Membrane-based treatment of shale oil and gas wastewater: The current state of knowledge

Abstract

• Shale oil and gas production generates wastewater with complex composition.

• Membrane technologies emerged for the treatment of shale oil and gas wastewater.

• Membrane technologies should tolerate high TDS and consume low primary energy.

• Pretreatment is a key component of integrated wastewater treatment systems.

• Full-scale implementation of membrane technologies is highly desirable.

Shale oil and gas exploitation not only consumes substantial amounts of freshwater but also generates large quantities of hazardous wastewater. Tremendous research efforts have been invested in developing membrane-based technologies for the treatment of shale oil and gas wastewater. Despite their success at the laboratory scale, membrane processes have not been implemented at full scale in the oil and gas fields. In this article, we analyze the growing demands of wastewater treatment in shale oil and gas production, and then critically review the current stage of membrane technologies applied to the treatment of shale oil and gas wastewater. We focus on the unique niche of those technologies due to their advantages and limitations, and use mechanical vapor compression as the benchmark for comparison. We also highlight the importance of pretreatment as a key component of integrated treatment trains, in order to improve the performance of downstream membrane processes and water product quality. We emphasize the lack of sufficient efforts to scale up existing membrane technologies, and suggest that a stronger collaboration between academia and industry is of paramount importance to translate membrane technologies developed in the laboratory to the practical applications by the shale oil and gas industry.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Shale oil and gas production / Wastewater treatment and reuse / Membrane technology / Pretreatment / Academia-industry collaboration

References

[1] Ahmadun F R, Pendashteh A, Abdullah L C, Biak D R A, Madaeni S S, Abidin Z Z (2009). Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 170(2-3): 530–551

[2] Alessi D S, Zolfaghari A, Kletke S, Gehman J, Allen D M, Goss G G (2017). Comparative analysis of hydraulic fracturing wastewater practices in unconventional shale development: Water sourcing, treatment and disposal practices. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 42(2): 105–121

[3] Alzahrani S, Mohammad A W, Hilal N, Abdullah P, Jaafar O (2013). Identification of foulants, fouling mechanisms and cleaning efficiency for NF and RO treatment of produced water. Separation and Purification Technology, 118: 324–341

[4] Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (2016). Fact Sheet and Supplementary Information for General Permit Discharges from Groundwater and Surface Water Clean Up Located within the State of Arkansas

[5] Aybar H S (2002). Analysis of a mechanical vapor compression desalination system. Desalination, 142(2): 181–186

[6] Bahar R, Hawlader M N A, Woei L S (2004). Performance evaluation of a mechanical vapor compression desalination system. Desalination, 166(1–3): 123–127

[7] Bai B, Carlson K, Prior A, Douglas C (2015). Sources of variability in flowback and produced water volumes from shale oil and gas wells. Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources, 12: 1–5

[8] Bai B, Goodwin S, Carlson K (2013). Modeling of frac flowback and produced water volume from Wattenberg oil and gas field. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering, 108: 383–392

[9] Bell E A, Poynor T E, Newhart K B, Regnery J, Coday B D, Cath T Y (2017). Produced water treatment using forward osmosis membranes: Evaluation of extended-time performance and fouling. Journal of Membrane Science, 525: 77–88

[10] Bond R, Veerapaneni S (2007). Zero liquid discharge for inland desalination. No. 500–01–040. Denver, CO: AWWA Research Foundation

[11] Boo C, Lee J, Elimelech M (2016a). Engineering surface energy and nanostructure of microporous films for expanded membrane distillation applications. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(15): 8112–8119

[12] Boo C, Lee J, Elimelech M (2016b). Omniphobic polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane for desalination of shale gas produced water by membrane distillation. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(22): 12275–12282

[13] Brantley S L, Yoxtheimer D, Arjmand S, Grieve P, Vidic R, Pollak J, Llewellyn G T, Abad J, Simon C (2014). Water resource impacts during unconventional shale gas development: The Pennsylvania experience. International Journal of Coal Geology, 126: 140–156

