Objective Transpapillary therapy remains a critical treatment modality for main pancreatic duct (MPD) injury after acute necrotizing pancreatitis. This study aimed to verify the factors linked to the technical success of transpapillary drainage by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in managing MPD injury, and the impact of technical success on tube duration and overall survival.
Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent ERCP for MPD injuries following acute pancreatitis from May 2019 to April 2021. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to identify factors associated with successful treatment. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to analyze the impact of technical success on tube duration and overall survival.
Results We included 63 patients in whom MPD opacification was achieved (43 technical successes and 20 failures). The technical success group had a significantly higher proportion of patients whose interval from onset of acute pancreatitis to endoscopic transpapillary drainage (IOP) was less than 90 days (58.14%) than the failure group (20.00%, P = 0.005). Multivariate analysis revealed that an IOP < 90 days (OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.06–0.91, P = 0.036) and MPD injury located outside the head and neck of the pancreas (OR = 4.66, 95% CI: 1.10–19.77, P = 0.036) were independently associated with technical success. Technical success was associated with a shorter median tube indwelling time (10.3 months, 95% CI: 7.3–13.3) compared to technical failure (16.8 months, 95% CI: 12.3–21.3, P = 0.025).
Conclusions ERCP should be performed within 90 days in patients with MPD injury, and the procedure has a higher success rate when the injury occurs outside the head and neck of the pancreas. This technical success significantly shortens drainage tube indwelling time and improves patients’ quality of life.
| [1] |
Iannuzzi JP, King JA, Leong JH, et al. . Global incidence of acute pancreatitis is increasing over time: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology., 2022, 162(1): 122-134
|
| [2] |
Peery AF, Crockett SD, Murphy CC, et al. . Burden and cost of gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States: update 2018. Gastroenterology., 2019, 156(1): 254-272.e11
|
| [3] |
Peery AF, Murphy CC, Anderson C, et al. . Burden and cost of gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States: update 2024. Gastroenterology., 2025, 168(5): 1000-1024
|
| [4] |
Sikora SS, Khare R, Srikanth G, et al. . External pancreatic fistula as a sequel to management of acute severe necrotizing pancreatitis. Dig Surg., 2005, 22(6): 446-451
|
| [5] |
Chon HK, Kozarek RA, Fotoohi M, et al. . Long-term outcome of rendezvous internalization treatment for external pancreatic fistulas associated with disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome: a retrospective study. Surg Endosc., 2025, 39(5): 3027-3036
|
| [6] |
Nealon WH, Bhutani M, Riall TS, et al. A unifying concept: pancreatic ductal anatomy both predicts and determines the major complications resulting from pancreatitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208(5):790–799; discussion 799–801.
|
| [7] |
Verma S, Rana SS. Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome: updated review on clinical implications and management. Pancreatology., 2020, 20(6): 1035-1044
|
| [8] |
Takenaka M, Saito T, Hamada T, et al. . Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome: diagnostic and therapeutic challenges and future directions. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol., 2024, 18(10): 631-645
|
| [9] |
Larsen M, Kozarek R. Management of pancreatic ductal leaks and fistulae. J Gastroenterol Hepatol., 2014, 29(7): 1360-1370
|
| [10] |
Meierhofer C, Fuegger R, Biebl M, et al. . Pancreatic fistulas: current evidence and strategy—a narrative review. J Clin Med., 2023, 12(15): 5046
|
| [11] |
Chen Y, Jiang Y, Qian W, et al. . Endoscopic transpapillary drainage in disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome after acute pancreatitis and trauma: long-term outcomes in 31 patients. BMC Gastroenterol., 2019, 19(1): 54
|
| [12] |
Yokoi Y, Kikuyama M, Kurokami T, et al. . Early dual drainage combining transpapillary endotherapy and percutaneous catheter drainage in patients with pancreatic fistula associated with severe acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology., 2016, 16(4): 497-507
|
| [13] |
