Simultaneously recovering electricity and water from wastewater by osmotic microbial fuel cells: Performance and membrane fouling

Abstract

OsMFC can simultaneously recover electricity and water from wastewater.

Membrane fouling played an important role in flux decline of FO membrane in OsMFCs.

Biofouling was the major fouling of the FO membrane in OsMFCs.

The growth of biofouling layer on the FO membrane can be divided into three stages.

Microorganisms were the dominant biofoulant in the biofouling layer.

Since the concept of the osmotic microbial fuel cell (OsMFC) was introduced in 2011, it has attracted growing interests for its potential applications in wastewater treatment and energy recovery. However, forward osmosis (FO) membrane fouling resulting in a severe water flux decline remains a main obstacle. Until now, the fouling mechanisms of FO membrane especially the development of biofouling layer in the OsMFC are not yet clear. Here, the fouling behavior of FO membrane in OsMFCs was systematically investigated. The results indicated that a thick fouling layer including biofouling and inorganic fouling was existed on the FO membrane surface. Compared to the inorganic fouling, the biofouling played a more important role in the development of the fouling layer. Further analyses by the confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) implied that the growth of biofouling layer on the FO membrane surface in the OsMFC could be divided into three stages. Initially, microorganisms associated with b-D-glucopyranose polysaccharides were deposited on the FO membrane surface. After that, the microorganisms grew into a biofilm caused a quick decrease of water flux. Subsequently, some of microorganisms were dead due to lack of nutrient source, in the meantime, polysaccharide and proteins in the biofouling layer were decomposed as nutrient source, thus leading to a slow development of the biofouling layer. Moreover, the microorganisms played a significant role in the formation and development of the biofouling layer, and further studies are needed to mitigate the deposition of microorganisms on FO membrane surfaces in OsMFCs.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Microbial fuel cell / Forward osmosis / Membrane fouling / Biofouling / Wastewater treatment

References

[1] APHA (2012).Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association

[2] Cath T Y, Childress A E, Elimelech M (2006). Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments. J Membr Sci, 281(1–2): 70–87

[3] Chen L, Gu Y, Cao C, Zhang J, Ng J W, Tang C (2014). Performance of a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor with forward osmosis membrane for low-strength wastewater treatment. Water Res, 50: 114–123

[4] Ge Z, He Z (2012). Effects of draw solutions and membrane conditions on electricity generation and water flux in osmotic microbial fuel cells. Bioresour Technol, 109(2): 70–76

[5] Ge Z, Ping Q Y, Xiao L, He Z (2013). Reducing effluent discharge and recovering bioenergy in an osmotic microbial fuel cell treating domestic wastewater. Desalination, 312: 52–59

[6] He Z (2012). One more function for microbial fuel cells in treating wastewater: producing high-quality water. Chemik, 66: 7–10

[7] Lefebvre O, Tan Z, Kharkwal S, Ng H Y (2012). Effect of increasing anodic NaCl concentration on microbial fuel cell performance. Bioresour Technol, 112(3): 336–340

[8] Li W W, Yu H Q, He Z (2014). Towards sustainable wastewater treatment by using microbial fuel cells-centered technologies. Energy Environ Sci, 7(3): 911–924

[9] Lin H, Gao W, Meng F, Liao B Q, Leung K T, Zhao L, Chen J, Hong H (2012). Membrane bioreactors for industrial wastewater treatment: A critical review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol, 42(7): 677–740

[10] Liu J, Wang X, Wang Z, Lu Y, Li X, Ren Y (2017). Integrating microbial fuel cells with anaerobic acidification and forward osmosis membrane for enhancing bio-electricity and water recovery from low-strength wastewater. Water Res, 110: 74–82

[11] Logan B E, Hamelers B, Rozendal R, Schröder U, Keller J, Freguia S, Aelterman P, Verstraete W, Rabaey K (2006). Microbial fuel cells: Methodology and technology. Environ Sci Technol, 40(17): 5181–5192

[12] Mahan Y, Das D (2009). Effect of ionic strength, cation exchanger and inoculum age on the performance of microbial fuel cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 34(17): 7542–7546

[13] Mccutcheon J R, Elimelech M (2006). Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis. J Membr Sci, 284(1): 237–247

[14] Mi B, Elimelech M (2008). Chemical and physical aspects of organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes. J Membr Sci, 320(1): 292–302

[15] Pant D, Van Bogaert G, Diels L, Vanbroekhoven K (2010). A review of the substrates used in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) for sustainable energy production. Bioresour Technol, 101(6): 1533–1543

[16] Qin M, Ping Q, Lu Y, Abu-Reesh I M, He Z (2015). Understanding electricity generation in osmotic microbial fuel cells through integrated experimental investigation and mathematical modeling. Bioresour Technol, 195: 194–201

[17] Qin M H, Hynes E A, Abu-Reesh I M, He Z (2017). Ammonium removal from synthetic wastewater promoted by current generation and water flux in an osmotic microbial fuel cell. J Clean Prod, 149: 856–862