[14] Burbano A, Brankhuber P (2012). Demonstration of membrane zero liquid discharge for drinking water systems: A literature review. Alexandria, VA: Water Environment Research Foundation

[15] Butkovskyi A, Bruning H, Kools S A E, Rijnaarts H H M, Van Wezel A P (2017). Organic pollutants in shale gas flowback and produced waters: Identification, potential ecological impact, and implications for treatment strategies. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(9): 4740–4754

[16] Cath T Y, Childress A E, Elimelech M (2006). Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments. Journal of Membrane Science, 281(1–2): 70–87

[17] Chang H, Li T, Liu B, Vidic R, Elimelech M, Crittenden J C (2019a). Potential and implemented membrane-based technologies for the treatment and reuse of flowback and produced water from shale gas and oil plays: A review. Desalination, 455: 34–57

[18] Chang H Q, Liu B C, Yang B X, Yang X, Guo C, He Q P, Liang S M, Chen S, Yang P (2019b). An integrated coagulation-ultrafiltration-nanofiltration process for internal reuse of shale gas flowback and produced water. Separation and Purification Technology, 211: 310–321

[19] Chen G, Wang Z W, Nghiem L D, Li X M, Xie M, Zhao B L, Zhang M X, Song J F, He T (2015). Treatment of shale gas drilling flowback fluids (SGDFs) by forward osmosis: Membrane fouling and mitigation. Desalination, 366: 113–120

[20] Chermak J A, Schreiber M E (2014). Mineralogy and trace element geochemistry of gas shales in the United States: Environmental implications. International Journal of Coal Geology, 126: 32–44

[21] Chevron Corporation (2018). Chevron tech challenge: Produced water- Unlocking a valuable natural resource

[22] Chew N G P, Zhao S S, Loh C H, Permogorov N, Wang R (2017). Surfactant effects on water recovery from produced water via direct-contact membrane distillation. Journal of Membrane Science, 528: 126–134

[23] Cho Y H, Kim H W, Nam S Y, Park H B (2011). Fouling-tolerant polysulfone-poly(ethylene oxide) random copolymer ultrafiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 379(1–2): 296–306

[24] Coday B D, Almaraz N, Cath T Y (2015). Forward osmosis desalination of oil and gas wastewater: Impacts of membrane selection and operating conditions on process performance. Journal of Membrane Science, 488: 40–55

[25] Coday B D, Cath T Y (2014). Forward osmosis: Novel desalination of produced water and fracturing flowback. Journal- American Water Works Association, 106(2): E55–E66

[26] Coday B D, Xu P, Beaudry E G, Herron J, Lampi K, Hancock N T, Cath T Y (2014). The sweet spot of forward osmosis: Treatment of produced water, drilling wastewater, and other complex and difficult liquid streams. Desalination, 333(1): 23–35

[27] Davenport D M, Deshmukh A, Werber J R, Elimelech M (2018). High-pressure reverse osmosis for energy-efficient hypersaline brine desalination: Current status, design considerations, and research needs. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 5(8): 467–475

[28] Deshmukh A, Boo C, Karanikola V, Lin S H, Straub A P, Tong T Z, Warsinger D M, Elimelech M (2018). Membrane distillation at the water-energy nexus: limits, opportunities, and challenges. Energy & Environmental Science, 11(5): 1177–1196

[29] Du X W, Zhang Z Y, Carlson K H, Lee J, Tong T Z (2018). Membrane fouling and reusability in membrane distillation of shale oil and gas produced water: Effects of membrane surface wettability. Journal of Membrane Science, 567: 199–208

[30] Duong H C, Chivas A R, Nelemans B, Duke M, Gray S, Cath T Y, Nghiem L D (2015). Treatment of RO brine from CSG produced water by spiral-wound air gap membrane distillation: A pilot study. Desalination, 366: 121–129

[31] Eastern Municipal Water District and Carollo Engineers (2008). Evaluation and selection of available processes for a zero-liquid discharge system for the Perris, California ground water basin. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation

[32] Elimelech M, Phillip W A (2011). The future of seawater desalination: Energy, technology, and the environment. Science, 333(6043): 712–717

