High-efficiency control strategies for urban composite non-point source pollution: optimization of source and process control facilities

Bingquan Lin , Chen Zhao , Yuxuan Liu , Yahong Gao , Xinqi An , Bin Qiu , Fei Qi , Dezhi Sun

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (9) : 126

PDF (6401KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (9) : 126 DOI: 10.1007/s11783-025-2046-z
RESEARCH ARTICLE

High-efficiency control strategies for urban composite non-point source pollution: optimization of source and process control facilities

Author information +
History +
PDF (6401KB)

Abstract

Urban composite non-point source (UCNPS) pollution has become a considerable source of basin pollution. Its control can generally be approached at the source and process levels; however, source and process control facilities face challenges in achieving high-efficiency control. To optimize the layout of source control facilities, two methods were developed in this study: 1) a Storm Water Management Model (SWMM)–group decision-making method for small-area basins and 2) a multi-objective optimization method for large-area basins. For process control of combined sewer overflow (CSO) pollution, methods based on the SWMM and ideal point theory were developed to determine the optimal CSO storage tank volume and the optimal interception ratio of the combined drainage systems. For process control of first-flush runoff (FFR) pollution in separate drainage systems, methods integrating SWMM simulations with empirical design formulas were proposed to determine the optimal volume and layout of FFR storage tanks. These methods were applied to develop high-efficiency source and process control schemes in two representative urban areas—Yongchuan and Jintan—in the Yangtze River Basin, China. The results indicated that by optimizing the layout of source control facilities, 12.44%–22.07% of the pollution load was intercepted at the source level. Furthermore, the rational deployment of process control facilities intercepted 29.6%–44.9% of CSO pollution and 22%–33% of FFR pollution at the process level, achieving efficient UCNPS pollution control with limited resources. The proposed methods and cases studies provide valuable references for UCNPS pollution control in other basins.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Urban composite non-point source / Source control / Process control / SWMM / Group decision-making / Multi-objective optimization

Highlight

● The optimal layout of source control facilities was determined.

● The optimal volume of CSO storage tank was determined.

● The optimal interception ratio of combined sewer system was determined.

● The optimal volume and layout of FFR storage tank was determined.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Bingquan Lin, Chen Zhao, Yuxuan Liu, Yahong Gao, Xinqi An, Bin Qiu, Fei Qi, Dezhi Sun. High-efficiency control strategies for urban composite non-point source pollution: optimization of source and process control facilities. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2025, 19(9): 126 DOI:10.1007/s11783-025-2046-z

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Ahiablame L M, Engel B A, Chaubey I. (2012). Effectiveness of low impact development practices: literature review and suggestions for future research. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 223(7): 4253–4273

[2]

Ahiablame L M, Shakya R. (2016). Modeling flood reduction effects of low impact development at a watershed scale. Journal of Environmental Management, 171: 81–91

[3]

Al Mamoon A, Jahan S, He X L, Joergensen N E, Rahman A. (2019). First flush analysis using a rainfall simulator on a micro catchment in an arid climate. Science of the Total Environment, 693: 133552

[4]

Alam Z, Anwar A H M F, Heitz A, Sarker D C. (2018). Improving stormwater quality at source using catch basin inserts. Journal of Environmental Management, 228: 393–404

[5]

Alyaseri I, Zhou J P, Morgan S M, Bartlett A. (2017). Initial impacts of rain gardens’ application on water quality and quantity in combined sewer: field-scale experiment. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 11(4): 19

[6]

Ashiq M M, Jazaei F, Bell K, Ali A S A, Bakhshaee A, Babakhani P. (2023). Abundance, spatial distribution, and physical characteristics of microplastics in stormwater detention ponds. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 17(10): 124

[7]

Ashofteh P S, Dougaheh M P. (2024). Ranking the optimal combination of low-impact urban development systems under climate change with the TODIM multi-criteria decision-making method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434: 140108

[8]

Ashofteh P S, Haddad O B, Loáiciga H A. (2015). Evaluation of climatic-change impacts on multiobjective reservoir operation with multiobjective genetic programming. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 141(11): 04015030

[9]

Bach P M, McCarthy D T, Deletic A. (2010). Redefining the stormwater first flush phenomenon. Water Research, 44(8): 2487–2498

[10]

Bakhshipour A E, Dittmer U, Haghighi A, Nowak W. (2019). Hybrid green-blue-gray decentralized urban drainage systems design, a simulation-optimization framework. Journal of Environmental Management, 249: 109364

[11]

