Projected changes of runoff in the Upper Yellow River Basin under shared socioeconomic pathways

Ziyan CHEN, Buda SU, Mengxia ZHAO, Yim ling SIU, Jinlong HUANG, Mingjin ZHAN, Tong JIANG

PDF(5466 KB)
PDF(5466 KB)
Front. Earth Sci. ›› DOI: 10.1007/s11707-022-1032-z
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Projected changes of runoff in the Upper Yellow River Basin under shared socioeconomic pathways

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Climate change has significantly impacted the water resources and conservation area of the Yellow River basin. The Upper Yellow River basin (UYR), referring to the area above Lanzhou station on the Yellow River is the focus of this study, the runoff changes in the UYR would greatly impact the water resources in China. Most existing studies rely on a single hydrological model (HM) to evaluate runoff changes instead of multiple models and criteria. In terms of the UYR, outputs of the previous Coupled Model International Comparison Project (CMIP) are used as drivers of HMs. In this study, the weighted results of three HMs were evaluated using multiple criteria to investigate the projected changes in discharge in the UYR using the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) from CMIP6. The research’s key findings include the following. 1) Annual discharge in the UYR is expected to increase by 15.2%−64.4% at the end of the 21st century under the 7 SSPs. In the long-term (2081−2100), the summer and autumn discharge will increase by 18.9%−56.6% and 11.8%−70%, respectively. 2) The risk of flooding in the UYR is likely to increase in the three future periods (2021−2040, 2041−2060, 2081−2100) under all 7 SSPs. Furthermore, the drought risk will decrease under most scenarios in all three future periods. The verified HMs and the latest SSPs are applied in this study to provide basin-scale climate impact projections for the UYR to support water resource management.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) / climate change / discharge / the Upper Yellow River basin

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ziyan CHEN, Buda SU, Mengxia ZHAO, Yim ling SIU, Jinlong HUANG, Mingjin ZHAN, Tong JIANG. Projected changes of runoff in the Upper Yellow River Basin under shared socioeconomic pathways. Front. Earth Sci., https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-022-1032-z