Smoczyński M, Jagielski M, Jabłońska A, et al. . Transpapillary drainage of walled-off pancreatic necrosis - a single center experience. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne., 2015, 10(4): 527-533
|
| [14] |
Karjula H, Saarela A, Vaarala A, et al. . Endoscopic transpapillary stenting for pancreatic fistulas after necrosectomy with necrotizing pancreatitis. Surg Endosc., 2015, 29(1): 108-112
|
| [15] |
Jagielski M, Smoczyński M, Adrych K. Transpapillary drainage of pancreatic parenchymal necrosis. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne., 2015, 10(3): 491-494
|
| [16] |
Bakker OJ, van Baal MC, van Santvoort HC, et al. . Endoscopic transpapillary stenting or conservative treatment for pancreatic fistulas in necrotizing pancreatitis: multicenter series and literature review. Ann Surg., 2011, 253(5): 961-967
|
| [17] |
Rana SS, Bhasin DK, Nanda M, et al. . Endoscopic transpapillary drainage for external fistulas developing after surgical or radiological pancreatic interventions. J Gastroenterol Hepatol., 2010, 25(6): 1087-1092
|
| [18] |
Bhasin DK, Rana SS, Udawat HP, et al. . Management of multiple and large pancreatic pseudocysts by endoscopic transpapillary nasopancreatic drainage alone. Am J Gastroenterol., 2006, 101(8): 1780-1786
|
| [19] |
Varadarajulu S, Noone TC, Tutuian R, et al. . Predictors of outcome in pancreatic duct disruption managed by endoscopic transpapillary stent placement. Gastrointest Endosc., 2005, 61(4): 568-575
|
| [20] |
Meng Y, Ding J, Tian C, et al. . Endoscopic transpapillary drainage for walled-off pancreatic necrosis with complete main pancreatic duct disruption by metallic stent placement: a retrospective study. Front Med., 2022, 9: 1064463
|
| [21] |
Ni J, Peng K, Yu L, et al. . Transpapillary stenting improves treatment outcomes in patients undergoing endoscopic transmural drainage of ductal disruption-associated pancreatic fluid collections. Am J Gastroenterol., 2023, 118(6): 972-982
|
| [22] |
Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. . Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut., 2013, 62(1): 102-111
|
| [23] |
Mederos MA, Reber HA, Girgis MD. Acute pancreatitis: a review. JAMA., 2021, 325(4): 382
|
| [24] |
Trikudanathan G, Yazici C, Evans Phillips A, et al. . Diagnosis and management of acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology., 2024, 167(4): 673-688
|
| [25] |
Ando Y, Okano K, Yasumatsu H, et al. . Current status and management of pancreatic trauma with main pancreatic duct injury: a multicenter nationwide survey in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci., 2021, 28(2): 183-191
|
| [26] |
Bhatia H, Yadav N, Gupta P. Radiological criteria for disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome: a targeted literature review. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol., 2022, 16(2): 121-127
|
| [27] |
Marchegiani G. The 2016 update of the international study group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. HPB., 2019, 21: S748
|
| [28] |
van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, et al. . A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med., 2010, 362(16): 1491-1502
|
| [29] |
Kozarek RA, Ball TJ, Patterson DJ, et al. . Endoscopic transpapillary therapy for disrupted pancreatic duct and peripancreatic fluid collections. Gastroenterology., 1991, 100(5 Pt 1): 1362-1370
|
| [30] |
Karjula H, Nordblad Schmidt P, Mäkelä J, et al. . Prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting in severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis: a prospective randomized study. Endoscopy., 2019, 51(11): 1027-1034
|
| [31] |
Larsen M, Kozarek RA. Management of disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol., 2016, 14(3): 348-359
|
Funding
Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzen Municipality(SZSM202403005)
Municipal Financial Subsidy of Nanshan District Medical Key Discipline Construction
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Just Accepted
This article has successfully passed peer review and final editorial review, and will soon enter typesetting, proofreading and other publishing processes. The currently displayed version is the accepted final manuscript. The officially published version will be updated with format, DOI and citation information upon launch. We recommend that you pay attention to subsequent journal notifications and preferentially cite the officially published version. Thank you for your support and cooperation.