Pregnancy Outcomes for Day 5 Versus Day 6 Single Frozen-thawed Blastocyst Transfer with Different Qualities of Embryos: A Large Matched-cohort Study

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to determine whether the day of blastocyst expansion affects pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer (FBT) cycles.

Methods

A retrospective match-cohort study was conducted. Patients who underwent blastocyst transfer in frozen-thawed cycles at day 5 or 6 were matched for potential confounding factors. A total of 2207 matched pairs of FBT cycles were included from January 2016 to December 2019 in our Reproductive Medicine Center.

Results

The clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) were significantly increased in day 5 blastocyst transfers when compared to day 6 blastocyst transfers, in terms of the same embryo quality. For FBT cycles with good-quality embryo, the CPR at day 5 and 6 was 61.30% and 57.56%, respectively (P=0.045), and the LBR was 44.79% and 36.16%, respectively (P<0.001). For FBT cycles with poor-quality embryo, the CPR at day 5 and 6 was 48.61% and 40.89%, respectively (P=0.006), and the LBR was 31.71% and 25.74%, respectively (P=0.019). The CPR for FBT cycles with good-quality embryo was statistically higher at day 6 than that at day 5 with poor-quality embryo transferred (57.56% vs. 48.61%, P=0.001). Maternal age, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), endometrial thickness, embryo quality, and the day of blastocyst expansion were independently correlated with the CPR and LBR. The FBT cycles at day 5 had significantly higher CPR (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=1.246, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.097–1.415, P=0.001) and LBR (adjusted OR=1.435, 95% CI: 1.258–1.637, P<0.001) than those at day 6.

Conclusion

The embryo quality is the primary indicator for FBT cycles. Day 5 blastocysts should be preferred when the quality of embryo at day 5 is the same as that at day 6.

Keywords

frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer / day 5 versus day 6 / embryo quality / clinical pregnancy rate / live birth rate

References

[1] GlujovskyD, Quinteiro RetamarAM, Alvarez SedoCR, et al.. Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2022, 5: CD002118

[2] MaS, PengY, HuL, et al.. Comparisons of benefits and risks of single embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2022, 20(1): 20

[3] LongX, WangY, WuF, et al.. Pregnancy Outcomes of Single/Double Blastocysts and Cleavage Embryo Transfers: a Retrospective Cohort Study of 24,422 Frozen-Thawed Cycles. Reprod Sci, 2020, 27(12): 2271-2278

[4] GardnerD, LaneM, StevensJ, et al.. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril, 2000, 73(6): 1155-1158

[5] BourdonM, Pocate-CherietK, Finet de BantelA, et al.. Day 5 versus Day 6 blastocyst transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. Hum Reprod, 2019, 34(10): 1948-1964

[6] ShapiroBS, DaneshmandST, GarnerFC, et al.. Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryoendometrium synchrony. Fertil Steril, 2008, 89(1): 20-26

[7] OzgurK, BerkkanogluM, BulutH, et al.. Perinatal outcomes after fresh versus vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer: retrospective analysis. Fertil Steril, 2015, 104(4): 899-907

[8] OzgurK, BerkkanogluM, BulutH, et al.. Higher clinical pregnancy rates from frozen-thawed blastocyst transfers compared to fresh blastocyst transfers: a retrospective matched-cohort study. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2015, 32(10): 1483-1490

[9] FranasiakJM, FormanEJ, PatounakisG, et al.. Investigating the impact of the timing of blastulation on implantation: management of embryo-endometrial synchrony improves outcomes. Hum Reprod, 2018, 2018(4): hoy022

[10] HaasJ, MerianoJ, LaskinC, et al.. Clinical pregnancy rate following frozen embryo transfer is higher with blastocysts vitrified on day 5 than on day 6. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2016, 33(12): 1553-1557

[11] DesaiN, PloskonkaS, GoodmanL, et al.. Delayed blastulation, multinucleation, and expansion grade are independently associated with live-birth rates in frozen blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril, 2016, 106(6): 1370-1378

[12] FerreuxL, BourdonM, SallemA, et al.. Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher with blastocysts expanded on Day 5 than on Day 6. Hum Reprod, 2018, 33(3): 390-398

[13] TubbingA, Shaw-JacksonC, AmeyeL, et al.. Increased live births after day 5 versus day 6 transfers of vitrified-warmed blastocysts. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2018, 35(3): 417-424

