Transforming Adolescent Smiles: Correcting Skeletal Mandibular Retrusion and Bimaxillary Protrusion with Clear Aligners

Abstract

Maxillary protrusion combined with mandibular retraction is a highly prevalent but extremely complex maxillofacial deformity that can have a serious negative impact on patients’ facial aesthetics and mental health. The traditional orthodontic treatment strategy often involves extracting 4 first premolars and conventional fixed techniques, combined with mini-implant screws, to retract the anterior teeth and improve facial protrusion. In recent years, an invisible orthodontic technique, without brackets, has become increasingly popular. However, while an invisible aligner has been used in some cases with reasonable results, there remain significant challenges in achieving a perfect outcome. This case report presents an adolescent patient with bimaxillary protrusion and mandibular retrognathia. Based on the characteristics of the invisible aligners and the growth characteristics of the adolescent’s teeth and jawbone, we designed precise three-dimensional tooth movement and corresponding resistance/over-correction for each tooth, while utilizing the patient’s jawbone growth potential to promote rapid development of the mandible, accurately and efficiently correcting bimaxillary protrusion and skeletal mandibular retrognathia. The patient’s facial aesthetics, especially the lateral morphology, have been greatly improved, and various aesthetic indicators have also shown significant changes, and to the patient’s great benefit, invasive mini-implant screws were not used during the treatment. This case highlights the advantages of using invisible aligners in adolescent maxillary protrusion combined with mandibular retraction patients. Furthermore, comprehensive and accurate design combined with good application of growth potential can also enable invisible orthodontic technology to achieve perfect treatment effects in tooth extractions, providing clinical guidance for orthodontists.

Keywords

mandibular retrusion / esthetic orthodontic treatment / clear aligners / growth potential

References

[1] UzunerFD, AslanBI, DincerM. Dentoskeletal morphology in adults with Class I, Class II Division 1, or Class II Division 2 malocclusion with increased overbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2019, 156(2): 248-256 e242

[2] GrippaudoC, PaolantonioEG, AntoniniG, et al.. Association between oral habits, mouth breathing and malocclusion. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital, 2016, 36(5): 386-394

[3] PaolantonioEG, LudoviciN, SaccomannoS, et al.. Association between oral habits, mouth breathing and malocclusion in Italian preschoolers. Eur J Paediatr Dent, 2019, 20(3): 204-208

[4] FarrowAL, ZarrinniaK, AziziK. Bimaxillary protrusion in black Americans—an esthetic evaluation and the treatment considerations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1993, 104(3): 240-250

[5] HusseinE, Abu MoisM. Bimaxillary protrusion in the Palestinian population. Angle Orthodontist, 2007, 77(5): 817-820

[6] Amr-ReyO, Sanchez-DelgadoP, Salvador-PalmerR, et al.. Association between malocclusion and articulation of phonemes in early childhood. Angle Orthod, 2022, 92(4): 505-511

[7] JacobHB, BuschangPH. Mandibular growth comparisons of Class I and Class II division 1 skeleto-facial patterns. Angle Orthodontist, 2014, 84(5): 755-761

[8] CaiY, NiZ, ChenW, et al.. The ADAMTS9 gene is associated with mandibular retrusion in a Chinese population. Gene, 2020, 749: 144701

[9] CarusoS, NotaA, CarusoS, et al.. Mandibular advancement with clear aligners in the treatment of skeletal Class II. A retrospective controlled study. Eur J Paediatr Dent, 2021, 22(1): 26-30

[10] GrippaudoMM, QuinziV, ManaiA, et al.. Orthodontic treatment need and timing: Assessment of evolutive malocclusion conditions and associated risk factors. Eur J Paediatr Dent, 2020, 21(3): 203-208

[11] GrippaudoC, PantanaliF, PaolantonioEG, et al.. Orthodontic treatment timing in growing patients. Eur J Paediatr Dent, 2013, 14(3): 231-236

[12] Szemraj-FolmerA, Wojtaszek-SlominskaA, Racka-PilszakB, et al.. Duration of the pubertal growth spurt in patients with increased craniofacial growth component in sagittal and vertical planes-retrospective and cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Investig, 2021, 25(8): 4907-4914

[13] KimEG, OhIS, SoJE, et al.. Estimating Cervical Vertebral Maturation with a Lateral Ceph-alogram Using the Convolutional Neural Network. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(22): 5400

[14] DrobockyOB, SmithRJ. Changes in facial profile during orthodontic treatment with extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1989, 95(3): 220-230

[15] JansonG, ValarelliDP, RizzoM, et al.. Prevalence of extraction space reopening in different orthodontic treatment protocols. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2017, 152(3): 320-326

[16] DaiFF, XuTM, ShuG. Comparison of achieved and predicted crown movement in adults after 4 first premolar extraction treatment with Invisalign. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2021, 160(6): 805-813

[17] TangZ, ChenW, MeiL, et al.. Relative anchorage loss under reciprocal anchorage in mandibular premolar extraction cases treated with clear aligners. Angle Orthod, 2023, 93(4): 375-381

[18] YangY, YangR, LiuL, et al.. The effects of aligner anchorage preparation on mandibular first molars during premolar-extraction space closure with clear aligners: A finite element study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2023, 164(2): 226-238

[19] FengX, JiangY, ZhuY, et al.. Comparison between the designed and achieved mesiodistal angulation of maxillary canines and posterior teeth and influencing factors: First premolar extraction treatment with clear aligners. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2022, 162(2): e63-e70

[20] YassirYA, NabbatSA, McIntyreGT, et al.. Clinical effectiveness of clear aligner treatment compared to fixed appliance treatment: an overview of systematic reviews. Clin Oral Investig, 2022, 26(3): 2353-2370

[21] WangQ, DaiD, WangJ, et al.. Biomechanical analysis of effective mandibular enmasse retraction using Class II elastics with a clear aligner: a finite element study. Prog Orthod, 2022, 23(1): 23