Insurmountable limitations of city-scale digital twins? On urban knowledge and planning

Abstract

Digital twins are enjoying widespread and growing success in both theoretical and practical applications. A recent development that is gaining increasing traction is the application of digital twins to cities. The aim of this article is to discuss whether there are inherent limitations in this case. At present, the scientific literature on urban digital twins is dominated by “technical” approaches. Critical investigation of digital twins – especially from a philosophical perspective – is still at its beginnings. This article aims to contribute to this line of inquiry. It is mainly theoretical and analytical. On the basis of a specific conceptual framework, it examines digital twins and their applications in urban contexts. It starts by distinguishing among simple, complicated and complex systems, and reaches the conclusion that, while using digital twins is generally appropriate (and often helpful) in the first two of these systems, there are some structural limitations on their use in the case of complex systems. In the latter case, inherent limitations depend on certain distinctive aspects of complex systems, such as their emergent and unpredictable nature, and the role played in this regard by “dispersed knowledge” (that is, is a form of diffused practical knowledge that is crucial for the functioning of large urban systems but that cannot be collected and re-unified because, as a coherent and integrated whole, it does not and cannot exist anywhere).

Keywords

Digital twins / Computation / Urban / City / Planning

References

[1] AdadeD, de VriesWT. An extended TOE framework for local government technology adoption for citizen participation: Insights for city digital twins for collaborative planning. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 2025, 19153-73.

[2] AlfasiN, ShnizikAR, DavidsonM, KahaniA. Anti-adaptive urbanism: Long-term implications of building inward-turned neighborhoods in Israel. Journal of Urbanism, 2020, 134387-409

[3] Al-SehrawyR, KumarB, WatsonR. The pluralism of digital twins for urban management: Bridging theory and practice. Journal of Urban Management, 2023, 12116-32.

[4] AmaralLA, OttinoJM. Complex networks: Augmenting the framework for the study of complex systems. The European Physical Journal B, 2004, 38: 147-162.

[5] AmaralLA, OttinoJM. Complex systems and networks: Challenges and opportunities for chemical and biological engineers. Chemical Engineering Science, 2004, 598–91653-1666.

[6] AnderssonDE. Spontaneous order and the Hayekian challenge to interdisciplinary social scientists. Atlantic Economic Journal, 2021, 49: 363-375.

[7] ArcherMS. Morphognenesis versus structuration: On combining structure and action. The British Journal of Sociology, 2010, 61: 225-252.

[8] Argota Sánchez-VaquerizoJ. Urban Digital Twins and metaverses towards city multiplicities: Uniting or dividing urban experiences?. Ethics and Information Technology, 2025, 2711-31.

[9] Argota Sánchez-Vaquerizo, J., & Zurera Gómez, A. (2023). A Tale of Three Cities: On Digital Twins (pp. 294–307). Emerging Urban Perspectives, TU Delft OPEN Publishing.

[10] AttarA, BabaeeM, RaissiS, NojavanM. Airside Optimization Framework Covering Multiple Operations in Civil Airport Systems with a Variety of Aircraft: A Simulation-Based Digital Twin. Systems, 2024, 12101-18.

[11] AustinM, DelgoshaeiP, CoelhoM, HeidarinejadM. Architecting smart city digital twins: Combined semantic model and machine learning approach. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2020, 3641-14.

[12] BaldwinWC, FelderWN, SauserBJ. Taxonomy of increasingly complex systems. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2011, 93298-316.

[13] Barat, S., Lobo, S., Korabu, R., Thogaru, H., & Mahamuni, R. (2023). Symbiotic Use of Digital Twin, Simulation and Design Thinking Approach for Resilient Enterprise. In C.G. Corlu, S.R. Hunter, H. Lam, B.S. Onggo, J. Shortle, & B. Biller (eds.), Proceedings of the 2023 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 686–697). IEEE Press.

[14] BarcikP, CoufalikovaA, FrantisP, VavraJ. The future possibilities and security challenges of city digitalization. Smart Cities, 2022, 61137-155.

[15] BarnettRThe Structure of Liberty, 1998Oxford University Press

[16] BarteltM, SteckenJ, KuhlenkötterB. Automated production of individualized products for teaching I4.0 concepts. Procedia Manufacturing, 2020, 45: 337-342.