Behzadian M, Otaghsara S K, Yazdani M, Ignatius J. (2012). A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17): 13051–13069

[12]

Chaudhary S, Chua L H C, Kansal A. (2022). Event mean concentration and first flush from residential catchments in different climate zones. Water Research, 219: 118594

[13]

Coello C A C, Pulido G T, Lechuga M S. (2004). Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 8(3): 256–279

[14]

Dougaheh M P, Ashofteh P S. (2025). Development of multi-objective Harris hawks optimization (MOHHO) algorithm in low-impact development systems considering the effects of climate change. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 137: 103816

[15]

Dougaheh M P, Ashofteh P S, Loáiciga H A. (2023). Urban stormwater management using low-impact development control measures considering climate change. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 154(3): 1021–1033

[16]

EckartKMcPhee ZBolisettiT (2017). Performance and implementation of low impact development: a review. Science of the Total Environment, 607–608: 607–608

[17]

Eckart K, McPhee Z, Bolisetti T. (2018). Multiobjective optimization of low impact development stormwater controls. Journal of Hydrology, 562: 564–576

[18]

Fletcher T D, Shuster W, Hunt W F, Ashley R, Butler D, Arthur S, Trowsdale S, Barraud S, Semadeni-Davies A, Bertrand-Krajewski J L. . (2015). SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more: the evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water Journal, 12(7): 525–542

[19]

Gao Z, Zhang Q H, Li J, Wang Y F, Dzakpasu M, Wang X C. (2023). First flush stormwater pollution in urban catchments: a review of its characterization and quantification towards optimization of control measures. Journal of Environmental Management, 340: 117976

[20]

Gong Y W, Chen Y, Yu L, Li J Q, Pan X Y, Shen Z Y, Xu X, Qiu Q Y. (2019). Effectiveness analysis of systematic combined sewer overflow control schemes in the sponge city pilot area of Beijing. International Journal of Environmental Reserch and Public Health, 16(9): 1503

[21]

Green C. (2010). Towards sustainable flood risk management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 1(1): 33–43

[22]

Guo X C, Du P F, Zhao D Q, Li M. (2019). Modelling low impact development in watersheds using the storm water management model. Urban Water Journal, 16(2): 146–155

[23]

Huang C L, Hsu N S, Liu H J, Huang Y H. (2018). Optimization of low impact development layout designs for megacity flood mitigation. Journal of Hydrology, 564: 542–558

[24]

Jeung M, Baek S, Beom J, Cho K H, Her Y, Yoon K. (2019). Evaluation of random forest and regression tree methods for estimation of mass first flush ratio in urban catchments. Journal of Hydrology, 575: 1099–1110

[25]

Kalhori M, Ashofteh P S, Moghadam S H. (2023). Development of the multi-objective invasive weed optimization algorithm in the integrated water resources allocation problem. Water Resources Management, 37(11): 4433–4458

[26]

Khorsandi M, Ashofteh P S, Azadi F, Chu X F. (2022). Multi-objective firefly integration with the K-nearest neighbor to reduce simulation model calls to accelerate the optimal operation of multi-objective reservoirs. Water Resources Management, 36(9): 3283–3304

[27]

Khorsandi M, Ashofteh P S, Singh V P. (2024). Development of a multi-objective reservoir operation model for water quality-quantity management. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 265: 104385

[28]

Kumar S, Guntu R K, Agarwal A, Villuri V G K, Pasupuleti S, Kaushal D R, Gosian A K, Bronstert A. (2022). Multi-objective optimization for stormwater management by green-roofs and infiltration trenches to reduce urban flooding in central Delhi. Journal of Hydrology, 606: 127455

[29]

Li J Q, Yang C Y. (2024). Design issue analysis and operation effect evaluation of large-scale storage tank. Water, 16(8): 1097

[30]

Li Y P, Zhou Y X, Wang H Y, Jiang H Z, Yue Z W, Zheng K, Wu B, Banahene P. (2022). Characterization and sources apportionment of overflow pollution in urban separate stormwater systems inappropriately connected with sewage. Journal of Environmental Management, 303: 114231

[31]

Liang C Y, You G J Y, Lee H Y. (2019). Investigating the effectiveness and optimal spatial arrangement of low-impact development facilities. Journal of Hydrology, 577: 124008

[32]

Lin B Q, An X Q, Zhao C, Gao Y H, Liu Y X, Qiu B, Qi F, Sun D Z. (2024a). Analysis of urban composite non-point source pollution characteristics and its contribution to river DOM based on EEMs and FT-ICR MS. Water Research, 266: 122406

