Evaluation of the Anterior Chamber Angle Structures in Perinatal Infants Using a Wide-Field Digital Fundus Camera

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the ability of a digital fundus camera to observe the development of the anterior chamber angle (ACA) in premature infants.

Methods

Forty-eight eyes of preterm infants (n=48) were examined by a digital fundus camera to observe the development of the ACA. ACA grading was performed based on the visualization of the anterior chamber structures according to the Scheie Angle Depth Evaluating System.

Results

ACA images from all 48 infants were successfully acquired using RetCam3. The corrected gestational age ranged from 30 weeks to 49 weeks, which covered the period from 2 months preterm to >2 months post-term. As the corrected gestational age increased, the corrected gestational age grading was significantly decreased. The mean corrected gestational ages of the infants corresponding to the ACA classification from grade IV to grade 0 were 32.75±1.89, 37.20±1.30, 39.75±2.38, 40.56±2.24, and 44.23±2.14 weeks, respectively, which were all significantly different (P<0.05). The regression analysis showed a linear correlation between the grading of the ACA and the corrected gestational age (R²=0.724, P=0.0001).

Conclusion

The ACA of a full-term newborn can be fully detected and evaluated by a digital fundus camera. For premature infants, part of the ACA is not visible physiologically; however, it should not be misdiagnosed as angle closure or a narrow angle.

Keywords

digital fundus camera / anterior chamber angle / glaucoma / infant

References

[1] SampaolesiR, CarusoR. Ocular Echometry in the Diagnosis of Congenital Glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol, 1982, 100(4): 574-577

[2] PanX, MaramJ, NittalaMG, et al.. Reproducibility and agreement of four anterior segment-optical coherence tomography devices for anterior chamber angle measurements. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2020, 258(7): 1475-1481

[3] AlwardWL. A history of gonioscopy. Optom Vis Sci, 2011, 88(1): 29

[4] SakataLM, LavanyaR, FriedmanDS, et al.. Comparison of Gonioscopy and Anterior Segment Ocular Coherence Tomography in Detecting Angle Closure in Different Quadrants of the Anterior Chamber Angle. Ophthalmology, 2008, 115(5): 769-774

[5] FriedmanDS, HeM. Anterior Chamber Angle Assessment Techniques. Surv Ophthalmol, 2008, 53(3): 250-257

[6] RivaI, MichelettiE, OddoneF, et al.. Anterior Chamber Angle Assessment Techniques: A Review. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(12): 3814

[7] LeungKS, WeinrebRN. Anterior chamber angle imaging with optical coherence tomography. Eye, 2011, 25(3): 261-267

[8] HaoH, ZhaoY, YanQ, et al.. Angle-closure assessment in anterior segment OCT images via deep learning. Med Image Anal, 2021, 69: 101956

[9] HusseinTR, ShalabySM, ElbakaryMA, et al.. Ultrasound biomicroscopy as a diagnostic tool in infants with primary congenital glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol, 2014, 8: 1725-1730

[10] TandonA, WatsonC, AyyalaR. Ultrasound biomicroscopy measurement of Schlemm’s canal in pediatric patients with and without glaucoma. J AAPOS, 2017, 21(3): 234-237

[11] ShiY, HanY, XinC, et al.. Disease-related and age-related changes of anterior chamber angle structures in patients with primary congenital glaucoma: An in vivo high-frequency ultrasound biomicroscopy-based study. PLoS One, 2020, 15(1): e227602

[12] SalconeEM, JohnstonS, VanderveenD. Review of the use of digital imaging in retinopathy of prematurity screening. Semin Ophthalmol, 2010, 25(5–6): 214-217

[13] ChengJ, LiuJ, LeeBH, et al.. Closed angle glaucoma detection in RetCam images. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2010, 2010: 4096-4099

[14] AzadRV, ChandraP, ChandraA, et al.. Comparative evaluation of RetCam vs. gonioscopy images in congenital glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2014, 62(2): 163-166

[15] ScheieHG. Width and Pigmentation of the Angle of the Anterior Chamber: A System of Grading by Gonioscopy. AMA Arch Ophthalmol, 1957, 58(4): 510-512

[16] BarishakYR. The development of the angle of the anterior chamber in vertebrate eyes. Doc Ophthalmol, 1978, 45(2): 329-360

[17] ZhaY, ZhuG, ZhuangJ, et al.. Axial Length and Ocular Development of Premature Infants without ROP. J Ophthalmol, 2017, 2017: 6823965

[18] ChoiMY. Long term refractive outcome in eyes of preterm infants with and without retinopathy of prematurity: comparison of keratometric value, axial length, anterior chamber depth, and lens thickness. Br J Ophthalmol, 2000, 84(2): 138-143

[19] AzadRV, ChandraP, ChandraA, et al.. Comparative evaluation of RetCam vs. gonioscopy images in congenital glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2014, 62(2): 163-166

[20] PereraSA, ManiB, FriedmanDS, et al.. Use of EyeCam for imaging the anterior chamber angle. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2010, 51(6): 2993-2997

[21] PereraSA, QuekDT, BaskaranM, et al.. Demonstration of angle widening using EyeCam after laser peripheral iridotomy in eyes with angle closure. Am J Ophthalmol, 2010, 149(6): 903-907

[22] MukherjeeAN, WattsP, AlmadfaiH, et al.. Impact of retinopathy of prematurity screening examination on cardiorespiratory indices: a comparison of indirect ophthalmoscopy and retcam imaging. Ophthalmology, 2006, 113(9): 1547-1552

[23] WuC, PetersenRA, VanderveenDK. RetCam imaging for retinopathy of prematurity screening. J AAPOS, 2006, 10(2): 107-111