[14] KayeL, WillEA, BartolucciA, et al.. Pregnancy rates for single embryo transfer (SET) of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts after cryopreservation by vitrification and slow freeze. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2017, 34(7): 913-919

[15] El-ToukhyT, WharfE, WalavalkarR, et al.. Delayed blastocyst development does not influence the outcome of frozen-thawed transfer cycles. BJOG, 2011, 118(13): 1551-1556

[16] GardnerDK, SchoolcraftWB. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 1999, 11(3): 307-311

[17] LédéeN, MunautC, AubertJ, et al.. Specific and extensive endometrial deregulation is present before conception in IVF/ICSI repeated implantation failures (IF) or recurrent miscarriages. Int J Exp Pathol, 2011, 225(4): 554-564

[18] SunkaraS, SiozosA, BoltonV, et al.. The influence of delayed blastocyst formation on the outcome of frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod, 2010, 25(8): 1906-1915

[19] YangH, YangQ, DaiS, et al.. Comparison of differences in development potentials between frozen-thawed D5 and D6 blastocysts and their relationship with pregnancy outcomes. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2016, 33(7): 865-872

[20] TaylorTH, PatrickJL, GitlinSA, et al.. Comparison of aneuploidy, pregnancy and live birth rates between day 5 and day 6 blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online, 2014, 29(3): 305-310

[21] KaingA, KroenerLL, TassinR, et al.. Earlier day of blastocyst development is predictive of embryonic euploidy across all ages: essential data for physician decision-making and counseling patients. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2018, 35(1): 119-125

[22] TongJ, NiuY, WanA, et al.. Comparison of day 5 blastocyst with day 6 blastocyst: Evidence from NGS-based PGT-A results. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2022, 39(2): 369-377

[23] IraniM, O’NeillC, PalermoGD, et al.. Blastocyst development rate influences implantation and live birth rates of similarly graded euploid blastocysts. Fertil Steril, 2018, 110(1): 95-102

[24] YanJ, WuK, TangR, et al.. Effect of maternal age on the outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Sci China Life Sci, 2012, 55(8): 694-698

[25] ZhangZ, ZhuLL, JiangHS, et al.. Predictors of pregnancy outcome for infertile couples attending IVF and ICSI programmes. Andrologia, 2016, 48(9): 874-881

[26] AlsonS, BungumL, GiwercmanA, et al.. Antimüllerian hormone levels are associated with live birth rates in ART, but the predictive ability of anti-müllerian hormone is modest. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2018, 225: 199-204

[27] TalR, SeiferD, WantmanE, et al.. Antimüllerian hormone as a predictor of live birth following assisted reproduction: an analysis of 85,062 fresh and thawed cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database for 2012–2013. Fertil Steril, 2018, 109(2): 258-265

[28] BuZ, YangX, SongL, et al.. The impact of endometrial thickness change after progesterone administration on pregnancy outcome in patients transferred with single frozen-thawed blastocyst. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2019, 17(1): 99

[29] ZhaoJ, ZhangQ, WangY, et al.. Endometrial pattern, thickness and growth in predicting pregnancy outcome following 3319 IVF cycle. Reprod Biomed Online, 2014, 29(3): 291-298

[30] ZhangJ, WangY, LiuH, et al.. Effect of in vitro culture period on birth weight after vitrified-warmed transfer cycles: analysis of 4,201 singleton newborns. Fertil Steril, 2019, 111(1): 97-104

[31] WangN, ZhaoX, MaM, et al.. Effect of Day 3 and Day 5/6 Embryo Quality on the Reproductive Outcomes in the Single Vitrified Embryo Transfer Cycles. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2021, 12: 641623

[32] CaiJ, LiuL, XuY, et al.. Day 6 blastocyst is associated with increased birth weight in full-term singleton newborns after frozen-thawed transfer. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2018, 298(2): 397-403

[33] WangX, ZhenJ, SunZ, et al.. Effects of fifth day (D5) or 6th day (D6) frozen-thawed blastocysts on neonatal outcomes. Zygote, 2016, 24(5): 684-691

[34] YangJ, WangZ, CaoH, et al.. Birthweight After Frozen Embryos Formed on the Fifth Day Versus the 6th Day: A Retrospective Analysis Including 17,127 Singleton Newborns. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2022, 13: 868335

[35] OldereidNB, WennerholmUB, PinborgA, et al.. The effect of paternal factors on perinatal and paediatric outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update, 2018, 24(3): 320-389