References

[1]
Arnold J, Srinivasan R, Muttiah R, Williams J R (1998). Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development.J Am Water Resour Assoc, 34(1): 73–89
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Arsenault R, Gatien P, Renaud B, Brissette F, Martel J (2015). A comparative analysis of 9 multimodel averaging approaches in hydrological continuous streamflow simulation.J Hydrol (Amst), 529: 754–767
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Bergström S, Forsman A (1973). Development of a conceptual deterministic rainfall-runoff model.Nord Hydrol, 4(3): 147–170
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Chang J, Wei J, Wang Y, Yuan M, Guo J (2017). Precipitation and runoff variations in the Yellow River Basin of China.J Hydroinform, 19(1): 138–155
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
ChenL (2017). Responses of water resources to the climate change in the Yellow River Basin. Dissertation for Master’s Degree. Xi᾽an: Xi᾽an University of Technology (in Chinese)
[6]
Chen Z, Wang Y, Su B, Huang J, Jiang T (2020). Research on the response of runoff to climate change in Wujiang River Basin based on multi-model (1861–2018).Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 30(08): 1927–1937
[7]
Dawson C W, Mount N J, Abrahart R J, Shamseldin A Y (2012). Ideal point error for model assessment in data-driven river flow forecasting.Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 16(8): 3049–3060
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Eghdamirad S, Johnson F, Sharma A, Kim J H (2019). The influence of dependence in characterizing multivariable uncertainty for climate change impact assessments.Hydrol Sci J, 64(6): 731–738
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Franke R (1982). Scattered data interpolation: tests of some methods.Math Comput, 38(157): 181–200
[10]
GaoC, SuB, KrysanovaV, Zha Q, ChenC, LuoG, ZengX, HuangJ, Xiong M, ZhangL, JiangT (2019). A 439-year daily discharge dataset (1861–2299) for the upper Yangtze River, China. Earth System Science Data Discussions, 1–26
[11]
Gidden M J, Riahi K, Smith S J, Fujimori S, Luderer G, Kriegler E, van Vuuren D P, van den Berg M, Feng L, Klein D, Calvin K, Doelman J C, Frank S, Fricko O, Harmsen M, Hasegawa T, Havlik P, Hilaire J, Hoesly R, Horing J, Popp A, Stehfest E, Takahashi K (2019). Global emissions pathways under different socioeconomic scenarios for use in CMIP6: a dataset of harmonized emissions trajectories through the end of the century.Geosci Model Dev, 12(4): 1443–1475
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Gupta H V, Kling H, Yilmaz K K, Martinez G F (2009). Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: implications for improving hydrological modelling.J Hydrol, 377(1−2): 80–91
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Hamed R, Ramachandra Rao A (1998). A modified Mann-Kendall trend test for autocorrelated data.J Hydrol (Amst), 204(1): 182–196
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Hausfather Z, Peters G P (2020). Emissions – the ‘business as usual’ story is misleading.Nature, 577(7792): 618–620
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Höllermann B, Evers M (2017). Perception and handling of uncertainties in water management—a study of practitioners’ and scientists’ perspectives on uncertainty in their daily decision-making.Environ Sci Policy, 71: 9–18
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
HuangJ (2014). Study on Changes of Runoff in Cuntan Catchment of the Yangtze river. Dissertation for Master’s Degree. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology (in Chinese)
[17]
Huang J, Zhai J, Jiang T, Wang Y, Li X, Wang R, Xiong M, Su B, Fischer T (2018). Analysis of future drought characteristics in China using the regional climate model CCLM.Clim Dyn, 50(1): 507–525
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
IPCC (2001).Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. In: Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
[19]
IPCC (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. In: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
[20]
Jia Y, Dong Z, Bian J, Zhong D, Lin M (2019). Research on multi-objective optimal operation of the cascade reservoirs of the Upper Yellow River.Yellow River, 41(1): 41–45, 50
[21]
Kang L, Ruby L L, Liu C, Wang S (2015). Simulative study of future climate and hydrological change over the Yellow River basin.Acta Meteorol Sin, 73(2): 382–393
[22]
Krysanova V, Bronstert A, Müller-Wohlfeil D I (1999). Modelling river discharge for large drainage basins: from lumped to distributed approach.Hydrol Sci J, 44(2): 313–331
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
KrysanovaV, Donnelly C, GelfanA, GertenD, Arheimer B, HattermannF, KundzewiczZ W (2018). How the performance of hydrological models relates to credibility of projections under climate change. Hydrol Sci J Hydrologiques, 1–25
[24]
Lambert S J, Boer G J (2001). CMIP1 evaluation and intercomparison of coupled climate models.Clim Dyn, 17(2−3): 83–106
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Li C, Jiang T, Wang Y, Miao L, Li S, Chen Z, Lv Y (2022). Simulation and estimation of future air temperature in upper basin of the Yellow River based on CMIP6 models.J Glaciol Geocryol, 44(01): 171–178
[26]
Li H, Sheffield J, Wood E F (2010). Bias correction of monthly precipitation and temperature fields from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change AR4 models using equidistant quantile matching.J Geophys Res, 115: D10101
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Liang X, Lettenmaier D P, Wood E F, Burges S (1994). A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models.J Geophys Res, 99(D7): 14415–14428
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Mann H B (1945). Nonparametric tests against trend.Econometrica, 13(3): 245–259
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Meng F, Su F, Yang D, Tong K, Hao Z (2016). Impacts of recent climate change on the hydrology in the source region of the Yellow River basin.J Hydrol (Amst), 6(C): 66–81
[30]
Moran P A P, Kendall M G (1951). Rank correlation methods.J R Stat Soc (Ser A), 114(1): 99–100
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Moriasi D N, Arnold J G, Van Liew M W, Bingner R L, Harmel , R D, Veith T L (2007). Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.Transactions of the ASABE, 50(3): 885–900
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
O’Neill B C, Tebaldi C, van Vuuren D P, Eyring V, Friedlingstein P, Hurtt G, Knutti R, Kriegler E, Lamarque J F, Lowe J, Meehl G A, Moss R, Riahi K, Sanderson B M (2016). The scenario model intercomparison project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6.Geosci Model Dev, 9(9): 3461–3482
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Peng S, Shang W, Wang Y, Jun L, Zheng X (2018). Research on ecological impacts of the joint operation of cascade reservoirs in the upstream of the Yellow River.J Hydraul Eng (NYNY), 49: 1187–1198
[34]
Puertes C, Lidón A, Echeverría C, Bautista I, González-Sanchis M, del Campo A D, Francés F (2019). Explaining the hydrological behaviour of facultative phreatophytes using a multi-variable and multi-objective modelling approach.J Hydrol (Amst), 575: 395–407
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Qin J, Su B, Tao H, Wang Y, Huang J, Jiang T (2021). Projection of temperature and precipitation under SSPs-RCPs Scenarios over northwest China.Front Earth Sci, 15(1): 23–37
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Qin P, Liu M, Du L, Xu H, Liu L, Xiao C (2019). Climate change impacts on runoff in the upper Yangtze River basin.Climate Change Research, 15(4): 405–415
[37]
Ritter A, Muñoz-Carpena R (2013). Performance evaluation of hydrological models: statistical significance for reducing subjectivity in goodness-of-fit assessments.J Hydrol, 480: 33–45
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Shamseldin A Y, O’connor K M, Nasr A E (2007). A comparative study of three neural network forecast combination methods for simulated river flows of different rainfall—runoff models.Hydrol Sci J, 52(5): 896–916
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Stocker T, Qin D, Plattner G (2014). Climate change 2013: the physical science basis.In: Contribution of working group into the fifth assessment report of IPCC the intergovernmental panel on climate change, 18(2): 95–123
[40]
Su B, Huang J, Zeng X, Gao C, Jiang T (2017). Impacts of climate change on streamflow in the upper Yangtze River basin.Clim Change, 141(3): 533–546
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Sun Y (2021). Impact of human activities on climate system: an interpretation of Chapter I of WGI report of IPCC AR6.Transact Atmosph Sci, 44(5): 654–657
[42]
Taylor K E (2001). Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram.J Geophys Res, 106(D7): 7183–7192
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Taylor K E, Stouffer R J, Meehl G A (2012). An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design.Bull Am Meteorol Soc, 93(4): 485–498
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Torres R R, Marengo J A (2014). Climate change hotspots over South America: from CMIP3 to CMIP5 multi-model datasets.Theor Appl Climatol, 117(3−4): 579–587
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
van Vuuren D P, Edmonds J, Kainuma M, Riahi K, Thomson A, Hibbard K, Hurtt G C, Kram T, Krey V, Lamarque J F, Masui T, Meinshausen M, Nakicenovic N, Smith S J, Rose S K (2011). The representative concentration pathways: an overview.Clim Change, 109(1−2): 5–31
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Vetter T, Huang S, Aich V, Yang T, Wang X, Krysanova V, Hattermann F (2015). Multi-model climate impact assessment and intercomparison for three large-scale river basins on three continents.Earth Syst Dyn, 6(1): 17–43
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
WangG, QiaoC, LiuM, Du F, Ye T, Wang J (2020). The future water resources regime of the Yellow River basin in the context of climate change. Hydro-Sci Engineer, 180(2): 4–11 (Chinese)
[48]
WangL, LiY, QixiangC, Wu S, FangF (2016). A new method of multi model ensemble to improve the simulation of the geographic distribution of Köppen-Geiger climate classification. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts
[49]
Wang Y, Quan Q, Xue T, Shen B, Zhang X (2018). Hydrological impact of climate change on the source region of the Yellow River.J Water Resourc Res, 7(2): 135–143
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Wei J, Chang J, Chen L (2016). Runoff change in upper reach of Yellow River under future climate change based on VIC model.J Hydroelectric Engineer, 35(05): 65–74
[51]
Wei Y, Li X, Li F (2021). Spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of wet and dry of runoff in the upper reaches of the Yellow River.Water Resourc Protect, 37(06): 103–113
[52]
Wen S, Su B, Wang Y, Zhai J, Sun H, Chen Z, Huang L, Wang A, Jiang T (2020). Comprehensive evaluation of hydrological models for climate change impact assessment in the Upper Yangtze River Basin, China.Clim Change, 163(3): 1207–1226
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Xi J, Yang X, Lv X, Hu H (2021). Hydrological simulation of Heihe and Baihe River Basin based on SWAT model.Yellow River, (10): 60–66+113
[54]
YanY (2017). Simulation of water resources in the upper reaches of the Yellow River and its future evolution. Dissertation for Master’s Degree. Shanghai: East China Normal University (in Chinese)
[55]
Zhang L, Chen X, Xin X (2019). Short commentary on CMIP6 Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP).Climate Change Res, 15(05): 519–525
[56]
Zhao M, Su B, Wang Y, Wang A, Jiang T (2020). Impacts of climate change on river runoff at the Ganjiang and Guanting River basins in the eastern monsoon region.Climate Change Res, 16(6): 679–689
[57]
Zhou T, Zou L, Chen X (2019). Commentary on the coupled model intercomparison project phase 6 (CMIP6).Climate Change Res, 15(5): 445–456
[58]
Zuo Q (2019). Research framework for ecological protection and high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin.Yellow River, 41(11): 1–6+16

Acknowledgments

This study was jointly supported by the International Cooperation Program between the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) and United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) (Grant No. 42261144002), and the Jiangxi Meteorological Bureau (No. JX201810) and the High-level Talent Recruitment Program of the Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(5466 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/