Membrane-based treatment of shale oil and gas wastewater: The current state of knowledge

Tiezheng Tong, Kenneth H. Carlson, Cristian A. Robbins, Zuoyou Zhang, Xuewei Du

PDF(1428 KB)
PDF(1428 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4) : 63. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-019-1147-y
REVIEW ARTICLE
REVIEW ARTICLE

Membrane-based treatment of shale oil and gas wastewater: The current state of knowledge

Author information +
History +

Highlights

• Shale oil and gas production generates wastewater with complex composition.

• Membrane technologies emerged for the treatment of shale oil and gas wastewater.

• Membrane technologies should tolerate high TDS and consume low primary energy.

• Pretreatment is a key component of integrated wastewater treatment systems.

• Full-scale implementation of membrane technologies is highly desirable.

Abstract

Shale oil and gas exploitation not only consumes substantial amounts of freshwater but also generates large quantities of hazardous wastewater. Tremendous research efforts have been invested in developing membrane-based technologies for the treatment of shale oil and gas wastewater. Despite their success at the laboratory scale, membrane processes have not been implemented at full scale in the oil and gas fields. In this article, we analyze the growing demands of wastewater treatment in shale oil and gas production, and then critically review the current stage of membrane technologies applied to the treatment of shale oil and gas wastewater. We focus on the unique niche of those technologies due to their advantages and limitations, and use mechanical vapor compression as the benchmark for comparison. We also highlight the importance of pretreatment as a key component of integrated treatment trains, in order to improve the performance of downstream membrane processes and water product quality. We emphasize the lack of sufficient efforts to scale up existing membrane technologies, and suggest that a stronger collaboration between academia and industry is of paramount importance to translate membrane technologies developed in the laboratory to the practical applications by the shale oil and gas industry.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Shale oil and gas production / Wastewater treatment and reuse / Membrane technology / Pretreatment / Academia-industry collaboration

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Tiezheng Tong, Kenneth H. Carlson, Cristian A. Robbins, Zuoyou Zhang, Xuewei Du. Membrane-based treatment of shale oil and gas wastewater: The current state of knowledge. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 63 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1147-y