[17] BattermanRW, RiceCC. Minimal model explanations. Philosophy of Science, 2014, 813349-376.

[18] Batty, M. (2024). The Computable City. Histories, Technologies, Stories, Predictions. The MIT Press.

[19] BattyMEnvironment and Planning B, 2018, 455817-820

[20] BattyMEnvironment and Planning B, 2021, 4882129-2132

[21] BettencourtL. Recent achievements and conceptual challenges for urban digital twins. Nature Computational Science, 2024, 4: 150-153.

[22] BoccardoP, La RicciaL, YadavY. Urban Echoes: Exploring the Dynamic Realities of Cities through Digital Twins. Land, 2024, 1351-22.

[23] BrutzkusBEconomic Planning in Soviet Russia, 1935Routledge

[24] BubaloB. Capacity and demand forecasting in Urban Air Mobility-A simulation of air transportation in Hamburg. Transportation Research Procedia, 2024, 80: 11-19.

[25] BuitelaarE, MoroniS, De FrancoA. Building obsolescence in the evolving city. Reframing property vacancy and abandonment in the light of urban dynamics and complexity. Cities, 2021, 108: 1-7.

[26] CaldarelliG, ArcauteE, BarthelemyM, BattyM, GershensonC, HelbingD, MancusoS, MorenoY, RamascoJJ, RozenblatC, SánchezA, Fernández-VillacañasJL. The role of complexity for digital twins of cities. Nature Computational Science, 2023, 3: 374-381.

[27] CalzatiS. No longer hype, not yet mainstream? Recalibrating city digital twins’ expectations and reality: A case study perspective. Frontiers in Big Data, 2023, 6: 1-2.

[28] CaprariG, CastelliG, MontuoriM, CamardelliM, MalvezziR. Digital twin for urban planning in the green deal era: A state of the art and future perspectives. Sustainability, 2022, 14101-16.

[29] CarterI, MoroniS. Adaptive and anti-adaptive neighbourhoods: Investigating the relationship between individual choice and systemic adaptability. Environment and Planning B, 2022, 492722-736

[30] CharitonidouM. Urban scale digital twins in data-driven society: Challenging digital universalism in urban planning decision-making. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 2022, 202238-253.

[31] Chen, G., Alomari, I., Taffese, W. Z., Shi, Z., Afsharmovahed, M. H., Mondal, T. G., & Nguyen, S. (2024a). Multifunctional Models in Digital and Physical Twinning of the Built Environment. A University Campus Case Study. Smart Cities, 7(2), 836–858.

[32] ChenK, NadirshaTN, LilithN, AlamS, SvenssonÅ. Tangible digital twin with shared visualization for collaborative air traffic management operations. Transportation Research Part c: Emerging Technologies, 2024, 161: 1-20.

[33] CondeJ, Munoz-ArcentalesA, RomeroM, RojoJ, SalvachúaJ, HuecasG, AlonsoA. Applying digital twins for the management of information in turnaround event operations in commercial airports. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2022, 54: 1-15.

[34] CondicSB, MorefieldR. Hayek on the essential dispersion of market knowledge. The Review of Austrian Economics, 2021, 344449-463.

[35] Cozzolino, S. (2020). The (anti) adaptive neighbourhoods. Embracing complexity and distribution of design control in the ordinary built environment. Environment and Planning B, 47(2), 203–219.

[36] Cozzolino, S., Moroni, S. (2024). Action, property, beauty. Planning with and for emergent urban complexity. Routledge.

[37] CozzolinoS, MoroniS. Multiple agents and self-organisation in complex cities: The crucial role of several property. Cities, 2021, 103: 1-7

[38] CozzolinoS, MoroniS. Structural preconditions for adaptive urban areas: Framework rules, several property and the range of possible actions. Cities, 2022, 130: 1-7.

[39] De FrancoA, MoroniS. The city as an information system: Urban agency, experiential inputs and planning measures. Cities, 2023, 134: 1-8.

[40] DembskiF, WössnerU, LetzgusM, RuddatM, YamuC. Urban digital twins for smart cities and citizens: The case study of Herrenberg, Germany. Sustainability, 2020, 1261-17.

[41] DengT, ZhangK, ShenZJM. A systematic review of a digital twin city: A new pattern of urban governance toward smart cities. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 2021, 62125-134.

