The Value of Subjective Visual Vertical in Diagnosis of Vestibular Migraine

Abstract

Objective

To study the value of the subjective visual vertical (SVV) in the diagnosis of vestibular migraine (VM).

Methods

This study recruited 128 VM patients and 64 age-matched normal subjects. We detected the SVV during the interval between attacks in both groups, in sitting upright, and the head tilted at 45° to the left or right. We then examined the correlation between the SVV results with the vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) and canal paresis (CP).

Results

It was found there was a significant difference in SVV at the upright position between VM patients and normal controls (P=0.006) and no significant difference was found at the tilts of 45° to the left or right between the two groups. The SVV results at the upright position were significantly correlated with cervical VEMP (P=0.042) whereas not significantly correlated with CP and VEMP. There existed no significant difference in the conformity to the Müller effect (M effect) between the two groups. ROC analysis exhibited that the sensitivity, specificity of SVVs at the upright were 67.200% and 62.500% respectively. The diagnostic value of SVV at the upright position was significantly higher than that at tilts of 45° to the left and right (P=0.006). Nonetheless the diagnostic accuracy was relatively low.

Conclusion

Abnormality in SVV possibly stems from the lasting functional disorder of cerebellar or high-level cortical centers in VM patients or is linked to the vestibular compensation. The SVV is of low diagnostic value for VM and the value of SVV in VM warrants further study.

Keywords

vestibular migraine / subjective visual vertical / diagnostic value evaluation

References

[1] JuanME, JoseAL. New insights into pathophysiology of vestibular migraine. Front Neurol, 2015, 6(6): 12

[2] MarianneD, MarkO, NeseC. Vestibular migraine: the most frequent entity of episodic vertigo. J Neurol, 2016, 263(S1): S82-89

[3] SohnJH. Recent Advances in the Understanding of Vestibular Migraine. Behav Neurol, 2016, 2016: 1801845

[4] JungES, KimCH, HongJP. Vestibular abnormality in patients with Meniere’s disease and migrainous vertigo. Acta Otolaryngol, 2013, 133(2): 154-158

[5] MichaelVB, DanielZ, HanneloreN, et al.. Acute migrainous vertigo: clinical and oculographic findings. Brain, 2005, 128(Pt2): 365-374

[6] SharonHP, RonaldJT. Nystagmus during attacks of vestibular migraine: an aid in diagnosis. Audiol Neurootol, 2010, 15(4): 241-246

[7] ThomasB, MichaelS. General vestibular testing. Clin Neurophysiol, 2005, 116(2): 406-426

[8] LeeH, LopezI, IshiyamaA, et al.. Can migraine damage the inner ear?. Arch Neurol, 2000, 57(11): 1631-1634

[9] BernhardB, StieberN, DieterichM. Vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in vestibular migraine. J Neurol, 2009, 256(9): 1447-1454

[10] ZunigaMG, KristenLJ, MichaelCS, et al.. Can vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials help differentiate Ménière disease from vestibular migraine?. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2012, 146(5): 788-796

[11] JosephMF, DawnAM. Migraine and motion sensitivity. Continuum (Minneap Minn), 2012, 18: 1102-1117Neuro-otology

[12] JungHS, YuKK, HyoJK, et al.. Altered brain metabolism in vestibular migraine: Comparison of interictal and ictal findings. Cephalalgia, 2014, 34(1): 58-67

[13] ChristopherJD, AmyP, PaolaG, et al.. Cerebellar Degeneration Increases Visual Influence on Dynamic Estimates of Verticality. Curr Biol, 2018, 28(22): 3589-3598

[14] FaithWA, OwenDM, AmberP, et al.. Normative data for the subjective visual vertical test during centrifugation. J Am Acad Audiol, 2011, 22(7): 460-468

[15] EghlimiB, SchaafH, HesseG, et al.. Measuring the subjective visual vertical using a portable system: a comparison with the standard darkroom method. HNO, 2012, 60(4): 330-336

[16] MaristelaMF, MaurícioMG, HeloisaHC. Subjective visual vertical after treatment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, 2017, 83(6): 659-664

[17] ClarkeAH, SchönfeldU, HamannC, et al.. Measuring unilateral otolith function via the otolith-ocular response and the subjective visual vertical. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl, 2001, 545: 84-87

[18] FaithWA, OwenDM, AmberP, et al.. Normative data for the subjective visual vertical test during centrifugation. J Am Acad Audiol, 2011, 22(7): 460-468

[19] MasayukiA, MitsuhiroA, HisamitsuH, et al.. Subclinical deviation of the subjective visual vertical in patients affected by a primary headache. Acta Otolaryngol, 2009, 129(1): 30-35

[20] LucC, LeenV, AnoukV. Patients with migraine correctly estimate the visual verticality. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2012, 114(4): 313-315

[21] ThomasL, JesO, JosephF, et al.. Vestibular migraine: diagnostic criteria. J Vestib Res, 2012, 22(4): 167-172

[22] ToshihisaM, MasahitoT, KyokoK, et al.. Simultaneous Presentation of Definite Vestibular Migraine and Definite Ménière’s Disease: Overlapping Syndrome of Two Diseases. Front Neurol, 2018, 10(9): 749

[23] ToshihisaM, HarukaN, ErikoY, et al.. Association of air-conducted sound oVEMP findings with cVEMP and caloric test findings in patients with unilateral peripheral vestibular disorders. Acta Otolaryngol, 2011, 131(9): 945-950

[24] FriedmannG. The judgment of the visual vertical and horizontal with peripheral and central vestibular lesions. Brain, 1970, 93(2): 313-328

[25] KooJW, BalabanCD. Serotonin-induced plasma extravasation in the murine inner ear: possible mechanism of migraine-associated inner ear dysfunction. Cephalalgia, 2006, 26(11): 1310-1319

[26] ChangTP, ArielAW, YungCH, et al.. The bucket test differentiates patients with MRI confirmed brainstem/cerebellar lesions from patients having migraine and dizziness alone. BMC Neurol, 2019, 19(1): 219

[27] ArielW, ShirinS, JorgeOM, et al.. Errors of Upright Perception in Patients With Vestibular Migraine. Front Neurol, 2018, 30(9): 892

[28] ToddJS. Multisensory integration in migraine. Curr Opin Neurol, 2013, 26(3): 248-253

[29] DanielB, ChristopherJB, DominikS, et al.. Differential effects of visual feedback on subjective visual vertical accuracy and precision. PLoS One, 2012, 7(11): e49311

[30] MaristelaMF, MaurícioMG, HeloisaHC. Subjective visual vertical after treatment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, 2017, 83(6): 659-664