References

[1]
Ahmadun F R, Pendashteh A, Abdullah L C, Biak D R A, Madaeni S S, Abidin Z Z (2009). Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 170(2-3): 530–551
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[2]
Alessi D S, Zolfaghari A, Kletke S, Gehman J, Allen D M, Goss G G (2017). Comparative analysis of hydraulic fracturing wastewater practices in unconventional shale development: Water sourcing, treatment and disposal practices. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 42(2): 105–121
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Alzahrani S, Mohammad A W, Hilal N, Abdullah P, Jaafar O (2013). Identification of foulants, fouling mechanisms and cleaning efficiency for NF and RO treatment of produced water. Separation and Purification Technology, 118: 324–341
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (2016). Fact Sheet and Supplementary Information for General Permit Discharges from Groundwater and Surface Water Clean Up Located within the State of Arkansas
[5]
Aybar H S (2002). Analysis of a mechanical vapor compression desalination system. Desalination, 142(2): 181–186
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Bahar R, Hawlader M N A, Woei L S (2004). Performance evaluation of a mechanical vapor compression desalination system. Desalination, 166(1–3): 123–127
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Bai B, Carlson K, Prior A, Douglas C (2015). Sources of variability in flowback and produced water volumes from shale oil and gas wells. Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources, 12: 1–5
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Bai B, Goodwin S, Carlson K (2013). Modeling of frac flowback and produced water volume from Wattenberg oil and gas field. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering, 108: 383–392
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Bell E A, Poynor T E, Newhart K B, Regnery J, Coday B D, Cath T Y (2017). Produced water treatment using forward osmosis membranes: Evaluation of extended-time performance and fouling. Journal of Membrane Science, 525: 77–88
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Bond R, Veerapaneni S (2007). Zero liquid discharge for inland desalination. No. 500–01–040. Denver, CO: AWWA Research Foundation
[11]
Boo C, Lee J, Elimelech M (2016a). Engineering surface energy and nanostructure of microporous films for expanded membrane distillation applications. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(15): 8112–8119
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[12]
Boo C, Lee J, Elimelech M (2016b). Omniphobic polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane for desalination of shale gas produced water by membrane distillation. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(22): 12275–12282
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[13]
Brantley S L, Yoxtheimer D, Arjmand S, Grieve P, Vidic R, Pollak J, Llewellyn G T, Abad J, Simon C (2014). Water resource impacts during unconventional shale gas development: The Pennsylvania experience. International Journal of Coal Geology, 126: 140–156
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Burbano A, Brankhuber P (2012). Demonstration of membrane zero liquid discharge for drinking water systems: A literature review. Alexandria, VA: Water Environment Research Foundation
[15]
Butkovskyi A, Bruning H, Kools S A E, Rijnaarts H H M, Van Wezel A P (2017). Organic pollutants in shale gas flowback and produced waters: Identification, potential ecological impact, and implications for treatment strategies. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(9): 4740–4754
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[16]
Cath T Y, Childress A E, Elimelech M (2006). Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments. Journal of Membrane Science, 281(1–2): 70–87
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Chang H, Li T, Liu B, Vidic R, Elimelech M, Crittenden J C (2019a). Potential and implemented membrane-based technologies for the treatment and reuse of flowback and produced water from shale gas and oil plays: A review. Desalination, 455: 34–57
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Chang H Q, Liu B C, Yang B X, Yang X, Guo C, He Q P, Liang S M, Chen S, Yang P (2019b). An integrated coagulation-ultrafiltration-nanofiltration process for internal reuse of shale gas flowback and produced water. Separation and Purification Technology, 211: 310–321
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Chen G, Wang Z W, Nghiem L D, Li X M, Xie M, Zhao B L, Zhang M X, Song J F, He T (2015). Treatment of shale gas drilling flowback fluids (SGDFs) by forward osmosis: Membrane fouling and mitigation. Desalination, 366: 113–120
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Chermak J A, Schreiber M E (2014). Mineralogy and trace element geochemistry of gas shales in the United States: Environmental implications. International Journal of Coal Geology, 126: 32–44
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Chevron Corporation (2018). Chevron tech challenge: Produced water- Unlocking a valuable natural resource
[22]
Chew N G P, Zhao S S, Loh C H, Permogorov N, Wang R (2017). Surfactant effects on water recovery from produced water via direct-contact membrane distillation. Journal of Membrane Science, 528: 126–134
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Cho Y H, Kim H W, Nam S Y, Park H B (2011). Fouling-tolerant polysulfone-poly(ethylene oxide) random copolymer ultrafiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 379(1–2): 296–306