[42] Diaz-SarachagaJM. Developing an assessment governance framework for urban digital twins: Insights from smart cities. Cities, 2025, 156: 1-12.

[43] DickinsonHD. Price formation in a socialist community. Economic Journal, 1933, 43: 237-250.

[44] DoldM, RizzoM. Hayekian psychological economics: A preliminary look. Behavioural Public Policy, 2024, 84773-788.

[45] El-AgamyRF, SayedHA, AkhatatnehAL, A. M., Aljohani, M., & Elhosseini, M.. Comprehensive analysis of digital twins in smart cities: A 4200-paper bibliometric study. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2024, 57: 1-54.

[46] ElsehrawyR, KumarB, WatsonR. Critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for the implementation of digital twins for urban management. Journal of Critical Realism, 2024, 232187-223.

[47] EngelhardtL. Central planning’s computation problem. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 2013, 162227-245

[48] FayB, RamasubramanianAK, MurphyRD, AdderleyT, PapakostasN. Using a process simulation platform for reviewing automated airport baggage handling system configurations. Procedia CIRP, 2022, 112: 180-185.

[49] Ferré-BigorraJ, CasalsM, GangolellsM. The adoption of urban digital twins. Cities, 2022, 121: 1-12

[50] FestréA. Hayek on expectations: The interplay between two complex systems. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2019, 265911-941.

[51] FioriS. Hayek’s theory on complexity and knowledge: Dichotomies, levels of analysis, and bounded rationality. Journal of Economic Methodology, 2009, 163265-285.

[52] Frantz, R. (2020). Before Kahneman and Tversky, there was Friedrich Hayek. Cosmos+Taxis: Studies in Emergent Order and Organization, 7(5), 20–31.

[53] FrydmanR, GoldbergMImperfect Knowledge Economics, 2007Princeton University Press

[54] FrydmanR, GoldbergMD. Macroeconomic theory for a world of imperfect knowledge. Capitalism and Society, 2008, 331-78.

[55] García-ArandaC, Martínez-CuevasS, TorresY, Pedrote SanzM. A Digital Twin of a University Campus from an Urban Sustainability Approach: Case Study in Madrid (Spain). Urban Science, 2024, 841-18.

[56] GardnerP, Dal BorgoM, RuffiniV, HughesAJ, ZhuY, WaggDJ. Towards the development of an operational digital twin. Vibration, 2020, 33235-265.

[57] GiocoliN. Truth or precision? Some reflections on the economists’ failure to predict the financial crisis. The Review of Austrian Economics, 2016, 29: 371-386.

[58] GitahiJ, KolbeTHKolbeTH, DonaubauerA, BeilC. Requirements for Web-Based 4D Visualisation of Integrated 3D City Models and Sensor Data in Urban Digital Twins. Recent Advances in 3D Geoinformation Science, 2024Springer707-725.

[59] GiudiceJM. Through the lens of complex systems theory: Why regulators must understand the economy and society as a complex system. University of Richmond Law Review, 2016, 5157-25

[60] GoncharovS, NechesovA. AI-Driven Digital Twins for Smart Cities. Engineering Proceedings, 2023, 5811-7

[61] GordonPAnderssonDE. Spontaneous cities. The Spatial Market Process, 2012Bingley181-209.

[62] Grabowski, F., & Strzalka, D. (2008). Simple, complicated and complex systems. The brief introduction. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Human System Interactions (pp. 570–573). IEEE.

[63] Greenfield, A. (2013). Against the Smart City: The City is Here for You to Use. Do projects.

[64] GreenwoodD. Planning and know-how: The relationship between knowledge and calculation in Hayek’s case for markets. Review of Political Economy, 2007, 193419-434.

[65] Grieves, M., & Vickers, J. (2017). Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In F.J. Kahlen, S. Flumenfert, A. Alves (eds.). Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems. New Findings and Approaches (pp. 85-113). Spinger.

[66] GrösserSNGrösserSN, Reyes-LecuonaA, GranholmG. Complexity management and system dynamics thinking. Dynamics of Long-Life Assets, 2017Springer69-92.

[67] Hands, D.W. (2018). Hypothetical Pattern Explanations In Economic Science: Hayek’s Explanation of the Principle and Pattern Prediction meets contemporary Philosophy of Science. In L. Fiorito, S. Scheall, spsampsps C.E. Suprinyak (Eds.) Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology (pp. 37–56). Emerald.

[68] HamY, KimJ. Participatory sensing and digital twin city: Updating virtual city models for enhanced risk-informed decision-making. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2020, 3631-12.

[69] HamalainenM. Urban development with dynamic digital twins in Helsinki city. IET Smart Cities, 2021, 34201-210.

[70] HaraguchiM, FunahashiT, BiljeckiF. Assessing governance implications of city digital twin technology: A maturity model approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2024, 204: 1-16.

[71] HayekFA. The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 1945, 35: 519-530

[72] HayekFAStudies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, 1967Routledge.

[73] HayekFANew Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas, 1978Routledge.

[74] HelbingD, FanitabasiF, GiannottiF, HänggliR, HausladenCI, van den HovenJ, MahajanS, PedreschiD, PournarasE. Ethics of smart cities: Towards value-sensitive design and co-evolving city life. Sustainability, 2021, 13201-25.

[75] HelbingD, Sánchez-VaquerizoJAZwitterA, GstreinOJ. Digital twins: Potentials, ethical issues and limitations. Handbook on the politics and governance of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence, 2023Edward Elgar64-104.

[76] HerfeldC. Explaining patterns, not details: Reevaluating rational choice models in light of their explananda. Journal of Economic Methodology, 2018, 252179-209.

[77] HomaeiM, Mogollón-GutiérrezÓ, SanchoJC, ÁvilaM, CaroA. A review of digital twins and their application in cybersecurity based on artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2024, 57: 1-65.

[78] HuP. Investigation on Smart Campus Management Platform Based on Digital Twin. Procedia Computer Science, 2023, 228: 937-945.

[79] Ikeda, S. (2023). A City Cannot be a Work of Art. Learning Economics and Social Theory from Jane Jacobs. Palgrave-MacMillan.

[80] IkedaS. Urbanising economics. Review of Austrian Economics, 2007, 204213-220.

[81] JacobsJThe Economy of Cities, 1969Vintage Books

[82] JiangH, HeZ, LiuS, HaiY, LiuC, MiaoSParkJS, YangLT, PanY, ParkJH. Intelligent Sewage Treatment Control System Based on Digital Twin. Advances in Computer Science and Ubiquitous Computing, 2023Springer479-485.

[83] KeskinB, SalmanB, KoseogluO. Architecting a BIM-based digital twin platform for airport asset management: A model-based system engineering with SysML approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2022, 14851-15.

[84] KetzlerB, NaserentinV, LatinoF, ZangelidisC, ThuvanderL, LoggA. Digital twins for cities: A state of the art review. Built Environment, 2020, 464547-573.

[85] KorenhofP, BlokV, KloppenburgS. Steering Representations. Towards a Critical Understanding of Digital Twins. Philosophy & Technology, 2021, 34: 1751-1773.

[86] KorotkovaN, BendersJ, MikalefP, CameronD. Maneuvering between skepticism and optimism about hyped technologies: Building trust in digital twins. Information & Management, 2023, 6041-13.

[87] LawsonTEconomics and reality, 1997Routledge.

[88] LehtolaVV, KoevaM, ElberinkSO, RaposoP, VirtanenJP, VahdatikhakiF, BorsciS. Digital twin of a city: Review of technology serving city needs. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2022, 114: 1-14.

[89] LeiB, JanssenP, StoterJ, BiljeckiF. Challenges of urban digital twins: A systematic review and Delphi expert survey. Automation in Construction, 2023, 147: 1-15.

[90] Li, C., & Li, Q. (2024). Design Scheme of Railway Construction Drawings Automatic Generation Platform driven by Digital Twin. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Information and Big Data Applications (pp. 846–851). Association for Computing Machinery.

[91] LiuC, TianY. Recognition of digital twin city from the perspective of complex system theory: Lessons from Chinese practice. Journal of Urban Management, 2023, 122182-192.

[92] LohmanW, CornelissenH, BorstJ, KlerkxR, AraghiY, WalravenE. Building digital twins of cities using the Inter Model Broker framework. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2023, 148: 501-513.

[93] LuQ, ParlikadAK, WoodallP, Don RanasingheG, XieX, LiangZ, KonstantinouE, HeatonJ, SchoolingJ. Developing a digital twin at building and city levels: Case study of West Cambridge campus. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2020, 3631-19.

[94] LuoJ, LiuP, CaoL. Coupling a physical replica with a digital twin: A comparison of participatory decision-making methods in an urban park environment. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2022, 1181-17.

[95] LuoQ, LiuH, LiuC, DengQ. Multi-strategy cooperative scheduling for airport specialized vehicles based on digital twins. Scientific Reports, 2024, 1411-25

[96] LvZ, ShangWL, GuizaniM. Impact of digital twins and metaverse on cities: History, current situation, and application perspectives. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12241-22.

[97] MaX, HeZ, YangP, LiaoX, LiuW. Agent-based modelling and simulation for life-cycle airport flight planning and scheduling. Journal of Simulation, 2023, 18115-28.

[98] Maiullari, D., Nageli, C., Rudena, A., Isacson, Å., Dokter, G., Ellenbroek, I., Wallbaum, H. & Thuvander, L. (2024). Digital twin for supporting decision-making and stakeholder collaboration in urban decarbonization processes. A participatory development in Gothenburg. Environment and Planning B (online ahead of print).

[99] MarinGG. Digital Twin: An Emerging Tool for Urban Planning and Design. Urbanism. Arhitectură. Construcţii, 2024, 1515-26

[100] MarshLButosWN. Hayek: Cognitive scientist avant la lettre. The Social Science of Hayek’s ‘The Sensory Order’, 2010Bingley115-155.

[101] MarshLFrancoP, MarshL. Oakeshott and Hayek: Situating the mind. A Companion to Michael Oakeshott, 2012University Park248-267

[102] MartellaA, RamadanAIHA, MartellaC, PatanoM, LongoA. State of the art of urban digital twin platforms. International Conference on Extended Reality, 2023Springer299-317.

[103] MasoumiH, ShirowzhanS, EskandarpourP, PettitCJ. City Digital Twins: Their maturity level and differentiation from 3D city models. Big Earth Data, 2023, 711-36.

[104] MazzettoS. A Review of Urban Digital Twins Integration, Challenges, and Future Directions in Smart City Development. Sustainability, 2024, 16191-33.

[105] MenapaceA, ZanfeiA, HerreraM, BrentanB. Graph neural networks for sensor placement: A proof of concept towards a digital twin of water distribution systems. Water, 2024, 16131-14.

[106] Moroni, S. (2012). Land-use planning and the question of unintended consequences. In D. E. Andersson (ed.). The Spatial Market Process (pp. 265–288). Emerald.

[107] MoroniSAnderssonD, MoroniS. Towards a General Theory of Contractual Communities. Cities and Private Planning, 2014Edward Elgar38-65

[108] MoroniSGunderM, MadanipourA, WatsonV. Public interest. The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory, 2018Routledge69-80

[109] Moroni S., and D. Chiffi (2021). Complexity and Uncertainty: Implications for Urban Planning. In J. Portugali (ed.), Handbook on Cities and Complexity (pp. 319–330). Edward Elgar.

[110] MoroniS. What can urban policies and planning really learn from John Rawls? A multi-strata view of institutional action and a canvas conception of the just city. Planning Theory, 2023, 224404-425.

[111] MoroniS, RauwsW, CozzolinoS. Forms of self-organisation: Urban complexity and planning implications. Environment and Planning B, 2020, 472220-234

[112] Nochta, T., & Oti-Sarpong, K. (2024). Participation matters: The social construction of digital twins for cities. Environment and Planning B (online ahead of print).

[113] NochtaT, WanL, SchoolingJM, ParlikadAK. A socio-technical perspective on urban analytics: The case of city-scale digital twins. Journal of Urban Technology, 2021, 281–2263-287.

[114] Owerko, T., Tomaszkiewicz, K., Kuras, P., Glinka, S., & Rochel, M. (2024). Towards developing and maintaining digital twin for railway stations. In 28th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (pp. 499–503). IEEE.

[115] PadovanoA, LongoF, MancaL, GrugniR. Improving safety management in railway stations through a simulation-based digital twin approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2024, 187: 1-25.

[116] PalminiO, CugurulloF. Charting AI urbanism: Conceptual sources and spatial implications of urban artificial intelligence. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 311-14.

[117] PantaleoniM. Considerazioni sulle proprietà di un sistema di prezzi politici. Giornale Degli Economisti, 1911, 429–29114-133

[118] PapyshevG, YarimeM. Exploring city digital twins as policy tools: A task-based approach to generating synthetic data on urban mobility. Data & Policy, 2021, 3: 1-18.

[119] PaqueKH. Pattern predictions in economics: Hayek’s methodology of the social sciences revisited. History of Political Economy, 1990, 222281-294.

[120] ParchomovskyG, SiegelmanP. Cities, property, and positive externalities. William & Mary Law Review, 2012, 541211-261

[121] PavónRM, AlbertiMG, ÁlvarezAAA, CepaJJ. Bim-based Digital Twin development for university Campus management. Case study ETSICCP. Expert Systems with Applications, 2025, 262: 1-14.

[122] PeldonD, BanihashemiS, LeNguyenK, DerribleS. Navigating Urban Complexity: The Transformative Role of Digital Twins in Smart City Development. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2024, 111: 1-19.

[123] PenningtonM. Citizen participation, the-knowledge problem-and urban land use planning: An austrian perspective on institutional choice. The Review of Austrian Economics, 2004, 17: 213-231.

[124] Pexyean, T., Saraubon, K., & Nilsook, P. (2024). digital twin energy management system with artificial intelligence internet of thing to smart campus. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 102(17), 1–13.

[125] PierceS, PallonettoF, De DonatisL, De RosaM. District energy modelling for decarbonisation strategies development. The case of a University campus. Energy Reports, 2024, 11: 1256-1267.

[126] PolanyiMPersonal Knowledge, 1958The University of Chicago Press

[127] PolanyiMThe Tacit Dimension, 1966Routledge

[128] PorquedduECalabròF, Della SpinaL, Piñeira MantiñánMJ. Adapting Anti-adaptive Neighborhoods. What is the Role of Spatial Design?. New Metropolitan Perspectives, 2022Springer1028-1038.

[129] QiuY. Digital Twin Based Resource Optimization and Dynamic Decision Making in Air Terminal Yards. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 2024, 911-23.

[130] RauwsW, CozzolinoS, MoroniS. Framework rules for self-organizing cities: Introduction. Environment and Planning B, 2020, 472195-202

[131] Roda-SanchezL, CirilloF, SolmazG, JacobsT, Garrido-HidalgoC, OlivaresT, KovacsE. Building a smart campus digital twin: System, analytics and lessons learned from a real-world project. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2023, 1131-14

[132] RohwerY, RiceC. Hypothetical pattern idealization and explanatory models. Philosophy of Science, 2013, 803334-355.

[133] RohwerY, RiceC. How are models and explanations related?. Erkenntnis, 2016, 81: 1127-1148.

[134] Roper, W.C. (1931). The Problem of Prices in a Socialist State. Harvard University Press.

[135] Rose, G. (2024). Visualising human life in volumetric cities: City digital twins and other disasters. Dialogues in Urban Research (online ahead of print).

[136] RussellB. Knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 1910, 11: 108-128.

[137] RyleG. Knowing how and knowing that. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 1945, 46: 1-16.

[138] SaeedZO, ManciniF, GlusacT, IzadpanahiP. Future city, digital twinning and the urban realm: A systematic literature review. Buildings, 2022, 1251-24.

[139] SaifutdinovF, JacksonI, TolujevsJ. An emulation oriented method and tool for test of ground traffic control systems at airports. Aviation, 2022, 262104-111.

[140] SaifutdinovF, TolujevsJ. Time and space discretisation in the digital twin of the airport transport network. Transport and Telecommunication Journal, 2021, 223257-265.

[141] San MiguelM, JohnsonJH, KerteszJ, KaskiK, Díaz-GuileraA, MacKayRS, LoretoV, ErdiP, HelbingD. Challenges in complex systems science. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 2012, 214: 245-271.

[142] SargutG, McGrathRG. Learning to live with complexity. Harvard Business Review, 2011, 89968-76

[143] ScalasA, CabidduD, MortaraM, SpagnuoloM. Potential of the geometric layer in urban digital twins. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2022, 1161-14.

[144] ScheallS. Lesser degrees of explanation: Further implications of FA Hayek's methodology of sciences of complex phenomena. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 2015, 8142-60.

[145] Schrotter, G., & Hürzeler, C. (2020). The digital twin of the city of Zurich for urban planning. PFG–Journal of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Science, 88(1), 99–112.

[146] SeagrenCW. Examining social processes with agent-based models. The Review of Austrian Economics, 2011, 24: 1-17.

[147] Shaffer, B.D. (2009). Boundaries of Order. Private Property as a Social System. Ludwig von Mises Institute.

[148] ShahatE, HyunCT, YeomC. City digital twin potentials: A review and research agenda. Sustainability, 2021, 1361-20.

[149] SomanathS, NaserentinV, EleftheriouO, SjölieD, WästbergBS, LoggA. Towards Urban Digital Twins: A Workflow for Procedural Visualization Using Geospatial Data. Remote Sensing, 2024, 16111-24.

[150] Stufano Melone, M.R., Borgo, S., & Camarda, D. (2023). Digital Twins of Cities vs. Digital Twins for Cities. In A. Marucci, F. Zullo, L. Fiorini, & L. Saganeiti (Eds.), International Conference on Innovation in Urban and Regional Planning (pp. 192–203). Springer.

[151] TaylorFW. The guidance of production in a socialist state. American Economic Review, 1929, 19: 1-8

[152] TheriasA, RafieeA. City digital twins for urban resilience. International Journal of Digital Earth, 2023, 1624164-4190.

[153] TomkoM, WinterS. Beyond digital twins. A commentary. Environment and Planning B, 2019, 462395-399

[154] TzachorA, SabriS, RichardsCE, RajabifardA, AcutoM. Potential and limitations of digital twins to achieve the sustainable development goals. Nature Sustainability, 2022, 510822-829.

[155] Van EeghenPH. Towards a methodology of tendencies. Journal of Economic Methodology, 1996, 32261-284.

[156] von MisesL. Die wirtschaftsrechnung im sozialistischen gemeinwesen. Archiv Für Sozialwissenschaft, 1920, 47186-121

[157] WangX, BaiW, SuY, YangG, LiC, LvX, PengK, LiJ. Digital twin for multi-scenario emergency of railway passenger stations. Frontiers in Physics, 2024, 11: 1-16.

[158] WeberMWirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 1922Mohr

[159] WeilC, BibriSE, LongchampR, GolayF, AlahiA. Urban digital twin challenges: A systematic review and perspectives for sustainable smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2023, 99: 1-16.

[160] WeimarWBEpistemology of the Human Sciences, 2023Palgrave-MacMillan.

[161] WenJ, GabrysB, MusialK. Toward digital twin oriented modeling of complex networked systems and their dynamics: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Access, 2022, 10: 66886-66923.

[162] WhiteG, ZinkA, CodecáL, ClarkeS. A digital twin smart city for citizen feedback. Cities, 2021, 110: 1-11.

[163] WinsbergE. Computer simulation and the philosophy of science. Philosophy Compass, 2009, 45835-845.

[164] WooleyA, SilvaDF, BitencourtJ. When is a simulation a digital twin? A systematic literature review. Manufacturing Letters, 2023, 35: 940-951.

[165] WrightL, DavidsonS. How to tell the difference between a model and a digital twin. Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences, 2020, 711-13.

[166] XieW, ZengY, ZhangX, WongHY, ZhangT, WangZ, WuX, ShiJ, HuangX, XiaoF, UsmaniA. AIoT-powered building digital twin for smart firefighting and super real-time fire forecast. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2025, 65: 1-16.

[167] YangZ, TangC, ZhangT, ZhangZ, DoanDT. Digital Twins in Construction: Architecture, Applications. Trends and Challenges. Buildings, 2024, 1491-28.

[168] YurkevichEV, StepanovskayaIA. Controlling the security of the airport airspace using the digital twin. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 186411-7

[169] Zhao, Y., Pang, S., Lv, Z., & Miao, S. (2023). Augmented Digital Twins for Predictive Automatic Regulation and Fault Alarm in Sewage Plan. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia (pp. 8495–8503). Association for Computing Machinery.

Funding

European Union and Italian MUR(CUP: D53D23007250006)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)