Wastewater-nitrogen removal using polylactic acid/starch as carbon source: Optimization of operating parameters using response surface methodology

Yan GUO, Chuanfu WU, Qunhui WANG, Min YANG, Qiqi HUANG, Markus MAGEP, Tianlong ZHENG

PDF(1278 KB)
PDF(1278 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2016, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (4) : 6. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-016-0845-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Wastewater-nitrogen removal using polylactic acid/starch as carbon source: Optimization of operating parameters using response surface methodology

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The use of PLA/starch blends for nitrogen removal was achieved.

The influence of different operating parameters on responses was verified using RSM.

The conditions for desired responses were successfully optimized simultaneously.

Blends material may have a promising application prospect in the future.

Nitrogen removal from ammonium-containing wastewater was conducted using polylactic acid (PLA)/starch blends as carbon source and carrier for functional bacteria. The exclusive and interactive influences of operating parameters (i.e., temperature, pH, stirring rate, and PLA-to-starch ratio (PLA proportion)) on nitrification (Y1), denitrification (Y2), and COD release rates (Y3) were investigated through response surface methodology. Experimental results indicated that nitrogen removal could be successfully achieved in the PLA/starch blends through simultaneous nitrification and denitrification. The carbon release rate of the blends was controllable. The sensitivity of Y1, Y2, and Y3 to different operating parameters also differed. The sequence for each response was as follows: for Y1, pH>stirring rate>PLA proportion>temperature; for Y2, pH>PLA proportion>temperature>stirring rate; and for Y3, stirring rate>pH>PLA proportion>temperature. In this study, the following optimum conditions were observed: temperature, 32.0°C; pH 7.7; stirring rate, 200.0 r·min-1; and PLA proportion, 0.4. Under these conditions, Y1, Y2, and Y3 were 134.0 µg-N·g-blend-1·h-1, 160.9 µg-N·g-blend-1·h-1, and 7.6 × 103 µg-O·g-blend-1·h-1, respectively. These results suggested that the PLA/starch blends may be an ideal packing material for nitrogen removal.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Nitrogen removal / Polylactic acid / Starch / Carbon source / Response surface methodology

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yan GUO, Chuanfu WU, Qunhui WANG, Min YANG, Qiqi HUANG, Markus MAGEP, Tianlong ZHENG. Wastewater-nitrogen removal using polylactic acid/starch as carbon source: Optimization of operating parameters using response surface methodology. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(4): 6 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-016-0845-y

