Mitigation of hydrogen sulfide production in sewer systems by inhibiting sulfate-reducing bacteria: a review

Zheng Qi, Tipei Jia, Wenjie Cong, Jinying Xi

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3) : 39.

PDF(2748 KB)
PDF(2748 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3) : 39. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-025-1959-x
REVIEW ARTICLE

Mitigation of hydrogen sulfide production in sewer systems by inhibiting sulfate-reducing bacteria: a review

Author information +
History +

Highlights

● Key strategies for H2S control in sewer systems were critically reviewed.

● Mechanisms for reducing H2S by inhibiting SRB metabolism were discussed.

● Advantages and limitations of chemical versus biological H2S control were analyzed.

● Enhanced SRB inhibition through bioaugmentation and chemical synergy were proposed.

Abstract

The emission of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) in sewers leads to pipeline corrosion and odor issues. Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) reduce sulfate as the main pathway for H2S production in wastewater. Inhibiting SRB activity through chemical or biological methods is an effective strategy to reduce H2S emissions. Therefore, the objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive summary of research in the reduction of H2S production in sewer systems via inhibition of the metabolic activity of SRB. This study provides an understanding on the complex metabolism of SRB, which is crucial for mitigating H2S generation in sewer systems. This review addresses H2S production in sewer systems and its reduction methods by inhibiting SRB activity using both chemical and biological methods. Currently, the addition of chemicals to sewer systems to control H2S has shown good effectiveness. However, these methods face challenges such as the need for repeated dosing, short effective durations, bacterial resistance, and increased loads on downstream wastewater treatment plants. Biological agents are more environmentally friendly, but research on their application for controlling H2S in sewer systems is limited, and their effectiveness and stability are yet to be determined. This review analyses the potential of chemical and biological methods, discusses current applications and future research directions based on SRB inhibition mechanisms, and provides insights for developing more efficient and ecofriendly strategies for H2S control in sewer systems.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Chemical dosing / Biological agent / Hydrogen sulfide / Sewer systems / Sulfate-reducing bacteria

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zheng Qi, Tipei Jia, Wenjie Cong, Jinying Xi. Mitigation of hydrogen sulfide production in sewer systems by inhibiting sulfate-reducing bacteria: a review. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2025, 19(3): 39 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-025-1959-x