[33] Esmaeilirad N, Carlson K, Omur Ozbek P (2015). Influence of softening sequencing on electrocoagulation treatment of produced water. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 283: 721–729

[34] Ferrer I, Thurman E M (2015). Chemical constituents and analytical approaches for hydraulic fracturing waters. Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 5: 18–25

[35] Forrestal C, Stoll Z, Xu P, Ren Z J (2015). Microbial capacitive desalination for integrated organic matter and salt removal and energy production from unconventional natural gas produced water. Environmental Science. Water Research & Technology, 1(1): 47–55

[36] Freedman D E, Riley S M, Jones Z L, Rosenblum J S, Sharp J O, Spear J R, Cath T Y (2017). Biologically active filtration for fracturing flowback and produced water treatment. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 18: 29–40

[37] Gallegos T J, Varela B A, Haines S S, Engle M A (2015). Hydraulic fracturing water use variability in the United States and potential environmental implications. Water Resources Research, 51(7): 5839–5845

[38] Gregory K B, Vidic R D, Dzombak D A (2011). Water management challenges associated with the production of shale gas by hydraulic fracturing. Elements, 7(3): 181–186

[39] Guo C, Chang H Q, Liu B C, He Q P, Xiong B Y, Kumar M, Zydney A L (2018). A combined ultrafiltration-reverse osmosis process for external reuse of Weiyuan shale gas flowback and produced water. Environmental Science. Water Research & Technology, 4(7): 942–955

[40] Hanson A J, Luek J L, Tummings S S, McLaughlin M C, Blotevogel J, Mouser P J (2019). High total dissolved solids in shale gas wastewater inhibit biodegradation of alkyl and nonylphenol ethoxylate surfactants. Science of the Total Environment, 668: 1094–1103

[41] Hayes T D, Halldorson B, Horner P, Ewing J, Werline J R, Severin B F (2014). Mechanical vapor recompression for the treatment of shale-gas flowback water. Oil and Gas Facilities, 3(4): 54–62

[42] He C, Wang X H, Liu W S, Barbot E, Vidic R D (2014). Microfiltration in recycling of Marcellus Shale flowback water: Solids removal and potential fouling of polymeric microfiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 462: 88–95

[43] He F, Sirkar K K, Gilron J (2009). Effects of antiscalants to mitigate membrane scaling by direct contact membrane distillation. Journal of Membrane Science, 345(1–2): 53–58

[44] He Y, Sun C, Zhang Y, Folkerts E J, Martin J W, Goss G G (2018). Developmental toxicity of the organic fraction from hydraulic fracturing flowback and produced waters to early life stages of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environmental Science & Technology, 52(6): 3820–3830

[45] Huang Y X, Wang Z, Jin J, Lin S (2017). Novel janus membrane for membrane distillation with simultaneous fouling and wetting resistance. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(22): 13304–13310

[46] Jain P, Sharma M, Dureja P, Sarma P M, Lal B (2017). Bioelectrochemical approaches for removal of sulfate, hydrocarbon and salinity from produced water. Chemosphere, 166: 96–108

[47] Jiang Q Y, Rentschler J, Perrone R, Liu K L (2013). Application of ceramic membrane and ion-exchange for the treatment of the flowback water from Marcellus shale gas production. Journal of Membrane Science, 431: 55–61

[48] Kim J, Kim J, Hong S (2018). Recovery of water and minerals from shale gas produced water by membrane distillation crystallization. Water Research, 129: 447–459

[49] Kim J, Kwon H, Lee S, Lee S, Hong S (2017). Membrane distillation (MD) integrated with crystallization (MDC) for shale gas produced water (SGPW) treatment. Desalination, 403: 172–178

[50] Kim S Y, Omur-Ozbek P, Dhanasekar A, Prior A, Carlson K (2016). Temporal analysis of flowback and produced water composition from shale oil and gas operations: Impact of frac fluid characteristics. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering, 147: 202–210

[51] Kondash A, Vengosh A (2015). Water footprint of hydraulic fracturing. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2(10): 276–280

