Effects of Thymidine Phosphorylase and Sine Oculis Homeobox Homologue 1 on the Prognosis and Immune Microenvironment of Gastric Cancer

Miao Li , Wei Chen , Yao-bing Chen , Lei Wang , Liu Huang

Current Medical Science ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3) : 616 -625.

PDF
Current Medical Science ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3) : 616 -625. DOI: 10.1007/s11596-025-00065-9
Original Article
research-article

Effects of Thymidine Phosphorylase and Sine Oculis Homeobox Homologue 1 on the Prognosis and Immune Microenvironment of Gastric Cancer

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the combined effects of thymidine phosphorylase (TYMP) and sine oculis homeobox homologue 1 (Six1) on the tumor microenvironment and their role in promoting metastasis in gastric cancer (GC).

Methods

A total of 674 GC patients who underwent surgical resection were enrolled. Correlations between TYMP/Six1 expression and the clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival of patients were analysed. The expression of TYMP, Six1 and vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGFc) was quantified via immunohistochemistry and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Cell transfection, wound-healing assays and bioinformatics analyses were used to explore the potential underlying mechanisms involved.

Results

Compared with the other groups, the Six1+ /TYMP+ patients exhibited poor differentiation, advanced tumor stage, a higher rate of lymphatic vessel invasion and shorter survival. Additionally, the protein expression of TYMP and Six1 was positively correlated with the VEGFc level. A significant increase in VEGFc expression was observed in cells transfected with TYMP, Six1, and TYMP/Six1 vectors. The results of the wound-healing assay indicated that the synergistic effect of TYMP and Six1 enhanced the migratory ability of GC cells. Furthermore, bioinformatics analysis revealed that TYMP and Six1 were positively correlated with immunosuppressive immune cell subsets and elevated the expression of inhibitory immune checkpoints in GC.

Conclusions

The combination of TYMP and Six1 is a good predictive and prognostic biomarker for GC. This combination enhances the expression of VEGFc, facilitates the invasion of GC cells, and may be linked to inhibitory immune cells and the tumor immune microenvironment.

Keywords

Gastric cancer / Metastasis / Prognosis / Immune checkpoints / Biomarkers

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Miao Li, Wei Chen, Yao-bing Chen, Lei Wang, Liu Huang. Effects of Thymidine Phosphorylase and Sine Oculis Homeobox Homologue 1 on the Prognosis and Immune Microenvironment of Gastric Cancer. Current Medical Science, 2025, 45(3): 616-625 DOI:10.1007/s11596-025-00065-9

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

TorreLA, BrayF, SiegelRL, et al.. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin., 2015, 65(2): 87-108.

[2]

StackerSA, WilliamsSP, KarnezisT, et al.. Lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic vessel remodelling in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer., 2014, 14(3): 159-172.

[3]

SleemanJP, ThieleW. Tumor metastasis and the lymphatic vasculature. Int J Cancer., 2009, 125(12): 2747-2756.

[4]

LeeHJ, KimYH, KimWH, et al.. Clinicopathological analysis for recurrence of early gastric cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol., 2003, 33(5): 209-214.

[5]

TsujiuraM, IchikawaD, KomatsuS, et al.. Circulating microRNAs in plasma of patients with gastric cancers. Br J Cancer., 2010, 102(7): 1174-1179.

[6]

LuHY, KleinRS, SchwartzEL. Antiangiogenic and antitumor activity of 6-(2-aminoethyl)amino-5-chlorouracil, a novel small-molecule inhibitor of thymidine phosphorylase, in combination with the vascular endothelial growth factor-trap. Clin Cancer Res., 2009, 15(16): 5136-5144.

[7]

ToiM, Atiqur RahmanM, BandoH, et al.. Thymidine phosphorylase (platelet-derived endothelial-cell growth factor) in cancer biology and treatment. Lancet Oncol., 2005, 6(3): 158-166.

[8]

TabataS, IkedaR, YamamotoM, et al.. Thymidine phosphorylase activates NFκB and stimulates the expression of angiogenic and metastatic factors in human cancer cells. Oncotarget., 2014, 5(21): 10473-10485.

[9]

HaraguchiM, KomutaK, UedaT, et al.. Prognostic significance of the serum thymidine phosphorylase levels in venous blood drainage specimens in patients with colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology., 2008, 55(82–83): 418-421

[10]

KatsumataK, SumiT, WadaT, et al.. Prognosis and efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer correlates with nucleic acid metabolizing enzymes. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho., 2004, 31(9): 1357-1360

[11]

YuEJ, LeeY, RhaSY, et al.. Angiogenic factor thymidine phosphorylase increases cancer cell invasion activity in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Mol Cancer Res., 2008, 6(10): 1554-1566.

