Risk Factors and Predictive Nomogram for Survival in Elderly Patients with Brain Glioma

Zhi-cheng Fan, Wen-jian Zhao, Yang Jiao, Shao-chun Guo, Yun-peng Kou, Min Chao, Na Wang, Chen-chen Zhou, Yuan Wang, Jing-hui Liu, Yu-long Zhai, Pei-gang Ji, Chao Fan, Liang Wang

Current Medical Science ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4) : 759-770.

Current Medical Science ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4) : 759-770. DOI: 10.1007/s11596-024-2880-4
Original Article

Risk Factors and Predictive Nomogram for Survival in Elderly Patients with Brain Glioma

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective

To determine the factors that contribute to the survival of elderly individuals diagnosed with brain glioma and develop a prognostic nomogram.

Methods

Data from elderly individuals (age ≥65 years) histologically diagnosed with brain glioma were sourced from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The dataset was randomly divided into a training cohort and an internal validation cohort at a 6:4 ratio. Additionally, data obtained from Tangdu Hospital constituted an external validation cohort for the study. The identification of independent prognostic factors was achieved through the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate Cox regression analysis, enabling the construction of a nomogram. Model performance was evaluated using C-index, ROC curves, calibration plot and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

A cohort of 20 483 elderly glioma patients was selected from the SEER database. Five prognostic factors (age, marital status, histological type, stage, and treatment) were found to significantly impact overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS), with tumor location emerging as a sixth variable independently linked to CSS. Subsequently, nomogram models were developed to predict the probabilities of survival at 6, 12, and 24 months. The assessment findings from the validation queue indicate a that the model exhibited strong performance.

Conclusion

Our nomograms serve as valuable prognostic tools for assessing the survival probability of elderly glioma patients. They can potentially assist in risk stratification and clinical decision-making.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhi-cheng Fan, Wen-jian Zhao, Yang Jiao, Shao-chun Guo, Yun-peng Kou, Min Chao, Na Wang, Chen-chen Zhou, Yuan Wang, Jing-hui Liu, Yu-long Zhai, Pei-gang Ji, Chao Fan, Liang Wang. Risk Factors and Predictive Nomogram for Survival in Elderly Patients with Brain Glioma. Current Medical Science, 2024, 44(4): 759‒770 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-024-2880-4

References

[1]
Ricard D, Idbaih A, Ducray F, et al.. Primary brain tumours in adults. Lancet, 2012, 379(9830): 1984-1996
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Ostrom QT, Cioffi G, Gittleman H, et al.. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2012–2016. Neuro-Oncology, 2019, 21(Supplement_5): v1-v100
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Ostrom QT, Cioffi G, Waite K, et al.. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2014–2018. Neuro-Oncology, 2021, 23(Supplement_3): iii1-iii105
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Ostrom QT, Price M, Neff C, et al.. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2016–2020. Neuro-Oncology, 2023, 25(Supplement_4): iv1-iv99
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Perry JR, Laperriere N, O’Callaghan C J, et al.. Short-Course Radiation plus Temozolomide in Elderly Patients with Glioblastoma. N Engl J Med, 2017, 376(11): 1027-1037
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Ma W, Sheng X, Li G, et al.. Effectiveness of different treatment strategies in elderly patients with glioblastoma: An evidence map of randomized controlled trials. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2022, 173: 103645
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Hoffe S, Balducci L. Cancer and Age: General Considerations. Clin Geriatr Med, 2012, 28(1): 1-18
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Turan ZG, Parvizi P, Dönertaş HM, et al.. Molecular footprint of Medawar’s mutation accumulation process in mammalian aging. Aging Cell, 2019, 18(4): e12965
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Li S, Vazquez JM, Sudmant PH. The evolution of aging and lifespan. Trends Genet, 2023, 39(11): 830-843
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Choudhury S, Huang AY, Kim J, et al.. Somatic mutations in single human cardiomyocytes reveal age-associated DNA damage and widespread oxidative genotoxicity. Nat Aging, 2022, 2(8): 714-725
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Liu Z, Liang Q, Ren Y, et al.. Immunosenescence: molecular mechanisms and diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2023, 8(1): 200
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Zhao W, Guo S, Xu Z, et al.. Nomogram for Predicting Central Nervous System Infection Following Traumatic Brain Injury in the Elderly. World Neurosurg, 2024, 183: e28-e43
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Iwamoto FM, Reiner AS, Panageas KS, et al.. Patterns of care in elderly glioblastoma patients. Ann Neurol, 2010, 64(6): 628-634
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Sasaki H, Kitamura Y, Toda M, et al.. Ctni-45. Upfront Chemotherapy and Subsequent Resection Utilizing Neoadjuvant Strategy For Oligodendrogliomas. Neuro Oncol, 2023, 25(Supplement_5): v85-v85
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Kruchko C, Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, et al.. The CBTRUS story: providing accurate population-based statistics on brain and other central nervous system tumors for everyone. Neuro Oncol, 2018, 20(3): 295-298
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
van den Bent MJ. Practice changing mature results of RTOG study 9802: another positive PCV trial makes adjuvant chemotherapy part of standard of care in low-grade glioma. Neuro Oncol, 2014, 16(12): 1570-1574
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Cote DJ, Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, et al.. Glioma incidence and survival variations by county-level socioeconomic measures. Cancer, 2019, 125(19): 3390-3400
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Stabellini N, Krebs H, Patil N, et al.. Sex Differences in Time to Treat and Outcomes for Gliomas. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 630579
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Niu X, Chang T, Yang Y, et al.. Prognostic nomogram models for predicting survival probability in elderly glioblastoma patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2023, 149(15): 14145-14157
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Liu ZY, Feng SS, Zhang YH, et al.. Competing risk model to determine the prognostic factors and treatment strategies for elderly patients with glioblastoma. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 9321
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Jia Z, Yan Y, Wang J, et al.. Development and validation of prognostic nomogram in ependymoma: A retrospective analysis of the SEER database. Cancer Med, 2021, 10(17): 6140-6148
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Furst T, Hoffman H, Chin LS. All-cause and tumor-specific mortality trends in geriatric oligodendroglioma (OG) patients: A surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) analysis. J Clin Neurosci, 2020,7394-100
[23]
Li J, Huang W, Chen J, et al.. Nomograms for predicting the overall survival of patients with cerebellar glioma: an analysis of the surveillance epidemiology and end results (SEER) database. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 19348
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Wen J, Chen W, Zhu Y, et al.. Clinical features associated with the efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with glioblastoma (GBM): a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) analysis. BMC Cancer, 2021, 21(1): 81
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Cao J, Yan W, Zhan Z, et al.. Epidemiology and risk stratification of low-grade gliomas in the United States, 2004–2019: A competing-risk regression model for survival analysis. Front Oncol, 2023, 13: 1079597
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Liu J, Li C, Wang Y, et al.. Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Elderly Patients With Glioblastoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Front Aging Neurosci, 2022, 13: 777962
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Doll KM, Rademaker A, Sosa JA. Practical Guide to Surgical Data Sets: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database. JAMA Surg, 2018, 153(6): 588-589
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Zhang X, Chang L, Zhu Y, et al.. Establishment and validation of nomograms to predict survival probability of advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma based on the SEER database and a Chinese medical institution. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2023, 14: 1139222
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, et al.. The 2007 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. Acta Neuropathol, 2007, 114(2): 97-109
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Malhotra AK, Karthikeyan V, Zabih V, et al.. Adolescent and young adult glioma: systematic review of demographic, disease, and treatment influences on survival. Neurooncol Adv, 2022, 4(1): 4(1):vdac168
[31]
Zheng C, Berger NA, Li L, et al.. Epigenetic age acceleration and clinical outcomes in gliomas. PLoS One, 2020, 15(7): e0236045
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Bauchet L, Zouaoui S, Darlix A, et al.. Assessment and treatment relevance in elderly glioblastoma patients. Neuro Oncol, 2014, 16(11): 1459-1468
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Glantz M, Chamberlain M, Liu Q, et al.. Temozolomide as an alternative to irradiation for elderly patients with newly diagnosed malignant gliomas. Cancer, 2003, 97(9): 2262-2266
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Zhu Y, Li C, Xie W, et al.. Trajectories of depressive symptoms and subsequent cognitive decline in older adults: a pooled analysis of two longitudinal cohorts. Age Ageing, 2021, 51(1): afab191
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Berk M, Köhler-Forsberg O, Turner M, et al.. Comorbidity between major depressive disorder and physical diseases: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, mechanisms and management. World Psychiatry, 2023, 22(3): 366-387
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Kim YJ, Lee DJ, Park CK, et al.. Optimal extent of resection for glioblastoma according to site, extension, and size: a population-based study in the temozolomide era. Neurosurg Rev, 2019, 42(4): 937-950
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Babu R, Komisarow JM, Agarwal VJ, et al.. Glioblastoma in the elderly: the effect of aggressive and modern therapies on survival. J Neurosurg, 2016, 124(4): 998-1007
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Zhao B, Wu J, Xia Y, et al.. Comparative efficacy and safety of therapeutics for elderly glioblastoma patients: A Bayesian network analysis. Pharmacol Res, 2022, 182: 106316
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Rehman SK, Haynes J, Collignon E, et al.. Colorectal Cancer Cells Enter a Diapause-like DTP State to Survive Chemotherapy. Cell, 2021, 184(1): 226-242.e21
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Petroni G, Cantley LC, Santambrogio L, et al.. Radiotherapy as a tool to elicit clinically actionable signalling pathways in cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2022, 19(2): 114-131
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Yang M, Zhang Z, Nice EC, et al.. Psychological intervention to treat distress: An emerging frontier in cancer prevention and therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer, 2022, 1877(1): 188665
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
He XY, Gao Y, Ng D, et al.. Chronic stress increases metastasis via neutrophil-mediated changes to the microenvironment. Cancer Cell, 2024, 42(3): 474-486.e12
CrossRef Google scholar

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/