Determination of an Appropriate Endoscopic Monitoring Interval for Patients with Gastric Precancerous Conditions in China

Kai Zhao , Li-na Feng , Su-hong Xia , Wang-dong Zhou , Ming-yu Zhang , Yu Zhang , Ruo-nan Dong , De-an Tian , Mei Liu , Jia-zhi Liao

Current Medical Science ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2) : 268 -273.

PDF
Current Medical Science ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2) : 268 -273. DOI: 10.1007/s11596-023-2705-x
Article

Determination of an Appropriate Endoscopic Monitoring Interval for Patients with Gastric Precancerous Conditions in China

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Objective

Gastric precancerous conditions such as atrophic gastritis (AG) and intestinal metaplasia (IM) are considered independent risk factors for gastric cancer (GC). The suitable endoscopic monitoring interval is unclear when we attempt to prevent GC development. This study investigated the appropriate monitoring interval for AG/IM patients.

Methods

Totally, 957 AG/IM patients who satisfied the criteria for evaluation between 2010 and 2020 were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the risk factors for progression to high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN)/GC in AG/IM patients, and to determine an appropriate endoscopic monitoring scheme.

Results

During follow-up, 28 AG/IM patients developed gastric neoplasia lesions including gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) (0.7%), HGIN (0.9%), and GC (1.3%). Multivariate analysis identified H. pylori infection (P=0.022) and extensive AG/IM lesions (P=0.002) as risk factors for HGIN/GC progression (P=0.025).

Conclusion

In our study, HGIN/GC was present in 2.2% of AG/IM patients. In AG/IM patients with extensive lesions, a 1–2-year surveillance interval is recommended for early detection of HIGN/GC in AG/IM patients with extensive lesions.

Keywords

atrophic gastritis / endoscopic monitoring / gastric cancer / gastric precancerous conditions / high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia / intestinal metaplasia

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Kai Zhao, Li-na Feng, Su-hong Xia, Wang-dong Zhou, Ming-yu Zhang, Yu Zhang, Ruo-nan Dong, De-an Tian, Mei Liu, Jia-zhi Liao. Determination of an Appropriate Endoscopic Monitoring Interval for Patients with Gastric Precancerous Conditions in China. Current Medical Science, 2023, 43(2): 268-273 DOI:10.1007/s11596-023-2705-x

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

SungH, FerlayJ, SiegelRL, et al.. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249

[2]

CorreaP, HaenszelW, CuelloC, et al.. A model for gastric cancer epidemiology. Lancet, 1975, 2(7924): 58-60

[3]

Pimentel-NunesP, LibânioD, Marcos-PintoR, et al.. Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS II): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG), European Society of Pathology (ESP), and Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED) guideline update 2019. Endoscopy, 2019, 51(4): 365-388

[4]

SumiyamaK. Past and current trends in endoscopic diagnosis for early stage gastric cancer in Japan. Gastric Cancer, 2017, 20(Suppl 1): 20-27

[5]

KataiH, IshikawaT, AkazawaK, et al.. Five-year survival analysis of surgically resected gastric cancer cases in Japan: a retrospective analysis of more than 100,000 patients from the nationwide registry of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2001–2007). Gastric Cancer, 2018, 21(1): 144-154

[6]

RenW, YuJ, ZhangZM, et al.. Missed diagnosis of early gastric cancer or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. World J Gastroenterol, 2013, 19(13): 2092-2096

[7]

Natioal Clinical Research Cenrter for Digestive Disease ShanghaiNational Early Gastrointestinal Center Prevention & Treatment Center AllianceHelicobacter Pylori GroupChinese Society of GastroenterologyChinese Medical Association. Chinese consensus on managenment of gastric epithelial precancerous conditions and lesions (2020). Chin J Dig, 2020, 40(11): 732-741

[8]

GuptaS, LiD, El SeragHB, et al.. AGA Clinical Practice Guidelines on Management of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia. Gastroenterology, 2020, 158(3): 693-702

[9]

DixonMF, GentaRM, YardleyJH, et al.. Classification and grading of gastritis. The updated Sydney System. International Workshop on the Histopathology of Gastritis, Houston 1994. Am J Surg Pathol, 1996, 20(10): 1161-1181

[10]

SchlemperRJ, RiddellRH, KatoY, et al.. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut, 2000, 47(2): 251-255

[11]

SongH, EkhedenIG, ZhengZ, et al.. Incidence of gastric cancer among patients with gastric precancerous lesions: observational cohort study in a low risk Western population. Bmj, 2015, 351(8020): h3867

[12]

de VriesAC, van GriekenNC, LoomanCW, et al.. Gastric cancer risk in patients with premalignant gastric lesions: a nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands. Gastroenterology, 2008, 134(4): 945-952

[13]

ZhangL, LiuY, YouP, et al.. Occurrence of gastric cancer in patients with atrophic gastritis during long-term follow-up. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2018, 53(7): 843-848

[14]

PiazueloMB, BravoLE, MeraRM, et al.. The Colombian chemoprevention trial: 20-year follow-up of a cohort of patients with gastric precancerous lesions. Gastroenterology, 2021, 160(4): 1106-1117.e1103

[15]

QuachDT, HiyamaT, LeHM, et al.. Use of endoscopic assessment of gastric atrophy for gastric cancer risk stratification to reduce the need for gastric mapping. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2020, 55(4): 402-407

[16]

RuggeM, MeggioA, PennelliG, et al.. Gastritis staging in clinical practice: the OLGA staging system. Gut, 2007, 56(5): 631-636

[17]

CapelleLG, de VriesAC, HaringsmaJ, et al.. The staging of gastritis with the OLGA system by using intestinal metaplasia as an accurate alternative for atrophic gastritis. Gastrointest Endosc, 2010, 71(7): 1150-1158

[18]

YueH, ShanL, BinL. The significance of OLGA and OLGIM staging systems in the risk assessment of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastric Cancer, 2018, 21(4): 579-587

[19]

RuggeM, MeggioA, PravadelliC, et al.. Gastritis staging in the endoscopic follow-up for the secondary prevention of gastric cancer: a 5-year prospective study of 1755 patients. Gut, 2019, 68(1): 11-17

[20]

PlummerM, FranceschiS, VignatJ, et al.. Global burden of gastric cancer attributable to Helicobacter pylori. Int J Cancer, 2015, 136(2): 487-490

[21]

HwangYJ, KimN, LeeHS, et al.. Reversibility of atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia after Helicobacter pylori eradication — a prospective study for up to 10 years. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2018, 47(3): 380-390

[22]

EspositoG, DilaghiE, CazzatoM, et al.. Endoscopic surveillance at 3 years after diagnosis, according to European guidelines, seems safe in patients with atrophic gastritis in a low-risk region. Dig Liver Dis, 2021, 53(4): 467-473

[23]

HamashimaC. Update version of the Japanese Guidelines for Gastric Cancer Screening. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2018, 48(7): 673-683

[24]

LeeKS, OhDK, HanMA, et al.. Gastric cancer screening in Korea: report on the national cancer screening program in 2008. Cancer Res Treat, 2011, 43(2): 83-88

[25]

ParkCH, KimEH, ChungH, et al.. The optimal endoscopic screening interval for detecting early gastric neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc, 2014, 80(2): 253-259

[26]

ShinWG, KimHU, SongHJ, et al.. Surveillance strategy of atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia in a country with a high prevalence of gastric cancer. Dig Dis Sci, 2012, 57(3): 746-752

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

111

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/