Fracture spacing behavior in layered rocks subjected to different driving forces: a numerical study based on fracture infilling process

Abstract

Natural layered rocks subjected to layer-parallel extension typically develop an array of opening-mode fractures with a remarkably regular spacing. This spacing often scales with layer thickness, and it decreases as extension increases until fracture saturation is reached. To increase the understanding of how these opening-mode fractures form in layered rocks, a series of 2D numerical simulations are performed to investigate the infilling process of fractures subjected to different driving forces. Numerical results illustrate that any one of the following could be considered as a driving force behind the propagation of infilling fractures: thermal effect, internal fluid pressure, direct extension loading, or pure compressive loading. Fracture spacing initially decreases with loading process, and at a certain ratio of fracture spacing to layer thickness, no new fractures nucleate (saturated). Both an increase in the opening of the infilled fractures and interface delamination are observed as mechanisms that accommodate additional strain. Interface debonding stops the transition of stress from the neighboring layers to the embedded central layer, which may preclude further infilling of new fractures. Whatever the driving force is, a large overburden stress and a large elastic contrast between the stiff and soft layers (referred to as a central or fractured layer and the top and bottom layers) are key factors favoring the development of tensile stress around the infilled fractures in the models. Fracture spacing is expected to decrease with increasing overburden stress. Numerical results highlight the fracturing process developed in heterogeneous and layered sedimentary rocks which provides supplementary information on the stress distribution and failure-induced stress redistribution., It also shows, in detail, the propagation of the fracture zone and the interaction of the fractures, which are impossible to observe in field and are difficult to consider with static stress analysis approaches.

Keywords

opening-mode fractures / fracture spacing / driving force / numerical simulation / heterogeneity

References

[1] Aveston J, Cooper G A, Kelly A (1971). The Properties of Fiber Composites. In: Conference Proceeding of National Physical Laboratory. Guildford: IPC Science and Technology Press, 15–26

[2] Bai T, Pollard D D (2000a). Fracture spacing in layered rocks: a new explanation based on the stress transition. J Struct Geol, 22(1): 43–57

[3] Bai T, Pollard D D (2000b). Closely spaced fractures in layered rocks: initiation mechanism and propagation kinematics. J Struct Geol, 22(10): 1409–1425

[4] Bai T, Pollard D D, Gao H (2000). Explanation for fracture spacing in layered materials. Nature, 403(6771): 753–756

[5] Becker A, Gross M R (1996). Mechanism for joint saturation in mechanically layered rocks: an example from southern Israel. Tectonophysics, 257(2–4): 223–237

[6] Bourne S J (2003). Contrast of elastic properties between rock layers as a mechanism for the initiation and orientation of tensile failure under uniform remote compression. J Geophys Res, 108(B8): 2395

[7] Cherepanov G P (1994). On the theory of thermal stresses in a thin film on a ceramic substrate. J Appl Phys, 75(2): 844–849

[8] Cooke M L, Simo J A, Underwood C A, Rijken P (2006). Mechanical stratigraphic controls on fracture patterns within carbonates and implications for groundwater flow. Sediment Geol, 184(3–4): 225–239

[9] Crosby W O (1882). On the classification and origin of joint structures. Proc Boston Soc Nat Hist, 22: 72–85

[10] De Joussineau G, Petit J P (2007). Can tensile stress develop in fractured multilayers under compressive strain conditions. Tectonophysics, 432(1–4): 51–62

[11] Engelder T, Fischer M P (1996). Loading configurations and driving mechanisms for joints based on the Griffith energy-balance concept. Tectonophysics, 256(1–4): 253–277

[12] Engelder T, Lacazette A (1990). Natural hydraulic fracturing. In: Proceeding of international symposium on rock joints. Norway: Loen, 35–43

[13] Engelder T, Peacock D C P (2001). Joint development normal to regional compression during flexural-flow folding: the Lilstock buttress anticline, Somerset, England. J Struct Geol, 23(2–3): 259–277

[14] Eyal Y, Gross M R, Engelder T, Becker A (2001). Joint development during fluctuation of the regional stress field in southern Israel. J Struct Geol, 23(2–3): 279–296