[52] Kondash A J, Albright E, Vengosh A (2017). Quantity of flowback and produced waters from unconventional oil and gas exploration. Science of the Total Environment, 574: 314–321

[53] Kondash A J, Lauer N E, Vengosh A (2018). The intensification of the water footprint of hydraulic fracturing. Sci Adv, 4(8): eaar5982

[54] Kong F X, Chen J F, Wang H M, Liu X N, Wang X M, Wen X, Chen C M, Xie Y F F (2017). Application of coagulation-UF hybrid process for shale gas fracturing flowback water recycling: Performance and fouling analysis. Journal of Membrane Science, 524: 460–469

[55] Kong F X, Sun G D, Chen J F, Han J D, Guo C M, Zhang T, Lin X F, Xie Y F F (2018). Desalination and fouling of NF/low pressure RO membrane for shale gas fracturing flowback water treatment. Separation and Purification Technology, 195: 216–223

[56] Koren A, Nadav N (1994). Mechanical vapor compression to treat oil-field produced water. Desalination, 98(1–3): 41–48

[57] Krupnick A, Wang Z M, Wang Y S (2014). Environmental risks of shale gas development in China. Energy Policy, 75: 117–125

[58] Lawson K W, Lloyd D R (1997). Membrane distillation. Journal of Membrane Science, 124(1): 1–25

[59] Lester Y, Ferrer I, Thurman E M, Sitterley K A, Korak J A, Aiken G, Linden K G (2015). Characterization of hydraulic fracturing flowback water in Colorado: Implications for water treatment. Science of the Total Environment, 512-513: 637–644

[60] Lin S H, Nejati S, Boo C, Hu Y X, Osuji C O, Elimelech M (2014). Omniphobic membrane for robust membrane distillation. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 1(11): 443–447

[61] Lobo F L, Wang H, Huggins T, Rosenblum J, Linden K G, Ren Z J (2016). Low-energy hydraulic fracturing wastewater treatment via AC powered electrocoagulation with biochar. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 309: 180–184

[62] Lokare O R, Tavakkoli S, Rodriguez G, Khanna V, Vidic R D (2017a). Integrating membrane distillation with waste heat from natural gas compressor stations for produced water treatment in Pennsylvania. Desalination, 413: 144–153

[63] Lokare O R, Tavakkoli S, Wadekar S, Khanna V, Vidic R D (2017b). Fouling in direct contact membrane distillation of produced water from unconventional gas extraction. Journal of Membrane Science, 524: 493–501

[64] Lutz B D, Lewis A N, Doyle M W (2013). Generation, transport, and disposal of wastewater associated with Marcellus Shale gas development. Water Resources Research, 49(2): 647–656

[65] McCutcheon J R, Mcginnis R L, Elimelech M (2005). A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process. Desalination, 174(1): 1–11

[66] McGinnis R L, Hancock N T, Nowosielski-Slepowron M S, Mcgurgan G D (2013). Pilot demonstration of the NH₃/CO₂ forward osmosis desalination process on high salinity brines. Desalination, 312: 67–74

[67] Miller D J, Huang X F, Li H, Kasemset S, Lee A, Agnihotri D, Hayes T, Paul D R, Freeman B D (2013). Fouling-resistant membranes for the treatment of flowback water from hydraulic shale fracturing: A pilot study. Journal of Membrane Science, 437: 265–275

[68] Mondal S, Wickramasinghe S R (2008). Produced water treatment by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 322(1): 162–170

[69] Monge M, Gil-Alana L A, De Gracia F P (2017). US shale oil production and WTI prices behaviour. Energy, 141: 12–19

[70] Notte C, Allen D M, Gehman J, Alessi D S, Goss G G (2017). Comparative analysis of hydraulic fracturing wastewater practices in unconventional shale developments: Regulatory regimes. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 42(2): 122–137

[71] Oasys Water Inc (2014). Oasys applies FO to treat wastewater from China’s growing power market. Membrane Technology, 2014(11): 2–3