References

[1]
Berditsch M, Lux H, Babii O, Afonin S, Ulrich A S. (2016). Therapeutic potential of gramicidin S in the treatment of root canal infections. Pharmaceuticals, 9(3): 56
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Bhattacharya S K, Uberoi V, Dronamraju M M. (1996). Interaction between acetate fed sulfate reducers and methanogens. Water Research, 30(10): 2239–2246
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Brogden K A. (2005). Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria? Nature Reviews. Microbiology, 3(3): 238–250
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Canfield D E, Desmarais D J. (1991). Aerobic sulfate reduction in microbial mats. Science, 251(5000): 1471–1473
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Castro H F, Williams N H, Ogram A. (2000). Phylogeny of sulfate-reducing bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 31(1): 1–9
[6]
Cen X, Li J, Jiang G, Zheng M. (2023). A critical review of chemical uses in urban sewer systems. Water Research, 240: 120108
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Chen H, Laws E A, Martin J L, Berhane T K, Gulig P A, Williams H N. (2018). Relative contributions of Halobacteriovorax and bacteriophage to bacterial cell death under various environmental conditions. mBio, 9(4): 01202–01218
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Chen H, Wu J, Liu B, Li Y Y, Yasui H. (2019). Competitive dynamics of anaerobes during long-term biological sulfate reduction process in a UASB reactor. Bioresource Technology, 280: 173–182
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Chen Y, Luo J, Yan Y, Feng L. (2013). Enhanced production of short-chain fatty acid by co-fermentation of waste activated sludge and kitchen waste under alkaline conditions and its application to microbial fuel cells. Applied Energy, 102: 1197–1204
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Chetty K, Garbe U, Mccarthy T, Hai F, Jiang G. (2023). Long-term self-healing efficiency of bioconcrete based on integrated sulfate- and nitrate-reducing bacterial granules. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 35(9): 12
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Chislett M, Guo J H, Bond P L, Wang Y, Donose B C, Yuan Z G. (2022). Reactive nitrogen species from free nitrous acid (FNA) cause cell lysis. Water Research, 217: 118401
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Colleran E, Finnegan S, Lens P. (1995). Anaerobic treatment of sulphate-containing waste streams. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 67(1): 29–46
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
da Silva S M, Voordouw J, Leitao C, Martins M, Voordouw G, Pereira I A C. (2013). Function of formate dehydrogenases in Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough energy metabolism. Microbiology, 159(Pt_8): 1760–1769
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Dai X H, Hu C L, Zhang D, Dai L L, Duan N N. (2017). Impact of a high ammonia-ammonium-pH system on methane-producing archaea and sulfate-reducing bacteria in mesophilic anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technology, 245: 598–605
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Dai X R, Blanes-Vidal V. (2013). Emissions of ammonia, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide from swine wastewater during and after acidification treatment: effect of pH, mixing and aeration. Journal of Environmental Management, 115: 147–154
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Dar S A, Kleerebezem R, Stams A J M, Kuenen J G, Muyzer G. (2008). Competition and coexistence of sulfate-reducing bacteria, acetogens and methanogens in a lab-scale anaerobic bioreactor as affected by changing substrate to sulfate ratio. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 78(6): 1045–1055
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Deng Q, Wu X, Wang Y, Liu M. (2018). Activity characteristics of sulfate reducing bacteria and formation mechanism of hydrogen sulfide. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 16(5): 6369–6383
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Despot D, Reinhold L, Barjenbruch M. (2022). Assessment of limited downstream nitrate dosing for sulphide control in pressure sewers: case study in Germany. Water Practice & Technology, 17(10): 2031–2047
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Dev S, Patra A, Mukherjee A, Bhattacharya J. (2015). Suitability of different growth substrates as source of nitrogen for sulfate reducing bacteria. Biodegradation, 26(6): 415–430
