Preoperative MRI Classification May Not Predict Symptom Relief after Uterine Artery Embolization in Patients with Adenomyosis

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the association between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) classification and symptom relief after uterine artery embolization (UAE) in patients with adenomyosis. Methods: Totally, 73 patients with symptomatic adenomyosis who underwent UAE were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative MRI classification was defined as: type I, high signal on both T2-weighted images (T2WI) and T1-weighted images (T1WI); type III, high signal only on T2WI, and type II, high signal on neither T1WI nor T2WI. Dysmenorrhea was measured with the visual-analog scales and the degree of menorrhagia was measured according to the number of sanitary pads used in one menstrual cycle. Dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia were measured before UAE and 12 months after UAE. Results: The number of the type I, II, III cases was 23, 37, and 13, respectively. The baseline characteristics of the three groups exhibited no significant difference. The alleviation rates of dysmenorrhea among type I, II, III cases were 73.9%, 89.2%, and 84.6%, respectively (P=0.455). The alleviation rates of menorrhagia for type I, II, III were 69.6%, 78.4%, and 92.3%, respectively (P=0.714). Conclusion: Pre-procedure MRI classification and symptom relief after UAE exhibited no significant association. UAE has a favorable mid-term control on dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia among patients with adenomyosis. Preoperative MRI classification might not indicate symptom relief. More research is needed before changing clinical practice.

Keywords

adenomyosis symptoms / magnetic resonance imaging / prognosis / uterine artery embolization

References

[1] CunninghamRK, HorrowMM, SmithRJ, et al.. Adenomyosis: A Sonographic Diagnosis. Radiographics, 2018, 38(5): 1576-1589

[2] StrubleJ, ReidS, BedaiwyMA. Adenomyosis: A Clinical Review of a Challenging Gynecologic Condition. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2016, 23(2): 164-185

[3] FarquharC, BrosensI. Medical and surgical management of adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2006, 20(4): 603-616

[4] VolkersNA, HehenkampWJ, SmitP, et al.. Economic evaluation of uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: results from the randomized EMMY trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2008, 19(7): 1007-1016

[5] DessoukyR, GamilSA, NadaMG, et al.. Management of uterine adenomyosis: current trends and uterine artery embolization as a potential alternative to hysterectomy. Insights Imaging, 2019, 10(1): 48

[6] KeungJJ, SpiesJB, CaridiTM. Uterine artery embolization: A review of current concepts. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2018, 46: 66-73

[7] PopovicM, PuchnerS, BerzaczyD, et al.. Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of adenomyosis: a review. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2011, 22(7): 901-909

[8] de BruijnAM, SminkM, LohlePNM, et al.. Uterine Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2017, 28(12): 1629-1642

[9] DueholmM, LundorfE, HansenES, et al.. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Fertil Steril, 2001, 76(3): 588-594

[10] BazotM, CortezA, DaraiE, et al.. Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology. Hum Reprod, 2001, 16(11): 2427-2433

[11] KimMD, KimYM, KimHC, et al.. Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic adenomyosis: a new technical development of the 1-2-3 protocol and predictive factors of MR imaging affecting outcomes. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2011, 22(4): 497-502

[12] JungDC, KimMD, OhYT, et al.. Prediction of early response to uterine arterial embolisation of adenomyosis: value of T2 signal intensity ratio of adenomyosis. Eur Radiol, 2012, 22(9): 2044-2049

[13] TamaiK, TogashiK, ItoT, et al.. MR imaging findings of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathologic features and diagnostic pitfalls. Radiographics, 2005, 25(1): 21-40

[14] RabinoviciJ, StewartEA. New interventional techniques for adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2006, 20(4): 617-636

[15] Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Pain, Disability, and Chronic Illness Behavior. Pain and Disability: Clinical, Behavioral, and Public Policy Perspectives. Osterweis M, Kleinman A, Mechanic D, editors. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US), 1987.

[16] GoodwinSC, McLucasB, LeeM, et al.. Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine leiomyomata midterm results. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 1999, 10(9): 1159-1165

[17] LiangE, BrownB, KirsopR, et al.. Efficacy of uterine artery embolisation for treatment of symptomatic fibroids and adenomyosis - an interim report on an Australian experience. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2012, 52(2): 106-112