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Coday B D, Almaraz N, Cath T Y (2015). Forward osmosis desalination of oil and gas wastewater: Impacts of membrane selection and operating conditions on process performance. Journal of Membrane Science, 488: 40–55
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Coday B D, Cath T Y (2014). Forward osmosis: Novel desalination of produced water and fracturing flowback. Journal- American Water Works Association, 106(2): E55–E66
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Coday B D, Xu P, Beaudry E G, Herron J, Lampi K, Hancock N T, Cath T Y (2014). The sweet spot of forward osmosis: Treatment of produced water, drilling wastewater, and other complex and difficult liquid streams. Desalination, 333(1): 23–35
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Davenport D M, Deshmukh A, Werber J R, Elimelech M (2018). High-pressure reverse osmosis for energy-efficient hypersaline brine desalination: Current status, design considerations, and research needs. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 5(8): 467–475
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Deshmukh A, Boo C, Karanikola V, Lin S H, Straub A P, Tong T Z, Warsinger D M, Elimelech M (2018). Membrane distillation at the water-energy nexus: limits, opportunities, and challenges. Energy & Environmental Science, 11(5): 1177–1196
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Du X W, Zhang Z Y, Carlson K H, Lee J, Tong T Z (2018). Membrane fouling and reusability in membrane distillation of shale oil and gas produced water: Effects of membrane surface wettability. Journal of Membrane Science, 567: 199–208
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Duong H C, Chivas A R, Nelemans B, Duke M, Gray S, Cath T Y, Nghiem L D (2015). Treatment of RO brine from CSG produced water by spiral-wound air gap membrane distillation: A pilot study. Desalination, 366: 121–129
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Eastern Municipal Water District and Carollo Engineers (2008). Evaluation and selection of available processes for a zero-liquid discharge system for the Perris, California ground water basin. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation
[32]
Elimelech M, Phillip W A (2011). The future of seawater desalination: Energy, technology, and the environment. Science, 333(6043): 712–717
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[33]
Esmaeilirad N, Carlson K, Omur Ozbek P (2015). Influence of softening sequencing on electrocoagulation treatment of produced water. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 283: 721–729
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[34]
Ferrer I, Thurman E M (2015). Chemical constituents and analytical approaches for hydraulic fracturing waters. Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 5: 18–25
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Forrestal C, Stoll Z, Xu P, Ren Z J (2015). Microbial capacitive desalination for integrated organic matter and salt removal and energy production from unconventional natural gas produced water. Environmental Science. Water Research & Technology, 1(1): 47–55
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Freedman D E, Riley S M, Jones Z L, Rosenblum J S, Sharp J O, Spear J R, Cath T Y (2017). Biologically active filtration for fracturing flowback and produced water treatment. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 18: 29–40
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Gallegos T J, Varela B A, Haines S S, Engle M A (2015). Hydraulic fracturing water use variability in the United States and potential environmental implications. Water Resources Research, 51(7): 5839–5845
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[38]
Gregory K B, Vidic R D, Dzombak D A (2011). Water management challenges associated with the production of shale gas by hydraulic fracturing. Elements, 7(3): 181–186
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Guo C, Chang H Q, Liu B C, He Q P, Xiong B Y, Kumar M, Zydney A L (2018). A combined ultrafiltration-reverse osmosis process for external reuse of Weiyuan shale gas flowback and produced water. Environmental Science. Water Research & Technology, 4(7): 942–955
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Hanson A J, Luek J L, Tummings S S, McLaughlin M C, Blotevogel J, Mouser P J (2019). High total dissolved solids in shale gas wastewater inhibit biodegradation of alkyl and nonylphenol ethoxylate surfactants. Science of the Total Environment, 668: 1094–1103
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[41]
Hayes T D, Halldorson B, Horner P, Ewing J, Werline J R, Severin B F (2014). Mechanical vapor recompression for the treatment of shale-gas flowback water. Oil and Gas Facilities, 3(4): 54–62
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
He C, Wang X H, Liu W S, Barbot E, Vidic R D (2014). Microfiltration in recycling of Marcellus Shale flowback water: Solids removal and potential fouling of polymeric microfiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 462: 88–95
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
He F, Sirkar K K, Gilron J (2009). Effects of antiscalants to mitigate membrane scaling by direct contact membrane distillation. Journal of Membrane Science, 345(1–2): 53–58
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
