Prospective Study of Low- and Standard-dose Chest CT for Pulmonary Nodule Detection: A Comparison of Image Quality, Size Measurements and Radiation Exposure

Abstract

Objective

To comprehensively and accurately analyze the out-performance of low-dose chest CT (LDCT) vs. standard-dose CT (SDCT).

Methods

The image quality, size measurements and radiation exposure for LDCT and SDCT protocols were evaluated. A total of 117 patients with extra-thoracic malignancies were prospectively enrolled for non-enhanced CT scanning using LDCT and SDCT protocols. Three experienced radiologists evaluated subjective image quality independently using a 5-point score system. Nodule detection efficiency was compared between LDCT and SDCT based on nodule characteristics (size and volume). Radiation metrics and organ doses were analyzed using Radimetrics.

Results

The images acquired with the LDCT protocol yielded comparable quality to those acquired with the SDCT protocol. The sensitivity of LDCT for the detection of pulmonary nodules (n=650) was lower than that of SDCT (n=660). There was no significant difference in the diameter and volume of pulmonary nodules between LDCT and SDCT (for BMI <22 kg/m², 4.37 vs. 4.46 mm, and 43.66 vs. 46.36 mm³; for BMI ≥22 kg/m², 4.3 vs. 4.41 mm, and 41.66 vs. 44.86 mm³) (P>0.05). The individualized volume CT dose index (CTDI_vol), the size specific dose estimate and effective dose were significantly reduced in the LDCT group compared with the SDCT group (all P<0.0001). This was especially true for dose-sensitive organs such as the lung (for BMI <22 kg/m², 2.62 vs. 12.54 mSV, and for BMI ≥22 kg/m², 1.62 vs. 9.79 mSV) and the breast (for BMI <22 kg/m², 2.52 vs. 10.93 mSV, and for BMI ≥22 kg/m², 1.53 vs. 9.01 mSV) (P<0.0001).

Conclusion

These results suggest that with the increases in image noise, LDCT and SDCT exhibited a comparable image quality and sensitivity. The LDCT protocol for chest scans may reduce radiation exposure by about 80% compared to the SDCT protocol.

Keywords

pulmonary nodules / tomography, X-ray computed / radiation dosage / lung / breast

References

[1] MortazaviSMJ. Comments regarding: “Occupational exposure to high-frequency electromagnetic fields and brain tumor risk in the INTEROCC study: An individualized assessment approach”. Environ Int, 2018, 121: 1024

[2] National Lung Screening Trial Research TeamAberleDR, AdamsAM, et al.. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med, 2011, 365(5): 395-409

[3] National Lung Screening Trial Research TeamAberleDR, BergCD, et al.. The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology, 2011, 258(1): 243-253

[4] GartenschlägerM, SchwedenF, GastK, et al.. Pulmonary nodules: detection with low-dose vs conventional-dose spiral CT. Eur Radiol, 1998, 8(4): 609-614

[5] RusinekH, NaidichDP, McGuinnessG, et al.. Pulmonary nodule detection: low-dose versus conventional CT. Radiology, 1998, 209(1): 243-249

[6] BaldwinDR, CallisterMEGuideline Development Group. The British Thoracic Society guidelines on the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules. Thorax, 2015, 70(8): 794-798

[7] MacMahonH, NaidichDP, GooJM, et al.. Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology, 2017, 284(1): 228-243

[8] HeuvelmansMA, VliegenthartR, OudkerkM. Contributions of the European trials (European randomized screening group) in computed tomography lung cancer screening. J Thorac Imaging, 2015, 30(2): 101-107

[9] HanD, HeuvelmansMA, OudkerkM. Volume versus diameter assessment of small pulmonary nodules in CT lung cancer screening. Transl Lung Cancer Res, 2017, 6(1): 52-61

[10] McColloughC, BakalyarDM, BostaniM, et al.. Use of Water Equivalent Diameter for Calculating Patient Size and Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in CT: The Report of AAPM Task Group 220. AAPM Rep, 2014, 2014: 6-23

[11] ChristnerJA, BraunNN, JacobsenMC, et al.. Size-specific dose estimates for adult patients at CT of the Torso. Radiology, 2012, 265(3): 841-847

[12] LengS, ShiungM, DuanX, et al.. Size-specific Dose Estimates for Chest, Abdominal, and Pelvic CT: Effect of Intrapatient Variability in Water-equivalent Diameter. Radiology, 2015, 276(1): 184-190

[13] ValeriG, CegnaS, MariA, et al.. Evaluating the appropriateness of dosimetric indices in body CT. Radiol Med, 2015, 120(5): 466-473

[14] CléroE, VaillantL, HamadaN, et al.. History of radiation detriment and its calculation methodology used in ICRP Publication 103. J Radiol Prot, 2019, 39(3): R19-R36

[15] ICRP. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP, 2007, 37(2–4): 1-332

[16] PrakashP, KalraMK, AckmanJB, et al.. Diffuse lung disease: CT of the chest with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Radiology, 2010, 256(1): 261-269

[17] BuenoJ, LanderasL, ChungJH. Updated Fleischner Society Guidelines for Managing Incidental Pulmonary Nodules: Common Questions and Challenging Scenarios. Radiographics, 2018, 38(5): 1337-1350

[18] FujiiK, McMillanK, BostaniM, et al.. Patient Size-Specifc Analysis of Dose Indexes From CT Lung Cancer Screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2017, 208(1): 144-149

[19] WeisM, HenzlerT, NanceJWJr, et al.. Radiation dose comparison between 70 kVp and 100 kVp with spectral beam shaping for non-contrast-enhanced pediatric chest computed tomography: A prospective randomized controlled study. Invest Radiol, 2017, 52(3): 155-162

[20] GabusiM, RiccardiL, AlibertiC, et al.. Radiation dose in chest CT: Assessment of size-specific dose estimates based on water-equivalent correction. Phys Med, 2016, 32(2): 393-397

[21] LeipsicJ, NguyenG, BrownJ, et al.. A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Am J Roentgenol, 2010, 195(5): 1095-1099

[22] LiangM, YipR, TangW, et al.. Variation in screening CT-detected nodule volumetry as a function of size. Am J Roentgenol, 2017, 209(2): 304-308

[23] LinningE, MaDQ. Volumetric measurement pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules with multi-detector CT: effect of various tube current on measurement accuracy—a chest CT phantom study. Acad Radiol, 2009, 16(8): 934-939

[24] FranckC, VandevoordeC, GoethalsI, et al.. The role of Size-Specific Dose Estimate (SSDE) in patient-specific organ dose and cancer risk estimation in paediatric chest and abdominopelvic CT examinations. Eur Radiol, 2016, 26(8): 2646-2655