Application of Shear Wave Elastography and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Transrectal Prostate Biopsy

Gao-wa Sharen , Jun Zhang

Current Medical Science ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2) : 447 -452.

PDF
Current Medical Science ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2) : 447 -452. DOI: 10.1007/s11596-022-2484-1
Article

Application of Shear Wave Elastography and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Transrectal Prostate Biopsy

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Objective

To explore the clinical value of ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in transrectal prostate biopsy.

Methods

A total of 54 patients (average age: 67.79±12.01 years) in the experimental group underwent transrectal prostate biopsy under the guidance of SWE, while 46 patients (average age: 69.22±11.54 years) in the control group underwent transrectal prostate biopsy guided by CEUS.

Results

There were a total of 451 needles, with an average of 8.35±1.67 needles per patient in the experimental group, and a total of 462 needles, with an average of 10.04±1.33 needles per patient in the control group. The difference in puncture times between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the positive detection rate, sensitivity or specificity between the two groups (P>0.05), but there was a significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy between the two groups (P<0.05). The Emean and Emax of prostate cancer were significantly higher in the experimental group than in benign prostatic hyperplasia (P<0.05). The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of Emean was 0.752 (S.E. =0.072, 95% CI=0.611–0.894, P=0.007), and the best cutoff value was 47.005 kPa.

Conclusion

In summary, both SWE- and CEUS-guided transrectal prostate biopsy can help find the focus and guide the puncture, and improve the positive detection rate.

Keywords

prostate puncture / ultrasonic shear wave elastography / contrast-enhanced ultrasound / biopsy analysis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Gao-wa Sharen, Jun Zhang. Application of Shear Wave Elastography and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Transrectal Prostate Biopsy. Current Medical Science, 2022, 42(2): 447-452 DOI:10.1007/s11596-022-2484-1

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

HassanO, HanM, ZhouA, et al.. Incidence of extra-prostatic extension at radical prostatectomy with pure Gleason score 3+3=6 (Grade Group 1) cancer: implications for whether Gleason score 6 prostate cancer should be renamed as “not cancer” and for selection criteria for active surveilla. J Urol, 2017, 199(6): 1482-1487

[2]

HansfordBG, PengY, JiangY, et al.. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging curve-type analysis: is it helpful in the differentiation of prostate cancer from healthy peripheral zone. Radiology, 2015, 275(2): 448-457

[3]

RadtkeJP, SchwabC, WolfMB, et al.. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy for index tumor detection: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimen. Eur Urol, 2016, 15(3): 846-853

[4]

HarveyH, MorganV, FromageauJ, et al.. Ultrasound shear wave elastography of the normal prostate: interobserver reproducibility and comparison with functional magnetic resonance tissue characteristics. Ultrason Imaging, 2018, 40(3): 158-170

[5]

EdgesSB, ComptonCC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manualand the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol, 2010, 17(6): 1471-1474

[6]

RahajuAS, RahniayuA. Clinicopathological characteristic of patient with prostatic carcinoma in department of pathology Dr Soetomo Hospital Surabaya, a descriptive retrospective study. Pathology, 2016, 48(1): S150

[7]

XieSW, LiHL, DuJ, XiaJG, et al.. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with contrast-tuned imaging technology for the detection of prostate cancer: comparison with conventional ultrasonography. BJU Int, 2012, 109(11): 1620-1626

[8]

PostemaAW, FrinkingPJA, SmeengeM, et al.. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound parametric imaging for the detection of prostate cancer. BJU Int, 2016, 117(4): 598-603

[9]

MuthigiA, GeorgeAK, SidanaA, et al.. Missing the mark: prostate cancer upgrading by systematic biopsy over magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy. J Urol, 2017, 197(2): 327-334

[10]

CollierN, DebreyneP, DelaplaceG, et al.. Contribution of the shear wave ultrasonic reflectometry to the stickiness measurements. Ultrasonics, 2018, 89(3): 187-194

[11]

WangYR, YaoBW, LiHF, et al.. Assessment of tumor stiffness with shear wave elastography in a human prostate cancer xenograft implantation model. J Ultras Med, 2017, 36(5): 955-963

[12]

BoesenL, NøRgaardN, LøGagerV, et al.. Clinical outcome following a low-suspicion multiparametric prostate MRI or benign MRI-guided biopsy to detect prostate cance. J Urol, 2017, 198(2): 310-315

[13]

WeiC, SzewczykbiedaM, NibblokP, et al.. Quantitative transrectal shear wave elastography undergoing salvage extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy followingfailed radiotherapy. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(11): 4552-4561

[14]

ZhuJ, MiaoY, QiL, et al.. Longitudinal shear wave imaging for elasticity mapping using optical coherence elastography. Appl Phys Lett, 2017, 110(20): 1419

[15]

YinX, HeH, NiuZC. Relationship of ultrasonic shear wave velocity with oncogene and tumor suppressor gene expression in primary liver cancer lesions as well as angiogenesis factor contents. J Hainan Med Univ, 2017, 23(12): 139-142(Chinese)

[16]

ZhangM, WangP, YinB, et al.. Transrectal shear wave elastography combined with transition zone biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue (Chinese), 2015, 21(7): 610-614

[17]

LeeD, LeibelS, ShielsR, et al.. The value of ultrasonic imaging and CT scanning in planning the radiotherapy for prostatic carcinoma. Cancer, 1980, 45(4): 724-727

[18]

AhmadS, CaoR, VargheseT, et al.. Transrectal quantitative shear wave elastography in the detection and characterisation of prostate cancer. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(9): 3280-3287

[19]

HuJ, ZhouZY, RanHL, et al.. Diagnosis of liver tumors by multimodal ultrasound imaging. Medicine, 2020, 99(32): e21652

[20]

HuangST, ZhangB, YinHL, et al.. Incremental diagnostic value of shear wave elastgraphy combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in TI-RADS category 4a and 4b noduls. J Med Ultrason, 2020, 47(3): 453-462

[21]

XuJ, WangP, YueW, et al.. Application of ultrasonic shear wave elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of patients with benign and malignant thyroid lesions. Gland Surg, 2020, 9(6): 2136-2143

[22]

XiangLH, YaoMH, XuG, et al.. Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and shear-wave elastography for breast lesions of sub-centimeter. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 2017, 67(1): 69-80

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

94

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/