He Y, Sun C, Zhang Y, Folkerts E J, Martin J W, Goss G G (2018). Developmental toxicity of the organic fraction from hydraulic fracturing flowback and produced waters to early life stages of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environmental Science & Technology, 52(6): 3820–3830
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[45]
Huang Y X, Wang Z, Jin J, Lin S (2017). Novel janus membrane for membrane distillation with simultaneous fouling and wetting resistance. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(22): 13304–13310
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[46]
Jain P, Sharma M, Dureja P, Sarma P M, Lal B (2017). Bioelectrochemical approaches for removal of sulfate, hydrocarbon and salinity from produced water. Chemosphere, 166: 96–108
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[47]
Jiang Q Y, Rentschler J, Perrone R, Liu K L (2013). Application of ceramic membrane and ion-exchange for the treatment of the flowback water from Marcellus shale gas production. Journal of Membrane Science, 431: 55–61
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Kim J, Kim J, Hong S (2018). Recovery of water and minerals from shale gas produced water by membrane distillation crystallization. Water Research, 129: 447–459
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[49]
Kim J, Kwon H, Lee S, Lee S, Hong S (2017). Membrane distillation (MD) integrated with crystallization (MDC) for shale gas produced water (SGPW) treatment. Desalination, 403: 172–178
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Kim S Y, Omur-Ozbek P, Dhanasekar A, Prior A, Carlson K (2016). Temporal analysis of flowback and produced water composition from shale oil and gas operations: Impact of frac fluid characteristics. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering, 147: 202–210
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Kondash A, Vengosh A (2015). Water footprint of hydraulic fracturing. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2(10): 276–280
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Kondash A J, Albright E, Vengosh A (2017). Quantity of flowback and produced waters from unconventional oil and gas exploration. Science of the Total Environment, 574: 314–321
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[53]
Kondash A J, Lauer N E, Vengosh A (2018). The intensification of the water footprint of hydraulic fracturing. Sci Adv, 4(8): eaar5982
[54]
Kong F X, Chen J F, Wang H M, Liu X N, Wang X M, Wen X, Chen C M, Xie Y F F (2017). Application of coagulation-UF hybrid process for shale gas fracturing flowback water recycling: Performance and fouling analysis. Journal of Membrane Science, 524: 460–469
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Kong F X, Sun G D, Chen J F, Han J D, Guo C M, Zhang T, Lin X F, Xie Y F F (2018). Desalination and fouling of NF/low pressure RO membrane for shale gas fracturing flowback water treatment. Separation and Purification Technology, 195: 216–223
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Koren A, Nadav N (1994). Mechanical vapor compression to treat oil-field produced water. Desalination, 98(1–3): 41–48
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Krupnick A, Wang Z M, Wang Y S (2014). Environmental risks of shale gas development in China. Energy Policy, 75: 117–125
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
Lawson K W, Lloyd D R (1997). Membrane distillation. Journal of Membrane Science, 124(1): 1–25
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Lester Y, Ferrer I, Thurman E M, Sitterley K A, Korak J A, Aiken G, Linden K G (2015). Characterization of hydraulic fracturing flowback water in Colorado: Implications for water treatment. Science of the Total Environment, 512-513: 637–644
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[60]
Lin S H, Nejati S, Boo C, Hu Y X, Osuji C O, Elimelech M (2014). Omniphobic membrane for robust membrane distillation. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 1(11): 443–447
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Lobo F L, Wang H, Huggins T, Rosenblum J, Linden K G, Ren Z J (2016). Low-energy hydraulic fracturing wastewater treatment via AC powered electrocoagulation with biochar. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 309: 180–184
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[62]
Lokare O R, Tavakkoli S, Rodriguez G, Khanna V, Vidic R D (2017a). Integrating membrane distillation with waste heat from natural gas compressor stations for produced water treatment in Pennsylvania. Desalination, 413: 144–153
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Lokare O R, Tavakkoli S, Wadekar S, Khanna V, Vidic R D (2017b). Fouling in direct contact membrane distillation of produced water from unconventional gas extraction. Journal of Membrane Science, 524: 493–501
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Lutz B D, Lewis A N, Doyle M W (2013). Generation, transport, and disposal of wastewater associated with Marcellus Shale gas development. Water Resources Research, 49(2): 647–656
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
McCutcheon J R, Mcginnis R L, Elimelech M (2005). A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process. Desalination, 174(1): 1–11
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
McGinnis R L, Hancock N T, Nowosielski-Slepowron M S, Mcgurgan G D (2013). Pilot demonstration of the NH3/CO2 forward osmosis desalination process on high salinity brines. Desalination, 312: 67–74