[15] Fairhurst C (1964). On the validity of the Brazilian test for brittle materials. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 1(4): 535–546

[16] Fang Z, Harrison J P (2002). Development of a local degradation approach to the modelling of brittle fracture in heterogeneous rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 39(4): 443–457

[17] Fischer M P, Gross M R, Engelder T, Greenfield R J (1995). Finite-element analysis of the stress distribution around a pressurized crack in a layered elastic medium: implications for the spacing of fluid-driven joints in bedded sedimentary rocks. Tectonophysics, 247(1–4): 49–64

[18] Gross M R (1993). The origin and spacing of cross joints: examples from Monterey Formation, Santa Barbara coastline, California. J Struct Geol, 15(6): 737–751

[19] Gross M R, Bahat D, Becker A (1997). Relations between jointing and faulting based on fracture-spacing ratios and fault-slip profiles: a new method to estimate strain in layered rock. Geology, 25(10): 887–890

[20] Gross M R, Engelder T (1995). Strain accommodated by brittle failure in adjacent units of the Monterey Formation, U.S.A.: scale effects and evidence for uniform displacement boundary conditions. J Struct Geol, 17(9): 1303–1318

[21] He M Y, Hutchinson J W (1989). Kinking of a crack out of an interface. J Appl Mech, 56(2): 270–278

[22] Helgeson D E, Aydin A (1991). Characteristics of joint propagation across layer interfaces in sedimentary rocks. J Struct Geol, 13(8): 897–911

[23] Hu M S, Thouless M D, Evans A G (1988). Decohesion of thin films from brittle substrates. Acta Metall, 36(5): 1301–1307

[24] Iyer K, Podladchikov Y Y (2009). Transformation-induced jointing as a gauge for interfacial slip and rock strength. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 280(1–4): 159–166

[25] Jain A, Guzina B B, Voller V R (2007). Effects of overburden on joint spacing in layered rocks. J Struct Geol, 29(2): 288–297

[26] Ji S, Saruwatari K (1998). A revised model for the relationship between joint spacing and layer thickness. J Struct Geol, 20(11): 1495–1508

[27] Ji S, Zhu Z, Wang Z (1998). Relationship between joint spacing and bed thickness in sedimentary rocks: effects of interbed slip. Geol Mag, 135(5): 637–655

[28] Kelly A, Tyson W R (1965). Tensile properties of fiber-reinforced metals: copper/tungsten and copper/molybdenum. J Mech Phys Solids, 13(6): 329–350

[29] Kingery W D (1955). Factors affecting thermal stress resistance of ceramic materials. J Am Ceram Soc, 38(1): 3–15

[30] Lachenbruch A H (1961). Depth and spacing of tension cracks. J Geophys Res, 66(12): 4273–4292

[31] Ladeira F L, Price N J (1981). Relationship between fracture spacing and bed thickness. J Struct Geol, 3(2): 179–183

[32] Larsen B, Grunnaleite I, Gudmundsson A (2010). How fracture systems affect permeability development in shallow-water carbonate rocks: an example from the Gargano Peninsula, Italy. J Struct Geol, 32(9): 1212–1230

[33] Li L C, Tang C A, Fu Y F (2009). Influence of heterogeneity on fracture behavior in multi-layered materials subjected to thermo-mechanical loading. Comput Mater Sci, 46(3): 667–671

[34] Li L C, Tang C A, Wang S Y (2012). A numerical investigation of fracture infilling and spacing in layered rocks subjected to hydro-mechanical loading. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 45: 753–765

[35] Li L C, Tang C A, Wang S Y, Yu J (2013). A coupled thermo-hydrologic-mechanical damage model and associated application in a stability analysis on a rock pillar. Tunn Undergr Space Technol, 34: 38–53

[36] Ma G W, Wang X J, Ren F (2011). Numerical simulation of compressive failure of heterogeneous rock-like materials using SPH method. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 48(3): 353–363

[37] Malvar L J, Fourney M E (1990). A three dimensional application of the smeared crack approach. Eng Fract Mech, 35(1–3): 251–260

[38] Mandl G (2005). Rock Joints. The Mechanical Genesis. Heidelberg: Springer, 27–48

