Present-day in situ stress distribution in shale oil reservoirs of Boxing subsag from 1D mechanical earth model and 3D geomechanical model
Wei JU , Zupeng LIU , Haiting ZHOU , Jiayao CHENG , Guocui GU , Liyang CHEN , Ruyue WANG , Hang YUAN , Jingshou LIU , Yu WANG
The Boxing subsag of the Bohai Bay Basin is estimated to contain a significant volume of shale oil resources; however, the present-day in situ stress distributions are poorly understood, which limits further shale oil production. To address the above issue, a one-dimensional mechanical earth model and three-dimensional geomechanical model were established to analyze the stress distribution within shale oil reservoirs of the Boxing subsag. The results indicate that the vertical (Sv), horizontal maximum (SHmax) and horizontal minimum (Shmin) principal stress magnitudes follow the relationship of SHmax > Sv > Shmin, indicating a dominant strike-slip faulting stress regime. Laterally, the distributions of SHmax and Shmin are similar, with higher and lower stress values in the north-western and southern parts of the study area, respectively. The calculated horizontal and vertical stress difference coefficients suggest that hydraulic fractures in shale oil reservoir of the Boxing subsag may be complex. In addition, based on interpretations from imaging logs, the SHmax and natural fracture orientations are ~E–W-trending and ~ENE–WSW-trending, respectively. The angles between the SHmax orientation and fracture strike are relatively small, indicating that natural fractures are highly mechanically effective under the present-day in situ stress state. Horizontal wells are better drilled along the Shmin orientation; therefore, hydraulic fractures may be optimal for contacting more reservoir rocks. The results provide geological and engineering references for shale oil development in the Boxing subsag.
in situ stress / geomechanical model / mechanical earth model / Boxing subsag / shale oil / Bohai Bay Basin
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
Higher Education Press
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |