Development and Validation of a Prediction Model on Adult Emergency Department Patients for Early Identification of Fulminant Myocarditis

Min Jiang , Jian Ke , Ming-hao Fang , Su-fang Huang , Yuan-yuan Li

Current Medical Science ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5) : 961 -969.

PDF
Current Medical Science ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5) : 961 -969. DOI: 10.1007/s11596-023-2768-8
Original Article

Development and Validation of a Prediction Model on Adult Emergency Department Patients for Early Identification of Fulminant Myocarditis

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Objective

It is difficult to predict fulminant myocarditis at an early stage in the emergency department. The objective of this study was to construct and validate a simple prediction model for the early identification of fulminant myocarditis.

Methods

A total of 61 patients with fulminant myocarditis and 160 patients with acute myocarditis were enrolled in the training and internal validation cohorts. LASSO regression and multivariate logistic regression were selected to develop the prediction model. The selection of the model was based on overall performance and simplicity. A nomogram based on the optimal model was built, and its clinical usefulness was evaluated by decision curve analysis. The predictive model was further validated in an external validation group.

Results

The resulting prediction model was based on 4 factors: systolic blood pressure, troponin I, left ventricular ejection fraction, and ventricular wall motion abnormality. The Brier scores of the final model were 0.078 in the training data set and 0.061 in the internal testing data set, respectively. The C-indexes of the training data set and the testing data set were 0.952 and 0.968, respectively. Decision curve analysis showed that the nomogram model developed based on the 4 predictors above had a positive net benefit for predicting probability thresholds. In the external validation cohort, the model also showed good performance (Brier score=0.007, and C-index=0.989).

Conclusion

We developed and validated an early prediction model consisting of 4 clinical factors (systolic blood pressure, troponin I, left ventricular ejection fraction, and ventricular wall motion abnormality) to identify potential fulminant myocarditis patients in the emergency department.

Keywords

fulminant myocarditis / emergency / risk prediction / nomogram

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Min Jiang, Jian Ke, Ming-hao Fang, Su-fang Huang, Yuan-yuan Li. Development and Validation of a Prediction Model on Adult Emergency Department Patients for Early Identification of Fulminant Myocarditis. Current Medical Science, 2023, 43(5): 961-969 DOI:10.1007/s11596-023-2768-8

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

LiuC, WangZ, ChenK, et al.. The absolute and relative changes in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I are associated with the in-hospital mortality of patients with fulminant myocarditis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2021, 21(1): 571

[2]

TschöpeC, CooperLT, Torre-AmioneG, et al.. Management of Myocarditis-Related Cardiomyopathy in Adults. Circ Res, 2019, 124(11): 1568-1583

[3]

VeroneseG, AmmiratiE, ChenC, et al.. Management perspectives from the 2019 Wuhan international workshop on fulminant myocarditis. Int J Cardiol, 2021, 324: 131-138

[4]

KociolRD, CooperLT, FangJC, et al.. Recognition and Initial Management of Fulminant Myocarditis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation, 2020, 141(6): e69-e92

[5]

WangD, LiS, JiangJ, et al.. Chinese society of cardiology expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of adult fulminant myocarditis. Sci China Life Sci, 2019, 62(2): 187-202

[6]

InabaO, SatohY, IsobeM, et al.. Factors and values at admission that predict a fulminant course of acute myocarditis: data from Tokyo CCU network database. Heart Vessels, 2017, 32(8): 952-959

[7]

GinsbergF, ParrilloJE. Fulminant myocarditis. Crit Care Clin, 2013, 29(3): 465-483

[8]

AmmiratiE, CiprianiM, LilliuM, et al.. Survival and Left Ventricular Function Changes in Fulminant Versus Nonfulminant Acute Myocarditis. Circulation, 2017, 136(6): 529-545

[9]

SharmaAN, StultzJR, BellamkondaN, et al.. Fulminant Myocarditis: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management. Am J Cardiol, 2019, 124(12): 1954-1960

[10]

VeroneseG, AmmiratiE, CiprianiM, et al.. Fulminant myocarditis: Characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. Anatol J Cardiol, 2018, 19(4): 279-286

[11]

AmmiratiE, VeroneseG, CiprianiM, et al.. Acute and Fulminant Myocarditis: a Pragmatic Clinical Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment. Curr Cardiol Rep, 2018, 20(11): 114

[12]

Newman-tokerDE, MoyE, ValenteE, et al.. Missed diagnosis of stroke in the emergency department: a cross-sectional analysis of a large population-based sample. Diagnosis (Berl), 2014, 1: 155-166

[13]

AbediV, KhanA, ChaudharyD, et al.. Using artificial intelligence for improving stroke diagnosis in emergency departments: a practical framework. Ther Adv Neurol Disord, 2020, 13: 1756286420938962

[14]

