Experimental model updating of slope considering spatially varying soil properties and dynamic loading

Abstract

The widespread threat posed by slope structure failures to human lives and property safety is widely acknowledged. Additionally, natural soil often displays spatial variability due to geological deposition and other factors. Therefore, predicting the seismic response of slopes subjected to ground motions and inversely analyzing the spatial distribution of soils remains an unresolved issue. In the present work, a shaking table experimental test is first designed and carried out, in which a soft-soil slope dynamic system is established. To capture the seismic response of the soft-soil slope, specifically the experimental characteristic of acceleration and soil pressure response in both spatial domain and time domain, a series of sensors were pre-embedded in the slope. Subsequently, a model updating approach is proposed for slope seismic analysis that incorporates spatial variability of soil. In addition, to enhance computational efficiency, the dimensionality reduction of Karhunen–Loève expansion method is introduced to reduce inverse analysis parameters. On the basis of 34 samples collected from experimental data, it is shown that near-fault pulse-like ground motions deliver greater concentrated energy, causing more severe damage to slope structures, especially the topsoil layer. Furthermore, using data obtained from a shaking table test subjected to ground motion Recorded Sequence Number 158H1 from the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center NGA-West2 database as an example, it is also shown that the proposed approach demonstrates high accuracy in predicting the spatial distribution of the maximum shear modulus in soil slope dynamic systems. The present work not only addresses the challenges posed by mainshock–aftershock effects but also highlights the potential of model updating approaches to enhance the understanding of slope behavior under seismic loading conditions.

Key words： Bayesian analysis; Markov chain Monte Carlo; model updating; seismic hazard; shaking table test

References

1 Nadukuru SS, Michalowski RL. Three-dimensional displacement analysis of slopes subjected to seismic loads. Can Geotech J. 2013;50(6):650-661.

2 Tsai CC, Hwang YW, Lu CC. Liquefaction, building settlement, and residual strength of two residential areas during the 2016 southern Taiwan earthquake. Acta Geotech. 2020;15:1363-1379.

3 Zhao L, Huang Y, Hu H. Stochastic seismic response of a slope based on large-scale shaking table tests. Eng Geol. 2020;277:105782.

4 Zhang S, Wang G, Sa W. Damage evaluation of concrete gravity dams under mainshock–aftershock seismic sequences. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng. 2013;50:16-27.

5 Zhai CH, Wen WP, Li S, Chen Z, Chang Z, Xie LL. The damage investigation of inelastic SDOF structure under the mainshock–aftershock sequence-type ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng. 2014;59:30-41.

6 Luo Q, He M, Chen F, Li Z. Probabilistic seismic performance assessment of timber-steel hybrid structures subjected to mainshock–aftershock sequences. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng. 2021;141:106532.

7 Wen W, Ji D, Zhai C, Li X, Sun P. Damage spectra of the mainshock–aftershock ground motions at soft soil sites. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng. 2018;115:815-825.

8 Bai Y, Ma Y, Yang Q, Florez-Lopez J, Li X, Biondini F. Earthquake-induced damage updating for remaining-life assessment of steel frame substructure systems. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2021;159:107782.

9 Somerville PG, Smith NF, Graves RW, Abrahamson NA. Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity. Seismol Res Lett. 1997;68(1):199-222.

10 Baker JW. Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 2007;97(5):1486-1501.

11 Mavroeidis GP. A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 2003;93(3):1099-1131.

12 Chen G, Yang J, Wang R, Li K, Liu Y, Beer M. Seismic damage analysis due to near-fault multipulse ground motion. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn. 2023;52(15):5099-5116.

13 Wang R, Li S, Liu Y, Hu X, Lai X, Beer M. Peridynamics-based large-deformation simulations for near-fault landslides considering soil uncertainty. Comput Geotech. 2024;168:106128.

14 Bao Y, Huang Y, Zhu C. Effects of near-fault ground motions on dynamic response of slopes based on shaking table model tests. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng. 2021;149:106869.

15 Bao Y, Hu H, Gan G. Seismic response analysis of slope reinforced by pile-anchor structures under near-fault pulse-like ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng. 2023;164:107576.

