Risk Factors of Enternal Nutrition Intolerance in Septic Patients: A Case-control Study

Li-zhu Wang, Yan Xiang, Qian Li, Yi-rong Zhu, Jue Fang, Xiao-dan Lu, Zhao-cai Zhang

Current Medical Science ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2) : 328-332.

Current Medical Science All Journals
PDF
Current Medical Science ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2) : 328-332. DOI: 10.1007/s11596-024-2849-3
Original Article

Risk Factors of Enternal Nutrition Intolerance in Septic Patients: A Case-control Study

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the incidence of enteral nutrition intolerance (ENI) in patients with sepsis and explore potential risk factors.

Methods

A case-control study was conducted in patients with sepsis who were receiving enteral nutrition (EN) at a tertiary hospital in China. The included patients were divided into the ENI group and the non-ENI group. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for ENI.

Results

A total of 859 patients were included in the study. Among them, 288 (33.53%) patients experienced symptoms of ENI, including diarrhea, vomiting, bloating, and gastric retention. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation H (APACHE H) score, thoracocentesis, and usage of cardiotonic drugs (namely, inotropes) were independent predictors of the ENI.

Conclusion

The incidence of ENI is relatively high in patients with sepsis, especially in those who have higher APACHE H scores, have undergone thoracocentesis, and have received inotropes.

Keywords

sepsis / enteral nutrition intolerance / influencing factor

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Li-zhu Wang, Yan Xiang, Qian Li, Yi-rong Zhu, Jue Fang, Xiao-dan Lu, Zhao-cai Zhang. Risk Factors of Enternal Nutrition Intolerance in Septic Patients: A Case-control Study. Current Medical Science, 2024, 44(2): 328‒332 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-024-2849-3
This is a preview of subscription content, contact us for subscripton.

