Enhanced methane production during long-term UASB operation at high organic loads as enabled by the immobilized Fungi

Qiong Guo, Zhichao Yang, Bingliang Zhang, Ming Hua, Changhong Liu, Bingcai Pan

PDF(2359 KB)
PDF(2359 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (6) : 71. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-021-1505-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Enhanced methane production during long-term UASB operation at high organic loads as enabled by the immobilized Fungi

Author information +
History +

Highlights

• Fungi enable the constant UASB operation even at OLR of 25.0 kg/(m3×d).

• The COD removal of 85.9% and methane production of 5.6 m3/(m3×d) are achieved.

• Fungi inhibit VFAs accumulation and favor EPS generation and sludge granulation.

• Fungi enrich methanogenic archaea and promote methanogenic pathways.

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion is widely applied in organic wastewater treatment coupled with bioenergy production, and how to stabilize its work at the high organic loading rate (OLR) remains a challenge. Herein, we proposed a new strategy to address this issue via involving the synergetic role of the Aspergillus sydowii 8L-9-F02 immobilized beads (AEBs). A long-term (210-day) continuous-mode operation indicated that the upflow anaerobic sludge bed (UASB) reactor (R1, with AEBs added) could achieve the OLR as high as 25.0 kg/(m3×d), whereas the control reactor (R0, with AEBs free) could only tolerate the maximum OLR of 13.3 kg/(m3×d). Remarkably, much higher COD removal (85.9% vs 23.9%) and methane production (5.4 m3/(m3×d) vs 2.2 m3/(m3×d)) were achieved in R1 than R0 at the OLR of 25.0 kg/(m3×d). Such favorable effect results from the facts that fungi inhibit VFAs accumulation, favor the pH stabilization, promote the generation of more extracellular polymeric substance, and enhance the sludge granulation and settleability. Moreover, fungi may enhance the secretion of acetyl-coenzyme A, a key compound in converting organic matters to CO2. In addition, fungi are favorable to enrich methanogenic archaea even at high OLR, improving the activity of acetate kinase and coenzyme F420 for more efficient methanogenic pathway. This work may shed new light on how to achieve higher OLR and methane production in anaerobic digestion of wastewater.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Anaerobic digestion / Fungi / Methane production / High OLR / Microbial community

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Qiong Guo, Zhichao Yang, Bingliang Zhang, Ming Hua, Changhong Liu, Bingcai Pan. Enhanced methane production during long-term UASB operation at high organic loads as enabled by the immobilized Fungi. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(6): 71 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1505-4

