Sepsis resuscitation has traditionally been guided by a flow-centered approach aimed at restoring arterial perfusion, often leading to standardized fluid administration strategies. However, recent evidence and international guidelines increasingly support individualized fluid therapy based not only on fluid responsiveness but also on fluid tolerance. Despite this paradigm shift, the venous side of the circulation remains largely under-recognized in bedside hemodynamic assessment. Organ perfusion depends not only on arterial inflow but also on effective venous drainage, and elevated venous pressure may impair tissue perfusion and contribute to organ dysfunction even in the presence of apparently adequate systemic hemodynamics. In septic patients, capillary leakage, myocardial dysfunction, vasoplegia, and altered venous compliance may create heterogeneous hemodynamic profiles in which fluid responsiveness and venous congestion can coexist. Consequently, fluid administration may transiently improve cardiac output while simultaneously worsening tissue edema and venous congestion. Emerging ultrasound-based tools, such as the Venous Excess Ultrasound (VExUS) score, aim to integrate venous assessment into resuscitation strategies, although their role in sepsis remains incompletely defined. Recognizing fluid tolerance as a complementary component of hemodynamic evaluation may help avoid one of the most common pitfalls of sepsis resuscitation: improving flow at the expense of congestion.
| [1] |
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA, 2016, 315: 801.
|
| [2] |
Prescott HC, Antonelli M, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2026. Crit Care Med, 2026, 54: 725-812.
|
| [3] |
Guarino M, Perna B, Cesaro AE, et al. 2023 update on sepsis and septic shock in adult patients: management in the emergency department. J Clin Med, 2023, 12: 3188.
|
| [4] |
Meyhoff TS, Hjortrup PB, Møller MH, et al. Conservative vs liberal fluid therapy in septic shock (CLASSIC) trial—Protocol and statistical analysis plan. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2019, 63: 1262-1271.
|
| [5] |
Jessen MK, Andersen LW, Thomsen MH, et al. Restrictive fluids versus standard care in adults with sepsis in the emergency department (REFACED): a multicenter, randomized feasibility trial. Acad Emerg Med, 2022, 29: 1172-1184.
|
| [6] |
Shapiro NI, Douglas IS, et al. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Prevention and Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury Clinical Trials Network Early restrictive or liberal fluid management for sepsis-induced hypotension. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:499–510.
|
| [7] |
Zampieri FG, Bagshaw SM, Semler MW. Fluid therapy for critically ill adults with sepsis: a review. JAMA, 2023, 329: 1967.
|
| [8] |
Marik PE, Cavallazzi R. Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit Care Med, 2013, 41: 1774-1781.
|
| [9] |
Bentzer P, Griesdale DE, Boyd J, et al. Will this hemodynamically unstable patient respond to a bolus of intravenous fluids?. JAMA, 2016, 316: 1298-1309.
|
| [10] |
Deulkar P, Singam A, Mudiganti VNKS, et al. Lactate monitoring in intensive care: a comprehensive review of its utility and interpretation. Cureus, 2024, 16e66356
|
| [11] |
Longino A, Martin K, Leyba K, et al. Prospective evaluation of venous excess ultrasound for estimation of venous congestion. Chest, 2024, 165: 590-600.
|
| [12] |
Longino A, Martin K, Leyba K, et al. Correlation between the VExUS score and right atrial pressure: a pilot prospective observational study. Crit Care, 2023, 27. 205
|
| [13] |
Song J, Chen G, Lai D, et al. Association between the Venous Excess Ultrasound (VExUS) score and acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with sepsis: a multicenter prospective observational study. Ann Intensive Care, 2025, 15. 105
|
| [14] |
Pierre-Grégoire G. VExUS score: optimizing its use in perioperative and critical care management. Crit Care, 2025, 29. 472
|
| [15] |
Leyba K, Longino A, Ormesher R, et al. VExUS point-of-care ultrasound tool to detect changes in volume status a prospective observational study. JACC Adv, 2026, 5. 102538
|
| [16] |
Prager R, Argaiz E, Pratte M, et al. Doppler identified venous congestion in septic shock: protocol for an international, multi-centre prospective cohort study (Andromeda-VEXUS). BMJ Open, 2023, 13: e074843.
|
| [17] |
Muñoz F, Born P, Bruna M, et al. Coexistence of a fluid responsive state and venous congestion signals in critically ill patients: a multicenter observational proof-of-concept study. Crit Care, 2024, 28. 52
|
| [18] |
Ter Horst S, van Oosten J, Laros R, et al. VExUS-ED: early venous congestion is associated with clinical fluid overload in patients with sepsis. J Crit Care, 2026, 94. 155488
|
Funding
Università degli Studi di Ferrara
Rights & permissions
The Author(s)
PDF
