An Improved Transosseous Pullout Suture Technique for Arthroscopic Repair of a Meniscus Root Tear

Wen-bin Zhao , Feng Tu , Hao Wang

Current Medical Science ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4) : 779 -783.

PDF
Current Medical Science ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4) : 779 -783. DOI: 10.1007/s11596-023-2756-z
Original Article

An Improved Transosseous Pullout Suture Technique for Arthroscopic Repair of a Meniscus Root Tear

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to explore the clinical efficiency of an improved transosseous pullout suture technique for arthroscopic repair of a meniscus root tear.

Methods

From January 2017 to January 2021, 53 patients with posterior meniscus root tears combined with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and/or posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tears were collected. Totally, in 29 patients (group A), the 2.0 mm modified pullout tunnel method was used to suture the posterior meniscus root, while 24 patients (group B) were treated with the traditional 4.5 mm pullout tunnel method. In group A, 20 patients had lateral meniscus posterior root (LMPR) combined with ACL tears, 5 patients had LMPR combined with ACL and PCL tears, and 4 patients had medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) combined with ACL tears. In group B, 19 patients had LMPR combined with ACL tears, 3 patients had LMPR combined with ACL and PCL tears, and 2 patients had MMPR combined with ACL tears. The improvement of the Lysholm and VAS scores and the incidence of complications in group A and group B before the operation, 1 month and 3 months after the operation, and after the final follow-up were compared.

Results

Preoperative Lysholm score was 26.0±5.6 in group A and 26.7±5.8 in group B (P>0.05). One-month postoperative Lysholm score was 66.5±5.7 in group A and 54.3±2.4 in group B (P<0.001). Three-month postoperative Lysholm score was 81.1±7.2 in group A and 73.2±9.7 in group B (P<0.05). Lysholm scores after the final follow-up was 90.3±5.6 in group A and 90.0±5.0 in group B (P>0.05). Preoperative VAS score was 6.3±1.4 in group A and 6.3±1.2 in group B (P>0.05). One-month postoperative VAS score was 1.8±0.7 in group A and 2.4±0.9 in group B (P<0.05). Three-month postoperative VAS score was 0.7±0.6 in group A and 0.8±0.6 in group B (P>0.05). VAS score after the final follow-up was 0.2±0.4 in group A and 0.3±0.5 in group B (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The improved transosseous pullout suture technique using a smaller 2.0 mm bone tunnel can virtually eliminate the risk of conflict with other bone tunnels and facilitate the management of bone tunnels in multiple ligament injuries, while also diminishing suture abrasion caused by the windshield wiper effect. The technique achieves good clinical efficacy.

Keywords

meniscus root tear / bone tunnel / multiple ligament injury / tunnel management / windshield wiper effect

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Wen-bin Zhao, Feng Tu, Hao Wang. An Improved Transosseous Pullout Suture Technique for Arthroscopic Repair of a Meniscus Root Tear. Current Medical Science, 2023, 43(4): 779-783 DOI:10.1007/s11596-023-2756-z

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

FithianDC, KellyMA, MowVC. Material properties and structure-function relationships in the menisci. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1990, 252: 19-31

[2]

KoenigJH, RanawatAS, UmansHR, et al.. Meniscal root tears: diagnosis and treatment. Arthroscopy, 2009, 25(9): 1025-1032

[3]

KopfS, ColvinAC, MuriukiM, et al.. Meniscal root suturing techniques: implications for root fixation. Am J Sports Med, 2011, 39(10): 2141-2146

[4]

KimJG, LeeYS, BaeTS, et al.. Tibiofemoral contact mechanics following posterior root of medial meniscus tear, repair, meniscectomy, and allograft transplantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2013, 21(9): 2121-2125

[5]

PapaliaR, VastaS, FranceschiF, et al.. Meniscal root tears: from basic science to ultimate surgery. Br Med Bull, 2013, 106: 91-115

[6]

ShelbourneKD, RobersonTA, GrayT. Long-term evaluation of posterior lateral meniscus root tears left in situ at the time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med, 2011, 39(7): 1439-1443

[7]

SungJH, HaJK, LeeDW, et al.. Meniscal extrusion and spontaneous osteonecrosis with root tear of medial meniscus: comparison with horizontal tear. Arthroscopy, 2013, 29(4): 726-732

[8]

LererDB, UmansHR, HuMX, et al.. The role of meniscal root pathology and radial meniscal tear in medial meniscal extrusion. Skeletal Radiol, 2004, 33(10): 569-574

[9]

HeinCN, DeperioJG, EhrensbergerMT, et al.. Effects of medial meniscal posterior horn avulsion and repair on meniscal displacement. Knee, 2011, 18(3): 189-192

[10]

AllaireR, MuriukiM, GilbertsonL, et al.. Biomechanical consequences of a tear of the posterior root of the medial meniscus: similar to total meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2008, 90(9): 1922-1931

[11]

PagnaniMJ, CooperDE, WarrenRF. Extrusion of the medial meniscus. Arthroscopy, 1991, 7(3): 297-300

[12]

JonesAO, HouangMT, LowRS, et al.. Medial meniscus posterior root attachment injury and degeneration: MRI findings. Australas Radiol, 2006, 50(4): 306-313

[13]

OzkocG, CirciE, GoncU, et al.. Radial tears in the root of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2008, 16(9): 849-854

[14]

ThompsonWO, ThaeteFL, FuFH, et al.. Tibial meniscal dynamics using three-dimensional reconstruction of magnetic resonance images. Am J Sports Med, 1991, 19(3): 210-215 discussion 215–216

[15]

MarzoJM, Gurske-DePerioJ. Effects of medial meniscus posterior horn avulsion and repair on tibiofemoral contact area and peak contact pressure with clinical implications. Am J Sports Med, 2009, 37(1): 124-129

[16]

PadaleckiJR, JanssonKS, SmithSD, et al.. Biomechanical consequences of a complete radial tear adjacent to the medial meniscus posterior root attachment site: in-situ pullout repair restores derangement of joint mechanics. Am J Sports Med, 2014, 42(3): 699-707

[17]

SeoJH, LiG, ShettyGM, et al.. Effect of repair of radial tears at the root of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus with the pullout suture technique: a biomechanical study using porcine knees. Arthroscopy, 2009, 25(11): 1281-1287

[18]

StarkeC, KopfS, GrobelKH, et al.. The effect of a nonanatomic repair of the meniscal horn attachment on meniscal tension: a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy, 2010, 26(3): 358-365

[19]

GriffithCJ, LaPradeRF, FrittsHM, et al.. Posterior root avulsion fracture of the medial meniscus in an adolescent female patient with surgical reattachment. Am J Sports Med, 2008, 36(4): 789-792

[20]

KimJH, ChungJH, LeeDH, et al.. Arthroscopic suture anchor repair versus pullout suture repair in posterior root tear of the medial meniscus: a prospective comparison study. Arthroscopy, 2011, 27(12): 1644-1653

[21]

EngelsohnE, UmansH, DifeliceGS. Marginal fractures of the medial tibial plateau: possible association with medial meniscal root tear. Skeletal Radiol, 2007, 36(1): 73-76

[22]

JungYH, ChoiNH, OhJS, et al.. All-inside repair for a root tear of the medial meniscus using a suture anchor. Am J Sports Med, 2012, 40(6): 1406-1411

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

106

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/