Differences and Correlations of Morphological and Hemodynamic Parameters between Anterior Circulation Bifurcation and Side-wall Aneurysms

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this research was to explore the difference and correlation of the morphological and hemodynamic features between sidewall and bifurcation aneurysms in anterior circulation arteries, utilizing computational fluid dynamics as a tool for analysis.

Methods

In line with the designated inclusion criteria, this study covered 160 aneurysms identified in 131 patients who received treatment at Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China, from January 2021 to September 2022. Utilizing follow-up digital subtraction angiography (DSA) data, these cases were classified into two distinct groups: the sidewall aneurysm group and the bifurcation aneurysm group. Morphological and hemodynamic parameters in the immediate preoperative period were meticulously calculated and examined in both groups using a three-dimensional DSA reconstruction model.

Results

No significant differences were found in the morphological or hemodynamic parameters of bifurcation aneurysms at varied locations within the anterior circulation. However, pronounced differences were identified between sidewall and bifurcation aneurysms in terms of morphological parameters such as the diameter of the parent vessel (D _vessel), inflow angle (θ _F), and size ratio (SR), as well as the hemodynamic parameter of inflow concentration index (ICI) ( P<0.001). Notably, only the SR exhibited a significant correlation with multiple hemodynamic parameters ( P<0.001), while the ICI was closely related to several morphological parameters (R>0.5, P<0.001).

Conclusions

The significant differences in certain morphological and hemodynamic parameters between sidewall and bifurcation aneurysms emphasize the importance to contemplate variances in threshold values for these parameters when evaluating the risk of rupture in anterior circulation aneurysms. Whether it is a bifurcation or sidewall aneurysm, these disparities should be considered. The morphological parameter SR has the potential to be a valuable clinical tool for promptly distinguishing the distinct rupture risks associated with sidewall and bifurcation aneurysms.

