. Nature Sustainability, 3(2): 144–151

[38]

Pan D, Chen Y Q, Kong F B. (2023). The role of place-based policies on carbon emission: a quasi-natural experiment from China’s old revolutionary development program. Heliyon, 9(5): e15964

[39]

Pap S, Zhang H Y, Bogdan A, Elsby D T, Gibb S W, Bremner B, Taggart M A. (2023). Pilot-scale phosphate recovery from wastewater to create a fertiliser product: an integrated assessment of adsorbent performance and quality. Water Research, 228: 119369

[40]

PearlJ (2010). An introduction to causal inference. The International Journal of Biostatistics, 6(2): Article 7

[41]

Peng Y, Cui J, Zhu H Y, Cao Y H, Du K, Yao D R. (2019). Long-term spatiotemporal variations of atmospheric sulfur, nitrogen and particle pollutants in Chongqing, southwest China: implication of industrial transfer. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(8): 8098–8110

[42]

Schmalensee R, Stavins R N. (2019). Policy evolution under the Clean Air Act. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(4): 27–50

[43]

SongY YLi H BHanYLuC CHouY A ZhangY SGuo J B (2020). Landfill leachate as an additional substance in the Johannesburg-Sulfur autotrophic denitrification system in the treatment of municipal wastewater with low strength and low COD/TN ratio. Bioresource Technology, 295: 122287

[44]

Su Q, Dai H C, Xie S Y, Yu X Y, Lin Y, Singh V P, Karthikeyan R. (2023). Water–energy–carbon nexus: greenhouse gas emissions from integrated urban drainage systems in China. Environmental Science & Technology, 57(5): 2093–2104

[45]

Sun C Y, Mao S Y, Zhao W Y, Chen Y S, Cao X, Tian T, Ma X Y, Li B, Qiu Y. (2025). Multi-objective comparison of conventional and emerging wastewater treatment processes based on simulation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 19(3): 29

[46]

Sun Y, Gao J J. (2023). Natural resource endowment and its impact on ecological efficiency. Resources Policy, 87: 104272

[47]

Sun Y, Wang X H, Ren N Q, Liu Y B, You S J. (2023). Improved machine learning models by data processing for predicting life-cycle environmental impacts of chemical. Environmental Science & Technology, 57(8): 3434–3444

[48]

Tapio P. (2005). Towards a theory of decoupling: degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transport Policy, 12(2): 137–151

[49]

Tofighi D, Mackinnon D P. (2011). RMediation: an R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3): 692–700

[50]

Venkatesh G, Hammervold J, Brattebø H. (2009). Combined MFA‐LCA for analysis of wastewater pipeline networks. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 13(4): 532–550

[51]

Wang D J, Xu Q H, Feng Y, Ignatius J, Yin Y Q, Xiao D. (2024a). Uplift modeling and its implications for appointment date prediction in attended home delivery. Decision Support Systems, 185: 114303

[52]

Wang D M, Yang W J, Geng X C, Li Q. (2024b). Information disclosure, multifaceted collaborative governance, and carbon total factor productivity: an evaluation of the effects of the ‘environmental information disclosure pilot’ policy based on double machine learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 366: 121817

[53]

Wang T X, Wang Z X, Wang T Z, Ma S M, Hu S D, Gao S J, Ye L, Cui R F, Arhonditsis G. (2024c). Evaluation of the role of urban domestic wastewater treatment systems for greenhouse gases emissions in China. Ecological Informatics, 81: 102571

[54]

Wang Z Z, Zhou F T, Zhong J H. (2024d). Can China’s low-carbon city pilot policy facilitate carbon neutrality? Evidence from a machine learning approach. Economic Analysis and Policy, 84: 756–773

[55]

Wei R K, Hu Y C, Yu K, Zhang L J, Liu G, Hu C Z, Qu S, Qu J H. (2024). Assessing the determinants of scale effects on carbon efficiency in China's wastewater treatment plants using causal machine learning. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 203: 107432

[56]

Weisner O, Arle J, Liebmann L, Link M, Schäfer R B, Schneeweiss A, Schreiner V C, Vormeier P, Liess M. (2022). Three reasons why the water framework directive (WFD) fails to identify pesticide risks. Water Research, 208: 117848

[57]

Wen H W, Hu K Y, Nghiem X H, Acheampong A O. (2024). Urban climate adaptability and green total-factor productivity: evidence from double dual machine learning and differences-in-differences techniques. Journal of Environmental Management, 350: 119588

[58]

Wu G, Zhu F, Zhang X X, Ren H Q, Wang Y R, Geng J J, Liu H L. (2023). PBT assessment of chemicals detected in effluent of wastewater treatment plants by suspected screening analysis. Environmental Research, 237: 116892

[59]

Wu Y S, Cao Y. (2023). Research on the influence of ecological environment satisfaction and income level on Chinese residents’ happiness: empirical analysis based on CGSS data. Sustainability, 15(10): 8175

[60]

Xia L B, Wu B B, Dai A Q, Zhou Y. (2024). Machine learning-based predominant driving factors impacting urban industrial wastewater discharge in the Yellow River Basin. ACS ES&T Water, 4(3): 890–898

[61]

Xu J, Zhang M, Zhou M, Li H L. (2017). An empirical study on the dynamic effect of regional industrial carbon transfer in China. Ecological Indicators, 73: 1–10

[62]

Yang M J, Peng M, Wu D, Feng H Y, Wang Y X, Lv Y P, Sun F Y, Sharma S, Che Y, Yang K. (2023). Greenhouse gas emissions from wastewater treatment plants in China: historical emissions and future mitigation potentials. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 190: 106794

[63]

Yang X, Duan C C, Chen B, Wang S G. (2024). Does stricter sewage treatment targets policy exacerbate the contradiction between effluent water quality improvement and carbon emissions mitigation? An evidence from China. Global Environmental Change, 87: 102881

[64]

YangY QYuan XYuL FJongM CPiusO ZouNZuoZ Q YangJ YZuo J E (2025a). Assessment of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from urban community sewer networks: field quantification and insights into environmental factors. Water Research X, 28: 100307Q

[65]

Yang Y T, Xu H, Yang X, Zhang Y, Liu T. (2025b). Exploring synergistic efficiency of air pollution and carbon reduction and its influencing factors: insights from China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 212: 107973

[66]

Zhang J Z, Wang S, Zhao W W, Meadows M E, Fu B J. (2022). Finding pathways to synergistic development of Sustainable Development Goals in China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1): 21

[67]

Zhao X Q, Ke X J, Jiang S Y, You X. (2024). Exploring the dynamics of urban energy efficiency in China: a double machine learning analysis of green finance influence. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 35: 103653

[68]

Zheng M, Hu Z T, Liu T, Sperandio M, Volcke E I P, Wang Z Y, Hao X D, Duan H R, Vlaeminck S E, Xu K N. . (2024). Pathways to advanced resource recovery from sewage. Nature Sustainability, 7(11): 1395–1404

[69]

Zheng P, Wang H J, Wei D M, Pu C Y, He Z H. (2022). Environmental governance capability and water quality: a quasi-natural experiment based on the Ten-point Water Plan. Urban Climate, 41: 101050

[70]

Zhou Z F, Liu J H, Zhou N X, Zhang T, Zeng H X. (2021). Does the “10-Point Water Plan” reduce the intensity of industrial water pollution? Quasi-experimental evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management, 295: 113048

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press 2025

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (6306KB)

Supplementary files

FSE-25087-OF-CY_suppl_1

790

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/