An assessment of China-Japan-Korea Free Trade Agreement’s economic and environmental impacts on China

Zhaoyang LIU, Xianqiang MAO, Wei TANG, Tao HU, Peng SONG

PDF(153 KB)
PDF(153 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2012, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (6) : 849-859. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-012-0432-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

An assessment of China-Japan-Korea Free Trade Agreement’s economic and environmental impacts on China

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Recently, China, Japan, and the Republic of Korea (Korea) are conducting a government-commissioned feasibility study on the Free Trade Agreement among the three countries (CJKFTA) to form a regional free trade zone in East Asia. Considering that freer trade can cause unexpected impact on domestic environment, there is a need to evaluate the environmental impact of such a trade policy. This move should be made to help negotiators understand and pay more attention to environmental issues during CJKFTA negotiations, and to help lobby with the government to carry out appropriate policy instruments for adaptation or mitigation. Following the Chain Reaction Assessment Method that integrates and links the elements of trade, production, and environment, the present research aims to quantitatively assess CJKFTA’s possible impact on China’s environment. This is done by estimating the variations of China’s major conventional pollutants and greenhouse gases (GHGs) emission in two policy scenarios to represent CJKFTA’s scale and composition effects on China’s environment. Estimating the variations is based on a static Computable General Equilibrium model, working with Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) 7 database and China’s energy-environment statistics. Based on these assessments, CJKFTA is predicted to lead to notable environmental impact, including increased emissions of agricultural total nitrogen, agricultural total phosphorus, chemical oxygen demand, and GHGs. On the other hand, decreased emissions of industrial SO2 and dust are also expected to happen. Suitable policies need to be made to combat negative effects and amplify positive ones, while aiming at a more sustainable regional freer trade system.

Keywords

Free Trade Agreement / Strategic Environmental Assessment / Chain Reaction Assessment Method / Computable General Equilibrium model / Global Trade Analysis Project

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhaoyang LIU, Xianqiang MAO, Wei TANG, Tao HU, Peng SONG. An assessment of China-Japan-Korea Free Trade Agreement’s economic and environmental impacts on China. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2012, 6(6): 849‒859 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-012-0432-9