[18] Tang C Y, She Q, Loong W C L, Wang R, Fane A G (2010). Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration. J Membr Sci, 354(1): 123–133

[19] Wang X, Chen Y, Yuan B, Li X, Ren Y (2014b). Impacts of sludge retention time on sludge characteristics and membrane fouling in a submerged osmotic membrane bioreactor. Bioresour Technol, 161(3): 340–347

[20] Wang X, Hu T, Wang Z, Li X, Ren Y (2017a). Permeability recovery of fouled forward osmosis membranes by chemical cleaning during a long-term operation of anaerobic osmotic membrane bioreactors treating low-strength wastewater. Water Res, 123: 505–512

[21] Wang X, Yuan B, Chen Y, Li X, Ren Y (2014a). Integration of micro-filtration into osmotic membrane bioreactors to prevent salinity build-up. Bioresour Technol, 167(2): 116–123

[22] Wang X, Zhao Y, Yuan B, Wang Z, Li X, Ren Y (2016b). Comparison of biofouling mechanisms between cellulose triacetate (CTA) and thin-film composite (TFC) polyamide forward osmosis membranes in osmotic membrane bioreactors. Bioresour Technol, 202: 50–58

[23] Wang X H, Chang V W C, Tang C Y (2016a). Osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) technology for wastewater treatment and reclamation: Advances, challenges, and prospects for the future. J Membr Sci, 504: 113–132

[24] Wang X H, Wang C, Tang C Y, Li X F, Ren Y P (2017b). Development of a novel anaerobic membrane bioreactor simultaneously integrating microfiltration and forward membranes for low-strength wastewater treatment. J Membr Sci, 527: 1–7

[25] Wang X H, Zhang J F, Chang V W C, She Q H, Tang C Y (2018). Removal of cytostatic drugs from wastewater by an anaerobic osmotic membrane bioreactor. Chem Eng J, 339: 153–161

[26] Wang X H, Zhao Y X, Li X F, Ren Y P (2017c). Performance evaluation of a microfiltration-osmotic membrane bioreactor (MF-OMBR) during removing silver nanoparticles from simulated wastewater. Chem Eng J, 313: 171–178

[27] Wang Z W, Wu Z C, Ying X, Tian L (2008). Membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) under sub-critical flux operation: Membrane foulant and gel layer characterization. J Membr Sci, 325(1): 238–244

[28] Werner C M, Logan B E, Saikaly P E, Amy G L (2013). Wastewater treatment, energy recovery and desalination using a forward osmosis membrane in an air-cathode microbial osmotic fuel cell. J Membr Sci, 428(428): 116–122

[29] Xie M, Bar-Zeev E, Hashmi S M, Nghiem L D, Elimelech M (2015). Role of Reverse Divalent Cation Diffusion in Forward Osmosis Biofouling. Environ Sci Technol, 49(22): 13222–13229

[30] Yang E, Chae K J, Alayande A B, Kim K Y, Kim I S (2016). Concurrent performance improvement and biofouling mitigation in osmotic microbial fuel cells using a silver nanoparticle-polydopamine coated forward osmosis membrane. J Membr Sci, 513: 217–225

[31] Yuan B, Wang X, Tang C, Li X, Yu G (2015). In situ observation of the growth of biofouling layer in osmotic membrane bioreactors by multiple fluorescence labeling and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Water Res, 75: 188–200

[32] Zhang F, Brastad K S, He Z (2011). Integrating forward osmosis into microbial fuel cells for wastewater treatment, water extraction and bioelectricity generation. Environ Sci Technol, 45(15): 6690–6696

[33] Zhang F, Jacobson K S, Torres P, He Z (2010). Effects of anolyte recirculation rates and catholytes on electricity generation in a liter-scale upflow microbial fuel cell. Energy Environ Sci, 3(9): 1347–1352

[34] Zhang J S, Loong W C L, Chou S, Tang C Y, Wang R, Fane A G (2012). Membrane biofouling and scaling in forward osmosis membrane bioreactor. J Membr Sci, 403: 8–14

[35] Zhu W J, Wang X H, She Q H, Li X F, Ren Y P (2018). Osmotic membrane bioreactors assisted with microfiltration membrane for salinity control (MF-OMBR) operating at high sludge concentrations: Performance and implications. Chem Eng J, 337: 576–583

[36] Zhu X Z, Zhang F, Li W W, Li J, Li L L, Yu H Q, Huang M S, Huang T Y (2016). Insights into enhanced current generation of an osmotic microbial fuel cell under membrane fouling condition. J Membr Sci, 504: 40–46

[37] Zhu X Z, Zhang F, Li W W, Liu H Q, Wang Y K, Huang M S (2015). Forward osmosis membrane favors an improved proton flux and electricity generation in microbial fuel cells. Desalination, 372: 26–31

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature