GIS-based flood proneness screening: a prelude to stormwater management in rapidly urbanizing catchments

Given J. MHINA , Marina B. JENSEN , Thomas BALSTRØM

Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (1) : 68 -79.

PDF (611KB)
Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (1) : 68 -79. DOI: 10.1007/s11707-021-0924-7
RESEARCH ARTICLE

GIS-based flood proneness screening: a prelude to stormwater management in rapidly urbanizing catchments

Author information +
History +
PDF (611KB)

Abstract

Absence of reliable hydro-climatic information is among the bottlenecks for inadequate and improper management of stormwater runoff in rapidly-urbanizing catchments. This paper explores the influence of catchment heterogeneity in understanding the proneness of urban catchments to stormwater-borne hazards. Using GIS techniques, satellite images, and field surveys, geomorphological features and hydrologic characteristics of the Mbezi River catchment in Dar es Salaam-Tanzania were modeled to understand variations in their influence on flood hazards occurrence throughout the study catchment. The findings reveal that with GIS techniques public, domain Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) can provide preliminary but useful insights to inform stormwater management decisions in cities with limited hydrological data. Specifically, the heterogeneity characterization of the case study catchment indicates that Mbezi River is fern-leaf-shaped: it has a well-drained catchment (drainage density= 1.9 km/km2), with total relief and elongation ratios of 265 m and 0.25, respectively. Results further revealed that the catchment is comprised of many natural sinks (blue spots) that, upon enhancement, can retain about 18 percent of stormwater runoff that could otherwise contribute to downstream runoff challenges. About 68 per cent of the major sinks (with potential volume>2.4 m3) are located along the river flood plain where land is publicly owned. Additionally, more than 11.6 ha of land (as property) and 168 buildings are in areas that were mapped to have large natural sinks and they are at risk to flooding when the sinks get filled.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

flood risk mapping / runoff modelling / flood control / runoff routing

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Given J. MHINA, Marina B. JENSEN, Thomas BALSTRØM. GIS-based flood proneness screening: a prelude to stormwater management in rapidly urbanizing catchments. Front. Earth Sci., 2025, 19(1): 68-79 DOI:10.1007/s11707-021-0924-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Apel H, Aronica G, Kreibich H, Thieken A (2009). Flood risk analyses—how detailed do we need to be? Nat Hazards, 49(1): 79–98

[2]

Baby S N, Arrowsmith C, Liu G J, Mitchell D, Al-Ansari N, Abbas N (2021). Finding areas at risk from floods in a downpour using the Lidar-based elevation model. J Civil Eng Archit

[3]

Ballesteros Cánovas J, Eguibar M, Bodoque J, Díez‐Herrero A, Stoffel M, Gutiérrez‐Pérez I (2011). Estimating flash flood discharge in an ungauged mountain catchment with 2D hydraulic models and dendrogeomorphic palaeostage indicators. Hydrol Processes, 25(6): 970–979

[4]

Balstrøm T, Crawford D (2018). Arc-Malstrøm: a 1D hydrologic screening method for stormwater assessments based on geometric networks. Comput Geosci, 116: 64–73

[5]

Betson R P (1964). What is watershed runoff? J Geophys Res, 69(8): 1541–1552

[6]

Beven K J (2011). Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: the Primer. New York: John Wiley & Sons

[7]

Blöschl G (2005). Rainfall-runoff modeling of ungauged catchments. In: Anderson M G, ed. Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences. New York: John Wiley & Sons

[8]

Chadha D K, Neupane B R (2011). Significance of Geomorphic Analysis of Watershed for Optimization of Recharge Structures. UNESCO

[9]

Chen J, Hill A A, Urbano L D (2009). A GIS-based model for urban flood inundation. J Hydrol (Amst), 373(1–2): 184–192

[10]

Debo T N, Reese A (2003). Municipal Stormwater Management. CRC Press

[11]

Dhalla S, Zimmer C (2010). Landscape-Based Stormwater Managment Manual. Toronto: Toronto and Region Conservation Authority

[12]

Dunne T, Whipple K X, Aubry B F (1995). Microtopography of hillslopes and initiation of channels by Horton overland flow. In: Costa J E, Miller A J, Potter K W, Wilcock P R, eds. Natural and Anthoropogenic Influenes in Fluvial Geomorphology. Geophys Monogr Am Geophys Un, 89: 27–44

[13]

Florinsky I, Skrypitsyna T, Luschikova O (2018). Comparative accuracy of the AW3D30 DSM, ASTER GDEM, and SRTM1 DEM: a case study on the Zaoksky testing ground, Central European Russia. Remote Sens Lett, 9(7): 706–714

[14]

Francis R A (2012). Positioning urban rivers within urban ecology. Urban Ecosyst, 15(2): 285–291

[15]

Furze S, Ogilvie J, Arp P A (2017). Fusing digital elevation models to improve hydrological interpretations. J Geogr Inf Syst, 9(5): 558–575

[16]

Ghimire B, Chen A S, Guidolin M, Keedwell E C, Djordjević S, Savić D A (2013). Formulation of a fast 2D urban pluvial flood model using a cellular automata approach. J Hydroinform, 15(3): 676–686

[17]

Gleyzer A, Denisyuk M, Rimmer A, Salingar Y (2004). A fast recursive gis algorithm for computing strahler stream order in braided and nonbraided networks 1. J Am Water Resour Assoc, 40(4): 937–946

[18]

Hewlett J D, Hibbert A R (1967). Factors affecting the response of small watersheds to precipitation in humid areas. Forest Hydrol, 1: 275–290

[19]

Justin M G, Bergen J M, Emmanuel M S, Roderick K G (2018). Mapping the gap of water and erosion control measures in the rapidly urbanizing Mbezi river catchment of Dar es Salaam. Water, 10(1): 64

[20]

Kherde R V (2016). Rainfall runoff modelling–modellers guide. Int J Appl Eng Res, 11(3): 1900–1907

[21]

Lee S, Yigitcanlar T (2010). Sustainable urban stormwater management: water sensitive urban design perceptions, drivers and barriers. In: Yigitcanlar T, ed. Rethinking Sustainable Development: Urban Management, Engineering, and Design. IGI Global, Engineering Science Reference, 26–37

[22]

Makungo R, Odiyo J, Ndiritu J, Mwaka B (2010). Rainfall–runoff modelling approach for ungauged catchments: a case study of Nzhelele River sub-quaternary catchment. Phys Chem Earth Parts ABC, 35(13–14): 596–607

[23]

Mason D C, Schumann G, Bates P (2011). Data utilization in flood inundation modelling. In: Pender G, Faulkner H, eds. Flood Risk Science and Management. New York: Wiley, 209–233

[24]

Mato R M (2002). Groundwater Pollution in Urban Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Assessing Vulnerability and Protection Priorities. Dissertation for Doctoral Degree. Eindhoven: Eindhoven University of Technology

[25]

Minea G (2013). Assessment of the flash flood potential of Bâsca River Catchment (Romania) based on physiographic factors. Cent Eur J Geosci, 5(3): 344–353

[26]

Mjemah I C, Walraevens K (2015). Hydrogeological mapping and estimation of potential evapotranspiration and recharge rate of Quaternary sand aquifers in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania. Int J Geomat Geosci, 6(2): 1539–1555

[27]

Pallard B, Castellarin A, Montanari A (2009). A look at the links between drainage density and flood statistics. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 13(7): 1019–1029

[28]

Papasaika H, Kokiopoulou E, Baltsavias E, Schindler K, Kressner D (2011). Fusion of digital elevation models using sparse representations. In: ISPRS Conference on Photogrammetric Image Analysis. Berlin: Springer

[29]

Parkinson J, Mark O (2005). Urban Stormwater Management in Developing Countries. IWA publishing

[30]

Saeedrashed Y, Guven A (2013). Estimation of geomorphological parameters of Lower Zab River-Basin by using GIS-based remotely sensed image. Water Resour Manage, 27(1): 209–219

[31]

Seo Y, Seo Y H, Kim Y O (2015). Behavior of a fully-looped drainage network and the corresponding dendritic networks. Water, 7(3): 1291–1305

[32]

Siart C, Bubenzer O, Eitel B (2009). Combining digital elevation data (SRTM/ASTER), high resolution satellite imagery (Quickbird) and GIS for geomorphological mapping: a multi-component case study on Mediterranean karst in Central Crete. Geomorphology, 112(1–2): 106–121

[33]

Sivapalan M, Takeuchi K, Franks S, Gupta V, Karambiri H, Lakshmi V, Liang X, McDONNELL J J, Mendiondo E M, O’Connell P E, Oki T, Pomeroy J W, Schertzer D, Uhlenbrook S, Zehe E (2003). IAHS Decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB), 2003–2012: shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences. Hydrol Sci J, 48(6): 857–880

[34]

Spence C (2010). A paradigm shift in hydrology: storage thresholds across scales influence catchment runoff generation. Geogr Compass, 4(7): 819–833

[35]

Tavares da Costa R, Mazzoli P, Bagli S (2019). Limitations posed by Free DEMs in watershed studies: the case of river Tanaro in Italy. Front Earth Sci, 7: 141

[36]

Tetzlaff D, Carey S, Laudon H, McGuire K (2010). Catchment processes and heterogeneity at multiple scales—benchmarking observations, conceptualization and prediction. Hydrol Processes, 24(16): 2203–2208

[37]

Tian Y, Lei S, Bian Z, Lu J, Zhang S, Fang J (2018). Improving the accuracy of open source digital elevation models with multi-scale fusion and a slope position-based linear regression method. Remote Sens, 10(12): 1861

[38]

Wagener T, Wheater H, Gupta H V (2004). Rainfall-Runoff Modelling in Gauged and Ungauged Catchments. Singapore: World Scientific

[39]

Weitman D, Weinberg A, Goo R (2009). Reducing stormwater costs through LID strategies and practices. In: She N, Char M, eds. Low Impact Development for Urban Ecosystem and Habitat Protection. In: Proceedings of the 2008 International Low Impact Development Conference

[40]

Zhang S, Pan B (2014). An urban storm-inundation simulation method based on GIS. J Hydrol (Amst), 517: 260–268

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (611KB)

1192

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/