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Di Luca M, Maccari G, Maisetta G, Batoni G. (2015). BaAMPs: the database of biofilm-active antimicrobial peptides. Biofouling, 31(2): 193–199
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Dong Y R, Wang J B, Gao Z Q, Di J Z, Wang D, Guo X Y, Hu Z Y, Gao X L, Wang Y F. (2023). Study on growth influencing factors and desulfurization performance of sulfate reducing bacteria based on the response surface methodology. Acs Omega, 8(4): 4046–4059
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Duan H R, Gao S H, Li X, Ab Hamid N H, Jiang G M, Zheng M, Bai X, Bond P L, Lu X Y, Chislett M M. . (2020). Improving wastewater management using free nitrous acid (FNA). Water Research, 171: 115382
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Fan F, Zhang B, Liu J, Cai Q, Lin W, Chen B. (2020). Towards sulfide removal and sulfate reducing bacteria inhibition: function of biosurfactants produced by indigenous isolated nitrate reducing bacteria. Chemosphere, 238: 124655
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Fang W W, Gu M F, Liang D Q, Chen G H, Wang S Q. (2020). Generation of zero valent sulfur from dissimilatory sulfate reduction under methanogenic conditions. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 383: 121197
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Ganigue R, Gutierrez O, Rootsey R, Yuan Z. (2011). Chemical dosing for sulfide control in Australia: an industry survey. Water Research, 45(19): 6564–6574
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Gao Y H, Shi X, Jin X, Wang X C, Jin P K. (2023a). A critical review of wastewater quality variation and in-sewer processes during conveyance in sewer systems. Water Research, 228: 119398
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Gao Y, Jiang J, Meng Y, Ju T, Han S. (2023b). Influence of H2S and NH3 on biogas dry reforming using Ni catalyst: a study on single and synergetic effect. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 17(3): 32
[28]
Gong C, Jiang X. (2015). Application of bacteriophages to reduce biofilms formed by hydrogen sulfide producing bacteria on surfaces in a rendering plant. Poultry Science, 61(8): 539–544
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Guo H, Tian L, Liu S, Wang Y, Hou J, Zhu T, Liu Y. (2023). The potent effects of polyoxometalates (POMs) on controlling sulfide and methane production from sewers. Chemical Engineering Journal, 453: 139955
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Gutierrez O, Mohanakrishnan J, Sharma K R, Meyer R L, Keller J, Yuan Z. (2008). Evaluation of oxygen injection as a means of controlling sulfide production in a sewer system. Water Research, 42(17): 4549–4561
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Gutierrez O, Park D, Sharma K R, Yuan Z. (2009). Effects of long-term pH elevation on the sulfate-reducing and methanogenic activities of anaerobic sewer biofilms. Water Research, 43(9): 2549–2557
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Gutierrez O, Sudarjanto G, Ren G, Ganigue R, Jiang G, Yuan Z. (2014). Assessment of pH shock as a method for controlling sulfide and methane formation in pressure main sewer systems. Water Research, 48: 569–578
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Gutierrez O, Sudarjanto G, Sharma K R, Keller J, Yuan Z G. (2011). SCORe-CT: a new method for testing effectiveness of sulfide-control chemicals used in sewer systems. Water Science and Technology, 64(12): 2381–2388
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Hao O J, Chen J M, Huang L, Buglass R L. (1996). Sulfate-reducing bacteria. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 26(2): 155–187
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Hao T W, Xiang P Y, Mackey H R, Chi K, Lu H, Chui H K, Van Loosdrecht M C M, Chen G H. (2014). A review of biological sulfate conversions in wastewater treatment. Water Research, 65: 1–21
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Hassan A N, Nelson B K. (2012). Invited review: anaerobic fermentation of dairy food wastewater. Journal of Dairy Science, 95(11): 6188–6203
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Hatchikian E C, Le Gall J, Bruschi M, Dubourdieu M. (1972). Regulation of reduction of sulfite and thiosulfate by ferredoxin, flavodoxin and cytochrome CC’3 in extracts of sulfate reducer Desulfovibrio-Gigas. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 258(3): 701–708
