Nonresilience curve: A new tool for use in resilience assessment

Abstract

Resilience assessment is a widely used method to evaluate the ability of an object (e.g., an individual structure, or a system consisting of multiple interacting structures) to withstand, recover from, and adapt to disruptive events. This paper proposes a novel concept of “nonresilience curve,” which measures the nonresilience (complement of resilience) of an object of interest conditional on a specific hazard intensity. It is by nature an extension of the well-established fragility curves, integrating the multiple damage states of a posthazard object. The applicability of the proposed nonresilience curve to individual structures and systems (including series systems, parallel systems, and more general and complicated systems) has been demonstrated in this paper. It is also preliminarily shown that the shape of the cumulative distribution function of a lognormal distribution is suitable to approximate the nonresilience curve, if only limited data points associated with the target nonresilience curve are available. Since the nonresilience curve is a function of the hazard intensity measure (IM), one can estimate the nonresilience of an object in a fully probabilistic manner by additionally taking into account the uncertainty associated with the IM. The proposed nonresilience curve can be further extended to formulate nonresilience surface, which is a joint function of both the IM and the available resource that supports the posthazard recovery process. The nonresilience curve is promising to be adopted in engineering practice for resilience assessment and resilience-based design of civil structures and infrastructure systems.

Keywords

fragility curve / nonresilience curve / nonresilience surface / resilience / system nonresilience

References

[1] Bruneau M, Chang SE, Eguchi RT, et al. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra. 2003;19(4):733-752.

[2] Singh RR, Bruneau M, Stavridis A, Sett K. Resilience deficit index for quantification of resilience. Resilient Cities Struct. 2022;1(2):1-9.

[3] National Research Council. Disaster Resilience: A National Imperative. The National Academies Press;2012.

[4] McAllister T. Developing Guidelines and Standards for Disaster Resilience of the Built Environment: A Research Needs Assessment. US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology;2013.

[5] Ayyub BM. Systems resilience for multihazard environments: definition, metrics, and valuation for decision making. Risk Anal. 2014;34(2):340-355.

[6] Cimellaro GP, Reinhorn AM, Bruneau M. Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience. Eng Struct. 2010;32(11):3639-3649.

[7] Bocchini P, Frangopol DM, Ummenhofer T, Zinke T. Resilience and sustainability of civil infrastructure: toward a unified approach. J Infrastruct Syst. 2014;20(2):04014004.

[8] Hosseini S, Barker K, Ramirez-Marquez JE. A review of definitions and measures of system resilience. Reliability Eng Syst Saf. 2016;145:47-61.

[9] Attoh-Okine NO, Cooper AT, Mensah SA. Formulation of resilience index of urban infrastructure using belief functions. IEEE Syst J. 2009;3(2):147-153.

[10] Salem S, Campidelli M, El-Dakhakhni WW, Tait MJ. Resilience-based design of urban centres: application to blast risk assessment. Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 2018;3(2):68-85.

[11] Sun W, Bocchini P, Davison BD. Resilience metrics and measurement methods for transportation infrastructure: the state of the art. Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 2020;5(3):168-199.

[12] Huang Z, Zhang D, Pitilakis K, et al. Resilience assessment of tunnels: framework and application for tunnels in alluvial deposits exposed to seismic hazard. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng. 2022;162:107456.

[13] Shang Q, Wang T, Li J. A quantitative framework to evaluate the seismic resilience of hospital systems. J Earthquake Eng. 2022;26(7):3364-3388.

[14] Pang Y, Wei K, He H, Wang W. Assessment of lifetime seismic resilience of a long-span cable-stayed bridge exposed to structural corrosion. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng. 2022;157(4):107275.

[15] Capacci L, Biondini F, Frangopol DM. Resilience of aging structures and infrastructure systems with emphasis on seismic resilience of bridges and road networks. Resilient Cities Struct. 2022;1(2):23-41.

[16] Du A, Wang X, Xie Y, Dong Y. Regional seismic risk and resilience assessment: methodological development, applicability, and future research needs—an earthquake engineering perspective. Reliability Eng Syst Saf. 2023;223:109104.