[33]

Lin B Q, Qi F, An X Q, Zhao C, Gao Y H, Liu Y X, Zhong Y, Qiu B, Wang Z B, Hu Q. . (2024b). Review: the application of source analysis methods in tracing urban non-point source pollution: categorization, hotspots, and future prospects. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(16): 23482–23504

[34]

Liu Z J, Han Z X, Shi X Y, Liao X Y, Leng L Y, Jia H F. (2023). Multi-objective optimization methodology for green-gray coupled runoff control infrastructure adapting spatial heterogeneity of natural endowment and urban development. Water Research, 233: 119759

[35]

Luo Z, Su X K, Deng Y Y, Deng Z Y, Yang S L, Luo X, Chen J, Shi L X, Chen H. (2023). Insight into the pollution characteristics of road and roof runoff in Changsha, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(25): 67608–67620

[36]

Mannina G, Viviani G. (2009). Separate and combined sewer systems: a long-term modelling approach. Water Science and Technology, 60(3): 555–565

[37]

Ministryof HousingUrban-RuralDevelopment of the People’s Republic of ChinaGeneralAdministration of Quality SupervisionInspectionof the People’s Republic of China (2017)Quarantine . Technical Code for Urban Stormwater Detention and Retention Engineering: GB 51174–2017. Beijing: China Planning Press

[38]

MOHURD(2014). Technical Guidelines for Sponge City Construction: Low Impact Development Stormwater System Construction (Trial). Beijing: Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China

[39]

Nguyen T T, Ngo H H, Guo W S, Wang X C, Ren N Q, Li G B, Ding J, Liang H. (2019). Implementation of a specific urban water management: Sponge City. Science of the Total Environment, 652: 147–162

[40]

Perera T, McGree J, Egodawatta P, Jinadasa K B S N, Goonetilleke A. (2019). Taxonomy of influential factors for predicting pollutant first flush in urban stormwater runoff. Water Research, 166: 115075

[41]

Piro P, Carbone M, Garofalo G. (2010). Distributed vs. concentrated storage options for controlling CSO volumes and pollutant loads. Water Practice & Technology, 5(3): wpt2010071

[42]

Rong G W, Hu L Y, Wang X, Jiang H L, Gan D N, Li S S. (2021). Simulation and evaluation of low-impact development practices in university construction: a case study of Anhui University of Science and Technology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 294: 126232

[43]

RossmanL ASimon M A (2022). Storm Water Management Model User’s Manual Version 5.2. Cincinnati: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

[44]

Saget A, Chebbo G, Bertrand-Krajewski J L. (1996). The first flush in sewer systems. Water Science and Technology, 33(9): 101–108

[45]

Shafique M, Kim R. (2015). Low impact development practices: a review of current research and recommendations for future directions. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S, 22(4): 543–563

[46]

Soltani A, Hewage K, Reza B, Sadiq R. (2015). Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of municipal solid waste management: a review. Waste Management, 35: 318–328

[47]

Tao J S, Li Z J, Peng X L, Ying G X. (2017). Quantitative analysis of impact of green stormwater infrastructures on combined sewer overflow control and urban flooding control. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 11(4): 11

[48]

Temprano J, Tejero I. (2002). Detention storage volume for combined sewer overflow into a river. Environmental Technology, 23(6): 663–675

[49]

Todeschini S, Manenti S, Creaco E. (2019). Testing an innovative first flush identification methodology against field data from an Italian catchment. Journal of Environmental Management, 246: 418–425

[50]

Wang T, Zhang Y H, Li H Z, Xu Z X, Jin W. (2024). Policies on combined sewer overflows pollution control: a global perspective to inspire China and less developed countries. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 54(14): 1050–1069

[51]

Xu T, Jia H F, Wang Z, Mao X H, Xu C Q. (2017). SWMM-based methodology for block-scale LID-BMPs planning based on site-scale multi-objective optimization: a case study in Tianjin. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 11(4): 1

[52]

Xu Z X, Hua W Y, Xiong L J, He Z. (2020). Novel design of volume of detention tanks assisted by a multi-source pollution overflow model towards pollution control in urban drainage basins. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(11): 12781–12791

[53]

Zeng S Y, Guo H, Dong X. (2019). Understanding the synergistic effect between LID facility and drainage network: with a comprehensive perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 246: 849–859

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press 2025

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (6401KB)

Supplementary files

FSE-25081-OF-LBQ_suppl_1

358

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/