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Heidelberg J F, Seshadri R, Haveman S A, Hemme C L, Paulsen I T, Kolonay J F, Eisen J A, Ward N, Methe B, Brinkac L M. . (2004). The genome sequence of the anaerobic, sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough. Nature Biotechnology, 22(5): 554–559
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Hilton B L, Oleszkiewicz J A. (1988). Sulfide induced inhibition of anaerobic digestion. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 114(6): 1377–1391
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Ito T, Nielsen J L, Okabe S, Watanabe Y, Nielsen P H. (2002). Phylogenetic identification and substrate uptake patterns of sulfate-reducing bacteria inhabiting an oxic-anoxic sewer biofilm determined by combining microautoradiography and fluorescent in situ hybridization. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68(1): 356–364
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Jayaraman A, Mansfeld F B, Wood T K. (1999a). Inhibiting sulfate-reducing bacteria in biofilms by expressing the antimicrobial peptides indolicidin and bactenecin. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 22(3): 167–175
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Jayaraman A, Ornek D, Duarte D A, Lee C C, Mansfeld F B, Wood T K. (1999b). Axenic aerobic biofilms inhibit corrosion of copper and aluminum. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 52(6): 787–790
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
JeffersonBHurst AStuetzRParsonsS A (2002). A comparison of chemical methods for the control of odours in wastewater. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 80(2 B2): 93–99
[44]
Jespersen M, Wagner T. (2023). Assimilatory sulfate reduction in the marine methanogen Methanothermococcus thermolithotrophicus. Nature Microbiology, 8(7): 1227–1239
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Jiang G, Gutierrez O, Sharma K R, Yuan Z. (2010). Effects of nitrite concentration and exposure time on sulfide and methane production in sewer systems. Water Research, 44(14): 4241–4251
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Jiang G, Keating A, Corrie S, O’Halloran K, Nguyen L, Yuan Z. (2013a). Dosing free nitrous acid for sulfide control in sewers: results of field trials in Australia. Water Research, 47(13): 4331–4339
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Jiang G, Sharma K R, Yuan Z. (2013b). Effects of nitrate dosing on methanogenic activity in a sulfide-producing sewer biofilm reactor. Water Research, 47(5): 1783–1792
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Jiang G M, Gutierrez O, Sharma K R, Keller J, Yuan Z G. (2011). Optimization of intermittent, simultaneous dosage of nitrite and hydrochloric acid to control sulfide and methane productions in sewers. Water Research, 45(18): 6163–6172
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Jin Z Y, Ci M T, Yang W Y, Shen D S, Hu L F, Fang C R, Long Y Y. (2020). Sulfate reduction behavior in the leachate saturated zone of landfill sites. Science of the Total Environment, 730: 138946
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Johnke J, Fraune S, Bosch T C G, Hentschel U, Schulenburg H. (2020). Bdellovibrio and like organisms are predictors of microbiome diversity in distinct host groups. Microbial Ecology, 79(1): 252–257
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Keller A A, Garner K, Miller R J, Lenihan H S. (2012). Toxicity of nano-zero valent iron to freshwater and marine organisms. PLoS One, 7(8): e43983
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Keller K L, Wall J D. (2011). Genetics and molecular biology of the electron flow for sulfate respiration in Desulfovibrio. Frontiers in Microbiology, 29(2): 135
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Kiilerich B, Kiilerich P, Nielsen A H, Vollertsen J. (2018). Variations in activities of sewer biofilms due to ferrous and ferric iron dosing. Water Science and Technology, 77(3): 845–858
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Kim J D, Park K M. (2006). Effectiveness of Lactobacillus plantarum strain KJ-10311 to remove characteristic malodorous gases in piggery slurry. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 19(1): 144–152
[55]
Kushkevych I, Cejnar J, Treml J, Dordevic D, Kollar P, Vítezová M. (2020). Recent advances in metabolic pathways of sulfate reduction in intestinal bacteria. Cells, 9(3): 698
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Lee K, Lee S, Lee S H, Kim S R, Oh H S, Park P K, Choo K H, Kim Y W, Lee J K, Lee C H. (2016). Fungal quorum quenching: a paradigm shift for energy savings in membrane bioreactor (MBR) for wastewater treatment. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(20): 10914–10922