[17] Wang C. A generalized index for functionality-sensitive resilience quantification. Resilient Cities Struct. 2023;2(1):68-75.

[18] Li Y, Ellingwood BR. Hurricane damage to residential construction in the US: importance of uncertainty modeling in risk assessment. Eng Struct. 2006;28(7):1009-1018.

[19] Kirçil MS, Polat Z. Fragility analysis of mid-rise R/C frame buildings. Eng Struct. 2006;28(9):1335-1345.

[20] Choe DE, Gardoni P, Rosowsky D, Haukaas T. Probabilistic capacity models and seismic fragility estimates for RC columns subject to corrosion. Reliability Eng Syst Saf. 2008;93(3):383-393.

[21] Ghosh J, Padgett JE. Aging considerations in the development of time-dependent seismic fragility curves. J Struct Eng. 2010;136(12):1497-1511.

[22] Shinozuka M, Feng MQ, Lee J, Naganuma T. Statistical analysis of fragility curves. J Eng Mech. 2000;126(12):1224-1231.

[23] Baker JW. Introducing correlation among fragility functions for multiple components. In: Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October 12–17, 2008;2008.

[24] Wang C, Zhang H, Ellingwood BR, Guo Y, Mahmoud H, Li Q. Assessing post-hazard damage costs to a community’s residential buildings exposed to tropical cyclones. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 2020;17(4):443-453.

[25] Wang C, Zhang H. Assessing the seismic resilience of power grid systems considering the component deterioration and correlation. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertainty Eng Syst Part B. 2020;6(2):020903.

[26] Shiraki N, Shinozuka M, Moore JE, Chang SE, Kameda H, Tanaka S. System risk curves: probabilistic performance scenarios for highway networks subject to earthquake damage. J Infrastruct Syst. 2007;13(1):43-54.

[27] FEM A. Multi-hazard Loss Estimation Methodology, Earthquake Model: Hazus-MH 2.1. Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Mitigation Division;2012.

[28] Wang C, Ayyub BM, Beer M. From reliability-based design to resilience-based design. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertainty Eng Syst Part B. 2023;9(3):031105.

[29] Panteli M, Mancarella P. Modeling and evaluating the resilience of critical electrical power infrastructure to extreme weather events. IEEE Syst J. 2015;11(3):1733-1742.

[30] Poulin C, Kane MB. Infrastructure resilience curves: performance measures and summary metrics. Reliability Eng Syst Saf. 2021;216:107926.

[31] Ayyub BM. Practical resilience metrics for planning, design, and decision making. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertainty Eng Syst Part A. 2015;1(3):04015008.

[32] Ross SM. Introduction to Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists. Academic Press;2020.

[33] Vitoontus S. Risk Assessment of Building Inventories Exposed to Large Scale Natural Hazards. Ph.D. Thesis. Georgia Institute of Technology;2012.

[34] Liu PL, DerKiureghian A. Multivariate distribution models with prescribed marginals and covariances. Probab Eng Mech. 1986;1(2)105-112.

[35] Melchers RE, Beck AT. Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction. John Wiley &Sons;2018.

[36] Wang C. Structural Reliability and Time-Dependent Reliability. Springer Nature;2021.

[37] Wang C, Ayyub BM. Time-dependent seismic resilience of aging repairable structures considering multiple damage states. Earthquake Eng Resilience. 2022;1(1):73-87.

[38] Wang C, Teh LH. Time-dependent seismic reliability of aging structures. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertainty Eng Syst Part A. 2022;8(2):04022010.

[39] Wang C, Zhang H, Beer M. Computing tight bounds of structural reliability under imprecise probabilistic information. Comput Struct. 2018;208:92-104.

[40] Faes MG, Daub M, Marelli S, Patelli E, Beer M. Engineering analysis with probability boxes: a review on computational methods. Struct Saf. 2021;93:102092.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 2024 The Authors. Earthquake Engineering and Resilience published by Tianjin University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.