[72] Oetjen K, Chan K E, Gulmark K, Christensen J H, Blotevogel J, Borch T, Spear J R, Cath T Y, Higgins C P (2018). Temporal characterization and statistical analysis of flowback and produced waters and their potential for reuse. Science of the Total Environment, 619-620: 654–664

[73] Riley S M, Ahoor D C, Cath T Y (2018a). Enhanced biofiltration of O&G produced water comparing granular activated carbon and nutrients. Science of the Total Environment, 640-641: 419–428

[74] Riley S M, Ahoor D C, Regnery J, Cath T Y (2018b). Tracking oil and gas wastewater-derived organic matter in a hybrid biofilter membrane treatment system: A multi-analytical approach. Science of the Total Environment, 613-614: 208–217

[75] Riley S M, Oliveira J M S, Regnery J, Cath T Y (2016). Hybrid membrane bio-systems for sustainable treatment of oil and gas produced water and fracturing flowback water. Separation and Purification Technology, 171: 297–311

[76] Rosenblum J, Thurman E M, Ferrer I, Aiken G, Linden K G (2017). Organic chemical characterization and mass balance of a hydraulically fractured well: From fracturing fluid to produced water over 405 days. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(23): 14006–14015

[77] Sardari K, Fyfe P, Lincicome D, Wickramasinghe S R (2018a). Aluminum electrocoagulation followed by forward osmosis for treating hydraulic fracturing produced waters. Desalination, 428: 172–181

[78] Sardari K, Fyfe P, Lincicome D, Wickramasinghe S R (2018b). Combined electrocoagulation and membrane distillation for treating high salinity produced waters. Journal of Membrane Science, 564: 82–96

[79] Schantz A B, Xiong B Y, Dees E, Moore D R, Yang X J, Kumar M (2018). Emerging investigators series: Prospects and challenges for high-pressure reverse osmosis in minimizing concentrated waste streams. Environmental Science. Water Research & Technology, 4(7): 894–908

[80] Shaffer D L, Arias Chavez L H, Ben-Sasson M, Romero-Vargas Castrillón S, Yip N Y, Elimelech M (2013). Desalination and reuse of high-salinity shale gas produced water: drivers, technologies, and future directions. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(17): 9569–9583

[81] Shaffer D L, Werber J R, Jaramillo H, Lin S H, Elimelech M (2015). Forward osmosis: Where are we now? Desalination, 356: 271–284

[82] Shih J S, Saiers J E, Anisfeld S C, Chu Z, Muehlenbachs L A, Olmstead S M M (2015). Characterization and analysis of liquid waste from Marcellus Shale gas development. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(16): 9557–9565

[83] Singh D, Sirkar K K (2012). Desalination of brine and produced water by direct contact membrane distillation at high temperatures and pressures. Journal of Membrane Science, 389: 380–388

[84] Stephenson M H (2016). Shale gas in North America and Europe. Energy Science & Engineering, 4(1): 4–13

[85] Stoll Z A, Forrestal C, Ren Z J, Xu P (2015). Shale gas produced water treatment using innovative microbial capacitive desalination cell. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 283: 847–855

[86] Sun Y, Wang D, Tsang D C W, Wang L, Ok Y S, Feng Y (2019). A critical review of risks, characteristics, and treatment strategies for potentially toxic elements in wastewater from shale gas extraction. Environment International, 125: 452–469

[87] Tavakkoli S, Lokare O R, Vidic R D, Khanna V (2017). A techno-economic assessment of membrane distillation for treatment of Marcellus shale produced water. Desalination, 416: 24–34

[88] Thiel G P, Tow E W, Banchik L D, Chung H W, Lienhard J H (2015). Energy consumption in desalinating produced water from shale oil and gas extraction. Desalination, 366: 94–112

[89] Tong T, Elimelech M (2016). The global rise of zero liquid discharge for wastewater management: Drivers, technologies, and future directions. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(13): 6846–6855

[90] U.S. Energy Information Administration (2018a). How much shale (tight) oil is produced in the United States? Available online at: accessed February 26, 2019)

[91] U.S. Energy Information Administration (2018b). How much shale gas is produced in the United States? Available online at: accessed February 26, 2019).