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Lee M R, Choi Y, Bayo J, Bugenyi A W, Kim Y, Heo J. (2023). Effects of administration of prebiotics alone or in combination with probiotics on in vitro fermentation kinetics, malodor compound emission and microbial community structure in swine. Fermentation, 9(8): 716
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
Li X, Lan S, Zhu Z, Zhang C, Zeng G, Liu Y, Cao W, Song B, Yang H, Wang S. . (2018). The bioenergetics mechanisms and applications of sulfate-reducing bacteria in remediation of pollutants in drainage: a review. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 158: 162–170
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Li X Z, Luo Q W, Wofford N Q, Keller K L, Mcinerney M J, Wall J D, Krumholz L R. (2009). A molybdopterin oxidoreductase is involved in H2 oxidation in Desulfovibrio desulfuricans G20. Journal of Bacteriology, 191(8): 2675–2682
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Liang S, Zhang L, Jiang F. (2016). Indirect sulfur reduction via polysulfide contributes to serious odor problem in a sewer receiving nitrate dosage. Water Research, 100: 421–428
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Liang Z, Wu D, Li G, Sun J, Jiang F, Li Y. (2023). Experimental and modeling investigations on the unexpected hydrogen sulfide rebound in a sewer receiving nitrate addition: mechanism and solution. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 125: 630–640
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Liang Z S, Zhang L, Wu D, Chen G H, Jiang F. (2019). Systematic evaluation of a dynamic sewer process model for prediction of odor formation and mitigation in large-scale pressurized sewers in Hong Kong. Water Research, 154: 94–103
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Lin Q, Deslouches B, Montelaro R C, Di Y P. (2018). Prevention of ESKAPE pathogen biofilm formation by antimicrobial peptides WLBU2 and LL37. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 52(5): 667–672
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Liu H, Wang M, Huang Z, Du H, Tang H. (2004). Study on biological control of microbiologically induced corrosion of carbon steel. Materials and Corrosion, 55(5): 387–391
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
Lou Y, Chang W, Cui T, Wang J, Qian H, Ma L, Hao X, Zhang D. (2021). Microbiologically influenced corrosion inhibition mechanisms in corrosion protection: a review. Bioelectrochemistry, 141: 107883
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
LovleyD RHolmes D ENevinK P (2004). Advances in Microbial Physiology. London: Academic Press
[67]
Mathews E R, Barnett D, Petrovski S, Franks A E. (2018). Reviewing microbial electrical systems and bacteriophage biocontrol as targeted novel treatments for reducing hydrogen sulfide emissions in urban sewer systems. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, 17(4): 749–764
CrossRef Google scholar
[68]
Mathews E R, Wood J L, Phillips D, Billington N, Barnett D, Franks A E. (2020). Town-scale microbial sewer community and H2S emissions response to common chemical and biological dosing treatments. Journal of Environmental Sciences-China, 87: 133–148
CrossRef Google scholar
[69]
McCrory D F, Hobbs P J. (2001). Additives to reduce ammonia and odor emissions from livestock wastes: a review. Journal of Environmental Quality, 30(2): 345–355
CrossRef Google scholar
[70]
Mohanakrishnan J, Gutierrez O, Meyer R L, Yuan Z. (2008). Nitrite effectively inhibits sulfide and methane production in a laboratory scale sewer reactor. Water Research, 42(14): 3961–3971
CrossRef Google scholar
[71]
Mohanakrishnan J, Gutierrez O, Sharma K R, Guisasola A, Werner U, Meyer R L, Keller J, Yuan Z. (2009). Impact of nitrate addition on biofilm properties and activities in rising main sewers. Water Research, 43(17): 4225–4237
CrossRef Google scholar
[72]
Muller C, Guevarra K, Summers A, Pierce L, Shahbaz P, Zemke P E, Woodland K, Hollingsworth V, Nakhla G, Bell K, Bronstad E. (2022). A review of the practical application of micro-aeration and oxygenation for hydrogen sulfide management in anaerobic digesters. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 165: 126–137
CrossRef Google scholar
[73]
Muyzer G, Stams A J M. (2008). The ecology and biotechnology of sulphate-reducing bacteria. Nature Reviews. Microbiology, 6(6): 441–454
CrossRef Google scholar
[74]