[39] McClintock F A, Argon A S (1966). Mechanical Behavior of Materials. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1–770

[40] Narr W (1991). Fracture density in the deep subsurface: techniques with applications to Point Arguello oil field. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull, 75: 1300–1323

[41] Olson J E (1993). Joint pattern development: effects of subcritical crack growth and mechanical crack interaction. J Geophys Res, 98(B7): 12251–12265

[42] Pascal C, Angelier J, Cacas M C, Hancock P (1997). Distribution of joints: probabilistic modelling and case study near Cardiff (Wales, U.K.). J Struct Geol, 19(10): 1273–1284

[43] Pearce C J, Thavalingam A, Liao Z, Bicanic N (2000). Computational aspects of the discontinuous deformation analysis framework for modeling concrete fracture. Eng Fract Mech, 65(2–3): 283–298

[44] Pietruszczak S, Xu G (1995). Brittle response of concrete as a localization problem. Int J Solids Struct, 32(11): 1517–1533

[45] Pollard D D, Segall P (1987). Theoretical displacements and stresses near fracture in rock: with applications to faults, joints, veins, dikes, and solution surfaces. In: Atkinson BK ed. Fracture Mechanics of Rock. London: Academic Press, 277–349

[46] Price N J (1966). Fault and Joint Development in Brittle and Semi-brittle Rocks. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 15–31

[47] Price N J, Cosgrove J W (1990). Analysis of geologic structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 120–145

[48] Ramsay J G, Huber M I (1987). The Techniques of Modern Structural Geology (Vol 2): Folds and Fractures. San Diego: Academic Press, 1–700

[49] Savalli L, Engelder T (2005). Mechanisms controlling rupture shape during subcritical growth of joints in layered rocks. Geol Soc Am Bull, 117(3): 436–449

[50] Secor D T (1965). Role of fluid pressure in jointing. Am J Sci, 263(8): 633–646

[51] Sibson R H (1996). Structural permeability of fluid-driven fault-fracture meshes. J Struct Geol, 18(8): 1031–1042

[52] Tang C A, Liang Z Z, Zhang Y B, Chang X, Xu T, Wang D G, Zhang J X, Liu J S, Zhu W C, Elsworth D (2008). Fracture spacing in layered materials: a new explanation based on two-dimensional failure process modeling. Am J Sci, 308(1): 49–72

[53] Tang C A, Liu H, Lee P K K, Tsui Y, Tham L G (2000). Numerical studies of the influence of microstructure on rock failure in uniaxial compression — Part I: effect of heterogeneity. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 37(4): 555–569

[54] Tang C A, Tham L G, Lee P K K, Yang T H, Li L C (2002). Coupling analysis of flow, stress and damage (FSD) in rock failure. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 39(4): 477–489

[55] Taylor D W (1981). Carbonate petrology and depositional environments of the limestone member of the Carmel Formation, near Carmel Junction, Kane County, Utah. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, 28: 117–133

[56] Thouless M D (1989). Some mechanics for the adhesion of thin films. Thin Solid Films, 181(1–2): 397–406

[57] Weibull W (1951). A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech, 18: 293–297

[58] Wong T F, Wong R H C, Chau K T, Tang C A (2006). Microcrack statistics, Weibull distribution and micromechanical modeling of compressive failure in rock. Mech Mater, 38(7): 664–681

[59] Wu H, Pollard D D (1995). An experimental study of the relationship between joint spacing and layer thickness. J Struct Geol, 17: 887–905

[60] Yin H M (2010). Fracture saturation and critical thickness in layered materials. Int J Solids Struct, 47(7–8): 1007–1015

[61] Zhu W C, Tang C A (2004). Micromechanical model for simulating the fracture process of rock. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 37(1): 25–56

[62] Zuo J P, Xie H P, Zhou H W, Peng S P (2010). SEM in-situ investigation on thermal cracking behavior of Pingdingshan sandstone at elevated temperatures. Geophys J Int, 181: 593–603

Acknowledgements

The study presented in this study was jointly supported by grants from PetroChina Innovation Foundation (Grant No. 2013D-5006-0211), National Basic Research Programme of China (Grant No. 2011CB013503) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51279024). The authors are grateful for their support.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg