Do Continuous and Categorical Measures Capture the Same Construct of Diversity? Evidence from China

Liangding Jia, Guoguang Wan, Jieyu Zhou, Qian Lu

Front. Bus. Res. China ›› 2010, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (3) : 423-450.

PDF(620 KB)
PDF(620 KB)
Front. Bus. Res. China ›› 2010, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (3) : 423-450. DOI: 10.1007/s11782-010-0105-0
research-article
research-article

Do Continuous and Categorical Measures Capture the Same Construct of Diversity? Evidence from China

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Chinese researchers have long preferred substantive research (i.e., examination of relationships among variables) to construct validation research, while failing to realize that construct validation research is the foundation of substantive research. This paper endeavors to answer a question: Do Rumelt’s (1974) categorical and Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) and skill-based continuous measures capture the same construct of diversity in the context of China? We take two steps to investigate the question. First, are continuous measures (SIC & skill-based entropy and Montgomery product count) appropriately differentiated among Rumelt’s categories? Second, are the categories converted from SIC & Skill-based measures convergent to Rumelt’s categorical measures? Results show that the two measures are consistent with each other.

Keywords

diversification / continuous measures / categorical measures / Standard Industrial Classification

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Liangding Jia, Guoguang Wan, Jieyu Zhou, Qian Lu. Do Continuous and Categorical Measures Capture the Same Construct of Diversity? Evidence from China. Front Bus Res Chin, 2010, 4(3): 423‒450 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-010-0105-0

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Brill
PDF(620 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/