Time-Dependent Fluid Accumulation Index for Phase-Specific Risk Stratification in Septic Shock with Heart Failure

Qian-fei Liu , Liang Ge , Di Yao , Xiao-min Huang , Guang-cai Li , Nian-jin Gong

Current Medical Science ›› : 1 -12.

PDF
Current Medical Science ›› :1 -12. DOI: 10.1007/s11596-025-00138-9
Original Article
research-article

Time-Dependent Fluid Accumulation Index for Phase-Specific Risk Stratification in Septic Shock with Heart Failure

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Objective

Fluid management in patients with septic shock and coexisting heart failure is a critical challenge, as it requires balancing resuscitation and the risk of fluid overload. This study investigated the potential of the fluid accumulation index (FAI), which is measured serially during the initial 72 h of intensive care unit (ICU) care, to provide dynamic prognostic information to guide fluid management in this high-risk population.

Methods

Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was used to explore the relationships between FAI levels at different time points within 72 h of ICU admission and ICU mortality. Associations were quantified via multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Subgroup analyses and Kaplan‒Meier survival curves were used to evaluate the consistency of associations and differences in survival between groups.

Results

A total of 643 patients with septic shock and concurrent heart failure were included, among whom 127 died. The RCS revealed a significant nonlinear relationship between FAI levels at various time points and ICU mortality. The optimal FAI cutoff values decreased over time: the cumulative values were 0.87 at 24 h, 0.59 at 48 h, and 0.56 at 72 h. The cutoff values for specific intervals were 0.27 for the 24–48 h period (2–24 h-FAI) and 0.12 for the 48–72 h period (3–24 h-FAI). In the fully adjusted model, FAI values exceeding these time-specific thresholds were significantly associated with increased ICU mortality (24 h-FAI > 0.87, HR = 1.96, P = 0.0251; 2–24 h-FAI > 0.27, HR = 2.07, P = 0.0051; 48 h-FAI > 0.59, HR = 2.50, P = 0.0005; 3–24 h-FAI > 0.12, HR = 2.05, P = 0.0091; 72 h-FAI > 0.56, HR = 2.97, P < 0.0001). These associations remained consistent across most predefined subgroups.

Conclusion

FAI serves as a dynamic and independent prognostic marker for critically ill patients with septic shock and heart failure during the first 72 h of ICU admission. A key finding was the time-dependent decline in the optimal FAI cutoff values (0.87 at 24 h vs. 0.12 for the 3–24 h period). This temporal decline supports a shift in fluid management strategy from an initial liberal approach toward a conservative strategy after the first 24 h, which may mitigate mortality risk.

Keywords

Septic shock / Heart failure / Fluid accumulation index / ICU mortality / Fluid management / Risk stratification / Prognostic marker / Critically ill patients

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Qian-fei Liu, Liang Ge, Di Yao, Xiao-min Huang, Guang-cai Li, Nian-jin Gong. Time-Dependent Fluid Accumulation Index for Phase-Specific Risk Stratification in Septic Shock with Heart Failure. Current Medical Science 1-12 DOI:10.1007/s11596-025-00138-9

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al.. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med., 2013, 39(2): 165-228

[2]

Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al.. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J., 2016, 37(27): 2129-2200

[3]

Shen Y, Huang X, Cai G, et al.. Impact of fluid balance on mortality is mediated by fluid accumulation index in sepsis: a cohort study. J Intensive Care Med., 2021, 36(12): 1458-1465

[4]

Dong N, Gao N, Hu W, et al.. Association of fluid management with mortality of sepsis patients with congestive heart failure: a retrospective cohort study. Front Med., 2022, 9 714384

[5]

Annane D, Bellissant E, Cavaillon JM. Septic shock. Lancet., 2005, 365(9453): 63-78

[6]

Abou Dagher G, Hajjar K, Khoury C, et al.. Outcomes of patients with systolic heart failure presenting with sepsis to the emergency department of a tertiary hospital: a retrospective chart review study from Lebanon. BMJ Open., 2018, 8(7 e022185

[7]

Hollenberg SM, Singer M. Pathophysiology of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy. Nat Rev Cardiol., 2021, 18(6): 424-434

[8]

Snipelisky D, Chaudhry SP, Stewart GC. The many faces of heart failure. Card Electrophysiol Clin., 2019, 11(1): 11-20

[9]

Miller WL. Fluid volume overload and congestion in heart failure: time to reconsider pathophysiology and how volume is assessed. Circ Heart Fail., 2016, 9(8 e002922

[10]

Morgan P, Majeed A. Sepsis: getting the balance right. BMJ., 2019, 367 l6700

[11]

Vaeli Zadeh A, Wong A, Crawford AC, et al.. Guideline-based and restricted fluid resuscitation strategy in sepsis patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med., 2023, 73: 34-39

[12]

Wang MP, Jiang L, Zhu B, et al.. Association of fluid balance trajectories with clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Mil Med Res., 2021, 8(140

[13]

Waskowski J, Michel MC, Steffen R, et al.. Fluid overload and mortality in critically ill patients with severe heart failure and cardiogenic shock-An observational cohort study. Front Med., 2022, 9: 1040055

[14]

Truong TN, Dunn AS, McCardle K, et al.. Adherence to fluid resuscitation guidelines and outcomes in patients with septic shock: Reassessing the “one-size-fits-all” approach. J Crit Care., 2019, 51: 94-98

[15]

Powell RE, Kennedy JN, Senussi MH, et al.. Association between preexisting heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and fluid administration among patients with sepsis. JAMA Netw Open., 2022, 5(10 e2235331

[16]

Shen Y, Cai G, Yan J. Fluid intake, fluid output or fluid balance, which one matters in ARDS. Crit Care., 2022, 26(1352

[17]

Wang YM, Chen Y, Zheng YJ, et al.. Low fluid intake volume during the first 24 h and persistent negative fluid balance from the second day are associated with favorable prognosis for patients with sepsis. Exp Ther Med., 2021, 21(4387

[18]

Shen Y, Ru W, Huang X, et al.. Time-related association between fluid balance and mortality in sepsis patients: interaction between fluid balance and haemodynamics. Sci Rep., 2018, 8(110390

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the Huazhong University of Science and Technology

PDF

162

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/