Human IgM and IgG Responses to an Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine
Jo-Lewis Banga Ndzouboukou , Yan-di Zhang , Qing Lei , Xiao-song Lin , Zong-jie Yao , Hui Fu , Le-yong Yuan , Xiong-lin Fan
Current Medical Science ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6) : 1081 -1086.
Human IgM and IgG Responses to an Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic warrants accelerated efforts to test vaccine candidates. To explore the influencing factors on vaccine-induced effects, antibody responses to an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy individuals who were not previously infected by COVID-19 were assessed.
All subjects aged 18–60 years who did not have SARS-CoV-2 infection at the time of screening from June 19, 2021, to July 02, 2021, were approached for inclusion. All participants received two doses of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Serum IgM and IgG antibodies were detected using a commercial kit after the second dose of vaccination. A positive result was defined as 10 AU/mL or more and a negative result as less than 10 AU/mL. This retrospective study included 97 infection-naïve individuals (mean age 35.6 years; 37.1% male, 62.9% female).
The seropositive rates of IgM and IgG antibody responses elicited after the second dose of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine were 3.1% and 74.2%, respectively. IgG antibody levels were significantly higher than IgM levels (P<0.0001). Sex had no effect on IgM and IgG antibody response after the second dose. The mean anti-IgG level in older persons (⩾42 years) was significantly lower than that of younger recipients. There was a significantly lower antibody level at > 42 days compared to that at 0–20 days (P<0.05) and 21–31 days (P<0.05) after the second dose.
IgG antibody response could be induced by inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy individuals (>18 years), which can be influenced by age and detection time after the second dose of vaccination.
COVID-19 / inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine / IgM and IgG antibody responses
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
Weekly epidemiological update on COVID-19 - 24 August 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on COVID-19—24-august-2021. [Accessed August 29, 2021]. |
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
COVID-19 vaccine tracker and landscape. Available from:https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/draft-landscape-of-covid-19-candidate-vaccines.[Accessed August 31, 2021]. |
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
Ward H, Cooke G, Whitaker M, et al. REACT-2 Round 5: increasing prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies demonstrate impact of the second wave and of vaccine roll-out in England. Available from: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.26.21252512v1. |
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
Röltgen K, Nielsen SCA, Arunachalam PS, et al. mRNA vaccination compared to infection elicits an IgG-predominant response with greater SARS-CoV-2 specificity and similar decrease in variant spike recognition. medRxiv. 2021:2021.04.05.21254952 |
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
Immunization coverage. Available from: https://www.who.int/news16room/fact-sheets/detail/immunization-coverage. [Accessed October 2, 2021]. |
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
Müller L, Andrée M, Moskorz W, et al. Age-dependent immune response to the Biontech/Pfizer BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination. Clin Infect Dis, 2021:ciab381 |
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |