Tunnel-soil-pile interaction (TSPI) is a vital issue during seismic excitation because of the evaluation of the interactive structural behaviors of the tunnel. This study derives analytical formulae for the proposed TSPI model under transverse horizontal shear, vertical shear, and body waves, considering a series of piles along the tunnel’s longitudinal axis. For this reason, the soil medium is considered to be an isotropic, homogeneous, elastic, and infinite. Also, the tunnel is assumed to be a beam element to connect to the series of piles by the linear elastic springs. Parametric studies of proposed formulae show the parabolic and exponential variations of tunnel forces and soil pressures when increases the number of piles. Also, recalculated tunnel moments of previous studies by using proposed formulae vary closely, which may indicate the accuracy of the present formulations. Similar variations are obtained for the previous field study verification by the present formulations. Therefore, the design charts and graphs are addressed in the present research which may be used as a standard to enhance this research in the future.
The widespread threat posed by slope structure failures to human lives and property safety is widely acknowledged. Additionally, natural soil often displays spatial variability due to geological deposition and other factors. Therefore, predicting the seismic response of slopes subjected to ground motions and inversely analyzing the spatial distribution of soils remains an unresolved issue. In the present work, a shaking table experimental test is first designed and carried out, in which a soft-soil slope dynamic system is established. To capture the seismic response of the soft-soil slope, specifically the experimental characteristic of acceleration and soil pressure response in both spatial domain and time domain, a series of sensors were pre-embedded in the slope. Subsequently, a model updating approach is proposed for slope seismic analysis that incorporates spatial variability of soil. In addition, to enhance computational efficiency, the dimensionality reduction of Karhunen–Loève expansion method is introduced to reduce inverse analysis parameters. On the basis of 34 samples collected from experimental data, it is shown that near-fault pulse-like ground motions deliver greater concentrated energy, causing more severe damage to slope structures, especially the topsoil layer. Furthermore, using data obtained from a shaking table test subjected to ground motion Recorded Sequence Number 158H1 from the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center NGA-West2 database as an example, it is also shown that the proposed approach demonstrates high accuracy in predicting the spatial distribution of the maximum shear modulus in soil slope dynamic systems. The present work not only addresses the challenges posed by mainshock–aftershock effects but also highlights the potential of model updating approaches to enhance the understanding of slope behavior under seismic loading conditions.
The spatial variation of ground motion may significantly aggravate the seismic damage of large-scale structures such as nuclear buildings. Establishing the seismic wave field with spatial features is the basis and key to seismic analysis of large-scale complex structures. For the nuclear island buildings, which are arranged close to each other, the influence of structure–soil–structure interaction (SSSI) and incoherent motion on the structural seismic response should be considered. Taking a domestic nuclear power project as an example, the seismic response analyses under incoherent seismic motion and coherent seismic motion are carried out respectively. The seismic motion incoherency effects on the nuclear island buildings on the common raft and the adjacent seismic category I structure are explored by comparing the results of the in-structure response spectrum (ISRS) at key elevations. The results indicate that the seismic motion incoherency does not change the trend of the response spectrum curve and the dominant frequency. Both the peak acceleration and zero-period acceleration of ISRS are changed to some extent. Overall, seismic motion incoherency has a more significant impact on the ISRS of nuclear buildings with smaller volumes.