[12]

SudaY, KuwashimaY, ShioyaT, et al.. The expression of thymidylate synthase and thymidine phosphorylase in the early-stage of gastric cancer. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho., 1999, 26(3): 321-327

[13]

KakejiY, MaeharaY, ShibaharaK, et al.. Heterogeneity and clinical role of thymidine phosphorylase activity in gastric cancer. Oncol Rep., 1999, 6(6): 1213-1216

[14]

LiuD, LiL, ZhangXX, et al.. SIX1 promotes tumor lymphangiogenesis by coordinating TGFβ signals that increase expression of VEGF-C. Cancer Res., 2014, 74(19): 5597-5607.

[15]

WangCA, JedlickaP, PatrickAN, et al.. SIX1 induces lymphangiogenesis and metastasis via upregulation of VEGF-C in mouse models of breast cancer. J Clin Invest., 2012, 122(5): 1895-1906.

[16]

SongWX, MaJ, LeiBB, et al.. Sine oculis homeobox 1 promotes proliferation and migration of human colorectal cancer cells through activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Cancer Sci., 2019, 110(2): 608-616.

[17]

LvHX, CuiAL, SunFD, et al.. Sineoculis homeobox homolog 1 protein as an independent biomarker for gastric adenocarcinoma. Exp Mol Pathol., 2014, 97(1): 74-80.

[18]

LiFX, ZhaoY, WeiLJ, et al.. Tumor-infiltrating Treg, MDSC, and IDO expression associated with outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer. Cancer Biol Ther., 2018, 19(8): 695-705.

[19]

AbramsSI. Developmental pathways of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in neoplasia. Cell Immunol., 2021, 360. 104261

[20]

ShangB, LiuY, JiangSJ, et al.. Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating FoxP3+ regulatory T cells in cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep., 2015, 515179.

[21]

Rizvi NA, Hellmann MD, Snyder A, et al. Cancer immunology. Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer. Science. 2015;348(6230):124–128.

[22]

WeiSC, DuffyCR, AllisonJP. Fundamental mechanisms of immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Cancer Discov., 2018, 8(9): 1069-1086.

[23]

QinS, XuLP, YiM, et al.. Novel immune checkpoint targets: moving beyond PD-1 and CTLA-4. Mol Cancer., 2019, 181155.

[24]

LivakKJ, SchmittgenTD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods., 2001, 25(4): 402-408.

[25]

RicciutiB, FogliettaJ, BianconiV, et al.. Enzymes involved in tumor-driven angiogenesis: A valuable target for anticancer therapy. Semin Cancer Biol., 2019, 56: 87-99.

[26]

ZhangXL, ZhengZL, ShinYK, et al.. Angiogenic factor thymidine phosphorylase associates with angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in the intestinal-type gastric cancer. Pathology., 2014, 46(4): 316-324.

[27]

HuangL, LiuS, LeiY, et al.. Systemic immune-inflammation index, thymidine phosphorylase and survival of localized gastric cancer patients after curative resection. Oncotarget., 2016, 7(28): 44185-44193.

[28]

YuC, ZhangB, LiYL, et al.. SIX1 reduces the expression of PTEN via activating PI3K/AKT signal to promote cell proliferation and tumorigenesis in osteosarcoma. Biomed Pharmacother., 2018, 105: 10-17.

[29]

NishimuraT, TamaokiM, KomatsuzakiR, et al.. SIX1 maintains tumor basal cells via transforming growth factor-β pathway and associates with poor prognosis in esophageal cancer. Cancer Sci., 2017, 108(2): 216-225.

[30]

SunSH, LiuD, DengYT, et al.. SIX1 coordinates with TGFβ signals to induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cervical cancer. Oncol Lett., 2016, 12(2): 1271-1278.

[31]

XuHW, ZhangY, PeñaMM, et al.. Six1 promotes colorectal cancer growth and metastasis by stimulating angiogenesis and recruiting tumor-associated macrophages. Carcinogenesis., 2017, 38(3): 281-292.

[32]

WuWJ, RenZQ, LiPH, et al.. Six1: a critical transcription factor in tumorigenesis. Int J Cancer., 2015, 136(6): 1245-1253.

[33]

XieY, JinP, SunXR, et al.. SIX1 is upregulated in gastric cancer and regulates proliferation and invasion by targeting the ERK pathway and promoting epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cell Biochem Funct., 2018, 36(8): 413-419.

[34]

TangS, LiYH, BaoYY, et al.. Novel cytisine derivatives exert anti-liver fibrosis effect via PI3K/Akt/Smad pathway. Bioorg Chem., 2019, 90. 103032

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China(81602104)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Huazhong University of Science and Technology

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

101

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/