Keywords

sidewall / bifurcation / unruptured aneurysms / computational fluid dynamics

References

[1]	van Gijn J, Kerr RS, Rinkel GJE. Subarachnoid haemorrhage. The Lancet, 2007,369(9558):306–318
[2]	Xiang J, Yu J, Choi H, et al. Rupture Resemblance Score (RRS): toward risk stratification of unruptured intracranial aneurysms using hemodynamic-morphological discriminants. J Neurointerv Surg, 2015,7(7):490–495
[3]	Ku DN, Giddens DP, Zarins CK, et al. Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress. Arteriosclerosis, 1985,5(3):293–302
[4]	Qian Y, Takao H, Umezu M, et al. Risk analysis of unruptured aneurysms using computational fluid dynamics technology: preliminary results. Am J Neuroradiol, 2011,32(10):1948–1955
[5]	Meng H, Tutino VM, Xiang J, et al. High WSS or low WSS? Complex interactions of hemodynamics with intracranial aneurysm initiation, growth, and rupture: toward a unifying hypothesis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2014,35(7):1254–1262
[6]	Hassan T, Timofeev EV, Saito T, et al. A proposed parent vessel geometry—based categorization of saccular intracranial aneurysms: computational flow dynamics analysis of the risk factors for lesion rupture. J Neurosurg, 2005,103(4):662–680
[7]	Detmer FJ, Chung BJ, Jimenez C, et al. Associations of hemodynamics, morphology, and patient characteristics with aneurysm rupture stratified by aneurysm location. Neuroradiology, 2019,61(3):275–284
[8]	Liu Q, Jiang P, Wu J, et al. The Morphological and Hemodynamic Characteristics of the Intraoperative Ruptured Aneurysm. Front Neurosci, 2019,13:233
[9]	Fahrig R, Nikolov H, Fox AJ, et al. A three-dimensional cerebrovascular flow phantom. Med Phys, 1999,26(8):1589–1599
[10]	Nambu I, Misaki K, Uchiyama N, et al. High Pressure in Virtual Postcoiling Model is a Predictor of Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm Recurrence After Coiling. Neurosurgery, 2019,84(3):607–615
[11]	Cebral JR, Mut F, Weir J, et al. Quantitative characterization of the hemodynamic environment in ruptured and unruptured brain aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol, 2011,32(1):145–151
[12]	Jou LD, Lee DH, Morsi H, et al. Wall shear stress on ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms at the internal carotid artery. Am J Neuroradiol, 2008,29(9):1761–1767
[13]	He X, Ku DN. Pulsatile flow in the human left coronary artery bifurcation: average conditions. J Biomech Eng, 1996,118(1):74–82
[14]	Sheikh MAA, Shuib AS, Mohyi MHH. A review of hemodynamic parameters in cerebral aneurysm. Interdiscip Neurosur, 2020,22
[15]	Zhang J, Can A, Mukundan S, et al. Morphological Variables Associated With Ruptured Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms. Neurosurgery, 2019,85(1):75–83
[16]	Lv N, Karmonik C, Chen S, et al. Wall Enhancement, Hemodynamics, and Morphology in Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms with High Rupture Risk. Transl Stroke Res, 2020,11(5):882–889
[17]	Brown RD, Broderick JP. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: epidemiology, natural history, management options, and familial screening. Lancet Neurol, 2014,13(4):393–404
[18]	Gross BA, Lai PMR, Du R. Impact of aneurysm location on hemorrhage risk. Clin Neurol Neurosur, 2014,123:78–82
[19]	Doddasomayajula R, Chung B, Hamzei-Sichani F, et al. Differences in Hemodynamics and Rupture Rate of Aneurysms at the Bifurcation of the Basilar and Internal Carotid Arteries. Am J Neuroradiol, 2017,38(3):570–576
[20]	Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J, 3rd, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet, 2003,362(9378):103–110
[21]	Feng X, Ji W, Qian Z, et al. Bifurcation Location Is Significantly Associated with Rupture of Small Intracranial Aneurysms (<5 mm). World Neurosurg, 2017,98:538–545
[22]	Jing L, Fan J, Wang Y, et al. Morphologic and Hemodynamic Analysis in the Patients with Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms: Ruptured versus Unruptured. PLoS One, 2015,10(7):e0132494
[23]	Liu Q, Jiang P, Jiang Y, et al. Bifurcation Configuration Is an Independent Risk Factor for Aneurysm Rupture Irrespective of Location. Front Neurol, 2019,10:844
[24]	Forget Jr TR, Benitez R, Veznedaroglu E, et al. A review of size and location of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery, 2001,49(6):1322–1326
[25]	Qiu T, Xing H. Morphological Distinguish of Rupture Status between Sidewall and Bifurcation Cerebral Aneurysms. Int J Morphol, 2014,32(3):1111–1119
[26]	Tremmel M, Dhar S, Levy EI, et al. Influence of intracranial aneurysm-to-parent vessel size ratio on hemodynamics and implication for rupture: results from a virtual experimental study. Neurosurgery, 2009,64(4):622–630
[27]	Lv N, Feng Z, Wang C, et al. Morphological Risk Factors for Rupture of Small (<7 mm) Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms. World Neurosurg, 2016,87:311–315
[28]	Tykocki T, Nauman P, Dow Enko A. Morphometric predictors of posterior circulation aneurysms risk rupture. Neurol Res, 2014,36(8):733–738
[29]	Evju O, Pozo JM, Frangi AF, et al. Robustness of common hemodynamic indicators with respect to numerical resolution in 38 middle cerebral artery aneurysms. PLoS One, 2017,12(6):e0177566
[30]	Himburg HA, Grzybowski DM, Hazel AL, et al. Spatial comparison between wall shear stress measures and porcine arterial endothelial permeability. Am J Physiol-Heart C, 2004,286(5):H1916–H1922
[31]	Sugiyama S, Niizuma K, Nakayama T, et al. Relative residence time prolongation in intracranial aneurysms: a possible association with atherosclerosis. Neurosurgery, 2013,73(5):767–776
[32]	Lauric A, Baharoglu MI, Malek AM. Size ratio performance in detecting cerebral aneurysm rupture status is insensitive to small vessel removal. Neurosurgery, 2013,72(4):547–554