CrossRef Google scholar
[67]
Miller D J, Huang X F, Li H, Kasemset S, Lee A, Agnihotri D, Hayes T, Paul D R, Freeman B D (2013). Fouling-resistant membranes for the treatment of flowback water from hydraulic shale fracturing: A pilot study. Journal of Membrane Science, 437: 265–275
CrossRef Google scholar
[68]
Mondal S, Wickramasinghe S R (2008). Produced water treatment by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 322(1): 162–170
CrossRef Google scholar
[69]
Monge M, Gil-Alana L A, De Gracia F P (2017). US shale oil production and WTI prices behaviour. Energy, 141: 12–19
CrossRef Google scholar
[70]
Notte C, Allen D M, Gehman J, Alessi D S, Goss G G (2017). Comparative analysis of hydraulic fracturing wastewater practices in unconventional shale developments: Regulatory regimes. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 42(2): 122–137
CrossRef Google scholar
[71]
Oasys Water Inc (2014). Oasys applies FO to treat wastewater from China’s growing power market. Membrane Technology, 2014(11): 2–3
CrossRef Google scholar
[72]
Oetjen K, Chan K E, Gulmark K, Christensen J H, Blotevogel J, Borch T, Spear J R, Cath T Y, Higgins C P (2018). Temporal characterization and statistical analysis of flowback and produced waters and their potential for reuse. Science of the Total Environment, 619-620: 654–664
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[73]
Riley S M, Ahoor D C, Cath T Y (2018a). Enhanced biofiltration of O&G produced water comparing granular activated carbon and nutrients. Science of the Total Environment, 640-641: 419–428
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[74]
Riley S M, Ahoor D C, Regnery J, Cath T Y (2018b). Tracking oil and gas wastewater-derived organic matter in a hybrid biofilter membrane treatment system: A multi-analytical approach. Science of the Total Environment, 613-614: 208–217
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[75]
Riley S M, Oliveira J M S, Regnery J, Cath T Y (2016). Hybrid membrane bio-systems for sustainable treatment of oil and gas produced water and fracturing flowback water. Separation and Purification Technology, 171: 297–311
CrossRef Google scholar
[76]
Rosenblum J, Thurman E M, Ferrer I, Aiken G, Linden K G (2017). Organic chemical characterization and mass balance of a hydraulically fractured well: From fracturing fluid to produced water over 405 days. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(23): 14006–14015
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[77]
Sardari K, Fyfe P, Lincicome D, Wickramasinghe S R (2018a). Aluminum electrocoagulation followed by forward osmosis for treating hydraulic fracturing produced waters. Desalination, 428: 172–181
CrossRef Google scholar
[78]
Sardari K, Fyfe P, Lincicome D, Wickramasinghe S R (2018b). Combined electrocoagulation and membrane distillation for treating high salinity produced waters. Journal of Membrane Science, 564: 82–96
CrossRef Google scholar
[79]
Schantz A B, Xiong B Y, Dees E, Moore D R, Yang X J, Kumar M (2018). Emerging investigators series: Prospects and challenges for high-pressure reverse osmosis in minimizing concentrated waste streams. Environmental Science. Water Research & Technology, 4(7): 894–908
CrossRef Google scholar
[80]
Shaffer D L, Arias Chavez L H, Ben-Sasson M, Romero-Vargas Castrillón S, Yip N Y, Elimelech M (2013). Desalination and reuse of high-salinity shale gas produced water: drivers, technologies, and future directions. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(17): 9569–9583
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[81]
Shaffer D L, Werber J R, Jaramillo H, Lin S H, Elimelech M (2015). Forward osmosis: Where are we now? Desalination, 356: 271–284
CrossRef Google scholar
[82]
Shih J S, Saiers J E, Anisfeld S C, Chu Z, Muehlenbachs L A, Olmstead S M M (2015). Characterization and analysis of liquid waste from Marcellus Shale gas development. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(16): 9557–9565
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[83]
Singh D, Sirkar K K (2012). Desalination of brine and produced water by direct contact membrane distillation at high temperatures and pressures. Journal of Membrane Science, 389: 380–388
CrossRef Google scholar
[84]
Stephenson M H (2016). Shale gas in North America and Europe. Energy Science & Engineering, 4(1): 4–13
CrossRef Google scholar
[85]
Stoll Z A, Forrestal C, Ren Z J, Xu P (2015). Shale gas produced water treatment using innovative microbial capacitive desalination cell. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 283: 847–855
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[86]
Sun Y, Wang D, Tsang D C W, Wang L, Ok Y S, Feng Y (2019). A critical review of risks, characteristics, and treatment strategies for potentially toxic elements in wastewater from shale gas extraction. Environment International, 125: 452–469
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[87]
Tavakkoli S, Lokare O R, Vidic R D, Khanna V (2017). A techno-economic assessment of membrane distillation for treatment of Marcellus shale produced water. Desalination, 416: 24–34
CrossRef Google scholar
[88]
Thiel G P, Tow E W, Banchik L D, Chung H W, Lienhard J H (2015). Energy consumption in desalinating produced water from shale oil and gas extraction. Desalination, 366: 94–112
CrossRef Google scholar
[89]