References

[1]
Akbar M, Khan M F S, Qian L, Wang H (2020). Degradation of polyacrylamide (PAM) and methane production by mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion: Effect of temperature and concentration. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 14(6): 98
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Al-Mashhadani M K H, Wilkinson S J, Zimmerman W B (2016). Carbon dioxide rich microbubble acceleration of biogas production in anaerobic digestion. Chemical Engineering Science, 156: 24–35
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Alef K, Nannipieri P (1995). Methods in Applied Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. Alef K and Nannipieri P,eds. London: Academic Press, 311–373
[4]
Ambuchi J J, Zhang Z, Shan L, Liang D, Zhang P, Feng Y (2017). Response of anaerobic granular sludge to iron oxide nanoparticles and multi-wall carbon nanotubes during beet sugar industrial wastewater treatment. Water Research, 117: 87–94
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[5]
APHA (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington, DC, USA: American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association(AWWA), Water Environment Federation (AEF)
[6]
Assress H A, Selvarajan R, Nyoni H, Ntushelo K, Mamba B B, Msagati T A M (2019). Diversity, co-occurrence and implications of fungal communities in wastewater treatment plants. Scientific Reports, 9(1): 14056
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[7]
Bajón Fernández Y, Soares A, Vale P, Koch K, Masse A L, Cartmell E (2019). Enhancing the anaerobic digestion process through carbon dioxide enrichment: initial insights into mechanisms of utilization. Environmental Technology, 40(13): 1744–1755
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[8]
Bajón Fernández Y, Soares A, Villa R, Vale P, Cartmell E (2014). Carbon capture and biogas enhancement by carbon dioxide enrichment of anaerobic digesters treating sewage sludge or food waste. Bioresource Technology, 159: 1–7
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[9]
Ceron-Chafla P, Kleerebezem R, Rabaey K, van Lier J B, Lindeboom R E F (2020). Direct and indirect effects of increased CO2 partial pressure on the bioenergetics of syntrophic propionate and butyrate conversion. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(19): 12583–12592
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[10]
Chen H, Wang Z, Liu H, Nie Y, Zhu Y, Jia Q, Ding G, Ye J (2021). Variable sediment methane production in response to different source-associated sewer sediment types and hydrological patterns: Role of the sediment microbiome. Water Research, 190: 116670
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[11]
Chen R, Nie Y, Tanaka N, Niu Q, Li Q, Li Y Y (2017). Enhanced methanogenic degradation of cellulose-containing sewage via fungi-methanogens syntrophic association in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Bioresource Technology, 245(Pt A): 810–818
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[12]
Chen W, Habibul N, Liu X Y, Sheng G P, Yu H Q (2015). FTIR and synchronous fluorescence heterospectral two-dimensional correlation analyses on the binding characteristics of copper onto dissolved organic matter. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(4): 2052–2058
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[13]
Dai X, Luo F, Zhang D, Dai L, Chen Y, Dong B (2015). Waste-activated sludge fermentation for polyacrylamide biodegradation improved by anaerobic hydrolysis and key microorganisms involved in biological polyacrylamide removal. Scientific Reports, 5(1): 11675
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[14]
Eirich L D, Vogels G D, Wolfe R S (1978). Proposed structure for coenzyme F420 from Methanobacterium. Biochemistry, 17(22): 4583–4593
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[15]
Fukuzaki S, Nishio N, Nagai S (1990). Kinetics of the methanogenic fermentation of acetate. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 56(10): 3158–3163
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[16]
Guo B, Zhang Y, Yu N, Liu Y (2021a). Impacts of conductive materials on microbial community during syntrophic propionate oxidization for biomethane recovery. Water Environment Research, 93(1): 84–93
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[17]
Guo H, Zhang Y, Huang Z, Liang W, Urynowicz M, Ali M I (2020). High potential of methane production from coal by fungi and hydrogenotrophic methanogens from produced water. Energy & Fuels, 34(9): 10958–10967
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Guo Q, Wang Y, Qian J, Zhang B, Hua M, Liu C, Pan B (2021b). Enhanced production of methane in anaerobic water treatment as mediated by the immobilized fungi. Water Research, 190: 116761
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[19]
Imran M, Anwar Z, Irshad M, Asad M J, Ashfaq H (2016). Cellulase production from species of fungi and bacteria from agricultural wastes and its utilization in industry: A review. Advances in Enzyme Research, 4(2): 44–55
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Katayama T, Kamagata Y (2017). Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology Protocols: Isolation and Cultivation. McGenity T J, Timmis K N, Nogales B, eds. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 177–195
[21]
Kim J, Lee C (2015). Response of a continuous biomethanation process to transient organic shock loads under controlled and uncontrolled pH conditions. Water Research, 73: 68–77
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[22]
Kong X, Wei Y, Xu S, Liu J, Li H, Liu Y, Yu S (2016). Inhibiting excessive acidification using zero-valent iron in anaerobic digestion of food waste at high organic load rates. Bioresource Technology, 211: 65–71
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[23]
Lee K, Lee S, Lee S H, Kim S R, Oh H S, Park P K, Choo K H, Kim Y W, Lee J K, Lee C H (2016). Fungal quorum quenching: A paradigm shift for energy savings in membrane bioreactor (MBR) for wastewater treatment. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(20): 10914–10922
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[24]
Li Q, Liu Y, Yang X, Zhang J, Lu B, Chen R (2020). Kinetic and thermodynamic effects of temperature on methanogenic degradation of acetate, propionate, butyrate and valerate. Chemical Engineering Journal, 396: 125366
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Li R, Zhou M, He S, Pan T, Liu J, Zhu J (2021a). Deciphering the effect of sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate on up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket treatment of synthetic sulfate-containing wastewater. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15(5): 91
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Li Y, Meng Z, Xu Y, Shi Q, Ma Y, Aung M, Cheng Y, Zhu W (2021b). Interactions between anaerobic fungi and methanogens in the rumen and their biotechnological potential in biogas production from lignocellulosic materials. Microorganisms, 9(1): 190
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[27]
Liu Y Q, Liu Y, Tay J H (2004). The effects of extracellular polymeric substances on the formation and stability of biogranules. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 65(2): 143–148
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[28]
Ma C, Jin R C, Yang G F, Yu J J, Xing B S, Zhang Q Q (2012). Impacts of transient salinity shock loads on Anammox process performance. Bioresource Technology, 112: 124–130
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[29]
Mayumi D, Dolfing J, Sakata S, Maeda H, Miyagawa Y, Ikarashi M, Tamaki H, Takeuchi M, Nakatsu C H, Kamagata Y (2013). Carbon dioxide concentration dictates alternative methanogenic pathways in oil reservoirs. Nature Communications, 4(1): 1998
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[30]
Mohd Yasin N H, Maeda T, Hu A, Yu C P, Wood T K (2015). CO2 sequestration by methanogens in activated sludge for methane production. Applied Energy, 142: 426–434
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Mostafa Y S, Alamri S A, Hashem M, Nafady N A, Abo-Elyousr K A M, Mohamed Z A (2020). Thermostable cellulase biosynthesis from Paenibacillus alvei and its utilization in lactic acid production by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. Open Life Sciences, 15(1): 185–197
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[32]
Nguyen D, Wu Z, Shrestha S, Lee P H, Raskin L, Khanal S K (2019). Intermittent micro-aeration: New strategy to control volatile fatty acid accumulation in high organic loading anaerobic digestion. Water Research, 166: 115080
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[33]
Pennings J L A, Keltjens J T, Vogels G D (1998). Isolation and characterization of Methanobacteriumthermoautotrophicum ΔH mutants unable to grow under hydrogen-deprived conditions. Journal of Bacteriology, 180(10): 2676–2681
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[34]
Rothstein A (1971). Current Topics in Membranes and Transport. Bronner F, Kleinzeller A, eds. Washington, DC: Academic Press, 135–176
[35]
Sobieraj M, Boone D R (2006). The Prokaryotes: Volume 4: Bacteria: Firmicutes, Cyanobacteria. Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer K H, Stackebrandt E, eds. New York, NY: Springer US, 1041–1049
[36]
Sundberg C, Al-Soud W A, Larsson M, Alm E, Yekta S S, Svensson B H, Sørensen S J, Karlsson A (2013). 454 pyrosequencing analyses of bacterial and archaeal richness in 21 full-scale biogas digesters. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 85(3): 612–626
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[37]
Surendra K C, Sawatdeenarunat C, Shrestha S, Sung S, Khanal S K (2015). Anaerobic digestion-based biorefinery for bioenergy and biobased products. Industrial Biotechnology (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 11(2): 103–112
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Tezel U, Padhye L P, Huang C H, Pavlostathis S G (2011). Biotransformation of nitrosamines and precursor secondary amines under methanogenic conditions. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(19): 8290–8297
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[39]
Tian Z, Zhang Y, Li Y, Chi Y, Yang M (2015). Rapid establishment of thermophilic anaerobic microbial community during the one-step startup of thermophilic anaerobic digestion from a mesophilic digester. Water Research, 69: 9–19
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[40]
Torres K, Álvarez-Hornos F J, San-Valero P, Gabaldón C, Marzal P (2018). Granulation and microbial community dynamics in the chitosan-supplemented anaerobic treatment of wastewater polluted with organic solvents. Water Research, 130: 376–387
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[41]
Tsui T H, Ekama G A, Chen G H (2018). Quantitative characterization and analysis of granule transformations: Role of intermittent gas sparging in a super high-rate anaerobic system. Water Research, 139: 177–186
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[42]
Ueno Y, Haruta S, Ishii M, Igarashi Y (2001). Changes in product formation and bacterial community by dilution rate on carbohydrate fermentation by methanogenic microflora in continuous flow stirred tank reactor. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 57(1-2): 65–73
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[43]
Van Lier J B, Mahmoud N, Zeeman G (2008). Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment. Henze M, van Loosdrecht M C M, Ekama G A, Brdjanovic D, eds. London: IWA Publishing
[44]
Vigneron A, Alsop E B, Lomans B P, Kyrpides N C, Head I M, Tsesmetzis N (2017). Succession in the petroleum reservoir microbiome through an oil field production lifecycle. The ISME Journal, 11(9): 2141–2154
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[45]
Wu J, Afridi Z U R, Cao Z P, Zhang Z L, Poncin S, Li H Z, Zuo J E, Wang K J (2016). Size effect of anaerobic granular sludge on biogas production: A micro scale study. Bioresource Technology, 202: 165–171
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[46]
Yang Y C, Liu X, Wan C, Sun S, Lee D J (2014). Accelerated aerobic granulation using alternating feed loadings: Alginate-like exopolysaccharides. Bioresource Technology, 171: 360–366
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[47]
Zhang Y, Wei W, Fan J, Jin C, Lu L, Fang W (2020). Aspergillus fumigatus mitochondrial acetyl Coenzyme A acetyltransferase as an antifungal target. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 86(7): e02986–02919
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[48]
Zhou W, Imai T, Ukita M, Sekine M, Higuchi T (2006). Triggering forces for anaerobic granulation in UASB reactors. Process Biochemistry, 41(1): 36–43
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported from the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21925602 and 51761165011).

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1505-4 and is accessible for authorized users.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2021 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(2359 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/