Analysis of the spatio-temporal impact of the built environment on shared bicycle ridership density

Abstract

The spatiotemporal nonstationarity of shared bicycle usage, a sustainable and eco-friendly mode of transportation, is believed to be influenced by the built environment. However, the specific spatial and temporal impacts of built environment factors on shared bicycle trips are not yet fully understood. This study investigates the relationship between the built environment and shared bicycle ridership in Shenzhen, a city where the distribution of shared bicycles is relatively dense, by utilizing multisource urban big data. Key independent variables were selected based on the “5Ds” dimensions of the built environment, and the performance of two models—Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) and Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression (GTWR)—were compared. The analysis evaluates the impact of the built environment on the density of shared bicycle ridership, incorporating both spatial and temporal dimensions. The results of the study found that the GTWR model used in this paper can effectively explain the spatio-temporal heterogeneity of built environment-related variables on shared bicycle trips with high goodness of fit. And the regression fit coefficients of the model show that the effects of different built environment indicators on the density of shared bicycle ridership are significantly different in both time and space. Among them, road network density, catering POI density, traffic POI density and POI diversity have a facilitating effect on shared bicycle travels, particularly during peak hours on weekdays and in central urban areas. Shopping POI density shows different effects on shared bike use in different times and spaces. While the distance from the city center and the nearest distance to the bus station have a suppressive effect on shared bicycle use, they show opposite degrees of influence in the spatial distribution. The results can provide more precise guidance for future rational transportation strategies or sustainable urban planning.

References

[1] Brunsdon C, Fotheringham AS, Charlton ME. Geographically weighted regression: A method for exploring spatial nonstationarity Geographical Analysis, 1996, 28: 281-298.

[2] CHEN E, YE Z. Identifying the nonlinear relationship between free-floating bike sharing usage and built environment Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 80(1): 124281.

[3] Liu YF, Chen L, Lu Y, Yang LC, Peng MJ, Liu YL, et al.. Association between built environment characteristics and metro usage at station level with a big data approach Travel Behaviour and Society, 2022, 28: 38-49.

[4] Chen YP, CHEN YP, Zhang BG, Guo TY, Gu ZY, Zhang YL, et al.. Exploring nonlinear effects of built environment on dockless bike sharing usage Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2024, 24(02): 217-224

[5] Wang KL, CHENG L, WANG KL, De VJ, et al.. Exploring non-linear built environment effects on the integration of free-floating bike-share and urban rail transport: A quantile regression approach Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2022, 162: 175-187.

[6] CHENG L, HUANG J, JIN TH, Jin TH, Chen WD, Li AY, et al.. Comparison of station-based and free-floating bikeshare systems as feeder modes to the metro Journal of Transport Geography, 2023, 107: 103545.

[7] Chu HJ, CHU HJ, BILAL M. PM2.5 mapping using integrated geographically temporally weighted regression (GTWR) and random sample consensus (RANSAC) models Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26: 1902-1910.

[8] Cui SQ, CUI S Q, ZHU P J, ZHANG M F, Zhu PJ, Zhang MF, Zhang HH, et al.. The influence of the built environment on the spatial distribution of bicycle-sharing use——Taking Changsha as an example Journal of Southwest University(Natural Science Edition), 2020, 42(06): 89-89

[9] Deng YL, DENG Y L, YAN Y D, Yan YD. Propensity Score Weighting with Generalized Boosted Models to Explore the Effects of the Built Environment and Residential Self-Selection on Travel Behavior Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2019, 2673: 373-383.

[10] Gao, Y., Song, C., Guo, S. H., & Pei, T. (2021a). Spatial-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of source and sink of dockless sharing bicycles connected to subway stations. Journal of Geo-information Science, 23(1), 155–170

[11] Gao, K., Yang, Y., Li, A. Y., & Qu, X. B. (2021b). Spatial heterogeneity in distance decay of using bike sharing: An empirical large-scale analysis in Shanghai. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 94, 102814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102814

[12] Qu XB, GAO K, YANG Y, QU X B, GIL J. Data-driven interpretation on interactive and nonlinear effects of the correlated built environment on shared mobility Journal of Transport Geography, 2023, 110: 103604.

[13] Guo, Y. Y., Zhou, J. B., Wu, Y., Li, Z. B., & Liu, J. G. (2017). Identifying the factors affecting bike-sharing usage and degree of satisfaction in Ningbo, China. Plos One, 12(9), e0185100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185100

[14] Rahman MM, Hatami, F, Rahman M M, Thill JC, et al.. Non-Linear Associations Between the Urban Built Environment and Commuting Modal Split: A Random Forest Approach and SHAP Evaluation IEEE Access, 2023, 11: 12649-12662.

[15] Huang B, Wu B, Barry M. Geographically and temporally weighted regression for modeling spatio-temporal variation in house prices International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2010, 24(3–4): 383-401.

[16] Huang FJ, Huang F J, Tang J Q, Tang JQ, Lin HL, Zhao PJ, et al.. Built environment effects on the spatio-temporal distribution of shared bikes based on multi-scale geographic weighted regression Geographic Research, 2023, 42(09): 2405-2418

[17] Huo JH, Huo J H, Yang H T, Yang HT, Li CJ, Yang LC, et al.. Influence of the built environment on E-scooter sharing ridership: A tale of five cities Journal of Transport Geography, 2021, 93(4): 103084.

[18] Jiang HC, Jiang H C, Dong L, Qiu B. How are macro-scale and micro-scale built environments associated with running activity? The application of strava data and deep learning in inner London ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf, 2022, 11(10): 504.

[19] Jiang, X., Xu, C. C., Zhang, J., & Liang, Q. Y. (2022a). Time and spaced dynamic demand forecasting of station-free sharing bikes on campus. Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition), 42(05), 105–115

[20] Xu LJ, Li F, Xu L J, Chen GJ, Zhu RB, et al.. An analysis of spatial-temporal characteristics of origin and destination of shared-bike users Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2022, 40(03): 146-153

[21] Luo SZX, Luo S Z, Zheng F, Yin QY, et al.. How built environment influence public bicycle usage: Evidence from the bicycle sharing system in Qiaobei Area, Nanjing Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(3): 332-341

[22] Lv XY, Lv X Y, Pan H X, Pan HX. Sharing bicycle riding characteristics analysis in Shanghai based on mobike opening data Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2018, 02: 46-51

[23] Mo HT, Mo H T, Wei ZV, Zhai Q, Wei ZC. Travel behaviors and influencing factors of bike sharing in old town: The case of Guangzhou South Architecture, 2019, 01: 7-12

[24] Munshi T. Built environment and mode choice relationship for commute travel in the city of Rajkot, India Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment, 2016, 44(5): 239-253.

[25] Peng YD, Peng Y D, Li W S, Li WS, Luo XB. A Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression Model for Spatial Downscaling of MODIS Land Surface Temperatures Over Urban Heterogeneous Regions IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2019, 57(7): 5012-5027.

[26] Rixey, R. A. (2012). Station-level forecasting of bike sharing ridership: station network effects in three U.S.systems

[27] Shao HY, Shao H Y, Jin C, Zhong YX, Mao WS, et al.. Spatial correlation between the origin and destination of bike-sharing and land use pattern in Xiamen island based on POI data Economic Geography, 2023, 43(03): 109-119

[28] Su H, Li WQ, Zhang YY. Determinants of Urban Residents’ Intention to Use Bike Sharing for Low-Carbon Travel CICTP, 2021, 202: 602-609.

[29] Sun C, Lu J. Bike-sharing trips spatial heterogeneity and driving factors Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(3): 198-206

[30] Sun QP, Sun Q P, Zeng KB, Zeng K B, Zhang KQ, Yang YC, Zhang SX, et al.. Spatiotemporal travel patterns and demand prediction of shared bikes in Beijing Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(1): 332-338

[31] Tan ZZ, Tan Z Z, Guo F, Li SY, Zhang XM, Lai ZP, Tan ZL, et al.. How is urban greenness spatially associated with dockless bike sharing usage on weekdays, weekends, and holidays? ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2021, 10(4): 238.

[32] Chen YJ, Wang K, Chen Y J. Joint analysis of the impacts of built environment on bikeshare station capacity and trip attractions Journal of Transport Geography, 2020, 82: 102603.

[33] Wang YC, Wang Y C, Zhan Z L, Zhan ZL, Mi YH, Zhou HY, et al.. Nonlinear effects of factors on dockless bike-sharing usage considering grid-based spatiotemporal heterogeneity Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2022, 104: 103194.

[34] Wang ZB, Wang Z B, Li H Q, Liu Z, Li HQ. Influence analys is of urban built environment on the return quantity of shared bikes Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science), 2023, 42(07): 128-135

[35] Zhou KC, Wang L, Zhou K C, Zhang SR, Moudon AV, Wang JF, Zhu YG, Sun WY, Lin JF, et al.. Designing bike-friendly cities: Interactive effects of built environment factors on bike-sharing Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2023, 117: 103670.

[36] Wei ZC, Wei Z C, Mo H T, Liu Y T, Mo HT, Liu YT. Spatiotemporal characteristics of bike-sharing: An empirical study of Tianhe District, Guangzhou Science & Technology Review, 2018, 36(18): 71-80

[37] Wei JM, Liu Z, Chen YY, Cao BX, Guo YJ. Analysis of factors influencing dockless bike-sharing cycling considering macroscale and microscale build environment Science Technology and Engineering, 2023, 23(09): 3904-3915

[38] Wu JX, Tang GK, Li WX. Nonlinear effect of built environment on bike-sharing ridership at different time periods: A case study from Shanghai Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2024, 24(01): 290-298

[39] Xiang ZH, Xiang Z H, Li Q, &Ban PF, et al.. Effects of built environment on the spatio-temporal trajectories of shared bicycles: A case study of Shenzhen Tropical Geography, 2024, 44(02): 236-247

[40] Yan YL, Yan Y L, Yu T, Shen L Z, Shen LZ. The impact mechanism of built environment on shared bike travel: A case study of Shanghai Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2020, 6: 85-91

[41] Yang HT, Yang H T, Zhang Y B, Zhang YB, Zhong LZ, Zhang XJ, Ling ZW, et al.. Exploring spatial variation of bike sharing trip production and attraction: A study based on Chicago’s Divvy system Applied Geography, 2019, 115: 102130.

[42] Yang LC, Yu B, Liang Y, Yang L C. Exploring the relationship between bike-sharing riderip and built environment characteristics: A case study based on GAMM in Boston World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(02): 48-58

[43] Maarseveen MV, Zhang Y, Thomas T, et al.. Exploring the impact of built environment factors on the use of public bikes at bike stations: Case study in Zhongshan, China Journal of Transport Geography, 2017, 58(1): 59-70.

[44] Zhang XX, Zhang X X, Huang B, Zhu SZ, et al.. Spatiotemporal Influence of Urban Environment on Taxi Ridership Using Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression International Journal of Geo-Information, 2019, 8(1): 23.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)