Noguera D R, Brusseau G A, Rittmann B E, Stahl D A. (1998). Unified model describing the role of hydrogen in the growth of Desulfovibrio vulgaris under different environmental conditions. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 59(6): 732–746
CrossRef Google scholar
[75]
Ontiveros-Valencia A, Ilhan Z E, Kang D W, Rittmann B, Krajmalnik-Brown R. (2013a). Phylogenetic analysis of nitrate- and sulfate-reducing bacteria in a hydrogen-fed biofilm. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 85(1): 158–167
CrossRef Google scholar
[76]
Ontiveros-Valencia A, Tang Y N, Krajmalnik-Brown R, Rittmann B E. (2013b). Perchlorate reduction from a highly contaminated groundwater in the presence of sulfate-reducing bacteria in a hydrogen-fed biofilm. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 110(12): 3139–3147
CrossRef Google scholar
[77]
Ontiveros-Valencia A, Ziv-El M, Zhao H P, Feng L, Rittmann B E, Krajmalnik-Brown R. (2012). Interactions between nitrate-reducing and sulfate-reducing bacteria coexisting in a hydrogen-fed biofilm. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(20): 11289–11298
CrossRef Google scholar
[78]
Otwell A E, Carr A V, Majumder E L W, Ruiz M K, Wilpiszeski R L, Hoang L T, Webb B, Turkarslan S, Gibbons S M, Elias D A. . (2021). Sulfur metabolites play key system-level roles in modulating denitrification. mSystems, 6(1): e01025–20
CrossRef Google scholar
[79]
Ou D Y, Chen B, Bai R N, Song P Q, Lin H S. (2015). Contamination of sulfonamide antibiotics and sulfamethazine-resistant bacteria in the downstream and estuarine areas of Jiulong River in Southeast China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 22(16): 12104–12113
CrossRef Google scholar
[80]
Padival N A, Weiss J S, Arnold R G. (1995). Control of Thiobacillus by means of microbial competition: implications for corrosion of concrete sewers. Water Environment Research, 67(2): 201–205
CrossRef Google scholar
[81]
Park S, Chung J, Rittmann B E, Bae W. (2015). Nitrite accumulation from simultaneous free-ammonia and free-nitrous-acid inhibition and oxygen limitation in a continuous-flow biofilm reactor. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 112(1): 43–52
CrossRef Google scholar
[82]
Pester M, Brambilla E, Alazard D, Rattei T, Weinmaier T, Han J, Lucas S, Lapidus A, Cheng J F, Goodwin L. . (2012). Complete genome sequences of Desulfosporosinus orientis DSM765T, Desulfosporosinus youngiae DSM17734T, Desulfosporosinus meridiei DSM13257T, and Desulfosporosinus acidiphilus DSM22704T. Journal of Bacteriology, 194(22): 6300–6301
CrossRef Google scholar
[83]
Price M N, Ray J, Wetmore K M, Kuehl J V, Bauer S, Deutschbauer A M, Arkin A P. (2014). The genetic basis of energy conservation in the sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio alaskensis G20. Frontiers in Microbiology, 5: 577
CrossRef Google scholar
[84]
Qiu L N, Mao Y N, Gong A J, Tong L, Cao Y Q. (2015). Inhibition effect of thiobacillus denitrificans on the corrosion of X70 pipeline steel caused by sulfate-reducing bacteria in crude petroleum. Materials and Corrosion, 66(6): 588–593
CrossRef Google scholar
[85]
Rabus R, Venceslau S S, Wöhlbrand L, Voordouw G, Wall J D Pereira I A C. (2015). A post-genomic view of the ecophysiology, catabolism and biotechnological relevance of sulphate-reducing prokaryotes. Advances in Microbial Physiology, 66: 55–321
[86]
Ramos A R, Keller K L, Wall J D, Pereira I A C. (2012). The membrane QmoABC complex interacts directly with the dissimilatory adenosine 5′-phosphosulfate reductase sulfate reducing bacteria. Frontiers in Microbiology, 3: 137
CrossRef Google scholar
[87]
Rathnayake D, Sathasivan A, Kastl G, Bal Krishna K C. (2019). Hydrogen sulphide control in sewers by catalysing the reaction with oxygen. Science of the Total Environment, 689: 1192–1200
CrossRef Google scholar
[88]
Rebosura M Jr, Salehin S, Pikaar I, Kulandaivelu J, Jiang G, Keller J, Sharma K, Yuan Z. (2020). Effects of in-sewer dosing of iron-rich drinking water sludge on wastewater collection and treatment systems. Water Research, 171: 115396
CrossRef Google scholar
[89]
Rückert C. (2016). Sulfate reduction in microorganisms-recent advances and biotechnological applications. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 33: 140–146
CrossRef Google scholar
[90]
Salim A, Madhavan A, Babu P, Porayath C, Kesavan M, Hely S, Kumar V A, Nair B G, Pal S. (2021). Bacteriophage-based control of biogenic hydrogen sulphide produced by multidrug resistant Salmonella enterica in synthetic sewage. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 9(4): 105797