References

[1]
Yoffie D, Gomes-Casseres B. International Trade and Competition. New York: McGraw Hill, 1994
[2]
Zhang X J. Core of regional economic integration: there exists a great potential in investment and trade among China, Japan and ROK. Inter Trade, 2003, (1): 4–8 (in Chinese)
[3]
Hu T, Wu Y P, Shen X Y, Mao X Q, Li L P, Yu H, Guo D M. China’s foreign trade deficit in term of resources and environment. China Population Resources and Environment, 2008, 18(2): 204–207 (in Chinese)
[4]
UNEP. Environment and Trade: A Handbook. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2005
[5]
Rock M. Pollution intensity of GDP and trade policy: can the world bank be wrong? World Development, 1996, 24(3): 471–479
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Antweiler W, Copeland B, Taylor S. Is free trade good for the environment? American Economic Review, 2001, 91(4): 877–908
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Gorssman G, Krueger A. Environment Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), 1991
[8]
OECD. The Environmental Effects of Trade. Paris: OECD, 1994
[9]
Hussein A, Ron B, Barry S. Environmental Impact Assessment and Strategic Environmental Assessment: Towards an Integrated Approach. Nairobi: UNEP, 2004
[10]
Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada (DFAIT). Handbook for Conducting Environmental Assessments of Trade Negotiations. Ottawa: DFAIT, 2008
[11]
Study Group on Environment and Economic Partnership Agreements/Free Trade Agreements. Guideline on Environmental Impact Assessment of Economic Partnership Agreements and Free Trade Agreements in Japan. Tokyo: Ministry of the Environment of Government of Japan, 2004
[12]
OECD. Applying Strategic Environmental Assessment: Good Practice Guidance for Development Co-operation. Paris: OECD, 2006
[13]
Directorate-General (DG) for Trade of European Commission. Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment of the Negotiations of a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the EU and China. Brussels: Directorate-General (DG) for Trade of European Commission, 2008
[14]
Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada (DFAIT). Initial Environmental Assessment (EA) of the Canada-China Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement. Ottawa: DFAIT, 2008
[15]
Ye R Q. Environment and Trade. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2001 (in Chinese)
[16]
Mao X Q, Li X Q, Tu Y Y, Hu T, Zhang Y Q. Case study on environmental impact assement of agriculture sector trade policy. China Population Resources and Environment, 2005, 15(6): 40–45 (in Chinese)
[17]
Shen X Y. Environmental deficit of trade surplus of textile industry. Environment Protection, 2007, (08A): 26–38 (in Chinese)
[18]
Li L P. Environmental impact assessment on trade policy of China chemical industry. Environment Protection, 2007, (08A):44–46 (in Chinese)
[19]
Hu T, Sun B Y, Zhao Y H. Environmental impact of China’s access to WTO. Environmental Science Trends, 2000, (1): 6–10 (in Chinese)
[20]
Li S T, Zhai F, Xuan X W. Environmental Impact of China’s Access to WTO. Beijing: Development Research Center of China State Council, 2002 (in Chinese)
[21]
Sun X Y. Possible Free Trade Area among China, Japan and Korea. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2006 (in Chinese)
[22]
Japan Korea Joint Study Group. Japan-Korea Free Trade Agreement Joint Study Group Report. Seoul: Japan Korea Joint Study Group, 2003
[23]
Yu H. The environmental impacts of regional economy and trade cooperation among China, Japan and ROK. Environmental Protection, 2007, (08A): 51–53 (in Chinese)
[24]
Liu Z Y, Mao X Q, Zhou Y, Tang W, Yang L. Analysis on China-Japan-Korea Free Trade Agreement’s impact on environment and economy. China Population Resources and Environment, 2009, 19(Suppl 3): 1–4 (in Chinese)
[25]
Shoven J, Whalley J. Applied general equilibrium models of taxation and international trade: an introduction and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 1984, 22(3): 1007–1051
[26]
Zheng Y X, Fan M T. CGE Model and Policy Analysis of China. Beijing: Social Science Literature Press, 1999 (in Chinese)
[27]
Shoven J, Whalley J. Applying General Equilibrium. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992
[28]
Huang Y N, Wang X J. Development of environmental computable general equilibrium model and analysis of its features. China Population Resource and Environment, 2002, 12(2): 34–38 (in Chinese)
[29]
Hertel T. Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997
[30]
Hertel T, Walmsley T. GTAP 7 Data Base Documentation. West Lafayette: Center for Global Trade Analysis, 2008
[31]
Burniaux J M, Truong P T. GTAP-E: An Energy-Environmental Version of the GTAP Model. West Lafayette: Center for Global Trade Analysis, 2002
[32]
Rutherford T, Arbor A. GTAP 6 in GAMS: The Dataset and Static Model. Moscow: Applied General Equilibrium Modeling for Trade Policy Analysis in Russia and the CIS, 2005
[33]
Rutherford T. Economic Equilibrium Modeling with GAMS: An Introduction to GAMS/MCP and GAMS/MPSGE. Washington DC: GAMS Development Corporation, 1998
[34]
Rosenthal R. GAMS: A User’s Guide. Washington DC: GAMS Development Corporation, 2008
[35]
Kitwiwattanachai A, Nelson D, Reed G. Quantitative impacts of alternative east asia free trade areas: a computable general equilibrium (CGE) assessment. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2010, 32(2): 286–301
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
China Environment Yearbook Editorial Committee. China Environment Yearbook2005. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2005 (in Chinese)
[37]
Lai S Y, Du P F, Chen J N. Evaluation of non-point source pollution based on unit analysis. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2004, 44(9): 1184–1187
[38]
National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistical Yearbook 2005. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2005 (in Chinese)
[39]
National Development and Reform Commission of China. People’s Republic of China National Greenhouse Gas Inventory. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2007 (in Chinese)
[40]
Dean J, Feinberg R, Ferrantino M, Ludema R. Estimating the Tariff-Equivalent of NTBS. Washington DC: US International Trade Commission, 2003
[41]
WTO. World Tariff Profiles. Lausanne: WTO Publication, 2008
[42]
Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China. China Commerce Yearbook 2009. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2009 (in Chinese)
[43]
Melitz M J. The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 2003, 71(6): 1695–1725
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Zhai F. Armington meets Melitz: introducing firm heterogeneity in a global CGE model of trade. Journal of Economic Integration, 2008, 23(3): 575–604

Acknowledgements

In the process of this research, Qinghua XU, Li FANG, Xiaoyue SHEN, Yao DONG, and Yuping WU from China’s Ministry of Environmental Production (MEP) have shared their experience from the viewpoint of policy makers and consultants. Jianwu HE from the Development Research Center of China’s State Council (DRC) and Nathan Rive from Imperial College London (ICL) have made suggestions in the CGE modeling work. Their kind help is greatly appreciated by the authors.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(153 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/