16 Zheng Z, Yufeng G, Fei Z, Jian S, Degao Z. Effects of soil dynamic response on post-earthquake deformation of slopes based on nested Newmark model. Earthquake Eng Eng Vib. 2020;19:573-582.

17 Mircevska V, Nastev M, Nanevska A. Seismic slope displacement of tailings dam: a comparative study between modified newmark and Mohr–Coulomb models. J Earthquake Eng. 2022;26(15):7878-7900.

18 Zhang Y, Liu J, Cheng Q, et al. A new permanent displacement model considering pulse-like ground motions and its application in landslide hazard assessment. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng. 2022;163:107556.

19 Jibson RW. Methods for assessing the stability of slopes during earthquakes—a retrospective. Eng Geol. 2011;122(1-2):43-50.

20 Pang R, Xu B, Zhou Y, Song L. Seismic time–history response and system reliability analysis of slopes considering uncertainty of multiparameters and earthquake excitations. Comput Geotech. 2021;136:104245.

21 Yiğit A. Prediction of amount of earthquake-induced slope displacement by using Newmark method. Eng Geol. 2020;264:105385.

22 Wang R, Li D, Chen EJ, Liu Y. Dynamic prediction of mechanized shield tunneling performance. Autom Constr. 2021;132:103958.

23 Chen X, Hu Y, Zhang L, Liu Y. 3D large-deformation modelling on face instability and sinkhole formation during tunnelling through non-uniform soils. Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 2023;134:105011.

24 Wang RH, Li DQ, Wang MY, Liu Y. Deterministic and probabilistic investigations of piping occurrence during tunneling through spatially variable soils. ASCE–ASME J Risk Uncertainty Eng Syst Part A. 2021;7(2):04021009.

25 Wang RH, Sun PG, Li DQ, Tyagi A, Liu Y. Three-dimensional seepage investigation of riverside tunnel construction considering heterogeneous permeability. ASCE–ASME J Risk Uncertainty Eng Syst Part A. 2021;7(4):04021041.

26 He L, Liu Y, Bi S, Wang L, Broggi M, Beer M. Estimation of failure probability in braced excavation using Bayesian networks with integrated model updating. Underground Space. 2020;5(4):315-323.

27 Ouyang JY, Liu Y, Yao K, Yang CJ, Niu HF. Model updating of slope stability analysis using 3D conditional random fields. ASCE–ASME J Risk Uncertainty Eng Syst Part A. 2021;7(3):04021034.

28 Ouyang J, Liu Y. Model updating for slope stability assessment in spatially varying soil parameters using multi-type observations. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2022;171:108906.

29 Biswal S, Ramaswamy A. Finite element model updating of concrete structures based on imprecise probability. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2017;94:165-179.

30 DiazDelaO FA, Garbuno-Inigo A, Au SK, Yoshida I. Bayesian updating and model class selection with subset simulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2017;317:1102-1121.

31 Lye A, Cicirello A, Patelli E. Sampling methods for solving Bayesian model updating problems: a tutorial. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2021;159:107760.

32 Uribe F, Papaioannou I, Betz W, Straub D. Bayesian inference of random fields represented with the Karhunen–Loève expansion. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2020;358:112632.

33 Liu Y, Li L, Chang Z. Efficient Bayesian model updating for dynamic systems. Reliability Eng Syst Saf. 2023;236:109294.

34 Jiang SH, Wang L, Ouyang S, Huang J, Liu Y. A comparative study of Bayesian inverse analyses of spatially varying soil parameters for slope reliability updating. Georisk: Assess Manage Risk Eng Syst Geohazards. 2022;16(4):746-765.

35 Jiang SH, Huang J, Qi XH, Zhou CB. Efficient probabilistic back analysis of spatially varying soil parameters for slope reliability assessment. Eng Geol. 2020;271:105597.

36 Luo J, Pei X, Evans SG, Huang R. Mechanics of the earthquake-induced Hongshiyan landslide in the 2014 Mw 6.2 Ludian earthquake, Yunnan, China. Eng Geol. 2019;251:197-213.

37 Maejima Y, Nagatsuka S, Higashi T. Mineralogical composition of iron oxides in red- and yellow-colored soils from Southern Japan and Yunnan, China. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2000;46(3):571-580.