TschöpeC, AmmiratiE, BozkurtB, et al.. Myocarditis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy: current evidence and future directions. Nat Rev Cardiol, 2021, 18(3): 169-193

[15]

CaforioAL, PankuweitS, ArbustiniE, et al.. Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of myocarditis: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J, 2013, 34(33): 2636-2648d

[16]

JCS Joint Working Group. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of myocarditis (JCS 2009): digest version. Circ J, 2011, 75(3): 734-743

[17]

LeeCH, TsaiWC, HsuCH, et al.. Predictive factors of a fulminant course in acute myocarditis. Int J Cardiol, 2006, 109(1): 142-145

[18]

KangTD, RenYL, ZhaoH, et al.. Risk factors for adverse cardiac events in adults with fulminant myocarditis during hospitalization. World J Clin Cases, 2020, 8(2): 255-263

[19]

MoX, ChenX, IeongC, et al.. Early Prediction of Clinical Response to Etanercept Treatment in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Using Machine Learning. Front Pharmacol, 2020, 11: 1164

[20]

SillM, SaadatiM, BennerA. Applying stability selection to consistently estimate sparse principal components in high-dimensional molecular data. Bioinformatics, 2015, 31(16): 2683-2690

[21]

StidhamRW, LiuY, EnchakalodyB, et al.. The Use of Readily Available Longitudinal Data to Predict the Likelihood of Surgery in Crohn Disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis, 2021, 27(8): 1328-1334

[22]

TongL, ErdmannC, DaldalianM, et al.. Comparison of predictive modeling approaches for 30-day all-cause non-elective readmission risk. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2016, 16: 26

[23]

CooperLTJr. Myocarditis. N Engl J Med, 2009, 360(15): 1526-1538

[24]

WangZ, WangY, LinH, et al.. Early characteristics of fulminant myocarditis vs. non-fulminant myo-carditis: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 2019, 98(8): e14697

[25]

SevranskyJ. Clinical assessment of hemodynamically unstable patients. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2009, 15(3): 234-238

[26]

BachmaierK, MairJ, OffnerF, et al.. Serum cardiac troponin T and creatine kinase-MB elevations in murine autoimmune myocarditis. Circulation, 1995, 92(7): 1927-1932

[27]

AngE, MweempwaA, HeronC, et al.. Cardiac Troponin I and T in Checkpoint Inhibitor-associated Myositis and Myocarditis. J Immunother, 2021, 44(4): 162-163

[28]

FreixaX, SionisA, CastelA, et al.. Low troponin-I levels on admission are associated with worse prognosis in patients with fulminant myocarditis. Transplant Proc, 2009, 41(6): 2234-2236

[29]

NdrepepaG, KufnerS, HoyosM, et al.. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and prognosis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Cardiol, 2018, 72(3): 220-226

[30]

WuSY, TuDN. The pathogenesis and early diagnosis of fulminant myocarditis. Chin J Med, 2023, 58(1): 31-36

[31]

HangW, ChenC, SeubertJM, et al.. Fulminant myocarditis: a comprehensive review from etiology to treatments and outcomes. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2020, 5(1): 287

[32]

ZuoH, LiR, MaF, et al.. Temporal echocardiography findings in patients with fulminant myocarditis: beyond ejection fraction decline. Front Med, 2020, 14(3): 284-292

[33]

FerreiraVM, Schulz-MengerJ, HolmvangG, et al.. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Nonischemic Myocardial Inflammation: Expert Recommendations. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2018, 72(24): 3158-3176

[34]

WangXT, LiuDW, YuKJ, et al.. China Expert Consensus on the critical-care echocardiography. Clin Focus, 2017, 32(5): 369-383

[35]

MelamedR, SprenkleMD, UlstadVK, et al.. Assessment of left ventricular function by intensivists using handheld echocardiography. Chest, 2009, 135(6): 1416-1420

[36]

AmmiratiE, VeroneseG, BrambattiM, et al.. Fulminant Versus Acute Nonfulminant Myocarditis in Patients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2019, 74(3): 299-311

[37]

HangW, ChenC, SeubertJM, et al.. Fulminant myocarditis: a comprehensive review from etiology to treatments and outcomes. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2020, 5(1): 287

[38]

ZhangT, MiaoW, WangS, et al.. Acute myocarditis mimicking ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A case report and review of the literature. Exp Ther Med, 2015, 10(2): 459-464

[39]

SagarS, LiuPP, CooperLT. Myocarditis. Lancet, 2012, 379(9817): 738-747

[40]

XuG, ChenF, ZhaoW, et al.. Establishment and assessment of a nomogram model for predicting the risk of fulminant myocarditis: A STROBE compliant cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore), 2021, 100(17): e25317

[41]

WangS, WeiX, HuH. STAR evidence evaluation of viral fulminant myocarditis: Specificity, Timeliness, Accessibility, Risk. Eur Heart J, 2020, 41(34): 3281-3282

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

95

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/