References

[1]
Li X, Shi H, Li K, Zhang L. Combined process of biofiltration and ozone oxidation as an advanced treatment process for wastewater reuse. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering, 2015, 9(6): 1076–1083
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Hocaoglu S M, Insel G, Cokgor E U, Orhon D. Effect of sludge age on simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in membrane bioreactor. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(12): 6665–6672
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[3]
Chu L, Wang J. Comparison of polyurethane foam and biodegradable polymer as carriers in moving bed biofilm reactor for treating wastewater with a low C/N ratio. Chemosphere, 2011, 83(1): 63–68
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[4]
Shen Z, Wang J. Biological denitrification using cross-linked starch/PCL blends as solid carbon source and biofilm carrier. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(19): 8835–8838
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[5]
Zhao X, Meng X, Wang J. Biological denitrification of drinking water using biodegradable polymer. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 2009, 38(3): 328–338
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Zhou H, Zhao X, Wang J. Nitrate removal from groundwater using biodegradable polymers as carbon source and biofilm support. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 2009, 38(3): 339–348
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Chu L, Wang J. Nitrogen removal using biodegradable polymers as carbon source and biofilm carriers in a moving bed biofilm reactor. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 170(1): 220–225
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Aslan Ü, Türkman A E. Combined biological removal of nitrate and pesticides using wheat straw as substrates. Process Biochemistry, 2005, 40(2): 935–943
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Soares M I M, Abeliovich A. Wheat straw as substrate for water denitrification. Water Research, 1998, 32(12): 3790–3794
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Volokita M, Abehovich A, Soares M I M. Denitrification of groundwater using cotton as energy source. Water Science and Technology, 1996, 34(1–2): 379–385
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Volokita M, Belkin S, Abeliovich A, Soares M I M. Biological denitrification of drinking water using newspaper. Water Research, 1996, 30(4): 965–971
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Hiraishi A, Khan S T. Application of polyhydroxyalkanoates for denitrification in water and wastewater treatment. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2003, 61(2): 103–109
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[13]
Wang X, Wang J. Removal of nitrate from groundwater by heterotrophic denitrification using the solid carbon source. Science In China Series B-Chemistry, 2009, 52(2): 236–240
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Zhou H, Zhao X, Wang J. Poly (epsilon-caprolactone) as substrate for water denitrification. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 2009, 38(3): 349–359
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Boley A, Müller W R. Denitrification with polycaprolactone as solid substrate in a laboratory-scale recirculated aquaculture system. Water Science and Technology, 2005, 52(10–11): 495–502
Pubmed
[16]
Aslan S, Türkman A. Biological denitrification of drinking water using various natural organic solid substrates. Water Science and Technology, 2003, 48(11–12): 489–495
Pubmed
[17]
Matzinos P, Tserki V, Kontoyiannis A, Panayiotou C. Processing and characterization of starch/polycaprolactone products. Polymer Degradation & Stability, 2002, 77(1): 17–24
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Shen Z, Zhou Y, Wang J. Comparison of denitrification performance and microbial diversity using starch/polylactic acid blends and ethanol as electron donor for nitrate removal. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 131(3): 33–39
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[19]
Wu C, Tang D, Wang Q, Wang J, Liu J, Guo Y, Liu S. Comparison of denitrification performances using PLA/starch with different mass ratios as carbon source. Water Science and Technology, 2015, 71(7): 1019–1025
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[20]
Fan Z X, Wang J L. [Denitrification using polylactic acid as solid carbon source]. Huan Jing Ke Xue, 2009, 30(8): 2315–2319
Pubmed
[21]
Kokufuta E, Shimohashi M, Nakamura I. Simultaneously occurring nitrification and denitrification under oxygen gradient by polyelectrolyte complex-coimmobilized Nitrosomonas europaea and Paracoccus denitrificans cells. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 1988, 31(4): 382–384
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[22]
Santos V A P M, Bruijnse M, Tramper J, Wijffels R H. The magic-bead concept: an integrated approach to nitrogen removal with co-immobilized micro-organisms. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 1996, 45(4): 447–453
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Cao G M, Zhang T. Study on single-stage biodenitrification by immobilized cells. China Environmentalence, 2000
[24]
Box G E P, Wilson K B. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Sp r inger Series in Statistics, 1992, 13(1): 1–45
[25]
Myers R H, Montgomery D C. Response Surface Methodology, 1988, Taylor & Francis.
[26]
Richard F G. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. Technometrics, 1996, 38(3): 284–286
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Liyana-Pathirana C, Shahidi F. Optimization of extraction of phenolic compounds from wheat using response surface methodology. Food Chemistry, 2005, 93(1): 47–56
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Sakuma T, Jinsiriwanit S, Hattori T, Deshusses M A. Removal of ammonia from contaminated air in a biotrickling filter—denitrifying bioreactor combination system. Water Research, 2008, 42(17): 4507–4513
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[29]
Gilcreas F W. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Journal of Public Health and the Nation's Health, 2012, 56(3): 113–117
[30]
Li B, Irvin S. The comparison of alkalinity and ORP as indicators for nitrification and denitrification in a sequencing batch reactor (SBR). Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2007, 34(3): 248–255
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Zhang C, Zhang S, Zhang L, Rong H, Zhang K. Effects of constant pH and unsteady pH at different free ammonia concentrations on shortcut nitrification for landfill leachate treatment. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2015, 99(8): 3707–3713
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[32]
Cameron S G, Schipper L A. Nitrate removal and hydraulic performance of organic carbon for use in denitrification beds. Ecological Engineering, 2010, 36(11): 1588–1595
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Rai C, Majumdar G C, De S. Optimization of Process Parameters for Water Extraction of Stevioside using Response Surface Methodology. Separation Science and Technology, 2012, 47(7): 1014–1022
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Do H, Lim J, Shin S G, Wu Y, Ahn J, Hwang S. Simultaneous effect of temperature, cyanide and ammonia-oxidizing bacteria concentrations on ammonia oxidation. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2008, 35(11): 1331–1338

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41505124) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. FRF-TP-15-044A1).
Funding
 

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1278 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/