References

[1]
SingerM, DeutschmanCS, SeymourCW, et al.. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis 3). Jama, 2016, 315(8): 775-787
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Fleischmann-StruzekC, MellhammarL, RoseN, et al.. Incidence and mortality of hospital-and ICU-treated sepsis: results from an updated and expanded systematic. review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med, 2020, 46(8): 1552-1562
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
McClaveSA, LowenCC, MartindaleRG. The 2016 ESPEN Arvid Wretlind lecture: The gut in stress. Clin Nutr, 2018, 37(2): 19-36
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
RokytaRJr, MatejovicM, KrouzeckyA, et al.. Postpyloric enteral nutrition in septic patients: Effects on hepato-splanchnic hemodynamics and energy status. Intensive Care Med, 2004, 30(14): 714-717
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
GattM, MacFieJ, AndersonAD, et al.. Changes in superior mesenteric artery bloodflow after oral, enteral, and parenteral feeding in humans. Crit Care Med, 2009, 37(12): 171-176
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
EvansL, AndrewR, WaleedA, et al.. Executive summary: surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for the management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Crit Care Med, 2021, 49(11): 1974-1982
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
LonghitanoY, ZanzaC, ThangathuraiD, et al.. Gut alterations in septic patients: a biochemical literature reviews. Rev Recent Clin Trials, 2020, 15(4): 289-297
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
BlaserAR, DeaneAM, PreiserJC, et al.. Enteral feeding intolerance: updates in Definitions and Pathophysiology. Nutr Clin Pract, 2021, 36(1): 40-49
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Berk TakirH, KarakurtZ, SalturkC, et al.. Does total parenteral nutrition increasethe mortality of patients with severe sepsis in the ICU?. Turk Thorac J, 2015, 16(2): 53-58
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
LavrentievaA, KontakiotisT, BitzaniM. Enteral nutrition intolerance in criticallyill septic burn patients. Burn Care Res, 2014, 5(12): 313-318
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
HeylandDK, OrtizA, StoppeC, et al.. Incidence, risk factors, and clinical consequence of enteral feeding intolerance in the mechanically ventilated critically ill: an analysis of a multicenter, multiyear database. Crit Care Med, 2021, 49(1): 49-59
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
YuK, GuoN, ZhangD, et al.. Prevalence and risk factors of enteral nutrition intolerance in intensive care unit patients: a retrospective study. Chin Med J (Engl), 2022, 135(15): 1814-1820
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
PaulS, SimonH, MarianneC, et al.. Feeding the critically ill obese patient: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database Systematic Rev Implement Rep, 2015, 13(10): 95-109
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
JenkinsB, CalderPC, MarinoLV. A systematic review of the definitions and prevalence of feeding intolerance in critically ill adults. Clin Nutr ESPEN, 2022, 49: 92-102
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
XiaoY, XuL. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Enteral Feeding Intolerance in Critically Ill Patients and the Effectiveness of Preventive Treatments: A Prospective Study. Saudi J Med Med Sci, 2023, 11(2): 135-142
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
ChenT, WangT, LiQ, et al.. Current status and influencing factors of enteral. feeding intolerance in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Chin J Nurs, 2017, 52(6): 716-720
[17]
ViraniFR, PeeryT, RivasO. Incidence and Effects of Feeding Intolerance in Trauma Patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 2019, 43(6): 742-749
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
ChenW, WangH, ChenY, et al.. The independent risk factors of early diarrhea in enteral nutrition for ICU patients. J Int Med Res, 2019, 47(10): 4929-4939
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
HaussnerF, ChakrabortyS, HalbgebauerR, et al.. Challenge to the intestinal mucosa during sepsis. Front Immunol, 2019, 10: 891-907
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
BordejéML, MontejoJC, MateuML, et al.. Intra-Abdominal pressure as a marker of enteral nutrition intolerance in critically ill patients. the PIANE study. Nutrients, 2019, 11(11): 2616
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
ZhaoHB, JiaL, YanQQ, et al.. Effect of Clostridium butyricum and Butyrate on Intestinal Barrier Functions: Study of a Rat Model of Severe Acute Pancreatitis with Intra-Abdominal Hypertension. Front Physiol, 2020, 11: 561061
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
LengY, JiangC, XingX, et al.. Prevention of Severe Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction Through a Single-Species Probiotics is Associated with the Activation of Microbiome-Mediated Glutamate-Glutamine Biosynthesis. Shock, 2021, 55(1): 128-137
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
RegliA, HockingsLE, MuskGC, et al.. Commonly applied positive end-expiratory pressures do not prevent functional residual capacity decline in the setting of intra-abdominal hypertension: a pig model. Crit Care, 2010, 14(04): R128
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
RegliA, MahendranR, FyshET, et al.. Matching positive end-expiratory pressure to intra-abdominal pressure improves oxygenation in a porcine sick lung model of intra-abdominal hypertension. Crit Care, 2012, 16(05): R208
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
SilvaPL, BallL, RoccoPRM, et al.. Physiological and Pathophysiological. Consequences of Mechanical Ventilation. Semin Respir Crit Care Med, 2022, 43(3): 321-334
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
SantosCL, MoraesL, SantosRS, et al.. Effects of different tidal volumes in pulmonary and extrapulmonary lung injury with or without intraabdominal hypertension. Intensive Care Med, 2012, 38(03): 499-508
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
PelosiP, LueckeT, RoccoPR. Chest wall mechanics and abdominal pressure. during general anesthesia in normal and obese individuals and in acute lung injury. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2011, 17(01): 72-79
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
GayenS. Malignant Pleural Effusion: Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management. Am J Med, 2022, 135(10): 1188-1192
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
CecconiM, EvansL, LevyM, et al.. Sepsis and septic shock. Lancet, 2018, 392(10141): 75-87
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
JacobiJ. The pathophysiology of sepsis-2021 update: Part 2, organ dysfunction and assessment. Am J Health Syst Pharm, 2022, 79(6): 424-436
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
De BackerD, Arias OrtizJ, LevyB. The medical treatment of cardiogenic shock: cardiovascular drugs. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2021, 27(4): 426-432
CrossRef Google scholar
PDF

83

Accesses

0

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/