Tong T, Elimelech M (2016). The global rise of zero liquid discharge for wastewater management: Drivers, technologies, and future directions. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(13): 6846–6855
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[90]
U.S. Energy Information Administration (2018a). How much shale (tight) oil is produced in the United States? Available online at: https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=847&t=6. (accessed February 26, 2019)
[91]
U.S. Energy Information Administration (2018b). How much shale gas is produced in the United States? Available online at: https:www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=907&t=8. (accessed February 26, 2019).
[92]
U.S. EPA (1995). Technically-based Local Limits Development Strategy
[93]
U.S. EPA (2005). 2005 Remediation General Permit Fact Sheet Excerpts
[94]
Van de Graaf T, Haesebrouck T, Debaere P (2018). Fractured politics? The comparative regulation of shale gas in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(9): 1276–1293
CrossRef Google scholar
[95]
Vengosh A, Jackson R B, Warner N, Darrah T H, Kondash A (2014). A critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(15): 8334–8348
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[96]
Vidic R D, Brantley S L, Vandenbossche J M, Yoxtheimer D, Abad J D (2013). Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality. Science, 340(6134): 1235009
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[97]
Wang Z, Elimelech M, Lin S (2016). Environmental applications of interfacial materials with special wettability. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(5): 2132–2150
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[98]
Winglee J M, Bossa N, Rosen D, Vardner J T, Wiesner M R (2017). Modeling the concentration of volatile and semivolatile contaminants in direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) product water. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(22): 13113–13121
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[99]
Wu Q, Chen G E, Sun W G, Xu Z L, Kong Y F, Zheng X P, Xu S J (2017). Bio-inspired GO-Ag/PVDF/F127 membrane with improved anti-fouling for natural organic matter (NOM) resistance. Chemical Engineering Journal, 313: 450–460
CrossRef Google scholar
[100]
Xiong B, Zydney A L, Kumar M (2016). Fouling of microfiltration membranes by flowback and produced waters from the Marcellus shale gas play. Water Research, 99: 162–170
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[101]
Xiong B Y, Roman-White S, Piechowicz B, Miller Z, Farina B, Tasker T, Burgos W, Zydney A L, Kumar M (2018). Polyacrylamide in hydraulic fracturing fluid causes severe membrane fouling during flowback water treatment. Journal of Membrane Science, 560: 125–131
CrossRef Google scholar
[102]
Yang H, Huang X J, Yang Q Y, Tu J J, Li S F, Yang D M, Xia H, Flower R J, Thompson J R (2015). Water requirements for shale gas fracking in Fuling, Chongqing, Southwest China. Energy Procedia, 76: 106–112
CrossRef Google scholar
[103]
Yao M W, Woo Y C, Tijing L D, Choi J S, Shon H K (2018). Effects of volatile organic compounds on water recovery from produced water via vacuum membrane distillation. Desalination, 440: 146–155
CrossRef Google scholar
[104]
Yu M, Weinthal E, Patiño-Echeverri D, Deshusses M A, Zou C, Ni Y, Vengosh A (2016). Water availability for shale gas development in Sichuan Basin, China. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(6): 2837–2845
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[105]
Zhai J, Huang Z, Rahaman M H, Li Y, Mei L, Ma H, Hu X, Xiao H, Luo Z, Wang K (2017). Comparison of coagulation pretreatment of produced water from natural gas well by polyaluminium chloride and polyferric sulphate coagulants. Environmental Technology, 38(10): 1200–1210
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[106]
Zhang R, Liu Y, He M, Su Y, Zhao X, Elimelech M, Jiang Z (2016). Antifouling membranes for sustainable water purification: strategies and mechanisms. Chemical Society Reviews, 45(21): 5888–5924
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[107]
Zhang Z Y, Du X W, Carlson K H, Robbins C A, Tong T Z (2019). Effective treatment of shale oil and gas produced water by membrane distillation coupled with precipitative softening and walnut shell filtration. Desalination, 454: 82–90
CrossRef Google scholar
[108]
Zhou X S, Gingerich D B, Mauter M S (2015). Water treatment capacity of forward-osmosis systems utilizing power-plant waste heat. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 54(24): 6378–6389
CrossRef Google scholar
[109]
Zou C, Ni Y, Li J, Kondash A, Coyte R, Lauer N, Cui H, Liao F, Vengosh A (2018). The water footprint of hydraulic fracturing in Sichuan Basin, China. Science of the Total Environment, 630: 349–356
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[110]
Zou Y Q, Yang C B, Wu D S, Yan C, Zeng M S, Lan Y Y, Dai Z X (2016). Probabilistic assessment of shale gas production and water demand at Xiuwu Basin in China. Applied Energy, 180: 185–195
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the start-up funds that T.T. received from the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, at Colorado State University, as well as the Advanced Industries Accelerator Grant that T.T. and K.H.C. received from Colorado Office of Economic Development and International Trade and CSU Ventures.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2019 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1428 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/