CrossRef Google scholar
[91]
Shammay A, Sivret E C, Le-Minh N, Lebrero Fernandez R, Evanson I, Stuetz R M. (2016). Review of odour abatement in sewer networks. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 4(4): 3866–3881
CrossRef Google scholar
[92]
Shi X, Gao G, Tian J, Wang X C, Jin X, Jin P. (2020). Symbiosis of sulfate-reducing bacteria and methanogenic archaea in sewer systems. Environment International, 143: 105923
CrossRef Google scholar
[93]
Stillger L, Müller D. (2022). Peptide-coating combating antimicrobial contaminations: a review of covalent immobilization strategies for industrial applications. Journal of Materials Science, 57(24): 10863–10885
CrossRef Google scholar
[94]
Stillger L, Viau L, Kamm L, Holtmann D, Müller D. (2023). Optimization of antimicrobial peptides for the application against biocorrosive bacteria. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 107(12): 4041–4049
CrossRef Google scholar
[95]
Stoeva M K, Coates J D. (2019). Specific inhibitors of respiratory sulfate reduction: towards a mechanistic understanding. Microbiology, 165(3): 254–269
CrossRef Google scholar
[96]
Sudarjanto G, Gutierrez O, Ren G, Yuan Z. (2013). Laboratory assessment of bioproducts for sulphide and methane control in sewer systems. Science of the Total Environment, 443: 429–437
CrossRef Google scholar
[97]
TripathiSChandra RPurchaseDBilalMMythiliR YadavS (2022). Quorum sensing: a promising tool for degradation of industrial waste containing persistent organic pollutants. Environmental Pollution, 292(Pt B): 118342
[98]
Usher K M, Kaksonen A H, Bouquet D, Cheng K Y, Geste Y, Chapman P G, Johnston C D. (2015). The role of bacterial communities and carbon dioxide on the corrosion of steel. Corrosion Science, 98: 354–365
CrossRef Google scholar
[99]
van den Brand T P H, Roest K, Brdjanovic D, Chen G H, Van Loosdrecht M C M. (2014). Influence of acetate and propionate on sulphate-reducing bacteria activity. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 117(6): 1839–1847
CrossRef Google scholar
[100]
Venceslau S S, Lino R R, Pereira I A C. (2010). The Qrc membrane complex, related to the alternative complex III, is a menaquinone reductase involved in sulfate respiration. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 285(30): 22774–22781
CrossRef Google scholar
[101]
Veshaguri S, Christensen S M, Kemmer G C, Ghale G, Moller M P, Lohr C, Christensen A L, Justesen B H, Jorgensen I L, Schiller J. . (2016). Direct observation of proton pumping by a eukaryotic P-type ATPase. Science, 351(6280): 1469–1473
CrossRef Google scholar
[102]
Vroblesky D A, Bradley P M, Chapelle F H. (1996). Influence of electron donor on the minimum sulfate concentration required for sulfate reduction in a petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated aquifer. Environmental Science & Technology, 30(4): 1377–1381
CrossRef Google scholar
[103]
Wang J, Cheng Z, Wang J, Chen D, Chen J, Yu J, Qiu S, Dionysiou D D. (2023a). Enhancement of bio-S0 recovery and revealing the inhibitory effect on microorganisms under high sulfide loading. Environmental Research, 238: 117214
CrossRef Google scholar
[104]
Wang J, Xue F, Cheng Z, Wang J, Chen D, Zhao J, Qiu S. (2023b). Temperature and pH on microbial desulfurization of sulfide wastewater: from removal performance to gene regulation mechanism. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 53: 103720
CrossRef Google scholar
[105]
Wang Y, Zheng X, Wu G, Guan Y. (2023c). Removal of ammonium and nitrate through Anammox and FeS-driven autotrophic denitrification. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 17(6): 74
CrossRef Google scholar
[106]
Williamson A J, Engelbrektson A L, Liu Y, Huang L L, Kumar A, Menon A R, Thieme J, Carlson H K, Coates J D. (2020). Tungstate control of microbial sulfidogenesis and souring of the engineered environment. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(24): 16119–16127
CrossRef Google scholar
[107]
Wu B, Wang R, Fane A G. (2017). The roles of bacteriophages in membrane-based water and wastewater treatment processes: a review. Water Research, 110: 120–132
CrossRef Google scholar
[108]
Wu M, Wang T, Wu K, Kan L L. (2020). Microbiologically induced corrosion of concrete in sewer structures: a review of the mechanisms and phenomena. Construction & Building Materials, 239: 117813
CrossRef Google scholar
[109]
Yan Z Y, Liu X F, Yuan Y X, Liao Y Z, Li X D. (2013). Deodorization study of the swine manure with two yeast strains. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering; BBE, 18(1): 135–143
CrossRef Google scholar
[110]
Yeung M, Tian L, Liu Y, Wang H, Xi J. (2024). Impacts of electrochemical disinfection on the viability and structure of the microbiome in secondary effluent water. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 18(5): 58
[111]
Yoda M, Kitagawa M, Miyaji Y. (1987). Long-term competition between sulfate-reducing and methane-producing bacteria for acetate in anaerobic biofilm. Water Research, 21(12): 1547–1556
CrossRef Google scholar
[112]
Yu R, Zhang S W, Chen Z K, Li C Y. (2017). Isolation and application of predatory Bdellovibrio-and-like organisms for municipal waste sludge biolysis and dewaterability enhancement. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 11(1): 10
CrossRef Google scholar
[113]
YuanXZhang XYangYLiXXingX ZuoJ (2024). Emission of greenhouse gases from sewer networks: field assessment and isotopic characterization. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 18(10): 119
[114]
Zhang L, de Schryver P, de Gusseme B, de Muynck W, Boon N, Verstraete W. (2008). Chemical and biological technologies for hydrogen sulfide emission control in sewer systems: a review. Water Research, 42(1−2): 1–12
CrossRef Google scholar
[115]
Zhang L, Qiu Y Y, Zhou Y, Chen G H, Van Loosdrecht M C M, Jiang F. (2021a). Elemental sulfur as electron donor and/or acceptor: Mechanisms, applications and perspectives for biological water and wastewater treatment. Water Research, 202: 117373
CrossRef Google scholar
[116]
Zhang Z, Zhang C, Yang Y, Zhang Z, Tang Y, Su P, Lin Z. (2022). A review of sulfate-reducing bacteria: metabolism, influencing factors and application in wastewater treatment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 376: 134109
CrossRef Google scholar
[117]
Zhang Z Y, Ni M Y, He M, Tian L, Qin Y C, Zhuang D, Cheng Y H, Lin Y. (2021b). Competition and cooperation of sulfate reducing bacteria and five other bacteria during oil production. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering, 203: 108688
CrossRef Google scholar
[118]
Zheng R, Zhang K, Kong L, Liu S. (2024). Research progress and prospect of low-carbon biological technology for nitrate removal in wastewater treatment. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 18(7): 80
CrossRef Google scholar
[119]
Zheng T, Li W, Ma Y, Liu J. (2021). Time-based succession existed in rural sewer biofilms: bacterial communities, sulfate-reducing bacteria and methanogenic archaea, and sulfide and methane generation. Science of the Total Environment, 765: 144397
CrossRef Google scholar
[120]
Zhou C, Zhou Y, Rittmann B E. (2017). Reductive precipitation of sulfate and soluble Fe(III) by Desulfovibrio vulgaris: electron donor regulates intracellular electron flow and nano-FeS crystallization. Water Research, 119: 91–101
CrossRef Google scholar
[121]
Zhou X, Ren X, Chen Y, Feng H, Yu J, Peng K, Zhang Y, Chen W, Tang J, Wang J. . (2023). Bacteria inactivation by sulfate radical: progress and non-negligible disinfection by-products. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 17(3): 29
CrossRef Google scholar
[122]
Zhu W, Xiao R, Xu M, Chai W, Liu W, Jin Z, Ikumi D, Lu H. (2024). Unraveling the role of formate in improving nitrogen removal via coupled partial denitrification-anammox. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 18(9): 112
CrossRef Google scholar
[123]
Zhuang R Y, Lou Y J, Qiu X T, Zhao Y Y, Qian D, Yan X J, He X D, Shen Q Q, Qian L Z. (2017). Identification of a yeast strain able to oxidize and remove sulfide high efficiently. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 101(1): 391–400
CrossRef Google scholar
[124]
Zuo R. (2007). Biofilms: strategies for metal corrosion inhibition employing microorganisms. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 76(6): 1245–1253
CrossRef Google scholar
[125]
Zuo Z, Song Y, Ren D, Li H, Gao Y, Yuan Z, Huang X, Zheng M, Liu Y. (2020). Control sulfide and methane production in sewers based on free ammonia inactivation. Environment International, 143: 105928
CrossRef Google scholar
[126]
Zuo Z Q, Xing Y X, Duan H, Ren D H, Zheng M, Liu Y C, Huang X. (2023). Reducing sulfide and methane production in gravity sewer sediments through urine separation, collection and intermittent dosing. Water Research, 234: 119820
CrossRef Google scholar

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2022YFC3702000).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 Higher Education Press 2025
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(2748 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/