38 Ma S, Huang M, Hu P, Yang C. Soil–water characteristics and shear strength in constant water content triaxial tests on Yunnan red clay. J Central South Univ. 2013;20(5):1412-1419.

39 Shein EV. The particle-size distribution in soils: problems of the methods of study, interpretation of the results, and classification. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2009;42(3):284-291.

40 Yang F, Zhang GL, Yang F, Yang RM. Pedogenetic interpretations of particle-size distribution curves for an alpine environment. Geoderma. 2016;282:9-15.

41 To P, Scheuermann A, Williams DJ. Quick assessment on susceptibility to suffusion of continuously graded soils by curvature of particle size distribution. Acta Geotech. 2018;13(5):1241-1248.

42 Turan A, Hinchberger SD, El Naggar H. Design and commissioning of a laminar soil container for use on small shaking tables. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng. 2009;29(2):404-414.

43 Pu X, Wan L, Wang P. Initiation mechanism of mudflow-like loess landslide induced by the combined effect of earthquakes and rainfall. Nat Hazards. 2021;105(3):3079-3097.

44 Ancheta TD, Darragh RB, Stewart JP, et al. NGA-West2 database. Earthquake Spectra. 2014;30(3):989-1005.

45 Cao Z, Wang Y, Li D. Quantification of prior knowledge in geotechnical site characterization. Eng Geol. 2016;203:107-116.

46 Shinozuka M, Deodatis G. Simulation of multi-dimensional Gaussian stochastic fields by spectral representation. Appl Mech Rev. 1996;49(1):29-53.

47 Montoya-Noguera S, Zhao T, Hu Y, Wang Y, Phoon KK. Simulation of non-stationary non Gaussian random fields from sparse measurements using Bayesian compressive sampling and Karhunen–Loève expansion. Struct Saf. 2019;79:66-79.

48 Li CC, Der Kiureghian A. Optimal discretization of random fields. J Eng Mech. 1993;119(6):1136-1154.

49 Liu Y, Lee FH, Quek ST, Beer M. Modified linear estimation method for generating multi-dimensional multi-variate Gaussian field in modelling material properties. Probab Eng Mech. 2014;38:42-53.

50 Papaioannou I, Betz W, Zwirglmaier K, Straub D. MCMC algorithms for subset simulation. Probab Eng Mech. 2015;41:89-103.

51 Betz W, Papaioannou I, Beck JL, Straub D. Bayesian inference with subset simulation: strategies and improvements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2018;331:72-93.

52 Banerjee S, Goh SH, Lee FH. Earthquake-induced bending moment in fixed-head piles in soft clay. Géotechnique. 2014;64(6):431-446.

53 Liu Y, Zhang L. Seismic response of pile–raft system embedded in spatially random clay. Géotechnique. 2019;69(7):638-645.

54 Chen G, Liu Y, Beer M. Effects of response spectrum of pulse-like ground motion on stochastic seismic response of tunnel. Eng Struct. 2023;289:116274.

55 Chong P. Characterization of Singapore lower marine clay. Ph.D. thesis. National University of Singapore;2002.

56 Zhang L, Goh SH, Yi J. A centrifuge study of the seismic response of pile–raft systems embedded in soft clay. Géotechnique. 2017;67(6):479-490.

57 Schevenels M, Lombaert G, Degrande G, Degrauwe D, Schoors B. The Green’s functions of a vertically inhomogeneous soil with a random dynamic shear modulus. Probab Eng Mech. 2007;22(1):100-111.

58 Ayad F, Bekkouche A, Houmadi Y. Effect of the spatial variation of the shear modulus on soil liquefaction potential. Electron J Geotech Eng. 2012;17:3281-3289.

59 Phoon KK, Kulhawy FH. Evaluation of geotechnical property variability. Can Geotech J. 1999;36(4):625-639.

60 Ching J, Phoon KK. Effect of element sizes in random field finite element simulations of soil shear strength. Comput Struct. 2013;126:120-134.

61 Chen J, Wang L, Pu X, Li F, Li T. Experimental study on the dynamic characteristics of low-angle loess slope under the influence of long- and short-term effects of rainfall before earthquake. Eng Geol. 2020;273:105684.