[92] U.S. EPA (1995). Technically-based Local Limits Development Strategy

[93] U.S. EPA (2005). 2005 Remediation General Permit Fact Sheet Excerpts

[94] Van de Graaf T, Haesebrouck T, Debaere P (2018). Fractured politics? The comparative regulation of shale gas in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(9): 1276–1293

[95] Vengosh A, Jackson R B, Warner N, Darrah T H, Kondash A (2014). A critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(15): 8334–8348

[96] Vidic R D, Brantley S L, Vandenbossche J M, Yoxtheimer D, Abad J D (2013). Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality. Science, 340(6134): 1235009

[97] Wang Z, Elimelech M, Lin S (2016). Environmental applications of interfacial materials with special wettability. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(5): 2132–2150

[98] Winglee J M, Bossa N, Rosen D, Vardner J T, Wiesner M R (2017). Modeling the concentration of volatile and semivolatile contaminants in direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) product water. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(22): 13113–13121

[99] Wu Q, Chen G E, Sun W G, Xu Z L, Kong Y F, Zheng X P, Xu S J (2017). Bio-inspired GO-Ag/PVDF/F127 membrane with improved anti-fouling for natural organic matter (NOM) resistance. Chemical Engineering Journal, 313: 450–460

[100] Xiong B, Zydney A L, Kumar M (2016). Fouling of microfiltration membranes by flowback and produced waters from the Marcellus shale gas play. Water Research, 99: 162–170

[101] Xiong B Y, Roman-White S, Piechowicz B, Miller Z, Farina B, Tasker T, Burgos W, Zydney A L, Kumar M (2018). Polyacrylamide in hydraulic fracturing fluid causes severe membrane fouling during flowback water treatment. Journal of Membrane Science, 560: 125–131

[102] Yang H, Huang X J, Yang Q Y, Tu J J, Li S F, Yang D M, Xia H, Flower R J, Thompson J R (2015). Water requirements for shale gas fracking in Fuling, Chongqing, Southwest China. Energy Procedia, 76: 106–112

[103] Yao M W, Woo Y C, Tijing L D, Choi J S, Shon H K (2018). Effects of volatile organic compounds on water recovery from produced water via vacuum membrane distillation. Desalination, 440: 146–155

[104] Yu M, Weinthal E, Patiño-Echeverri D, Deshusses M A, Zou C, Ni Y, Vengosh A (2016). Water availability for shale gas development in Sichuan Basin, China. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(6): 2837–2845

[105] Zhai J, Huang Z, Rahaman M H, Li Y, Mei L, Ma H, Hu X, Xiao H, Luo Z, Wang K (2017). Comparison of coagulation pretreatment of produced water from natural gas well by polyaluminium chloride and polyferric sulphate coagulants. Environmental Technology, 38(10): 1200–1210

[106] Zhang R, Liu Y, He M, Su Y, Zhao X, Elimelech M, Jiang Z (2016). Antifouling membranes for sustainable water purification: strategies and mechanisms. Chemical Society Reviews, 45(21): 5888–5924

[107] Zhang Z Y, Du X W, Carlson K H, Robbins C A, Tong T Z (2019). Effective treatment of shale oil and gas produced water by membrane distillation coupled with precipitative softening and walnut shell filtration. Desalination, 454: 82–90

[108] Zhou X S, Gingerich D B, Mauter M S (2015). Water treatment capacity of forward-osmosis systems utilizing power-plant waste heat. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 54(24): 6378–6389

[109] Zou C, Ni Y, Li J, Kondash A, Coyte R, Lauer N, Cui H, Liao F, Vengosh A (2018). The water footprint of hydraulic fracturing in Sichuan Basin, China. Science of the Total Environment, 630: 349–356

[110] Zou Y Q, Yang C B, Wu D S, Yan C, Zeng M S, Lan Y Y, Dai Z X (2016). Probabilistic assessment of shale gas production and water demand at Xiuwu Basin in China. Applied Energy, 180: 185–195

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature